http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60032
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60027
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60055
Bug ID: 60055
Summary: Invalid binding of __tsan_default_options
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitize
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59598
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60055
--- Comment #1 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 32034
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32034&action=edit
Proposed patch
Attached patch seems to fix the bug.
$ readelf -s ~/gcc-master-install/lib64/libtsan.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57350
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59261
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2014-02/msg00179.html
No regressions and the testcase works now.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59603
Jörg Richter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joerg.rich...@pdv-fs.de
--- Comment #2 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60055
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Shouldn't __tsan::OnFinalize also have SANITIZER_INTERFACE_ATTRIBUTE ?
__tsan::OnReport does have it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60055
Dmitry Vyukov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dvyukov at google dot com
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60043
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 4 Feb 2014, abel at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60043
>
> Andrey Belevantsev changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60043
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59788
--- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Tue Feb 4 09:31:38 2014
New Revision: 207454
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207454&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Ensure libgcc_s unwinder is always used on 64-bit Solaris 10+/x86 (PR
target/5978
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59788
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60012
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59261
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 4 09:36:18 2014
New Revision: 207456
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207456&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/59261
* expmed.c (expand_mult): For MODE_VECTOR_INT mu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60043
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> Hmm, oops. The testcase has a true dependence ... ;) Still, isn't the
> code in sched_analyze_2 wrong? Or are pending_mems all before 't'?
Yes (to second
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 60012, which changed state.
Bug 60012 Summary: Vectorizer generates unnecessary loop versioning for alias
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60012
What|Removed |Added
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60012
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Feb 4 09:34:58 2014
New Revision: 207455
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207455&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-04 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/60012
* tree-v
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59261
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58028
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
That's good news!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60006
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Created attachment 32035
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32035&action=edit
Assembly file for fib_no_return.c at r207381
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60006
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Created attachment 32036
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32036&action=edit
Assembly file for fib_no_return.c at r207382
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60051
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60026
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
You could also check gimple_vop (fn) == NULL_TREE (not in virtual SSA form,
we probably should have a better way to query that). But indeed guarding
this for -O0 is better.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60051
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60046
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57499
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60055
--- Comment #4 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
(In reply to Dmitry Vyukov from comment #3)
> Hi,
>
> Does this work for you
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=200747
> ?
>
> These callbacks are intended for very specific usage
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60056
Bug ID: 60056
Summary: [C++11] ICE in var_defined_without_dynamic_init, at
cp/decl2.c:2876 with TLS static
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60055
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 4 10:46:22 2014
New Revision: 207459
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207459&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/60055
* tsan/tsan_flags.cc (__tsan_default_options): Ad
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60003
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60006
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60036
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60057
Bug ID: 60057
Summary: bind(C): multi-dimensional arrays have incompatible
types
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic, lto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60046
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54852
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60057
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54852
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic, lto
Status|WAITI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56885
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abel at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60032
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|amodra at gcc do
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57915
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 4 12:14:52 2014
New Revision: 207460
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207460&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/57915
* recog.c (simplify_while_replacing): If
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60036
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58712
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 4 12:19:32 2014
New Revision: 207461
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207461&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR other/58712
* omp-low.c (simd_clone_struct_copy): If from->inbra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60032
--- Comment #3 from Alan Modra ---
No, not quite. SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED_MODE looks to be required by lra, so
make rs6000_secondary_memory_needed_mode depend on lra_in_progress.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58712
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 4 12:31:30 2014
New Revision: 207462
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207462&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR other/58712
* omp-low.c (simd_clone_struct_copy): If from->inbra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57499
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57915
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60058
Bug ID: 60058
Summary: [4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation
fault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60026
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 4 13:04:37 2014
New Revision: 207463
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207463&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/60026
* tree-inline.c (copy_forbidden): Fail for
__attri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60026
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60023
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 4 13:08:00 2014
New Revision: 207464
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207464&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/60023
* tree-if-conv.c (predicate_mem_writes):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60023
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59603
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60058
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Looks like an "if (target)" wrapper like in the other hunk of r207447 is
necessary.
