[Bug libgomp/58691] OpenMP 4: Surprising results with OMP_PLACES=

2013-10-12 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58691 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > Looks reasonable, bind-var default value is indeed implementation defined and > setting it to true by default if OMP_PLACES or GOMP_CPU_AFFINITY has been > parsed

[Bug libgomp/58691] OpenMP 4: Surprising results with OMP_PLACES=

2013-10-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58691 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #2) > (Note that that will turn an explicit OMP_PROC_BIND=false into true, which > looks odd - even if I regard it as unlikely that someone wants to have no > proc-bindi

[Bug libgomp/58691] OpenMP 4: Surprising results with OMP_PLACES=

2013-10-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58691 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Oct 12 07:52:15 2013 New Revision: 203479 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203479&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libgomp/58691 * config/linux/proc.c (gomp_cpuset_popcount): Add u

[Bug tree-optimization/58696] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

2013-10-12 Thread mikpelinux at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58696 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson --- Broke with r203061, works again with r203463, likely dup of PR58640.

[Bug c++/40365] g++ template expansion bug

2013-10-12 Thread oleg_dolomanov at hotmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40365 --- Comment #7 from Oleg Dolomanov --- Sorry guys, it really was the hardware: I wish you could see (I have a picture!), but it was one of the memory chips (one along the 16 on the OCZ 2Gb PC2 6400 5-5-5-18!) falling off - it did take me long time

[Bug c++/58055] [meta-bug] RVO / NRVO improvements

2013-10-12 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58055 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/58697] [4.8 Regression] wrong code (segfaults) at -O3

2013-10-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58697 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/58055] [meta-bug] RVO / NRVO improvements

2013-10-12 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58055 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #3) > You can go farther if the return operation overwrites entirely the anonymous > return object and for example allow returning literals, but I don't know if > this is

[Bug target/58699] New: ARM: emit PLDW instruction for prefetch with write intent

2013-10-12 Thread mans at mansr dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58699 Bug ID: 58699 Summary: ARM: emit PLDW instruction for prefetch with write intent Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug target/58690] internal compiler error: in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:641

2013-10-12 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58690 --- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Sat Oct 12 14:55:28 2013 New Revision: 203486 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203486&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Truncate x32 DImode TLS address to a SImode register gcc/ PR ta

[Bug c++/55436] g++ compiles invalid code with child class of nested class in template class

2013-10-12 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55436 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|conradsand.arma at gmail dot com | --- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlin

[Bug target/58641] [4.9 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr49002-2.c scan-assembler vmovapd[\t ]*%ymm[0-9]+,[^,]*

2013-10-12 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58641 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/58645] FAIL: gnat.dg/specs/linker_alias.ads (test for errors, line 6)

2013-10-12 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58645 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Sure, but you can just skip the testcase like on Darwin. It is not! I was about to open a PR for it: On x86_64-apple-darwin(10|12) gnat.dg/specs/linker_section.ads fails, starting between revisions

[Bug tree-optimization/55912] missing optimization of x/x and x/std::abs(x)

2013-10-12 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55912 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > Most of the math builtin folding needs to be re-done at GIMPLE level based > on SSA form. Convenient places are either tree-ssa-forwprop.c or > tree-ssa-math-opts.

[Bug testsuite/58645] FAIL: gnat.dg/specs/linker_alias.ads (test for errors, line 6)

2013-10-12 Thread charlet at adacore dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58645 --- Comment #3 from charlet at adacore dot com --- > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58645 > > --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > > Sure, but you can just skip the testcase like on Darwin. > > It is not! I was about to o

Re: [Bug testsuite/58645] FAIL: gnat.dg/specs/linker_alias.ads (test for errors, line 6)

2013-10-12 Thread Arnaud Charlet
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58645 > > --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > > Sure, but you can just skip the testcase like on Darwin. > > It is not! I was about to open a PR for it: Actually the new output is as expected since types are now accepted (in addition to o

[Bug testsuite/57605] colors break note pruning in the testsuite

2013-10-12 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57605 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/57572] vector operators don't participate in overload resolution

2013-10-12 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57572 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- Created attachment 30992 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30992&action=edit vector-only patch I have had this lying around for a while. IIRC it seemed to work, but it doesn't handle the mixed

[Bug tree-optimization/58698] Spurious "may be used unitialized" warning when compiling with -Os

2013-10-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58698 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Component|c

[Bug c/52794] gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr52027.c fails on x86_64/i386-apple-darwin*

2013-10-12 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52794 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/46507] std::get and devirtualization on non-automatic variables

2013-10-12 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46507 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|std::tuple missed |std::get and |optimizatio

[Bug c/52795] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr34999.c compilation, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE on {x86_64,i386}-apple-darwin{10,11} at -m64

2013-10-12 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52795 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/51244] [SH] Inefficient conditional branch and code around T bit

2013-10-12 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244 --- Comment #70 from Oleg Endo --- Author: olegendo Date: Sat Oct 12 20:47:22 2013 New Revision: 203492 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203492&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/51244 * config/sh/sh_treg_combine.cc: New SH specific RTL

[Bug c++/58700] New: [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE declaring static bit-field

