https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64757
--- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Thu Feb 5 08:06:04 2015
New Revision: 220436
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220436&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-02-05 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/64757
* resolve.c (resolve_st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64757
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49213
Bug 49213 depends on bug 64757, which changed state.
Bug 64757 Summary: [5 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2353
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64757
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64943
Bug ID: 64943
Summary: No error on ultimate allocatable components in IO list
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64944
Bug ID: 64944
Summary: Coarrays not registered for structure constructor with
allocatable coarray components
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64945
Bug ID: 64945
Summary: Structure constructors and non-NULL-data-targets and
polymorphic pointer components
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64757
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64935
--- Comment #7 from Maxim Kuvyrkov ---
Created attachment 34674
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34674&action=edit
Initial patch
Marcus,
Would you please bootstrap / test this patch?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64935
--- Comment #8 from Maxim Kuvyrkov ---
Markus,
I'll test it on x86/x86_64 and arm/aarch64, but I don't have a powerpc box to
bootstrap on.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64349
--- Comment #15 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Author: charlet
Date: Thu Feb 5 09:09:51 2015
New Revision: 220437
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220437&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-02-05 Tristan Gingold
PR ada/64349
* env.c: Fix think
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64349
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63765
--- Comment #20 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Thu Feb 5 09:41:44 2015
New Revision: 220438
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220438&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix failures on AIX (PR libobjc/63765)
PR libobjc/63765
* thr.c (_XOP
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64905
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Compiling the test gcc.target/i386/pr64905.c on x86_64-apple-darwin14 gives an
ICE
[Book15] f90/bug% gcc5 /opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr64905.c
-Os -ffixed-rax -ffixed-rbx -ffixed-r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #27
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64905
--- Comment #11 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #10)
> Compiling the test gcc.target/i386/pr64905.c on x86_64-apple-darwin14 gives
> an ICE
I have a patch that disables the test on -fPIC targets.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
--- Comment #28 from Jakub Jelinek ---
If this is about ccache, I wonder if ccache couldn't preprocess with
-fdirectives-only instead, that way hopefully no info is lost.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64718
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64922
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64905
--- Comment #12 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Feb 5 10:37:05 2015
New Revision: 220441
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220441&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/64905
* gcc.target/i386/pr64905.c: Re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50948
--- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 50949 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50949
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50948
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64937
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61466
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64935
--- Comment #9 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Your patch bootstraps / tests fine on ppc64. GCC_COMPARE_DEBUG=1 kernel build
also succeeds.
Thanks.
(If you want access to ppc machines get a compile farm account:
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64937
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64516
Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.3.3
--- Comment #2 from Mark
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64943
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64317
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63765
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64516
--- Comment #3 from Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer ---
Just for reference, here is the expected result:
$ clang -target armv5-unknown-linux-gnu -marm -mfloat-abi=soft --version
clang version 3.5.1 (tags/RELEASE_351/final)
Target: armv5-unknown-linux-gn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64943
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
In principle, we do have a similar check in resolve.c's resolve_transfer. The
question is why it doesn't trigger.
if (ts->type == BT_CLASS)
{
/* FIXME: Test for defined input/output. */
gf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64943
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #2)
> In principle, we do have a similar check in resolve.c's resolve_transfer.
> The question is why it doesn't trigger.
Answer: Only functions and variables are hand
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64941
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64946
Bug ID: 64946
Summary: For Aarch64, vectorization with "abs" instruction is
not hapenning with vector elements of char/short type.
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64946
--- Comment #1 from vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The test case is got from gcc.target/aarch64/vect-abs-compile.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64326
--- Comment #5 from tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #4)
> make_forwarder_block is definitely wrong on not capping. But I do not see
> how vectorizing can get us to a frequncy over FREQ_MAX? So probably some
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64940
--- Comment #4 from Bill Torpey ---
That was the first thing I tried, but the system limits.h does an include_next
which fails, and the system features.h doesnt include compiler-specific
definitions, so that also fails.
So, there is absolutely n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64946
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|aarch64 |aarch64*-none-*
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64349
--- Comment #17 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Better now?
Yes, I have bootstrapped a clean revision r220437 on x86_64-apple-darwin10,
regtesting in progress.
