[Bug ipa/65432] [5 Regression] Invalid read of size 1: ipa_icf::sem_item_optimizer::merge_classes(unsigned int) (ipa-icf.c:2958)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65432 --- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- To reproduce: trippels@gcc2-power8 testsuite % ~/gcc_valgrind/usr/local/bin/g++ -c -O2 -fdump-ipa-icf -fno-inline g++.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-4.C

[Bug middle-end/65431] [5 Regression] Invalid read of size 8 at 0x105DBBF8: delete_omp_context(unsigned long) (omp-low.c:1586)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65431 --- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- To reproduce: trippels@gcc2-power8 testsuite % ~/gcc_valgrind/usr/local/bin/g++ -c -std=c++11 -fopenacc c-c++-common/goacc/nesting-1.c

[Bug fortran/65024] [4.9/5 Regression] [OOP] ICE concerning unlimited polymorphic pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65024 --- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Mar 15 09:13:03 2015 New Revision: 221440 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221440&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-03-15 Paul Thomas PR fortran/65024 * trans-expr.c (gfc_con

[Bug c/65423] No warning on always-true/false predicates containing bitwise operations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65423 Mikhail Maltsev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||maltsevm at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug fortran/65024] [OOP] unlimited polymorphic pointer structure not built when it should be

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65024 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |FIXME Version|4.9.2

[Bug target/65414] [5 Regression] ICE while building libgcc after stage 2, bootstrap failure on aarch64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65414 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- It is working with 2ed7acc3505bbfed6a80787cf2537e212ff2bbe2 (revision 221332).

[Bug target/65414] [5 Regression] ICE while building libgcc after stage 2, bootstrap failure on aarch64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65414 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8) > It is working with 2ed7acc3505bbfed6a80787cf2537e212ff2bbe2 (revision > 221332). Fails with f4aade0acf5728ebadda80b38944f427a000e255 (revision 221402)

[Bug target/65414] [5 Regression] ICE while building libgcc after stage 2, bootstrap failure on aarch64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65414 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski --- 132858c819691c84077f130a5e7021961c0fb3ef (revision 221370) works.

[Bug target/64833] [SH]: Error: pcrel too far when compiling imagemagick and graphicsmagick on Debian sh4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64833 --- Comment #6 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- Here's a tarball with the failed build: > http://userpage.physik.fu-berlin.de/~glaubitz/graphicsmagick-failed-build.tar.gz You can reproduce the problem with: $ cd graphicsmagick-1.3.20/ $ cd P

[Bug go/65272] switch on type of interface failing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65272 --- Comment #3 from James Michael DuPont --- (In reply to James Michael DuPont from comment #2) > also on github https://github.com/golang/go/issues/10047 this was closed on github because it is valid go.

[Bug c++/65159] Linker forgets definition of type_info::__is_pointer_p

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65159 --- Comment #8 from David Krauss --- It was an updated tree. I'm not sure what revision it was updated from, but it was probably late January. Sorry for the delay, my machine got completely hosed by a bad RAM chip. Took the filesystem with it. S

[Bug c++/65159] Linker forgets definition of type_info::__is_pointer_p

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65159 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to David Krauss from comment #8) > Jonathan, what does the "confirmed" mean, were you able to reproduce it at > all? Yes, but not after starting a fresh build in am empty directory, so it seems t

[Bug go/65272] switch on type of interface failing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65272 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/60875] `_Pragma("message \"foo\")"` doesn't work in expression contexts.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60875 Ryan Lortie changed: What|Removed |Added CC||desrt at desrt dot ca --- Comment #3 from

[Bug go/65272] switch on type of interface failing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65272 --- Comment #5 from James Michael DuPont --- @iant thanks for the update. my bad, I got confused. here is the commit. https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/cc0446bae7c8c0ccead885787ad3fc4db0c127e0

[Bug target/63234] arm used label is removed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63234 --- Comment #7 from Mikael Pettersson --- The wrong-code started in the 4.7 dev cycle with r183328, a fix for a similar bug (PR50313) in 4.6. That fix was backported to 4.6 but doesn't trigger this PR there (I just re-checked with 4.6.4). The b

[Bug c++/65433] New: ICE processing lambdas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65433 Bug ID: 65433 Summary: ICE processing lambdas Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unas

[Bug c++/65433] ICE processing lambdas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65433 --- Comment #1 from Avi Kivity --- Created attachment 35038 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35038&action=edit Preprocessed source triggering ICE (bzip2'ed)

[Bug c++/65433] ICE processing lambdas

/src/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc-5.0.0 --enable-clocale=gnu --disable-nls --with-system-zlib --with-demangler-in-ld --enable-plugins --enable-shared --enable-bootstrap --with-fpmath=sse --enable-languages=c,c++,lto Thread model: posix gcc version 5.0.0 20150315 (experimental) (GCC) $ /opt/gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/65337] [5 Regression] bootstrap-lto gnat1 linktime ICE: gcc/ada/exp_aggr.adb:6570:0: internal compiler error: in forward_edge_to_pdom, at tree-ssa-dce.c:1086

