http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
--- Comment #51 from GoWhoopee at yahoo dot com ---
http://web.cs.dal.ca/~vlado/pl/C_Standard_2011-n1570.pdf
That's the principle, but not what happens with gcc...
Phase 2 says, "Each instance of a backslash character (\) immediately followed
by a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59450
--- Comment #5 from b...@miller-mohr.de ---
(In reply to janus from comment #4)
> (In reply to janus from comment #2)
> > Draft patch which fixes the error (not regtested):
>
> Does regtest cleanly.
Hi,
just wanted to say thanks. Your speed is t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57897
--- Comment #10 from Rainer Emrich ---
Am 12.12.2013 23:08, schrieb ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57897
>
> --- Comment #9 from Kai Tietz --- By following
> patch for me the issue is solved:
>
> Index:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59350
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59350
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|ebotcazou at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34723
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57897
--- Comment #11 from Kai Tietz ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Fri Dec 13 09:24:16 2013
New Revision: 205957
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205957&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/57897
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_option_override_internal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57897
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59487
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |4.9.0
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59487
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||58721
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59436
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59491
Bug ID: 59491
Summary: compiler can't detect if xpression is always fixed
value
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59419
--- Comment #4 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Indeed I suspect we have many cases in the IO library where stuff fails, leaks
memory, or leaves stuff in an inconsistent state when IOSTAT= is present.
I think that we should modify generate_error() to no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39838
bin.cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker.cheng at gmail dot com
--- Comment #15
/gcc-snapshot-20131213/build/./gcc/xgcc
-shared-libgcc -B/scratch/packages/gcc/snap/gcc-snapshot-20131213/build/./gcc
-nostdinc++
-L/scratch/packages/gcc/snap/gcc-snapshot-20131213/build/x86_64-linux-gnu/x32/libstdc++-v3/src
-L/scratch/packages/gcc/snap/gcc-snapshot-20131213/build/x86_64-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
--- Comment #52 from GoWhoopee at yahoo dot com ---
Whitespace is required by Translation Phase 3, consequently Translation Phase 1
should not be changing whitespace at all, only mapping multibyte characters and
trigraphs.
Comment #39: Indicates th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59471
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59473
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59469
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59477
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59479
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39838
--- Comment #16 from bin.cheng ---
For optimization level O2, the dump before IVOPT is like:
:
_21 = p_6(D)->count;
if (_21 > 0)
goto ;
else
goto ;
:
:
# i_26 = PHI
if (count_8(D) > 0)
goto ;
else
goto ;
:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54742
--- Comment #33 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Igor Zamyatin from comment #31)
> The problem is that there is a performance regression on i686 for Coremark
> test
If you can reproduce a testcase please file a new bug for this issue.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59490
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59491
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Severity|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59492
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59479
--- Comment #2 from bin.cheng ---
I will investigate it later. Just clarifying, the function is called three
times by the caller, it would increase code size usually.
BTW, could you explain a little about "2nd-order effect"? I am not familiar
w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59493
Bug ID: 59493
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault on
Class(*) pointer association with GCC 4.8.1
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59484
--- Comment #3 from Reinhold Straub ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #2)
There is obviously no bug :-)
Sorry for the noise.
And thanks for your very helpful comments!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59492
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59492
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41488
--- Comment #8 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Fri Dec 13 11:36:22 2013
New Revision: 205959
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205959&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/58296
PR tree-optimization/41488
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58296
--- Comment #1 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Fri Dec 13 11:36:22 2013
New Revision: 205959
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205959&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/58296
PR tree-optimization/41488
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58849
--- Comment #2 from otmar.struwe at web dot de ---
After updating some parts of the mingw environment (mpfr/gmp/mpc) I am not able
to reproduce the described behavior.
Now I get:
c:\temp\ccWxAggU.o:complex.c:(.text+0xef): undefined reference to `
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59492
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
GCC generates
.cfi_personality 0x9c,DW.ref.__gxx_personality_v0
.cfi_lsda 0x1c,.LLSDA3386
instead of
.cfi_personality 0x9b,DW.ref.__gxx_personality_v0
.cfi_lsda 0x1b,.LLSDA3385
Even 64-bi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59488
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59487
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> r202826 was fixed later by the fix for PR58656 (rnflow regression),
> so your bisection converged on a bogus revision.
OK! I was too focused on the -fwhole-program option. The slowdown after r202826
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59493
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59493
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #1)
> Confirmed with 4.9 and trunk.
