[Bug target/62231] Exception handling broken on powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62231 --- Comment #2 from manfred.rudigier at omicron dot at --- I've built 4.9.2 today and can also confirm that it is working with this version, so it seems the bug has already been fixed in newer GCC versions.

[Bug ipa/63470] [5 Regression] internal compiler error: in estimate_edge_growth, at ipa-inline.h:308

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63470 Joost VandeVondele changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/57353] unrecognizable insn in decLibrary.c, ICE in extract_insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57353 --- Comment #2 from Roland Stigge --- Yes, me neither. Consider it gone. Thanks!

[Bug middle-end/63994] Ada bootstrap fails with -fcheck-pointer-bounds -mmpx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63994 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 26 Nov 2014, enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63994 > > --- Comment #5 from Ilya Enkovich --- > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from com

[Bug tree-optimization/61634] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ICE in in vect_get_vec_def_for_operand, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1423

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61634 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Nov 27 09:33:32 2014 New Revision: 218113 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218113&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-11-27 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/61634 * tree

[Bug target/62173] [5.0 regression] [AArch64] Can't ivopt array base address while ARM can

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62173 Jiong Wang changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Depends

[Bug tree-optimization/61634] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in in vect_get_vec_def_for_operand, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1423

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61634 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||5.0 Summary|[4.8/4.9/5 Regre

[Bug middle-end/63994] Ada bootstrap fails with -fcheck-pointer-bounds -mmpx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63994 --- Comment #7 from Ilya Enkovich --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #6) > I see. I mainly wonder because of LTO which can combine TUs from C > and Ada and because for example both Fortran and Ada define > interoperability with C.

[Bug tree-optimization/64091] [5 Regression] ICE in update_debug_stmt, at tree-ssa-tail-merge.c:1620

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64091 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- We have this debug bind statement: # DEBUG b => NULL then we iterate on its SSA_OP_USEs, but USE_FROM_PTR is a debug_expr_decl (D#1), not a ssa_name.

[Bug lto/63704] -flto internal compiler error: in mems_in_disjoint_alias_sets_p, at alias.c:398

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63704 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/63704] -flto internal compiler error: in mems_in_disjoint_alias_sets_p, at alias.c:398

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63704 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Nov 27 09:51:32 2014 New Revision: 218114 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218114&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-11-27 Richard Biener PR middle-end/63704 * alias.c (me

[Bug middle-end/64083] [5 Regression] ICE: in fix_loop_structure, at loop-init.c:252 compiling Linux Kernel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64083 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Nov 27 09:57:13 2014 New Revision: 218115 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218115&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-11-27 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/64083 * tree

[Bug middle-end/64083] [5 Regression] ICE: in fix_loop_structure, at loop-init.c:252 compiling Linux Kernel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64083 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/63671] [5 Regression] 21% tramp3d-v4 performance hit due to -fdevirtualize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63671 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/64091] [5 Regression] ICE in update_debug_stmt, at tree-ssa-tail-merge.c:1620

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64091 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|NEW

[Bug target/59593] [arm big-endian] using "ldrh" access a immediate which stored in a memory by word

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59593 --- Comment #5 from thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: thopre01 Date: Thu Nov 27 11:00:15 2014 New Revision: 218118 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218118&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-11-27 Thomas Preud'homme gcc/ PR target/5

[Bug tree-optimization/64091] [5 Regression] ICE in update_debug_stmt, at tree-ssa-tail-merge.c:1620

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64091 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Same issue on the 4.9 and 4.8 branches.

