http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58978
octoploid at yandex dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58718
--- Comment #5 from Yury Gribov ---
(In reply to Alexey Samsonov from comment #2)
> I've already fixed the problem with crashes caused by small
> "malloc_context_size" values. I think you should wait till the ASan runtime
> will be merged from LLV
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58970
--- Comment #23 from Bernd Edlinger ---
hmm...
all examples I can see, where bitpos is negative,
or less than the representative's bitoffset with offset=NULL,
are just blandtly invalid.
The only valid example would be
struct S { unsigned char s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58853
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
+1, x86 RTEMS build is broken without this fix. RTEMS uses -march=pentiumpro in
its default multilib configuration.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58999
Bug ID: 58999
Summary: sizeof ...(T) is very slow than clang
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58999
khurshid changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://stackoverflow.com/qu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59000
Bug ID: 59000
Summary: lto can't merge user-defined weak builtin functions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58853
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka ---
Right now I am preparing a short conference, but I will try to look into it
tonight.
The way it was supposed to work is that the misaligned move prologues should be
disabled
for pentiumpro target. I wonder why
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59000
--- Comment #1 from ma.jiang at zte dot com.cn ---
Created attachment 31157
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31157&action=edit
second source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57554
Igor Zamyatin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58997
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58997
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rakdver at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Miles
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59001
Bug ID: 59001
Summary: Use of -pedantic throws errors instead of warnings
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58988
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Fruzynski ---
gcc 4.8.2 is also affected by this bug - is works in the same way as gcc 4.7.3.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58999
--- Comment #2 from Václav Zeman ---
You should probably add the complete test case as an attachment.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59001
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59000
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58998
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58996
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58999
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58993
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Chris Studholme from comment #0)
> Sample code:
>
> class base {
> protected:
> typedef void (base::*foo_type)() const;
> void foo() const {}
> };
>
> template
> struct bar : public b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59002
Bug ID: 59002
Summary: Access checking in templates
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: meta-bug
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58868
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek ---
The issue, as I understand it, is that in check_initializer, in C++11 mode, we
enter this block
if ((type_build_ctor_call (type) || CLASS_TYPE_P (type))
&& !(flags & LOOKUP_ALREADY_DIGESTED)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58993
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Status|UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58896
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58984
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Nov 5 12:05:37 2013
New Revision: 204385
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204385&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/58984
* ipa-prop.c (ipa_load_from_parm_agg_1):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58984
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Nov 5 12:11:17 2013
New Revision: 204387
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204387&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/58984
* ipa-prop.c (ipa_load_from_parm_agg_1):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58999
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
--enable-checking=release makes quite a big difference
$ time ~/gcc/4.x/bin/g++ -std=c++11 -c t.cc -ftime-report
Execution times (seconds)
phase setup : 0.00 ( 0%) usr 0.01 ( 2%) sys 0.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58999
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini ---
Probably a meta-bug about this sort of issue would also make sense. We have got
a few bugs already.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58958
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
Author: glisse
Date: Tue Nov 5 13:01:06 2013
New Revision: 204389
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204389&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-05 Marc Glisse
PR tree-optimization/58958
gcc/
* tree-ssa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58958
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59003
Bug ID: 59003
Summary: [4.9 Regression] profiledbootstrap miscompiles gcc
during stagefeedback
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57616
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
Additionally, check whether -fsanitize=vla-bound (are there more usans?) should
be handled.
Check whether MPX bounds checking should be implemented, cf.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-10/msg02660.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59004
Bug ID: 59004
Summary: ICE generated by __func__
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58687
--- Comment #17 from Max TenEyck Woodbury ---
It might be better to put the CUR__LINE__ definition in 'internal.h' instead of
in 'cpplib.h'.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58941
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 5 13:24:13 2013
New Revision: 204391
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204391&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-05 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/58941
* tree-dfa.c (g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58941
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.0
Summary|[4.7/4.8/4.9 Re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59004
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59003
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58993
--- Comment #3 from Chris Studholme ---
Ah, thanks for the info. I thought I tried '&bar::foo' and it didn't work
without 'using base::foo'. I just tried it again and it does work (in both
cases) without the using declaration so I must have made
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58113
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58121
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59005
Bug ID: 59005
Summary: Having designated inits in C++ with -std=c++11 does
not cause any errors
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58384
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58466
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58479
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59005
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020
--- Comment #14 from fkrogh at mathalacarte dot com ---
Hi Francois-Xavier --
I'm sorry, but Richard did all the work on this, and I'm just a
sorry middle man. We are both people specializing in computational
mathematics, and thus not likel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59005
--- Comment #1 from p.micolet at gmail dot com ---
Also saw this issue using GCC 4.7.0, same target, same flags and same code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020
--- Comment #15 from fkrogh at mathalacarte dot com ---
Hi Francois-Xavier --
I'm sorry, but Richard did all the work on this, and I'm just a
sorry middle man. We are both people specializing in computational
mathematics, and thus not likely
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58981
--- Comment #8 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Nov 5 14:17:33 2013
New Revision: 204394
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204394&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Don't use mode wider than Pmode for size in movmem/setmem
gcc/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58492
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58501
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58511
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20131105 (experimental) (GCC)
regehr@regehr-M51AC:~/z/reduce/r121$ cat small.c
int a[8], b;
void fn1(void) {
int c;
for (; b; b++) {
int d = a[b];
c = a[0] ? d : 0;
a[b] = c;
}
}
regehr@regehr-M51AC:~/z/reduce/r121$ gcc -O3 small.c -c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58532
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58548
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58545
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|other |rtl-optimization
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58549
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code,
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58550
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46936
--- Comment #3 from Ondrej Bilka ---
> As per http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Function-Attributes.html, the
> annotation on the example function there "causes the compiler to check that,
> in > calls to my_memcpy, arguments dest and src are non
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58555
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58567
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58580
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58585
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58572
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58609
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58607
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58613
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58627
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Version|unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58630
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #2 from Richard Bien
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58632
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46936
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58639
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58651
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58653
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58697
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Known to fail|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58700
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58701
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code,
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58721
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Priority|P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58712
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58726
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58733
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58759
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58776
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58775
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58809
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58811
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58698
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58955
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 5 15:08:43 2013
New Revision: 204398
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204398&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-05 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/58955
* tree-l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58492
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58712
--- Comment #7 from octoploid at yandex dot com ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
> Any issues remaining?
Yes. The second one.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58555
--- Comment #6 from octoploid at yandex dot com ---
Program received signal SIGFPE, Arithmetic exception.
[Switching to process 21235]
0x0052531d in want_inline_self_recursive_call_p (edge=0x774412d8,
outer_node=0x77442260, peeling=
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58712
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58955
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58733
octoploid at yandex dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resoluti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58492
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 5 15:09:40 2013
New Revision: 204399
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204399&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-05 Richard Biener
PR ipa/58492
* passes.def (all_pass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58653
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Hmm, looks like a very old patch in my dev tree fixes this (though reverting it
doesn't make it reproduce on trunk):
Index: tree-predcom.c
===
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58724
--- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Nov 5 15:22:36 2013
New Revision: 204401
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204401&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-05 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/58724
* doc/extend.te
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
