https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64948
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64085
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||my.pvt.emailaddress@googlem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65233
--- Comment #24 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Mar 5 08:37:40 2015
New Revision: 221203
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221203&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-03-05 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/65233
* ipa-polymo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64834
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini ---
Let's add the testcase and close the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65270
--- Comment #20 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Mar 5 08:43:13 2015
New Revision: 221204
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221204&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-03-05 Richard Biener
PR ipa/65270
* ipa-icf-gimple.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64834
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Mar 5 08:48:22 2015
New Revision: 221205
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221205&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-03-05 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/64834
* g++.dg/cpp1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65321
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64834
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65321
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Component|target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65322
Bug ID: 65322
Summary: Narrowing conversion
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65318
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64665
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini ---
Let's add a reduced testcase and close the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65310
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Mar 5 09:14:01 2015
New Revision: 221206
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221206&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-03-05 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/65310
* tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65310
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64665
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Mar 5 09:15:58 2015
New Revision: 221207
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221207&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-03-05 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/64665
* g++.dg/cpp0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60685
Jens Maurer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.8.2 |4.9.2
--- Comment #3 from Jens Maurer ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65321
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65316
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64665
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65270
--- Comment #21 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 4 Mar 2015, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65270
>
> --- Comment #16 from Jan Hubicka ---
> Richard,
> thanks, I also think alias trick
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64431
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|rutsky.vladi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65270
--- Comment #22 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 5 Mar 2015, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65270
>
> --- Comment #18 from Jan Hubicka ---
> Here is summary of my current understanding
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65270
--- Comment #23 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 5 Mar 2015, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65270
>
> --- Comment #19 from Jan Hubicka ---
> I tried to construct a testcase for __restr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65323
Bug ID: 65323
Summary: -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant stutters
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65324
Bug ID: 65324
Summary: -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant: incorrect location
for function templates
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62274
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
EDG accepts it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65238
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65322
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65322
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
N.B. to make the code compile just don't use braces for the initialization:
: m_counter( b ? 1u : 0u )
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65321
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65322
--- Comment #3 from Wolfgang Roehrl ---
Hi Jonathan,
of course you are true. (I was overhasty with my bug report.)
Now I changed my program to using a constexpr-ctor:
#include "atomic"
struct S
{
explicit constexpr S (bool b = true)
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65270
--- Comment #24 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #22)
> On Thu, 5 Mar 2015, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65270
> >
> > --- Comment #18 from Jan Hubicka --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65322
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Wolfgang Roehrl from comment #3)
> The compiler rejects this program too - is this correct?
Yes. Adding constexpr to the constructor only means that it *can* be used in
constant-expressions, n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65159
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-apple-darwin*
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65322
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> Just use m_counter( b ? 1u : 0u ) or m_counter{ short(b ? 1u : 0u) }
Oops, the second one should be m_counter{ (unsigned short)(b ? 1u : 0u) }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65322
--- Comment #6 from Wolfgang Roehrl ---
Thank you and have a nice day!
