Questions not related to GCC should be written to gcc-help@ - and not to
gcc-bugs@. While bugs should be submitted via Bugzilla.
emailstorbala wrote:
double num = 23e45;
buffer = new char[sizeof(double) + 1];
Here you allocate 9 bytes.
sprintf(buffer, "%lf",
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60703
Bug ID: 60703
Summary: System.Address not preelaborable on MIPS
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60677
--- Comment #6 from Mikael Morin ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> Fixed on the trunk. From the referenced PR, seems like this bug now exists
> also on 4.7/4.8.
Yes, I'm going to fix 4.8 and 4.7 as well.
Thanks for reminding me.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60687
--- Comment #3 from Frank Bergemann ---
Hi Yury,
ok - thanks!
I didn't know, that the default is that high (#1024 for c++11).
So you can close it RESOLVED/WORKSFORME or INVALID.
- many thanks!
best regards,
Frank
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53090
bin.cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker.cheng at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60677
--- Comment #7 from Mikael Morin ---
Author: mikael
Date: Sat Mar 29 11:07:57 2014
New Revision: 208932
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208932&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
fortran/
PR fortran/60677
* trans-intrinsic.c (gfc_conv_intrinsic_ic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60704
Bug ID: 60704
Summary: ICE: in extract_constrain_insn_cached, at recog.c:2156
with -flive-range-shrinkage -march=amdfam10
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60648
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Mar 29 11:10:25 2014
New Revision: 208933
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208933&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/60648
* g++.dg/pr60648.C: Move test to...
* g++.dg/tor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60704
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60522
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Mar 29 11:51:17 2014
New Revision: 208934
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208934&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-04-29 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/60522
* frontend-passes.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60522
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60677
--- Comment #8 from Mikael Morin ---
Author: mikael
Date: Sat Mar 29 12:14:41 2014
New Revision: 208935
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208935&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
fortran/
PR fortran/60677
* trans-intrinsic.c (gfc_conv_intrinsic_ic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60677
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60705
Bug ID: 60705
Summary: alias template member access ignored
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60705
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #59 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Created attachment 32485
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32485&action=edit
Patch for gfortran.dg/fmt_en.f90
Could you test the attached patch?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60576
--- Comment #15 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Reduced test case failing on x86_64-apple-darwin13 r208927 with -m64 (4.9.0 and
4.8.3, it succeeds with -m32 as well as the original test).
[Book15] f90/bug% cat assumed_rank_7_red.f90
implicit none
t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #204 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Here is a comparison of libxul sizes (in bytes, unstripped) for different
compiler options:
gcc (trunk):
-O3 90213016
-O3 -flto 79682648
-O3 -flto / PGO 77250512
-Os 7043
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58197
--- Comment #2 from Winfried Magerl ---
the bug is already fixed in current gcc-4.8-branch and in TRUNK.
gcc-4.8-branch/contrib/ChangeLog:
---
2013-10-21 Mike Stump
* gcc_update (configure): Update to handle svn 1.8.1.
---
gcc-4.9-b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #60 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 29-Mar-14, at 12:12 PM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> Could you test the attached patch?
Test no longer fails on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11:
Unsupported rounding for real(4)
Unsupported rou
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58197
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60626
--- Comment #1 from Adam Butcher ---
Author: abutcher
Date: Sat Mar 29 19:23:44 2014
New Revision: 208940
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208940&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR c++/60626
PR c++/60626
* parser.c (cp_parser_init_declarat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60626
Adam Butcher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60706
Bug ID: 60706
Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/size_kind_2.f90 -O scan-tree-dump
original "var2 = 42949673 00;"
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60707
Bug ID: 60707
Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr45636.f90 -O
scan-tree-dump-times forwprop2 "memset" 0
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60127
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #61 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Test no longer fails on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11:
>
> Unsupported rounding for real(4)
> Unsupported rounding for real(8)
> Unsupported rounding for real(16)
>0 0 0
> PAS
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #62 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 29-Mar-14, at 7:30 PM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
>
> --- Comment #61 from Dominique d'Humieres ens.fr> ---
>> Test no longer fails
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60127
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #2)
> Am I overlooking something basic here?
a) You also can have
DO CONCURRENT(i=1:5, j=1:5)
but your code only handles one variable (by looking at the wrong variabl
29 matches
Mail list logo
