https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64435
--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Or perhaps we could change SizeClassAllocator64 so that on some architectures
it could use variable bounds. The fact that they are template parameters makes
this harder, but perhaps we could say that if som
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64532
--- Comment #11 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to baoshan from comment #10)
> I have a second thought:
> As the 'y' is declared as float, should GCC infer the register is a single
> float register even the constraint is 'w' ?
I don't kn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49847
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.8.5 |4.9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64682
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64672
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
OpenACC bug - the LTO frontend doesn't seem to know about the OpenACC builtin
function codes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64595
--- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 19 Jan 2015, ian at airs dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64595
>
> --- Comment #7 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
> That failure is not related to the new gotool
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64595
--- Comment #14 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015, ian at airs dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64595
>
> --- Comment #12 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
> It's not libbacktrace that is crashing the a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63576
--- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Unfortunately your patch dosen't work:
lto1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
0xa12f6f crash_signal
../../gcc/gcc/toplev.c:381
0x88b190 ipa_merge_profiles(cgraph_node*, cgraph_node*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64685
Bug ID: 64685
Summary: wrong code by LTO on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64676
--- Comment #6 from ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Tue Jan 20 08:29:09 2015
New Revision: 219880
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219880&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR bootstrap/64676
Revert:
2015-01-19
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64081
--- Comment #4 from ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Tue Jan 20 08:29:09 2015
New Revision: 219880
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219880&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR bootstrap/64676
Revert:
2015-01-19
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63576
--- Comment #11 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
And if I try the obvious fix:
637 else if (e2 && e2->speculative)
I hit the assert in ipa-inline.c later on:
lto1: internal compiler error: in edge_badness, at ipa-inline.c:912
0x100bf73 e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64681
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63408
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64639
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64676
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64081
Bug 64081 depends on bug 64676, which changed state.
Bug 64676 Summary: [5 Regression] SEGV in tree-ssa-structalias.c
solve_constraint
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64676
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64677
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |libgcc
--- Comment #4 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63741
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #4)
> is not the correct way to set /f flags to all insn of the generated sequence.
Please see how mips/mips.c annotates expanded sequences using
mips_set_frame_expr, esp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64682
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64681
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64684
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto, wrong-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64341
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Can't reproduce this with a cross to sparc64-linux with -m32, can you still
> reproduce it?
No, they went away between 20141212 and 20141219.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64341
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64685
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto, wrong-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64410
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #13 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64410
--- Comment #14 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 34496
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34496&action=edit
sparc-sun-solaris2.11 .vect dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62258
Piotr Bartosiewicz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p.bartosiewi at partner dot
samsun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64681
zhongwei.yao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
Assignee: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: markus at trippelsdorf dot net
gcc -v:
gcc version 5.0.0 20150120 (experimental) (GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64686
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64595
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64149
--- Comment #7 from renlin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: renlin
Date: Tue Jan 20 10:26:18 2015
New Revision: 219884
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219884&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARM] PR 64149: Remove -mlra/-mno-lra option for ARM.
gcc/
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64672
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64684
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55646
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64672
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Well, -fopenmp isn't marked LTO, so if not anything else, for consistency
-fopenacc should be handled similarly as -fopenmp.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63751
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64684
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64685
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64684
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
*** Bug 64685 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64600
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64042
--- Comment #11 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Reported upstream here:
https://lists.opendylan.org/pipermail/bdwgc/2015-January/006071.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64410
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 20 11:06:13 2015
New Revision: 219885
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219885&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-20 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/64410
* g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63776
--- Comment #5 from Tom Straub ---
Created attachment 34497
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34497&action=edit
Test Program for UTF-8 CPP library
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63776
--- Comment #6 from Tom Straub ---
Hi Tim,
After banging my head against the wall looking for a solution to the C++11
UTF-8 support problems, I finally found what seems to be a great addition to my
project, which I think might be beneficial to G
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63658
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64500
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 34498
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34498&action=edit
perf report for the testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64639
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Summary|fals
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64687
Bug ID: 64687
Summary: powerpc: GCC 5.0 (trunk@219851) build failure for
powerpc with hardware decimal floating point disabled
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64383
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62241
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini ---
I'm adding a reduced testcase and closing the bug as fixed for 5.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64658
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Jan 20 11:50:43 2015
New Revision: 219886
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219886&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/64658
* include/std/atomic (atomic_init): Define.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64650
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Jan 20 11:51:03 2015
New Revision: 219889
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219889&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/64650
* include/experimental/optional (bad_optional_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64383
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
On the #c2 testcase, gcc trunk now warns, starting with r217957.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62241
--- Comment #8 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Jan 20 11:58:43 2015
New Revision: 219890
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219890&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-20 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/62241
* g++.dg/cpp1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62241
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64682
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Testcase usable for the testsuite:
int a, b = 1;
__attribute__((noinline, noclone)) void
foo (int x)
{
if (x != 5)
__builtin_abort ();
}
int
main ()
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 56; i++)
for (; a;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64672
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I wonder if https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg00085.html
> helps here.