[Bug lto/64025] [5 Regression] Several testsuite execution failures with -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64025 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Nov 27 11:02:02 2014 New Revision: 218119 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218119&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR lto/64025 * alias.c (find_base_term): Use std::swap. Prefer tm

[Bug tree-optimization/64024] [5 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-simd-clone-6.c ICEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64024 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Nov 27 11:03:12 2014 New Revision: 218120 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218120&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/64024 * tree-vectorizer.h (struct _stmt_vec_

[Bug middle-end/64067] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ICE in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:10540, involving compound literal shenanigans

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64067 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Nov 27 11:04:16 2014 New Revision: 218121 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218121&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/64067 * expr.c (expand_expr_addr_expr_1) : Handl

[Bug target/64093] New: [5 Regression] ICE error: unrecognizable insn with -mcpu=cell

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64093 Bug ID: 64093 Summary: [5 Regression] ICE error: unrecognizable insn with -mcpu=cell Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug target/64093] [5 Regression] ICE error: unrecognizable insn with -mcpu=cell

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64093 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Try this patch: Index: rs6000.md === --- rs6000.md(revision 218072) +++ rs6000.md(working copy) @@ -2644,7 +2644,8 @@ (define_expand "an

[Bug pending/64094] New: "No such file or directory" -> "No such file"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64094 Bug ID: 64094 Summary: "No such file or directory" -> "No such file" Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: p

[Bug target/64093] [5 Regression] ICE error: unrecognizable insn with -mcpu=cell

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64093 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Try this patch: > Index: rs6000.md > === > --- rs6000.md (revision 218072) > +++ rs6000.md (

[Bug target/64093] [5 Regression] ICE error: unrecognizable insn with -mcpu=cell

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64093 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Only to hit another issue: arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c:208:1: error: unrecognizable insn: } ^ (insn 53 52 54 6 (set (reg:DI 213 [ bits ]) (and:DI (reg/v:DI 180 [ entry ]) (const_int

[Bug target/64093] [5 Regression] ICE error: unrecognizable insn with -mcpu=cell

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64093 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|UNC

[Bug middle-end/64088] [5 Regression] ICE: in fold_abs_const, at fold-const.c:15550

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64088 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug rtl-optimization/64087] [5 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in in lra_create_live_ranges, at lra-lives.c:1330

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64087 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug bootstrap/64086] [5 Regression] building patched libstdc++ on powerpc64-linux-gnu gets ICE in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:7716

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64086 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/64074] PowerPC E500: Passing of double parameters not EABI compliant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64074 Florian Miedniak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/62173] [5.0 regression] 64bit Arch can't ivopt while 32bit Arch can

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62173 --- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 27 Nov 2014, jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62173 > > Jiong Wang changed: > >What|Removed |Added >

[Bug tree-optimization/62173] [5.0 regression] 64bit Arch can't ivopt while 32bit Arch can

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62173 --- Comment #14 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 27 Nov 2014, rguenther at suse dot de wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62173 > > --- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de --- > On Thu, 27 Nov 2014, jiwang at

[Bug driver/64094] "No such file or directory" -> "No such file"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64094 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCO

[Bug c++/63904] ICE when accessing array member of constexpr struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63904 --- Comment #2 from Kai Tietz --- Author: ktietz Date: Thu Nov 27 12:56:58 2014 New Revision: 218122 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218122&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/63904 * g++.dg/cpp0x/pr63904.C: New. Added: trunk/gcc/te

[Bug c++/63904] ICE when accessing array member of constexpr struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63904 --- Comment #3 from Kai Tietz --- Author: ktietz Date: Thu Nov 27 13:02:45 2014 New Revision: 218123 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218123&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-11-27 Kai Tietz PR c++/63904 * constexpr.c (cxx_eval_vec_ini

[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 63904, which changed state. Bug 63904 Summary: ICE when accessing array member of constexpr struct https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63904 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/63904] ICE when accessing array member of constexpr struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63904 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/62173] [5.0 regression] 64bit Arch can't ivopt while 32bit Arch can

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62173 --- Comment #15 from Jiong Wang --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #14) > I'd be happy to approve such a change - maybe you can check if > it helps you and whether it passes testing and enough benchmarks? > (there is still the relate

[Bug driver/64094] "No such file or directory" -> "No such file"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64094 Harald van Dijk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||harald at gigawatt dot nl --- Comment

[Bug libgcc/56846] _Unwind_Backtrace on ARM and noexcept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56846 --- Comment #16 from thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: thopre01 Date: Thu Nov 27 13:58:35 2014 New Revision: 218126 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218126&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-11-13 Thomas Preud'homme Backport from mainl

[Bug driver/64094] "No such file or directory" -> "No such file"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64094 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- "No such file or directory" is a familiar, recognizable error message, and is automatically translated through libc. Is the required complexity for this special case really worth it?

