[Bug tree-optimization/64284] [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64284 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/64284] [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64284 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Dec 15 08:19:55 2014 New Revision: 218733 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218733&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-12-15 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/64284 * tree

[Bug target/64310] New: libgcc2.c:2051:1: internal compiler error: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:3383

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64310 Bug ID: 64310 Summary: libgcc2.c:2051:1: internal compiler error: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:3383 Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/64246] [5 Regression] ICE building libada for Windows due to NULL loop header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64246 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- We should make mark_loop_for_removal more robust then, I am testing Index: gcc/cfgloop.c === --- gcc/cfgloop.c (revision 218733) +++ gcc

[Bug rtl-optimization/64311] New: ICE: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90) with -fpic -march=corei7 for gcc.target/i386/avx512bw-vpbroadcast[bw]-1.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64311 Bug ID: 64311 Summary: ICE: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90) with -fpic -march=corei7 for gcc.target/i386/avx512bw-vpbroadcast[bw]-1.c Product

[Bug middle-end/64309] if (1 & (1 << n)) not simplified to if (n == 0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64309 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|

[Bug rtl-optimization/64311] ICE: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90) with -fpic -march=corei7 for gcc.target/i386/avx512bw-vpbroadcast[bw]-1.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64311 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||evstupac at gmail dot com,

[Bug tree-optimization/64308] Missed optimization: 64-bit divide used when 32-bit divide would work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64308 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Not sure if your analysis is correct, but value-range propagation computes ret_4: VARYING ... _12: [0, 4294967295] _13: [0, 4294967295] _14: [0, 18446744065119617025] _15: [0, 4294967295] _16: [0, +INF] fo

[Bug ipa/64307] [5 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: invalid argument to gimple call with -fPIC -fipa-icf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64307 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mliska at suse dot cz Target Mileston

[Bug rtl-optimization/64300] [5 Regression] s390x, ICE, unable to generate reloads, in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64300 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ra CC|

[Bug ipa/64298] [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in get_binfo_at_offset at tree.c:11914

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64298 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0

[Bug tree-optimization/64295] [5 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV (infinite recursion) with -frounding-math -funsafe-math-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64295 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/63551] [4.9/5 Regression] wrong code (segfaults) at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63551 --- Comment #12 from Martin Jambor --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #11) > The gcc.dg/ipa/pr63551.c test fails on the 4.9 branch on 32-bit > targets (i386, arm, s390): > gcc.dg/ipa/pr63551.c:24:9: warning: this decimal constant is unsi

[Bug rtl-optimization/64291] [5 Regression] Miscompile t-div in GMP's testsuite

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64291 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0

[Bug middle-end/64246] [5 Regression] ICE building libada for Windows due to NULL loop header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64246 --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou --- > I suppose extracting a testcase for this is too hard? Do you mean a testcase like the one I attached on Friday?

[Bug rtl-optimization/64287] [5 Regression] Disable -fuse-caller-save when -pg is active

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64287 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0

[Bug target/64264] [5 Regression] s390 bootstrap fails in ada

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64264 --- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 12 Dec 2014, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64264 > > Eric Botcazou changed: > >What|Removed |Add

[Bug middle-end/64246] [5 Regression] ICE building libada for Windows due to NULL loop header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64246 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 15 Dec 2014, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64246 > > --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou --- > > I suppose extracting a testcase for th

[Bug tree-optimization/64312] New: [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64312 Bug ID: 64312 Summary: [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimiz

[Bug target/64254] [5 Regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/vshuf-(v4si|v8hi).c -O* (internal compiler error) between r218540 and r218566.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64254 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Let us track the gcc.target/i386/avx512bw-vpbroadcast[bw]-1.c failures in pr64311.

[Bug rtl-optimization/64311] ICE: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90) with -fpic -march=corei7 for gcc.target/i386/avx512bw-vpbroadcast[bw]-1.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64311 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/64295] [5 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV (infinite recursion) with -frounding-math -funsafe-math-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64295 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Ok, so we're folding g / 3 -> g * (1 / 3) and then applyign the same transform to 1 / 3 (because that's not constant folded with -frounding-math). I believe the option combination is a red herring, but ...

[Bug middle-end/64246] [5 Regression] ICE building libada for Windows due to NULL loop header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64246 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou --- > Yes, but in suitable form for gnat.dg (not sure how I can do > multi-file testcases there or which one would be the main one) Most testcases are multi-file under gnat.dg... I'm going to attach it.

