[Bug target/56865] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-96.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "Alignment of access forced using peeling" 1

2013-10-30 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865 --- Comment #18 from Bill Schmidt --- spawn /home/wschmidt/gcc/build/gcc-mainline-test2/gcc/xgcc -B/home/wschmidt/gcc /build/gcc-mainline-test2/gcc/ /home/wschmidt/gcc/gcc-mainline-test2/gcc/testsu ite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-96.c -fno-diagnostics-show-c

[Bug preprocessor/58687] "#line __LINE__ ..." changes subsequent line numbers

2013-10-30 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58687 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/58876] No non-virtual-dtor warning in std::unique_ptr

2013-10-30 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58876 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug preprocessor/58887] Allow recursion in variadic macros?

2013-10-30 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58887 --- Comment #12 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Wed, 30 Oct 2013, mtewoodbury at gmail dot com wrote: > I think I understand consensus, but I only hear your voice here, not the voice > of a multitude. You may be part of the consensus

[Bug bootstrap/58918] [4.9 regression] cilk #includes alloc.h unconditionally, even when not present

2013-10-30 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58918 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- XALLOCA is a libiberty macro, target libraries shouldn't be using libiberty headers.

[Bug target/58847] ARM: emit NEON alignment hints for 32/16-bit accesses

2013-10-30 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58847 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug target/58423] [ARM]ICE with shrink-wrap-sibcall.c on a15/neon/hard

2013-10-30 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58423 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Stat

[Bug middle-end/56341] GCC produces unaligned data access

2013-10-30 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56341 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCO

[Bug bootstrap/58918] [4.9 regression] cilk #includes alloc.h unconditionally, even when not present

2013-10-30 Thread law at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58918 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com Assignee

[Bug libstdc++/58876] No non-virtual-dtor warning in std::unique_ptr

2013-10-30 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58876 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini --- At some point Ian Taylor filed a Bugzilla about these issues, I think it's still open. Not sure what we should do in this area...

[Bug c++/29234] Call to operator() of temporary object wrongly parsed

2013-10-30 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29234 --- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini --- Tentative patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-10/msg02536.html

[Bug preprocessor/58687] "#line __LINE__ ..." changes subsequent line numbers

2013-10-30 Thread mtewoodbury at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58687 --- Comment #11 from Max TenEyck Woodbury --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #10) > > If you are planning to do sporadic GCC development, it may be worthwhile to > ask for an account in the Compile Farm http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Comp

[Bug target/47754] [missed optimization] AVX allows unaligned memory operands but GCC uses unaligned load and register operand

2013-10-30 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47754 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Oct 30 17:59:44 2013 New Revision: 204219 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204219&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/47754 * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_avx256_split_vector_move_

[Bug libstdc++/58876] No non-virtual-dtor warning in std::unique_ptr

2013-10-30 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58876 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/58876] No non-virtual-dtor warning in std::unique_ptr

2013-10-30 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58876 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Yes, I should dig Ian's bug out and have another look. I'm planning to throw some ideas around on the mailing list ...

[Bug rtl-optimization/58295] [4.8/4.9 regression] Missed zero-extension elimination in the combiner

2013-10-30 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58295 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|ebotcazou at

[Bug c++/58914] Internal compiler error when using lambdas as default parameters in static methods

2013-10-30 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58914 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug preprocessor/58687] "#line __LINE__ ..." changes subsequent line numbers

2013-10-30 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58687 --- Comment #12 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Wed, 30 Oct 2013, mtewoodbury at gmail dot com wrote: > Thank you, I will look info all of that. My own resources have limits; when > it > comes to testing generated code on many archit

[Bug libstdc++/58912] make_shared value initializes storage space even when not desired

2013-10-30 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58912 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Oct 30 18:24:56 2013 New Revision: 204221 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204221&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-10-30 Chris Studholme PR libstdc++/58912 * include/bits/sh

[Bug libstdc++/58912] make_shared value initializes storage space even when not desired

2013-10-30 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58912 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Oct 30 18:26:53 2013 New Revision: 204222 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204222&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-10-30 Chris Studholme PR libstdc++/58912 * include/bits/sh

[Bug libstdc++/58912] make_shared value initializes storage space even when not desired

2013-10-30 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58912 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/58581] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE with no-throw specification in deleted function

2013-10-30 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58581 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/57410] [4.9 Regression] ICE: in emit_spill_move, at lra-constraints.c:863 with -fpeel-loops and uninitialised variable

2013-10-30 Thread vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57410 --- Comment #1 from Vladimir Makarov --- I can not reproduce it on today trunk. I guess it was fixed by some LRA patch but I ca not say by what patch exactly as there were too many LRA patches since May.