For the record, I still see the warning
ld: warning: can't add line info to anonymo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64947
Bug ID: 64947
Summary: Internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at
gimplify.c:8425
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64915
gene at staubsaal dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60463
gene at staubsaal dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gene at staubsaal dot de
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64947
--- Comment #1 from Lorenz Hüdepohl ---
Also present in 4.8.3:
#> gfortran --version
GNU Fortran (SUSE Linux) 4.8.3 20141208 [gcc-4_8-branch revision 218481]
Copyright (C) 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GNU Fortran comes with NO WARRANTY,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64349
--- Comment #18 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #17)
> > Better now?
>
> Yes, I have bootstrapped a clean revision r220437 on x86_64-apple-darwin10,
> regtesting in progress.
>
> For the record, I still see t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55541
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64580
--- Comment #13 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Thu Feb 5 15:01:49 2015
New Revision: 220453
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220453&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/64580
Backport from mainline
* config.rs6000/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64580
--- Comment #14 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Thu Feb 5 15:06:40 2015
New Revision: 220454
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220454&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/64580
Backport from mainline
* config.rs6000/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64948
Bug ID: 64948
Summary: Lambda reference capture initialization in template
function creates segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64580
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64947
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64947
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Internal compiler error: in |ICE in gimplify_expr, at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55541
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 34677
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34677&action=edit
gcc5-pr55541.patch
Untested fix (that cures the testcase).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64949
Bug ID: 64949
Summary: jit linking fails when building with in-tree libraries
(mpc etc...)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64813
--- Comment #15 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #12)
> I'been testing patch that does not create retval and return gimple statement.
Any updates on the testing?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58400
--- Comment #17 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Thu Feb 5 17:04:04 2015
New Revision: 220457
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220457&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
* config/h8300/constraints.md ("U" constraint): Use strict
variant
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58400
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64950
Bug ID: 64950
Summary: postpone expanding va_arg till pass_stdarg
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64889
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joel at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64602
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51153
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63754
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49874
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35455
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lacombar at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009
--- Comment #51 from clyon at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34678
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34678&action=edit
tentative patch
Here is a patch proposal: with it I an able to cross-build GCC for
aarch64-linux and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52598
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49878
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tony at bakeyournoodle dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49877
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58400
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lacombar at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47983
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35455
--- Comment #15 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
*** Bug 47983 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46918
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48231
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mon...@monami-software.com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42790
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42128
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41089
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55541
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #11)
> Created attachment 34677 [details]
> gcc5-pr55541.patch
>
> Untested fix (that cures the testcase).
Unfortunately it broke bootstrap, I'd have hoped it wouldn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64951
Bug ID: 64951
Summary: g++ generates incorrect code when using a register
variable within a template function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64952
Bug ID: 64952
Summary: Missing temporary in assignment from elemental
function
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31934
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64953
Bug ID: 64953
Summary: Compiling sourcecode for STM32F103 causes USB errors
with some optimization settings
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48231
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21530
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||corsepiu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64953
--- Comment #1 from manuel.reimer at gmx dot de ---
One addition: The same problem exists with other "USB based" sourcecode. For
example with this one:
https://github.com/j1rie/IRMP_STM32/
olebowle at vdr-portal.de did a nice overview on which o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64953
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64884
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64952
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
Technical, it is a bit similar to:
module m
integer :: i
contains
pure subroutine f(x)
integer, intent(inout) :: x
x = 2*x + i
end subroutine
end module m
which doesn't modify "i" but still fe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51419
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21530
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kikairoya at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64954
Bug ID: 64954
Summary: GCC incorrectly rejects constexpr variable
initialization.
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64205
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64205
--- Comment #6 from Michael Meissner ---
Created attachment 34680
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34680&action=edit
Proposed patch to fix the problem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32693
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fabio.giovagnini@aurion-tec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33163
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64955
Bug ID: 64955
Summary: RFE: have -Wformat suggest the correct format string
to use
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64955
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64943
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Feb 5 21:58:38 2015
New Revision: 220462
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220462&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-02-05 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/64943
* resolve.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64943
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64876
--- Comment #6 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Thu Feb 5 22:52:24 2015
New Revision: 220463
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220463&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/64876
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (chain_already_loaded): New
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64884
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-apple-darwin*|x86_64-apple-darwin*,
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