[Bug libgcc/56846] _Unwind_Backtrace on ARM and noexcept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56846 --- Comment #17 from thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: thopre01 Date: Thu Nov 27 14:10:10 2014 New Revision: 218127 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218127&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-11-27 Thomas Preud'homme Backport from mainl

[Bug ipa/63851] [5 Regression] ipa-icf miscompiles gfortran.dg/assumed_rank_(8|9|10).f90 at -O2 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63851 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug driver/64094] "No such file or directory" -> "No such file"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64094 --- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- My preference would be a gnulib/glibc/libiberty function that all GNU utilities could use to give more precise error messages (open_strerror(int errnum, int flags)?). Then, perhaps update the Coding Sta

[Bug middle-end/64088] [5 Regression] ICE: in fold_abs_const, at fold-const.c:15550

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64088 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Nov 27 14:22:29 2014 New Revision: 218128 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218128&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-11-27 Richard Biener PR middle-end/64088 * fold-const.

[Bug middle-end/64088] [5 Regression] ICE: in fold_abs_const, at fold-const.c:15550

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64088 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/64091] [5 Regression] ICE in update_debug_stmt, at tree-ssa-tail-merge.c:1620

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64091 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/63424] [4.9 regression] Octave -O3 build: internal compiler error: in prepare_cmp_insn, at optabs.c:4237

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63424 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/63634] Compiler generated R_AARCH64_TLSLE_ADD_TPREL_HI12/LO12 pair overflowed by large TP offset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63634 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/62178] [5.0 regression] [AArch64] Performance regression on matrix matrix multiply due to r211211

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62178 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/64009] ICE when compiling pr48335-2.c with armeb-linux-gnueabi-gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64009 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Sta

[Bug target/64011] Fail to compile pr48335-2.c on big-endian aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64011 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Sta

[Bug c++/64095] New: [C++14] Ellipsis at end of generic lambda parameter-declaration-clause should be parsed as a parameter pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64095 Bug ID: 64095 Summary: [C++14] Ellipsis at end of generic lambda parameter-declaration-clause should be parsed as a parameter pack Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1

[Bug bootstrap/63573] [5 Regression] libgo: ICE building libgo on powerpc-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63573 --- Comment #25 from Martin Liška --- There's updated version of Honza's patch that fixes testcase instroduced in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63573#c23: diff --git a/gcc/tree-inline.c b/gcc/tree-inline.c index d4864ae..0036f15 1

[Bug bootstrap/64086] [5 Regression] building patched libstdc++ on powerpc64-linux-gnu gets ICE in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:7716

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64086 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/63573] [5 Regression] libgo: ICE building libgo on powerpc-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63573 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #26 f

[Bug bootstrap/63573] [5 Regression] libgo: ICE building libgo on powerpc-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63573 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug ipa/63814] [5 Regression] g++.dg/ipa/pr61160-1.C fails with -m32 -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63814 --- Comment #26 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I proposed a fix on the mailing list: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg02832.html I have this patch in my working tree as well as the patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2

[Bug libstdc++/64096] New: std::list, set and map violate a rule about allocator::construct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64096 Bug ID: 64096 Summary: std::list, set and map violate a rule about allocator::construct Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/64032] [5 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c (test for warnings, line 18)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64032 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Stubbs --- When I configure for powerpc-linux-gnu, undefined-loop-2.c.003t.original contains this: if (((p != 0 ? (unsigned char) array1[i] != 0 : (unsigned char) array2[i] != 0) && i <= 4) && i <= 99) goto ; else go

[Bug target/64093] [5 Regression] ICE error: unrecognizable insn with -mcpu=cell

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64093 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug bootstrap/63573] [5 Regression] libgo: ICE building libgo on powerpc-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63573 --- Comment #28 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #25) > There's updated version of Honza's patch that fixes testcase instroduced in > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63573#c23: > > diff --git a/gcc/tre

[Bug c++/64077] dynamic_cast incorrectly rejected for private base

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64077 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler --- (In reply to Andrew Dixie from comment #2) > In p5, is "inaccessible" meant to include friendship relationships granted > by the current scope or instead use the explicit public base rules spelt out > in p8?