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Dr. Peter-Alexander Wacker
Geschäftsführer: Dr. Walter Schlebusch (Vorsitzender, CEO),
Stefan Auerbach, Hans Wolfgang Kunz, Ralf Wintergerst,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64892
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65319
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65319
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65318
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 34962
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34962&action=edit
Suggested patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65325
Bug ID: 65325
Summary: float/interger operation needs cast with 02 switch.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65325
Sebastian Dröge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slomo at coaxion dot net
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65325
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Dröge ---
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.embedded.yocto.meta-freescale/13018 also
has other mentions of this bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65319
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Mar 5 13:54:19 2015
New Revision: 221213
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221213&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/65319
* c-ada-spec.c (print_destructor): Remove obsolet
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65319
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65319
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Mar 5 13:55:43 2015
New Revision: 221214
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221214&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/65319
* c-ada-spec.c (print_destructor): Remove obsolet
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65325
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61607
--- Comment #11 from Yvan Roux ---
Author: yroux
Date: Thu Mar 5 14:28:05 2015
New Revision: 221216
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221216&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
2015-03-05 Yvan Roux
Backport from trunk r212011, r214942, r2149
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64083
--- Comment #6 from Yvan Roux ---
Author: yroux
Date: Thu Mar 5 14:28:05 2015
New Revision: 221216
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221216&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
2015-03-05 Yvan Roux
Backport from trunk r212011, r214942, r21495
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64284
--- Comment #6 from Yvan Roux ---
Author: yroux
Date: Thu Mar 5 14:28:05 2015
New Revision: 221216
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221216&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
2015-03-05 Yvan Roux
Backport from trunk r212011, r214942, r21495
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64878
--- Comment #9 from Yvan Roux ---
Author: yroux
Date: Thu Mar 5 14:28:05 2015
New Revision: 221216
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221216&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
2015-03-05 Yvan Roux
Backport from trunk r212011, r214942, r21495
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63196
--- Comment #6 from Yvan Roux ---
Author: yroux
Date: Thu Mar 5 14:28:05 2015
New Revision: 221216
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221216&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
2015-03-05 Yvan Roux
Backport from trunk r212011, r214942, r21495
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63204
--- Comment #5 from Yvan Roux ---
Author: yroux
Date: Thu Mar 5 14:28:05 2015
New Revision: 221216
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221216&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
2015-03-05 Yvan Roux
Backport from trunk r212011, r214942, r21495
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64246
--- Comment #12 from Yvan Roux ---
Author: yroux
Date: Thu Mar 5 14:28:05 2015
New Revision: 221216
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221216&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
2015-03-05 Yvan Roux
Backport from trunk r212011, r214942, r2149
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65306
--- Comment #11 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
I see no problems here on darwin13.4.0 (with mpc-1.0.2, gmp-6.0.0a, mpfr-3.1.2,
isl-0.12.2 and cloog-0.18.2 present in the gcc-4_9-branch svn tree as mpc, gmp,
mpfr, isl and cloog) using...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64342
--- Comment #15 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Jeff, thanks for the detail analysis. It helped me a lot. I am working on the
patch fixing the problem. I hope it will be ready today.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64317
--- Comment #21 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #17)
> Thanks Vlad, that patch helped. Prior to your patch we had 15 reloads of
> the PIC register from memory, after your patch we have just 9. However,
> seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65325
--- Comment #4 from Stephane Cerveau ---
http://pastebin.com/stQFwaSg
Here is a sample which is supposed to describe the same behaviour as in
gstvolume.c but i'm not able to reproduce it with this code.
Here is my build command line:
arm-oad-l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65325
--- Comment #5 from Stephane Cerveau ---
Created attachment 34963
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34963&action=edit
assembly code
Here is the command line:
arm-oad-linux-gnueabi-gcc -march=armv7-a -mthumb-interwork -mfloat-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65315
--- Comment #3 from Steve Ellcey ---
Author: sje
Date: Thu Mar 5 16:34:03 2015
New Revision: 221219
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221219&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-03-05 Steve Ellcey
PR middle-end/65315
* cfgexpand.c (expand
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64928
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, so it's already calculate_live_ranges that takes much memory. I have a
small patch to improve that somewhat.
But what we really need is to get the "must coalesce" stuff "coalesced" with
respect to bot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65326
Bug ID: 65326
Summary: LRA missing a Thumb optimization.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63860
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ville.voutilainen at gmail dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65327
Bug ID: 65327
Summary: GCC rejects "constexpr volatile int i = 5;"
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65318
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Thu Mar 5 17:49:49 2015
New Revision: 221221
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221221&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/65318
* ipa-icf.c (sem_variable::equals): Compare variables
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64431
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini ---
Note that, besides the cases of volatile and restrict which should be also
included, already have a patch including those, we need further tweaks to
recover the location of 'const' in:
int* const f9();
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65303
Bug 65303 depends on bug 65318, which changed state.