2013-10-12 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58700 Bug ID: 58700 Summary: [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE declaring static bit-field Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug c++/58700] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE declaring static bit-field

2013-10-12 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58700 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Known to work|

[Bug c++/58701] New: [4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE initializing member of static union

2013-10-12 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58701 Bug ID: 58701 Summary: [4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE initializing member of static union Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/58701] [4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE initializing member of static union

2013-10-12 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58701 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.7.0, 4.8.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/58702] New: [4.9 Regression] ICE with undeclared variable in OpenMP reduction clause

2013-10-12 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58702 Bug ID: 58702 Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE with undeclared variable in OpenMP reduction clause Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/58702] [4.9 Regression] ICE with undeclared variable in OpenMP reduction clause

2013-10-12 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58702 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery, |

[Bug c++/58703] New: [4.9 Regression] ICE with invalid types in OpenMP declare reduction clause

2013-10-12 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58703 Bug ID: 58703 Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE with invalid types in OpenMP declare reduction clause Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug testsuite/58645] FAIL: gnat.dg/specs/linker_alias.ads (test for errors, line 6)

2013-10-12 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58645 --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou --- > It is not! I was about to open a PR for it: > > On x86_64-apple-darwin(10|12) gnat.dg/specs/linker_section.ads fails, It is, you're confusing 2 different tests here.

[Bug c++/58703] [4.9 Regression] ICE with invalid types in OpenMP declare reduction clause

2013-10-12 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58703 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery, |

[Bug c++/58704] New: [c++11] ICE initializing array member of template class

2013-10-12 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58704 Bug ID: 58704 Summary: [c++11] ICE initializing array member of template class Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug target/51244] [SH] Inefficient conditional branch and code around T bit

2013-10-12 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244 --- Comment #71 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #70) > Author: olegendo > Date: Sat Oct 12 20:47:22 2013 > New Revision: 203492 > The issue raised in comment #59 has been fixed on 4.9. There are some open issues though, wh

[Bug c++/58705] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE with invalid initializer for _Complex variable

2013-10-12 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58705 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Known to work|

[Bug c++/58705] New: [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE with invalid initializer for _Complex variable

2013-10-12 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58705 Bug ID: 58705 Summary: [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE with invalid initializer for _Complex variable Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug c++/58706] New: ICE with lambda in OpenMP for-loop

2013-10-12 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58706 Bug ID: 58706 Summary: ICE with lambda in OpenMP for-loop Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ A

[Bug c++/58707] New: [C++11] A greater-than operator in square brackets should not end a template argument list

2013-10-12 Thread tuomas.tynkkynen at iki dot fi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58707 Bug ID: 58707 Summary: [C++11] A greater-than operator in square brackets should not end a template argument list Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/58338] Add noexcept to functions with a narrow contract

2013-10-12 Thread bredelin at ucla dot edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58338 bredelin at ucla dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bredelin at ucla dot edu --- Co

[Bug c++/58708] New: string literal operator templates broken

2013-10-12 Thread mustrumr97 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58708 Bug ID: 58708 Summary: string literal operator templates broken Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug bootstrap/57438] bootstrap fails on x86_64 darwin in stage2 linking cc1

2013-10-12 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57438 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/58605] atomic::atomic() disobeys [atomics.types.operations.req]p4 for types with user-defined default constructors

2013-10-12 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58605 --- Comment #4 from Daniel Krügler --- (In reply to Daniel Krügler from comment #3) A new library has been opened: http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-active.html#2334

[Bug c++/58709] New: [c++11] Bogus? int vs. scoped enum printf warning when -fabi-version >= 6

2013-10-12 Thread ppluzhnikov at google dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58709 Bug ID: 58709 Summary: [c++11] Bogus? int vs. scoped enum printf warning when -fabi-version >= 6 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug c++/58709] [c++11] Bogus? int vs. scoped enum printf warning when -fabi-version >= 6

2013-10-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58709 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I think the warning is correct as it is not promoted to int in the function call. This is the same reason why bitfields warn when passing them for printf too.

[Bug c++/58709] [c++11] Bogus? int vs. scoped enum printf warning when -fabi-version >= 6

2013-10-12 Thread ppluzhnikov at google dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58709 --- Comment #2 from Paul Pluzhnikov --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > I think the warning is correct as it is not promoted to int in the function > call. How is it passed then? I see: movl$0, 4(%esp) movl

[Bug c++/58701] [4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE initializing member of static union

2013-10-12 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58701 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/58700] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE declaring static bit-field

2013-10-12 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58700 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/58710] New: HAVE_GETIPINFO is incorrectly set on Mac OS X 10.4

2013-10-12 Thread misty at brew dot sh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58710 Bug ID: 58710 Summary: HAVE_GETIPINFO is incorrectly set on Mac OS X 10.4 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug middle-end/58711] New: Missing "uninitialized" warning in loop condition (when compiling without optimization)

2013-10-12 Thread mimomorin at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58711 Bug ID: 58711 Summary: Missing "uninitialized" warning in loop condition (when compiling without optimization) Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Se

[Bug libstdc++/58338] Add noexcept to functions with a narrow contract

2013-10-12 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58338 --- Comment #11 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to bredelin from comment #10) > Was this change intentional? See: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-09/msg01101.html and Paolo's reply.