https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64227
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64171
--- Comment #3 from Ville Voutilainen ---
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #2)
> Today I can't reproduce the issue in mainline. Ville, can you double check?
Works fine for me on current trunk, no ICE, no hang.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64227
--- Comment #3 from Ville Voutilainen ---
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #2)
> I guess we should resolve this one as fixed and re-open c++/64085, which
> still ICEs for me. Agreed?
Yes, this bug doesn't reproduce anymore, whereas 64085
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65307
Bug ID: 65307
Summary: Incorrect optimization breaks basic arithmetic
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64398
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini ---
This works in mainline, I'm adding the testcase and closing the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64398
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64398
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Mar 4 08:32:23 2015
New Revision: 221174
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221174&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-03-04 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/64398
* g++.dg/cpp0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65307
--- Comment #1 from madars+gccbug at gmail dot com ---
I should clarify that the same behavior can be observed on Debian, Ubuntu and
Fedora:
gcc (Ubuntu 4.9.1-16ubuntu6) 4.9.1
gcc (Debian 4.9.1-19) 4.9.1
gcc (GCC) 4.9.2 20141101 (Red Hat 4.9.2-1)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64608
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65304
Maxim Kuvyrkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|clyon at gcc dot gnu.org |cbaylis at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65076
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
> I wonder where the main _int_malloc load comes from.
To answer this question myself, 84% from the _int_malloc load comes from
calling
malloc of which 55% comes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63175
--- Comment #31 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #27)
> On the other hand, the vectorizer tuning is encoding x86 preferences.
Huh, the vectorizer tuning is specified by target hooks. And initial
vectorizer tuning
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65307
Anders Kaseorg changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andersk at mit dot edu
--- Comment #2 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65306
Maxim Kuvyrkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65270
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #9)
> Lets reopen this. I agree with other type flags - they seem safe except for
> TYPE_ATTRIBUTES of functions I will add compare of today.
>
> > No. But you can't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64171
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|paolo.carlin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65270
--- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65270
>
> --- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka ---
> Hi,
> while looking for a testcase that wou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65306
--- Comment #2 from Matthew Niemerg ---
I understand I am using clang as the compiler. I am trying to build gcc-4.9.2
with clang as my compiler.
I have successfully used clang for compiling gcc-4.3.3, gcc-4.4.3, gcc-4.7.3,
and gcc-4.8.4 from so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65306
Maxim Kuvyrkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|MOVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65308
Bug ID: 65308
Summary: [C++14] auto-returning function template used inside
function template has problems with being assigned to
auto
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65306
--- Comment #4 from Matthew Niemerg ---
Don't worry about it.
The assembler I am using is
Apple Inc version cctools-862, GNU assembler version 1.38
(from as -v)
So, if I want to get the *.i and *.s files I should add "-save-temps" to say,
CPP
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65307
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64227
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Mar 4 10:20:23 2015
New Revision: 221181
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221181&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-03-04 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/64227
* g++.dg/cpp1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64227
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|paolo.carlin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64085
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63664
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65303
Bug 65303 depends on bug 63664, which changed state.
Bug 63664 Summary: ipa-icf pass fails with segfault
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63664
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65305
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65270
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 34946
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34946&action=edit
patch
I am testing the following patch for the dependence info compare (not sure
where
the function parameter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65309
Bug ID: 65309
Summary: [Regression] Executes wrong function inside an
anonymous namespace on runtime
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65309
--- Comment #1 from Albert Astals Cid ---
Works fine with
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/i686-linux-gnu/4.8/lto-wrapper
Target: i686-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63572
--- Comment #12 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #11)
> Reported by HJ:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237
>
> As of r221117, I still see
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/sra-1.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65309
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64931
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65309
--- Comment #3 from Albert Astals Cid ---
I guess i'm using the system default one, that would be
$ `which ld` -V
GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.25
Supported emulations:
elf_x86_64
elf32_x86_64
elf_i386
i386linux
elf_l1om
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65133
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||5.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65309
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Does it also happens with -fuse-ld=gold?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65309
ecloud changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s at ecloud dot org
--- Comment #5 from ecloud
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65310
Bug ID: 65310
Summary: vectorizer uses wrong alignment
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65310
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65309
--- Comment #6 from Albert Astals Cid ---
Same as ecloud, also fails if using gold.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65309
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65309
Sergio Martins changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc at bobbyperu dot info
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65308
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65308
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
--- Comment #2 from Jona
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65120
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Btw, just saw
> [ 2808s] ../drivers/xen/sfc_netfront/falcon_event.c:113:43: error: logical
> not is only applied to the left hand side of comparison
> [-Werror=logical-not-parentheses]
> [ 2808s] BUG_ON(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65309
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65311
Bug ID: 65311
Summary: Segmentation fault when doing unaligned assignment in
a loop
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65270
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 34949
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34949&action=edit
function parameter and variable part
I am testing that in addition.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65270
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, as variable merging always creates aliases accesses and their types remain
the same. So we don't need any extra checks for merging globals here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65312
Bug ID: 65312
Summary: Implicitly-declared default constructor must be
defined as deleted
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65311
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65312
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I believe this is a GCC extension, G++ implements the proposed resolution of
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#253 and since all
sub-objects of List are correctly initialized, no i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65309
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65306
--- Comment #5 from Maxim Kuvyrkov ---
No need to rebuild the whole GCC with -save-temps. Just go to directory where
compilation of extenddftf2_s.o takes place and copy-paste the compilation
command for that one file with addition of -save-temps
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65307
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65312
--- Comment #2 from radventure at yandex dot ru ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> I believe this is a GCC extension, G++ implements the proposed resolution of
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#253 and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65216
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||madars+gccbug at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65307
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Why do you think it is a duplicate? PR65216 was a 5 Regression, something that
worked in 4.9; this one is an issue with 4.9 and not 5. PR65216 was also about
-O3 only, this one fails even with -O2. PR65216
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65307
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65312
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The {} means value-initialization as opposed to default-initialization.