[Bug other/33426] Support of #pragma ivdep

2013-10-30 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33426 --- Comment #18 from Tobias Burnus --- Author: burnus Date: Wed Oct 30 18:53:42 2013 New Revision: 204223 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204223&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-10-30 Tobias Burnus gcc/cp/ PR other/33426 * cp-t

[Bug tree-optimization/58926] New: -Wstrict-overflow unwanted warning comparing variables initialized from one of static duration

2013-10-30 Thread gabe.jones at ni dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58926 Bug ID: 58926 Summary: -Wstrict-overflow unwanted warning comparing variables initialized from one of static duration Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/58927] New: Despite loop->safelen=INT_MAX / GCC ivdep: loop versioned for vectorization because of possible aliasing

2013-10-30 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58927 Bug ID: 58927 Summary: Despite loop->safelen=INT_MAX / GCC ivdep: loop versioned for vectorization because of possible aliasing Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0

[Bug preprocessor/58887] Allow recursion in variadic macros?

2013-10-30 Thread mtewoodbury at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58887 --- Comment #13 from Max TenEyck Woodbury --- (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #12) > > I was agreeing with Andrew. Jason, the other maintainer likely to review > libcpp patches, hasn't commented on this issue. (There are plen

[Bug sanitizer/57316] [4.8/4.9 regression] build failure in libsanitizer

2013-10-30 Thread skunk at iskunk dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57316 --- Comment #10 from Daniel Richard G. --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9) > What's the status of this bug? Same as I reported in comment #5---I just confirmed with a build of 4.8.2.

[Bug rtl-optimization/58369] [4.8/4.9 regression] ICE in subreg_get_info when compiling boost for m68k-linux

2013-10-30 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58369 --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Wed Oct 30 19:21:27 2013 New Revision: 204224 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204224&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/58369 * reload1.c (compute_reload_subreg_offset):

[Bug preprocessor/58687] "#line __LINE__ ..." changes subsequent line numbers

2013-10-30 Thread mtewoodbury at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58687 --- Comment #13 from Max TenEyck Woodbury --- (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #12) > On Wed, 30 Oct 2013, mtewoodbury at gmail dot com wrote: > >> Thank you, I will look info all of that. My own resources have limits; when >> i

[Bug target/58901] vax bootstrap fails on subreg reload

2013-10-30 Thread martin at netbsd dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58901 --- Comment #1 from Martin Husemann --- The real question is: why does memory_address_addr_space_p() return false for this rtx. Stepping into it results in: 0x007618be in vax_legitimate_address_p (mode=HImode, x=0x7ea0fd2c, strict=20, 5, 212

[Bug target/58762] [missed optimization] Vectorizing abs(int).

2013-10-30 Thread congh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58762 --- Comment #2 from congh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: congh Date: Wed Oct 30 20:01:47 2013 New Revision: 204229 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204229&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-10-30 Cong Hou PR target/58762 * config/i386/i386

[Bug c/58928] New: Different results from gcc when -mlzcnt is used

2013-10-30 Thread mikeb01 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58928 Bug ID: 58928 Summary: Different results from gcc when -mlzcnt is used Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c++/58929] New: condition_variable does not wait without -pthread

2013-10-30 Thread lundberj at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58929 Bug ID: 58929 Summary: condition_variable does not wait without -pthread Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug target/58901] vax bootstrap fails on subreg reload

2013-10-30 Thread martin at netbsd dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58901 --- Comment #2 from Martin Husemann --- indexable_address_p() returns false for (symbol_ref:SI ("DECPOWERS") [flags 0x40] ) because flag_pic is true and symbolic_operand (xfoo0, SImode)) returns true: /* Return true if xfoo0 and xfoo1 constitut

[Bug c/58488] -Wuninitialized is useless for a variable whose address is later taken

2013-10-30 Thread law at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58488 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

2013-10-30 Thread law at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 58488, which changed state. Bug 58488 Summary: -Wuninitialized is useless for a variable whose address is later taken http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58488 What|Removed |Add

[Bug rtl-optimization/58369] [4.8 regression] ICE in subreg_get_info when compiling boost for m68k-linux

2013-10-30 Thread mikpelinux at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58369 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.9.0 Summary|[4.8/4.9 reg

[Bug c++/58930] New: [C++11] Bogus error: converting to ... from initializer list would use explicit constructor

2013-10-30 Thread ppluzhnikov at google dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58930 Bug ID: 58930 Summary: [C++11] Bogus error: converting to ... from initializer list would use explicit constructor Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/58455] spurious "may be used uninitialized" warning with -Og

2013-10-30 Thread law at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58455 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com Blocks

[Bug c/58236] -Wuninitialized doesn't report uninitialised variable as expected

2013-10-30 Thread law at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58236 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/58183] Missing uninitialized warning

2013-10-30 Thread law at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58183 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/57156] miscompilation of call to _mm_cmpeq_epi8(a, a) or _mm_comtrue_epu8(a, a) with uninitialized a

2013-10-30 Thread law at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57156 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/58931] New: condition_variable::wait_until overflowed by large time_point