[Bug lto/64075] [5 Regression] ICE: in bp_pack_value, at data-streamer.h:106

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64075 Dmitry Gorbachev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/64077] dynamic_cast incorrectly rejected for private base

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64077 Andrew Dixie changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/63833] REAL_PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM is wrong for x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63833 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/63833] REAL_PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM is wrong for x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63833 --- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Thu Nov 27 21:03:32 2014 New Revision: 218132 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218132&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Use R15_REG for REAL_PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM PR target/63833

[Bug c++/64077] dynamic_cast incorrectly rejected for private base

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64077 --- Comment #5 from Daniel Krügler --- (In reply to Andrew Dixie from comment #4) > If the 'accessible' in p5 includes friendships relationships, then the > dynamic_cast should succeed. Yes, friendship relations need to be considered when access

[Bug target/63833] REAL_PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM is wrong for x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63833 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/63870] [Aarch64] [ARM] Errors in use of NEON intrinsics are reported incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63870 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNC

[Bug c++/12277] Warn on dynamic casts with known NULL results.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12277 Andrew Dixie changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gcc at dixie dot net.nz --- Comment #7 fr

[Bug c++/12277] Warn on dynamic casts with known NULL results.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12277 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Dixie --- Created attachment 34130 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34130&action=edit dynamic_cast warning

[Bug target/63842] x86-64 large PIC model may load the GOT base into the wrong register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63842 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/57249] Unrolling too late for inlining

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57249 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka --- We probably should simply move cunrolli to early passes and let it to cunroll only when size is going to decrease (i.e. when we know late cunrolli will unroll no matter on the profile).

[Bug fortran/64097] New: Bug with nested WHERE constructs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64097 Bug ID: 64097 Summary: Bug with nested WHERE constructs Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug ipa/63851] [5 Regression] ipa-icf miscompiles gfortran.dg/assumed_rank_(8|9|10).f90 at -O2 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63851 --- Comment #4 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2) > There's a pair of functions 'g' and 'h' that are proved by IPA ICF to be > equal and thunk is created (darwin does not have alias support). If you look

[Bug other/63758] liblto_plugin.so has undefined reference to _environ on OSX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63758 --- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe --- I'm not disputing that the code is wrong… … and the change that you've put forward looks reasonable. However, I'm not finding it easy to reproduce any failure - I've got a cross from darwin12 => x86-64-linux-

[Bug middle-end/64012] GCC-4.9.2 option -fcaller-saves in -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64012 cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug libstdc++/64096] std::list, set and map violate a rule about allocator::construct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64096 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to rylai from comment #0) > As we can see, std::list implementation tries to call construct for whole > list node (U = std::_List_node), This is already fixed on the SVN trunk, which will be GCC

[Bug middle-end/64012] GCC-4.9.2 option -fcaller-saves in -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64012 Airbak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug c++/64092] when explicit uing synthesized move operation（constructorand assignment operator），synthesize move constructor by calling member‘s copy constructor。

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64092 xbguo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgomp/42616] OMP'ed loop inside pthread leads to crash.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42616 java4ada at yahoo dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||java4ada at yahoo dot com ---

[Bug libstdc++/63497] std::regex can't handle [^class] correctly and cause runtime crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63497 --- Comment #8 from Tim Shen --- Author: timshen Date: Fri Nov 28 06:50:34 2014 New Revision: 218138 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218138&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/63497 include/bits/regex_executor.tcc (_Executor::_M_dfs