AFAICT it does:
=== libgomp Summary ===
# of expected passes12418
# of unsupported tests5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63576
--- Comment #12 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Martin pointed out that the assertion gets also hit in a pure LTO Firefox
build.
See PR64686.
When I comment out that assertion, Firefox LTO/PGO now builds fine with your
patch and the trivial fix fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64672
--- Comment #9 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I tried the example, and added -fopenmp. In lto1, I observed:
...
(gdb) p flag_openmp
$2 = 0
(gdb) p flag_openacc
$3 = 0
(gdb) p flag_tree_parallelize_loops
$4 = 1
(gdb) p flag_offload_abi
$5 = OFF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64682
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64688
Bug ID: 64688
Summary: internal compiler error: Max. number of generated
reload insns per insn is achieved (90)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64688
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63776
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The codecvt stuff was implemented last week. Probably incorrectly, because I
didn't really know what I was doing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59937
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini ---
This is fixed for 5.0. I'm adding the testcases and closing the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64684
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 20 13:26:19 2015
New Revision: 219892
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219892&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-20 Richard Biener
PR ipa/64684
* ipa-reference.c (a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64684
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64689
Bug ID: 64689
Summary: tree-vectorize generates wrong code with inlined
function - minimum working example included
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59937
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Jan 20 13:39:10 2015
New Revision: 219894
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219894&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-20 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/59937
* g++.dg/cpp0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59937
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 59937, which changed state.
Bug 59937 Summary: [constexpr] bogus diagnostic "used in its own initializer"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59937
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64383
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini ---
Yes, this is already fixed by the patch for c++/63657. The testcases are
slightly different thus I'm going to add the reduced testcase before closing
the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64690
Bug ID: 64690
Summary: -freport-bug issue with comments
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: driver
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64689
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61553
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Jan 20 14:17:51 2015
New Revision: 219895
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219895&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2014-06-23 Marek Polacek
PR c/61
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64383
--- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Jan 20 14:19:32 2015
New Revision: 219896
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219896&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-20 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/64383
* g++.dg/warn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61553
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Jan 20 14:19:35 2015
New Revision: 219897
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219897&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2014-06-23 Marek Polacek
PR c/61
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64383
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|paolo.carlin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63751
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64691
Bug ID: 64691
Summary: Suboptimal register allocation for bytes comparison on
i386
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64632
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43631
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||shenhan at google dot com
--- Comment #27
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64645
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60141
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63979
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64692
Bug ID: 64692
Summary: Incorrect result for sourced allocate of class(*)
array
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64632
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64693
Bug ID: 64693
Summary: [5 Regression] PCH failed with LTO + profiledbootstrap
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64683
--- Comment #5 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Tue Jan 20 16:11:36 2015
New Revision: 219900
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219900&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/64683
runtime/pprof: Let memory profiler test pass if val
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64645
--- Comment #7 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to Richard Henderson from comment #6)
> No. In that case this unwind info would simply be ignored.
> Anyway, fixed in r219860.
Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64595
--- Comment #16 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
Yes, gccgo ought to enable -g by default. For some reason I thought it did but
clearly I was wrong.
file/line info is needed for the standard library runtime.Callers function,
which is used by many othe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64683
--- Comment #6 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
Should be fixed now. Thanks for reporting it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64617
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64688
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
This is while reloading
(define_insn "vec_set_0"
[(set (match_operand:VI4F_128 0 "nonimmediate_operand"
"=Yr,*v,v,v ,x,x,v,Yr ,*x ,x ,m ,m ,m")
(vec_merge:VI4F_128
(vec_duplic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64435
--- Comment #23 from Kostya Serebryany ---
Can we move the discussion to the asan issue tracker?
https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/issues/list
There is already quite a bit of aarch64 discussion at
https://code.google.com/p/address-san
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60322
Antony Lewis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||antony at cosmologist dot info
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64694
Bug ID: 64694
Summary: [5 Regression] FAIL:
23_containers/unordered_set/insert/hash_policy.cc
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64695
Bug ID: 64695
Summary: [5 Regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/cxx11.cc
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64595
--- Comment #17 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #16)
> Yes, gccgo ought to enable -g by default. For some reason I thought it did
> but clearly I was wrong.
Maybe -g1 is enough now.
1 - 100 of 188 matches
Mail list logo