Bug 65318 Summary: [5 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on
x86_64-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65318
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65318
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65328
Bug ID: 65328
Summary: GCC perf issue when compiling templates - 120x slower
than Clang
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65328
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
This is not that useful. Can you provide the preprocessed source for the file
which is taking a long time?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65327
Shafik Yaghmour changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yaghmour.shafik at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65328
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
Can youm please attach the preprocessed source files (generated with -E) to
reproduce the problem and also compile with -ftime-report and post the output?
Can youm please attach the preprocessed source files (generated with -E) to
reproduce the problem and also compile with -ftime-report and post the output?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65067
--- Comment #11 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Author: edlinger
Date: Thu Mar 5 18:56:37 2015
New Revision: 221222
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221222&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc:
2015-03-05 Bernd Edlinger
PR rtl-optimization/65067
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65328
--- Comment #3 from juchem at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 34965
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34965&action=edit
preprocessed files from gcc 4.9
generated with:
$ time g++-4.9 -Wall -std=c++11 -E -I .
fatal/type/be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65328
juchem at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #34966|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65328
juchem at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #34965|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65328
--- Comment #4 from juchem at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 34966
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34966&action=edit
preprocessed file from gcc 4.8
generated with:
$ time g++-4.8 -Wall -std=c++11 -E -I .
fatal/type/ben
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65328
--- Comment #7 from juchem at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 34969
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34969&action=edit
FWIW, preprocessed file from clang 3.4
generated with:
$ time clang++-3.4 -Wall -std=c++11 -E -I .
fa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64886
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 34970
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34970&action=edit
RTL expand dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65329
Bug ID: 65329
Summary: [C++14] constexpr complex::real(), imag() are
non-const
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65328
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog
Statu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65329
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The doxygen docs are not up to date. This should be fixed at r216258
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65314
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64342
--- Comment #16 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Mar 5 19:43:11 2015
New Revision: 221223
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221223&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-03-05 Vladimir Makarov
PR target/64342
* lra-assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65270
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5 regression] ICF needs to |issues with merging memory
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64886
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin ---
Revised test1.c testcase attached to PR64434 would pass on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65330
Bug ID: 65330
Summary: restrict should be considered when folding through
references from global vars
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65270
--- Comment #26 from Jan Hubicka ---
I completely missed the discussion concerning restrict. I opened PR65330 with
that testcase. We can check in the following way:
Index: ipa-icf.c
===
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64317
--- Comment #22 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Yes, absolutely, we have to compensate for the case where B clobbers something
useful, undoing transformations, etc. It may not be reasonably feasible within
the current structure of LRA.
I'm getting pret
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65270
--- Comment #27 from Jan Hubicka ---
here is a variant of orignal testcase for tree-tail-merge
struct a
{
int a[10];
};
typedef struct a misaligned_t __attribute__ ((aligned (8)));
typedef struct a aligned_t __attribute__ ((aligned (32)))
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65323
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65138
--- Comment #18 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Thu Mar 5 20:31:10 2015
New Revision: 221224
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221224&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-03-03 Michael Meissner
Backport from trunk
2015-03
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65329
--- Comment #2 from Axel Naumann ---
Thanks Jonathan,
Indeed, that does it. Apologies for not going to the source of it!
Axel.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65330
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Depends on|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65321
--- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> (gdb) p debug_rtx (x.first)
> (const_int 128 [0x80])
> (gdb) p x.second
> $2 = QImode
> (gdb) p precision
> $3 = 8
>
> the CONST_INT is not prop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65324
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini ---
Weird, I thought we already had this in Bugzilla, where I explained that it
doesn't particularly have to do with this warning, eg,
template
void fun(T, signed char = 1000.0) {}
int main()
{
fun(0);
}
Ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65323
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini ---
This one should be easy to fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65329
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52718
--- Comment #21 from Paolo Carlini ---
*** Bug 65324 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