Sorry, that was supposed to be "4.8 and trunk", obviously ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59492
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tmsriram at google dot com
--- Comment #4 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59493
--- Comment #3 from Hossein Talebi ---
Will it be fixed in gfortran 4.8 or 4.9?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59492
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
[hjl@gnu-6 gcc]$ cat /tmp/x.cc
void
__throw_runtime_error(const char*) __attribute__((__noreturn__));
unsigned int
__attribute__ ((target("rdrnd")))
__x86_rdrand(void)
{
unsigned int retries = 100;
unsigned int
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59494
Bug ID: 59494
Summary: [4.9 Regression] FAIL:
gfortran.dg/vect/fast-math-mgrid-resid.f
scan-tree-dump-times optimized "vect_[^\\n]*\\+ " 13
Product: gcc
Version: 4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59493
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59495
Bug ID: 59495
Summary: -ftrack-macro-expansion=2 ignores warnings originated
from /usr/include headers
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59477
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59487
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
"dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" wrote:
>http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59487
>
>--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres
>---
>> r202826 was fixed later by the fix for PR58656 (rnflow reg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59487
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Still the regression must appear with a different revision.
> The one you cited has nothing to do with -fwhole-program.
I see the slowdown with -fwhole-program for all the revisions I have tested
s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59495
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59492
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from H.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59494
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59484
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59492
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
A patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-12/msg01253.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59496
Bug ID: 59496
Summary: [4.9 Regression] Bootstrap fails on
powerpc-apple-darwin9 after r205685
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59496
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58944
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43751
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42632
Bug 42632 depends on bug 45685, which changed state.
Bug 45685 Summary: [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] missed conditional move opportunity
in loop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45685
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46542
Bug 46542 depends on bug 45685, which changed state.
Bug 45685 Summary: [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] missed conditional move opportunity
in loop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45685
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45685
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45685
--- Comment #27 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Fri Dec 13 16:34:39 2013
New Revision: 205963
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205963&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/45685
* tree-ssa-phiopt.c (neg_replacement): Ne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55252
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doront at mellanox dot com
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59495
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59492
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Summary|[4.9 Regression] bootstra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59451
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59149
--- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Fri Dec 13 17:50:18 2013
New Revision: 205967
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205967&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/59149
* calls.c (flags_from_decl_or_type): Fai
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59149
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59498
Bug ID: 59498
Summary: Pack expansion error in template alias
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59499
Bug ID: 59499
Summary: Probably optimization error
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assign
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59477
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Reload pass gives
b.i: In function ‘void test1(_Bit_iterator)’:
b.i:90:1: error: unable to find a register to spill in class ‘CREG’
}
^
b.i:90:1: error: this is the insn:
(insn 29 43 30 2 (parallel [
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59500
Bug ID: 59500
Summary: Bogus maybe-unintialized warning due to optimizations
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58113
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58015
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ---
Why not just adapt the existing implementation of nextafterf to long double?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59313
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59501
Bug ID: 59501
Summary: Vector Gather with GCC 4.9 2013-12-08 Snapshot
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tre
gnu/4.9.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-trunk/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc-trunk
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --disable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20131213 (experimental) (GCC)
$ gfortran test.F90 -o test.o -c
f951: internal compiler er
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59503
Bug ID: 59503
Summary: Bogus integer-overflow error with long long with -m32
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59503
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59504
Bug ID: 59504
Summary: "Internal compiler error: segmentation fault" in GCC
4.8.1 with -fprofile-use
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59504
Collin Baker changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chbaker0 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59505
Bug ID: 59505
Summary: gcc-4.9.0-20131208 can't link glsl_compiler with
-flto=4 in -m32 where gcc-4.8.2 works fine
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59505
--- Comment #2 from David Kredba ---
Created attachment 31433
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31433&action=edit
gcc-4.8.2-64bit-build.log gzipped
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59505
--- Comment #3 from David Kredba ---
Created attachment 31434
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31434&action=edit
gcc-4.8.2-32bit-build.log gzipped
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59505
--- Comment #1 from David Kredba ---
Created attachment 31432
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31432&action=edit
gcc-4.8.2-32bit-config.log gzipped
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59505
--- Comment #5 from David Kredba ---
Created attachment 31436
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31436&action=edit
32bit-config.log gzipped
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59505
--- Comment #4 from David Kredba ---
Created attachment 31435
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31435&action=edit
Build.log gzipped
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57709
--- Comment #11 from Jan Kratochvil ---
Similar inappropriate warning is generated for typedef-vs-variable as reported
now by Adam Jackson. Again a mistaken use cannot harm as it causes other
errors. And clang also does not warn on it.
int main
87 matches
Mail list logo