[Bug middle-end/64246] [5 Regression] ICE building libada for Windows due to NULL loop header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64246 --- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou --- Created attachment 34282 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34282&action=edit Concatenated testcase for gnat.dg To be gnatchop'ed and installed into the gnat.dg testsuite: * gnat.d

[Bug sanitizer/64265] [5 Regression] r217669 broke tsan

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64265 --- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Dec 15 09:37:47 2014 New Revision: 218734 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218734&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR sanitizer/64265 * tsan.c (instrument_func_entry): Insert __tsa

[Bug ipa/61283] [5 regression] SEGV in pass_ipa_comdats::execute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61283 --- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka --- > The i386 testcase works for me now. It has static ctor that becomes pure so it > ought to be duplicate of PR61324 Right: the testcase started to

[Bug libstdc++/64054] 27_io/basic_ostream/inserters_arithmetic/char/hexfloat.cc FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64054 --- Comment #14 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely --- > Rainer, should we close this now? I'd rather keep it open or mark it suspended as a reminder. Rainer

[Bug sanitizer/64265] [5 Regression] r217669 broke tsan

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64265 --- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Dec 15 09:46:21 2014 New Revision: 218735 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218735&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR sanitizer/64265 * tsan.c (instrument_func_entry): Insert __tsa

[Bug sanitizer/64265] [5 Regression] r217669 broke tsan

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64265 --- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Dec 15 09:50:11 2014 New Revision: 218736 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218736&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR sanitizer/64265 * tsan.c (instrument_func_entry): Insert __tsa

[Bug ipa/64307] [5 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: invalid argument to gimple call with -fPIC -fipa-icf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64307 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/63259] Detecting byteswap sequence

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63259 --- Comment #10 from thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #9) > (In reply to thopre01 from comment #7) > > > > Strange, could you show the output of -fdump-tree-bswap? > > Not so strange at all. What is strange i

[Bug tree-optimization/64308] Missed optimization: 64-bit divide used when 32-bit divide would work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64308 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse --- You would need symbolic ranges, b and ret are in [0,m-1]. And then you are using that very specific x86 instruction that divides 64 bits by 32 bits but only works if the result fits in 32 bits. It works here be

[Bug fortran/63674] [F03] procedure pointer and non/pure procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63674 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Mon Dec 15 10:34:46 2014 New Revision: 218738 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218738&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-12-15 Janus Weil PR fortran/63674 * resolve.c (

[Bug middle-end/58624] gcc internal compiler error: Segmentaion fault in insert_to_assembler_name_hash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58624 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Dec 15 10:36:16 2014 New Revision: 218739 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218739&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/58624 Backported from mainline 2014-03-07 Jaso

[Bug tree-optimization/63551] [4.9/5 Regression] wrong code (segfaults) at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63551 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Dec 15 10:44:53 2014 New Revision: 218740 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218740&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/63551 * gcc.dg/ipa/pr63551.c (fn2): Use 4294

[Bug libgcc/63832] [5.0 Regression] crtstuff.c:400:19: warning: array subscript is above array bounds [-Warray-bounds]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63832 --- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak --- I'm testing following patch: --cut here-- Index: crtstuff.c === --- crtstuff.c (revision 218733) +++ crtstuff.c (working copy) @@ -393,13 +393,

[Bug middle-end/58624] gcc internal compiler error: Segmentaion fault in insert_to_assembler_name_hash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58624 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Dec 15 10:47:14 2014 New Revision: 218741 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218741&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/58624 Backported from mainline 2014-03-07 Jaso

[Bug c++/61189] ICE with __builtin_return_address() in noexcept lambda on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61189 Ville Voutilainen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/64210] [5 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-(vmovdqa64|vpbroadcastd)-1.c ... with -fpic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64210 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Dec 15 10:50:52 2014 New Revision: 218743 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218743&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/64210 * gcc.target/i386/avx512f-broadcast-gpr-1.c: Use %

[Bug target/64210] [5 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-(vmovdqa64|vpbroadcastd)-1.c ... with -fpic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64210 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/61261] [OOP] Segfault on source-allocating polymorphic variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61261 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 fr

[Bug target/64310] libgcc2.c:2051:1: internal compiler error: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:3383

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64310 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de --- C

[Bug middle-end/64309] if (1 & (1 << n)) not simplified to if (n == 0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64309 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/64290] [F03] No finalization at deallocation of LHS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64290 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|