I think value-init requires the compiler to zero out all the members first,
even though they will be given another value anyway.
I h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65307
--- Comment #7 from Kai Tietz ---
Well, it looked like the same issue by inspection dumps, as folding issue
happens in reassoc-pass. Of course it might be that forward-prop patch is the
actual issue.
I noticed for -O3 on 4.9.x that valid comput
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65313
Bug ID: 65313
Summary: Compilation error in lto profiledbootstrap on
powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65233
--- Comment #22 from Richard Biener ---
The error is to do anything that possibly relies on an up-to-date SSA web when
need_ssa_update () is true.
In fact the polymorphic call code walks to the PHI which is already dead
(it's block is gone). So
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65233
--- Comment #23 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 34950
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34950&action=edit
CFG debugging
Just FYI - this is a local CFG debugging patch I use. Just do
(gdb) p debug_dot_cfg (cfun)
f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65307
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65309
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||5.0
Summary|[4.9/5 Regr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63175
--- Comment #32 from David Edelsohn ---
"So currently on a tie we don't vectorize basic-blocks (same with GCC 4.8).
That's kind of arbitrary, but given instruction encoding size on x86 for
example
it makes sense."
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65307
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63175
--- Comment #33 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 4 Mar 2015, dje at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63175
>
> --- Comment #32 from David Edelsohn ---
> "So currently on a tie we don't vectorize ba
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65248
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5 Regression] Copy |Copy relocation in PIE
|relo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65307
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65307
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|5.0 |
Summary|[4.9 Regression] In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65302
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65307
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Fixed 4.9 assert:
gcc_assert ((valv & ~val.mask
& ~nonzero_bits & mask).is_zero ());
fixed trunk assert:
@@ -1901,9 +1922,14 @@ evaluate_stmt (gimple stmt)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65284
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2015-03-03 00:00
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65306
howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at bromo dot med
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65275
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
The warning here appears to be bogus; the code looks well-defined to me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65298
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #3)
> ix=1 and m_vecpfx.m_num=1 in this case.
> Let me know what other debugging info may be useful to you.
Well, it might be difficult debugging this without re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65298
--- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Could you attach the patch, please. It doesn't apply when I copy&paste.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65314
Bug ID: 65314
Summary: invalid type for array subscript
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64797
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65261
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Author: trippels
Date: Wed Mar 4 17:28:56 2015
New Revision: 221190
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221190&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR65261
Running bootstrap-ubsan on ppc64le shows many instan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
Bug 63426 depends on bug 65261, which changed state.
Bug 65261 Summary: [5 Regression] bootstrap-ubsan ppc64le:
gcc/libcpp/lex.c:552:30: runtime error: load of misaligned address
0x01002172dfc6 for type 'const uchar', which requires 16 byte alig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65261
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64317
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
--- Comment #20 from Jeffrey A. Law
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64797
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Mar 4 17:19:55 2015
New Revision: 221189
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221189&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/64797
* include/bits/locale_conv.h (wstring_convert:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64085
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65298
--- Comment #8 from Martin Jambor ---
Created attachment 34951
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34951&action=edit
Patch testing pass-through jump function indices
Here is the same patch as an attachment.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65309
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65309
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65209
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Mar 4 18:13:44 2015
New Revision: 221192
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221192&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/65209
PR c++/65309
* decl2.c (constrain_visibility_for_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65309
--- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Mar 4 18:13:44 2015
New Revision: 221192
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221192&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/65209
PR c++/65309
* decl2.c (constrain_visibility_for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65240
--- Comment #12 from Michael Meissner ---
Created attachment 34952
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34952&action=edit
Initial patch to paper over the problem
This patch papers over the problem. As I mentioned before this is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65270
--- Comment #16 from Jan Hubicka ---
Richard,
thanks, I also think alias trick makes gloal vars safe for merging across
RESTRICT flags.
One however needs to consider merging of items referring restricted vars.
const restrict int *a=&var;
const
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65315
Bug ID: 65315
Summary: incorrect alignment of local variable with aligned
attribute
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65316
Bug ID: 65316
Summary: [5 Regression] LTO: Uninitialized memory / ICE with -g
-fno-lto-odr-type-merging: in types_same_for_odr, at
ipa-devirt.c:465
Product: gcc
V
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65315
--- Comment #1 from Steve Ellcey ---
It might be easier to see this bug if you apply this patch:
diff --git a/gcc/cfgexpand.c b/gcc/cfgexpand.c
index 7dfe1f6..7beb00e 100644
--- a/gcc/cfgexpand.c
+++ b/gcc/cfgexpand.c
@@ -973,6 +973,8 @@ expand_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65298
--- Comment #9 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #8)
> Created attachment 34951 [details]
> Patch testing pass-through jump function indices
>
> Here is the same patch as an attachment.
Thanks. But I cannot re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65316
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