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65337 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka --- Indeed, the cd-dce is one the worst documented of the tradition SSA optimizations. I commented on this to Jakum on IRC. The mechanizm that should prevent conditional from being removed is the control dependenc

[Bug c++/65433] ICE processing lambdas

ome/miyuki/gcc/src/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc-5.0.0 > --enable-clocale=gnu --disable-nls --with-system-zlib > --with-demangler-in-ld > --enable-plugins --enable-shared --enable-bootstrap --with-fpmath=sse > --enable-languages=c,c++,lto > Thread model: posix > gcc version 5.0.0 20150315

[Bug c++/65433] ICE processing lambdas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65433 --- Comment #4 from Avi Kivity --- I see the same crash on trunk, only now I get a stack trace: 0xca999f crash_signal ../../gcc/toplev.c:383 0x7f0b74 contains_struct_check ../../gcc/tree.h:2959 0x7f0b74 lambda_expr_this_capture(tree_node

[Bug target/63234] arm used label is removed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63234 --- Comment #8 from Mikael Pettersson --- The failures on 4.7+ seem to be triggered by r177855, yet another ARM costing tweak. I'm not going to investigate this any further.

[Bug c++/65433] ICE processing lambdas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65433 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug libstdc++/58625] std::signbit always converts to double

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58625 Tijl Coosemans changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tijl at coosemans dot org --- Comment #

[Bug libgcj/52579] [4.8/4.9/5 regression] i386_w32_fallback_frame_state should care ffi raw-closure stub function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52579 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/64432] [5 Regression] SYSTEM_CLOCK(COUNT_RATE=rate) wrong result for integer(4)::rate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64432 --- Comment #32 from Harald Anlauf --- Jerry, to give you some positive feedback: I'm now using your latest patch in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-03/msg00067.html It works for me. Thanks, Harald

[Bug c/46115] Feature request: anonymous functions (complementing anon aggregates)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46115 Shawn Landden changed: What|Removed |Added CC||shawn at churchofgit dot com --- Comment

[Bug c/46115] Feature request: anonymous functions (complementing anon aggregates)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46115 --- Comment #5 from Shawn Landden --- http://mackyle.github.io/blocksruntime/#download

[Bug middle-end/65414] [5 Regression] ICE while building libgcc after stage 2, bootstrap failure on aarch64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65414 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build, wrong-code CC|

[Bug c/46115] Feature request: anonymous functions (complementing anon aggregates)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46115 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Rob Staudinger from comment #3) > For the record, this is already possible using bracketed expressions, but > the syntactical sugar of not having to pick a function name would be great. Actually

[Bug ipa/44563] GCC uses a lot of RAM when compiling a large numbers of functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44563 --- Comment #34 from Jan Hubicka --- The problem is (as described earlier) the fact htat we sum size of all call statmts in function after every inline decision. Most of time is spent in calling estimate_edge_size_and_time: 79.95% cc1 cc1

[Bug middle-end/65414] [5 Regression] ICE while building libgcc after stage 2, bootstrap failure on aarch64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65414 --- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #11) > I am almost 100% sure it was caused by > e2a16b9122d238b8877640b5f6ef1599e195fae0 (revision 221372). I am checking > if reverting this patch from the current u

[Bug lto/65380] [5 Regression] LTO: ICE in add_symbol_to_partition_1, at lto/lto-partition.c:158

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65380 --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka --- Hmm, this one compiles just fine for me with today mainline. Does the problem still reproduce for you? Can you possibly dump out node->debug() and c?

[Bug regression/63150] [4.9/5 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/pr53199.c scan-assembler-times *

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63150 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at g

[Bug regression/63150] [4.9/5 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/pr53199.c scan-assembler-times *

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63150 --- Comment #5 from Alan Modra --- Author: amodra Date: Mon Mar 16 03:29:36 2015 New Revision: 221445 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221445&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/63150 gcc/ * config/rs6000/rs6000.md (bswapdi2): Remove on

[Bug target/62109] __gthr_i486_lock_cmp_xchg missing clobber

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62109 --- Comment #4 from David --- (In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #3) > Do you have a test case which fails without your patch? I do not. But this is a "by definition" thing. This instruction is intended to emulate the Windows Interloc

[Bug c/53119] -Wmissing-braces wrongly warns about universal zero initializer {0}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53119 --- Comment #24 from nightstrike --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #20) > Sorry, the patch hasn't been applied to 4.9 nor 4.8 branch yet, and I don't > think it should be backported as-is, because just today I found out that the > patch