[Bug fortran/37336] [F03] Finish derived-type finalization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336 --- Comment #28 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #27) > Currently missing are: > > a) Finalization of the LHS during intrinsic assignment: aka PR 64290

[Bug middle-end/64292] [5.0 regression] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr60474.C -O1 (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64292 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Mon Dec 15 12:15:14 2014 New Revision: 218745 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218745&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/64292 * fold-const.c (negate_expr_p): Add INTEGRA

[Bug middle-end/64292] [5.0 regression] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr60474.C -O1 (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64292 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/64246] [5 Regression] ICE building libada for Windows due to NULL loop header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64246 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/64246] [5 Regression] ICE building libada for Windows due to NULL loop header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64246 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Dec 15 12:20:10 2014 New Revision: 218746 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218746&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-12-15 Richard Biener PR middle-end/64246 * cfgloop.c

[Bug tree-optimization/64312] [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64312 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0

[Bug tree-optimization/64295] [5 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV (infinite recursion) with -frounding-math -funsafe-math-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64295 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/64295] [5 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV (infinite recursion) with -frounding-math -funsafe-math-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64295 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Dec 15 13:01:47 2014 New Revision: 218748 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218748&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-12-15 Richard Biener PR middle-end/64295 * match.pd (X

[Bug middle-end/64313] New: [5 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/builtin-explog-1.c fails on bare-metal targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64313 Bug ID: 64313 Summary: [5 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/builtin-explog-1.c fails on bare-metal targets Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug middle-end/64313] [5 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/builtin-explog-1.c fails on bare-metal targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64313 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/14541] [tree-ssa] built-in math functions are not fully optimized at tree level

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14541 --- Comment #24 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #23) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #22) > > (In reply to ktkachov from comment #21) > > > Created attachment 34215 [details] > > > Link errors output for aarc

[Bug middle-end/64309] if (1 & (1 << n)) not simplified to if (n == 0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64309 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug fortran/64244] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ICE at class.c:236 when using non_overridable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64244 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.6.4 Known to fail|

[Bug c++/64314] New: [5 Regression] ICE in record_reference, at cgraphbuild.c:87

(g++ (GCC) 5.0.0 20141215 (experimental) as of r218745) Results in: cc1plus: internal compiler error: in record_reference, at cgraphbuild.c:87 0x768273 record_reference ../../gcc/gcc/cgraphbuild.c:87 0xc2dda3 walk_tree_1(tree_node**, tree_node* (*)(tree_node**, int*, void*), void*, hash_set

[Bug middle-end/64313] [5 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/builtin-explog-1.c fails on bare-metal targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64313 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug ipa/64314] [5 Regression] ICE in record_reference, at cgraphbuild.c:87

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64314 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 CC|

[Bug libstdc++/64315] New: num_put misbehaves if the C library doesn't support floats

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64315 Bug ID: 64315 Summary: num_put misbehaves if the C library doesn't support floats Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug libstdc++/64315] num_put misbehaves if the C library doesn't support floats

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64315 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/64244] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ICE at class.c:236 when using non_overridable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64244 --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1) > Likely r181107 for pr50919. Yes, this commit (authored by myself) is definitely the culprit here. The nontriviality in the given test case is t

[Bug c++/58796] throw nullptr not caught by catch(type*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58796 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- However with that patch the caught pointer is not null, so it's not right.

[Bug tree-optimization/64312] [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64312 --- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Created attachment 34283 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34283&action=edit reduced testcase markus@x4 tmp % g++ -w -O2 -std=c++11 type_erased_mix_values.ii type_erased_mix_values.i

[Bug tree-optimization/64312] [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64312 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/61524] [5 Regression] cgraph visibility aix bootstrap failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61524 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/58192] G++ emits incorrect code when passing enum classes as function parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58192 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added CC|uros at gcc dot gnu.org|hjl.tools at gmail dot com,

[Bug tree-optimization/64312] [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64312 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug rtl-optimization/64316] New: [5 Regression] ICE in simplify_const_unary_operation after r218503

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64316 Bug ID: 64316 Summary: [5 Regression] ICE in simplify_const_unary_operation after r218503 Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/64312] [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64312 --- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Started with r218515.

[Bug c++/58192] G++ emits incorrect code when passing enum classes as function parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58192 --- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #11) > Does this still fail after r218720, AKA [1]? > > [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-12/msg01183.html I think it is a dup of PR64037.