2013-10-30 Thread lundberj at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58931 Bug ID: 58931 Summary: condition_variable::wait_until overflowed by large time_point Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug bootstrap/58918] [4.9 regression] cilk #includes alloc.h unconditionally, even when not present

2013-10-30 Thread bviyer at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58918 --- Comment #4 from bviyer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: bviyer Date: Wed Oct 30 22:51:29 2013 New Revision: 204232 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204232&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix for bug Bootstrap/58918. +2013-10-30 Balaji V. Iyer + +

[Bug c++/58932] New: [4.9 Regression][C++11] Deleted functions and SFINAE in partial template specializations

2013-10-30 Thread lucdanton at free dot fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58932 Bug ID: 58932 Summary: [4.9 Regression][C++11] Deleted functions and SFINAE in partial template specializations Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED S

[Bug bootstrap/58933] New: IRA ICE in update_costs_from_allocno

2013-10-30 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58933 Bug ID: 58933 Summary: IRA ICE in update_costs_from_allocno Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap

[Bug bootstrap/58933] IRA ICE in update_costs_from_allocno

2013-10-30 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58933 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc*-*-* Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug tree-optimization/58915] [missed optimization] GCC fails to get the loop bound for some loops.

2013-10-30 Thread congh at google dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58915 --- Comment #2 from Cong Hou --- I am afraid that get_range_info () has little use here. The value range we care about may only exist under specific conditions and is hence flow sensitive. For example, we may need the value range of n in the if bo

[Bug other/58545] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] error: unable to find a register to spill in class 'POINTER_REGS'

2013-10-30 Thread amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58545 --- Comment #5 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke --- Author: amylaar Date: Wed Oct 30 23:55:46 2013 New Revision: 204234 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204234&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc: PR other/58545 * reload1.c (update_eliminabl

[Bug ada/52120] [Ada] Compiler assertion in iterator

2013-10-30 Thread nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52120 --- Comment #2 from nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr --- 4.8.2-1 produces the expected output for the last trigger gcc-4.8 -c proc.adb proc.adb:9:10: iterator is an Ada 2012 feature gnatmake: "proc.adb" compilation error

[Bug c++/43361] missing uninitialized warning without optimization (loop representation)

2013-10-30 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43361 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||noufal at nibrahim dot net.in --- C

[Bug c/58236] -Wuninitialized doesn't report uninitialised variable as expected

2013-10-30 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58236 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org Res

[Bug ada/52121] [Ada] Compiler assertion on precondition

2013-10-30 Thread nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52121 nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicolas.boulenguez at f

[Bug target/58762] [missed optimization] Vectorizing abs(int).

2013-10-30 Thread congh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58762 --- Comment #3 from congh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: congh Date: Thu Oct 31 00:50:47 2013 New Revision: 204241 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204241&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-10-30 Cong Hou Backport from mainline: 2013-10-30

[Bug middle-end/58134] [4.8/4.9 Regression] -ftree-vectorizer-verbose= shows vectorized loops only for N== 1 and N >2 but not for N==2

2013-10-30 Thread singhai at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58134 --- Comment #6 from Sharad Singhai --- Author: singhai Date: Thu Oct 31 01:01:40 2013 New Revision: 204244 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204244&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-10-30 Sharad Singhai PR middle-end/58134 * opts.c (commo

[Bug bootstrap/58933] IRA ICE in update_costs_from_allocno

2013-10-30 Thread vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58933 --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Thu Oct 31 03:14:07 2013 New Revision: 204245 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204245&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-10-30 Vladimir Makarov PR bootstrap/58933 * ira-color

[Bug rtl-optimization/58295] [4.8/4.9 regression] Missed zero-extension elimination in the combiner

2013-10-30 Thread npickito at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58295 Kito Cheng changed: What|Removed |Added CC||npickito at gmail dot com --- Comment #10 fr

[Bug rtl-optimization/58934] New: [4.9 Regression]: build fails on cris-elf in reload_cse_simplify_operands for newlib dtoa.c

2013-10-30 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58934 Bug ID: 58934 Summary: [4.9 Regression]: build fails on cris-elf in reload_cse_simplify_operands for newlib dtoa.c Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/57662] [4.9 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in code_motion_process_successors with -fschedule-insns2 -fselective-scheduling2

2013-10-30 Thread abel at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57662 --- Comment #6 from Andrey Belevantsev --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > Fixed according to > > 2013-08-14 Andrey Belevantsev > > PR rtl-optimization/57662 > * sel-sched.c (code_motion_process_successors): Whe

[Bug rtl-optimization/58295] [4.8/4.9 regression] Missed zero-extension elimination in the combiner

2013-10-30 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58295 --- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou --- > So why don't reject it at > TARGET_LEGITIMATE_COMBINED_INSN/ix86_legitimate_combined_insn > instead of limit at combine phase if it's only benefit for x86 ? The question sounds self-contradictory... Anywa

<    1   2