diff --git a/gcc/ipa-cp.c b/gcc/ipa-cp.c
index 68afeb0d89e4..dab9e8a0f80d 100644
--- a/gcc/ipa-cp.c
+++ b/gcc/ipa-cp.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60042
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Bah, and with -fipa-pta -Ofast -fwhole-program we now _do_ see that there
isn't any aliasing but PRE messes up the loop and creates loop carried
dependencies ... :/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60042
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> Bah, and with -fipa-pta -Ofast -fwhole-program we now _do_ see that there
> isn't any aliasing but PRE messes up the loop and creates loop carried
> dependencies
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60002
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 4 13:38:13 2014
New Revision: 207465
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207465&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/60002
* cgraphclones.c (build_function_decl_ski
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60002
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57033
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60058
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56885
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu ---
On trunk, it was fixed by r206938.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60042
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59723
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Feb 4 14:53:24 2014
New Revision: 207471
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207471&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-04 Richard Biener
PR lto/59723
* lto-streamer-out.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60042
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #32038|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59723
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56885
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to wo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55960
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55960
--- Comment #6 from Sergio Losilla ---
Well, a very similar case, with a non-abstract type throws an ICE with gfortran
4.8.1:
module Foo_class
type :: Foo
integer :: n
contains
procedure :: n2 => Foo_n2
procedure
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55960
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Sergio Losilla from comment #6)
> Well, a very similar case, with a non-abstract type throws an ICE with
> gfortran 4.8.1:
Right. This comes from mio_expr and seems to be similar or ide
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60059
Bug ID: 60059
Summary: Error when building gcc-4.8.2 together with binutils
2.24
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60042
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60017
--- Comment #5 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Feb 4 16:43:00 2014
New Revision: 207475
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207475&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2014-02-02 Uros Bizjak
PR tar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60017
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60058
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
Ah yes, if the method can not be referred, we need to check that target is
non-NULL.
I reorganized the code one too man times. I will double check it is what
happens in your testcase.
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55260
--- Comment #13 from Martin Jambor ---
Fix to this second issue (which is indeed very similar to the initial
one) has been sent to the mailing list:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-02/msg00201.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60017
--- Comment #6 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Feb 4 16:46:06 2014
New Revision: 207476
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207476&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2014-02-02 Uros Bizjak
PR tar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60058
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60013
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Slightly more reduced testcase for -O2:
typedef long int jmp_buf[64];
extern int _setjmp (jmp_buf) __attribute__ ((__nothrow__));
struct S { int a, b, c; };
extern struct S *baz (struct S *);
static jmp_buf j
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60058
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Tue Feb 4 17:25:38 2014
New Revision: 207478
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207478&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/60058
* ipa-cp.c (ipa_get_indirect_edge_target_1): Check tha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60060
Bug ID: 60060
Summary: [4.9 Rgression] lto1: internal compiler error: in
add_AT_specification, at dwarf2out.c:4096
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60036
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Feb 4 18:05:29 2014
New Revision: 207481
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207481&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/60036
c-family/
* c-common.c (conversion_warning): Unwrap C_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60036
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60061
Bug ID: 60061
Summary: Different dump-ipa-cp-details without/with -flto for
gfortran.dg/pr53787.f90
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59913
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Tue Feb 4 18:56:59 2014
New Revision: 207485
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207485&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-04 Vladimir Makarov
PR bootstrap/59913
* lra-const
: ../gcc-trunk/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20140204 (experimental) [trunk revision 207452] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -m32 -O0 small.c; a.out
hello
$ gcc-trunk -m64 -O1 small.c; a.out
hello
$ gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60062
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60063
Bug ID: 60063
Summary: -Wunused-local-typedefs warning despite attribute used
in a template
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60062
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
What I'm seeing is that this was fine in r202186, then started ICEing in
r202187 [*], then r202661 turned it into wrong-code issue.
[*]
/home/polacek/p.c:17:1: error: inlined_to pointer is set but no predeces
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60064
Bug ID: 60064
Summary: [c++1y] ICE with auto as parameter of friend function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60065
Bug ID: 60065
Summary: [c++1y] ICE with auto parameter pack
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60066
Bug ID: 60066
Summary: Bad elemental invocation of non-scalar base object
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60066
--- Comment #2 from Fran Martinez Fadrique ---
Created attachment 32042
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32042&action=edit
Main program
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60066
--- Comment #1 from Fran Martinez Fadrique ---
Created attachment 32041
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32041&action=edit
Core type containing the elemental subroutine
--- Comment #5 from Paul Pluzhnikov ---
gcc.target/i386/pr35767-5.c is failing for me in both -m32 and -m64 mode on
trunk: xgcc (GCC) 4.9.0 20140204 (experimental)
The assembly produced:
test:
subq$24, %rsp
movaps .LC0(%rip), %xmm0
movups %xmm0, (%rsp)
movaps %xmm0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60013
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ok, here is what happens on the reduced testcase. We have 9 dynamic conditions
and 14 basic blocks. Let's use letters for the dynamic conditions:
A (op1[ref offset: 0] == 0)
B (op1[ref offset: 0] != 0)
C (o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60066
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60067
Bug ID: 60067
Summary: bogus error default template arguments may not be used
in function templates
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60013
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Important thing I forgot to mention is the order or predecessors, bb10 has
first bb9 and then bb11, bb11 has first bb4, then bb12, then bb5, bb6, bb8.
The oscillation is there really just because of the firs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59913
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