[Bug target/63594] [5 Regression] ICE: in ix86_vector_duplicate_value, at config/i386/i386.c:39831 with -mavx512f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63594 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/64317] New: [5 Regression] Ineffective allocation of PIC base register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64317 Bug ID: 64317 Summary: [5 Regression] Ineffective allocation of PIC base register Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug rtl-optimization/64317] [5 Regression] Ineffective allocation of PIC base register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64317 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Target Milestone|

[Bug rtl-optimization/64316] [5 Regression] ICE in simplify_const_unary_operation after r218503

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64316 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0

[Bug c++/54890] [DR 1982] Incorrect SFINAE Rejection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54890 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/60511] [C++1y][N3652] Missing extended constexpr function support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60511 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/64316] [5 Regression] ICE in simplify_const_unary_operation after r218503

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64316 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/64244] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ICE at class.c:236 when using non_overridable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64244 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|un

[Bug rtl-optimization/64316] [5 Regression] ICE in simplify_const_unary_operation after r218503

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64316 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug target/64231] [5 Regression] SIGSEGV building glibc on aarch64-linux-gnu from r217852

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64231 --- Comment #8 from Tejas Belagod --- Hi Sandra, I'm unable to reproduce this SEGV with a x-build of aarch64-linux-gcc/native gcc with -O2 on the attached prepocessed test case. Are there any other options I'm missing?

[Bug fortran/64244] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ICE at class.c:236 when using non_overridable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64244 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #4) > Here is a draft patch which does this (making the ICE disappear): Regtests cleanly.

[Bug c++/64297] [5 Regression] ICE: canonical types differ for identical types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64297 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/58192] G++ emits incorrect code when passing enum classes as function parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58192 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/64037] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Miscompilation with -Os and enum class : char parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64037 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||temporal at gmail dot com --- Comment #26 from

[Bug fortran/63727] [F03] Checks missing for proc-pointer components: Usage as actual argument when elemental

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63727 --- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Mon Dec 15 16:10:50 2014 New Revision: 218751 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218751&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-12-15 Janus Weil PR fortran/63727 * resolve.c (

[Bug fortran/63727] [F03] Checks missing for proc-pointer components: Usage as actual argument when elemental

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63727 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug c++/58882] ICE with invalid C99 style designated initializers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58882 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Dec 15 16:16:29 2014 New Revision: 218752 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218752&root=gcc&view=rev Log: /cp 2014-12-15 Paolo Carlini PR c++/58882 * decl.c

[Bug c++/58882] ICE with invalid C99 style designated initializers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58882 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/63313] [5 Regression] ICE in ipa-comdats.c:371

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63313 --- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop --- Confirmed: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218640&root=gcc&view=rev has fixed the bug that I was seeing.

[Bug ipa/64314] [5 Regression] ICE in record_reference, at cgraphbuild.c:87

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64314 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/63889] [5 Regression] Ice with redundant static in class scope constexpr variable template.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63889 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/64149] -mno-lra bitrots, suggest to remove for GCC 5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64149 --- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw --- Sounds sensible to me. We switched to LRA quite late in gcc-4.9, so keeping a way to switch back in case of problems was pragmatic. But we've been running with the new code now for a year and not encou

[Bug libgcc/56846] _Unwind_Backtrace on ARM and noexcept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56846 thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug go/61253] gccgo: spurious "error: expected '<-' or '='" [GoSmith]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61253 --- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Mon Dec 15 17:12:26 2014 New Revision: 218753 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218753&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR go/61253 compiler: Support RecvStmt = ExpressionList "=" Rec

[Bug ipa/64218] [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (symtab_node::get_alias_target()) running Boost testsuite

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64218 --- Comment #8 from Antony Polukhin --- A few more observations: * Same Boost test compiles and works well on -mcpu=power8 with -fno-rtti * Test fails to compile on -mcpu=power8 *WITH RTTI on*: 0x109ccb0b crash_signal ?../../gcc/gcc/toplev.c:358

[Bug go/61248] gccgo: spurious "error: too many arguments" [GoSmith]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61248 --- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Mon Dec 15 17:33:43 2014 New Revision: 218754 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218754&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR go/61248 compiler: Ignore argument when typechecking convert

[Bug target/61360] [5 Regression] ICE: in lra_update_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:1363 with -mtune=bdver4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61360 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #16

[Bug c++/64297] [5 Regression] ICE: canonical types differ for identical types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64297 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse --- struct A { typedef int X; template X m_fn1() const; }; template struct is_function {}; is_function i; struct D { template > D(Y); } b(&A::m_fn1<0>);

  1   2   >