http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58550
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58549
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abutcher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58547
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58545
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4
Summary|[4.7/4.8 Regres
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58459
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Sep 27 08:14:53 2013
New Revision: 202966
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202966&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-27 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/58459
* tree-s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58550
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58547
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa-unknown-linux-gnu |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58551
Bug ID: 58551
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE with abort in OpenMP SESE region
inside of some loop
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58547
--- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Fri Sep 27 08:59:18 2013
New Revision: 202967
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202967&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc:
PR middle-end/58547
* rtlanal.c (lsb_bitfield_op_p): Make both p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58551
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Anoter testcase that ICEs even with -O2 -fopenmp:
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O2 -fopenmp" } */
void bar (int, int);
void
foo (int *a)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 8; i++)
#pragma omp task
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58551
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58459
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58543
--- Comment #3 from Yury Gribov ---
Created attachment 30908
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30908&action=edit
Test results
Tests seem to pass both on x86_64 and on ARM (attached).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58532
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from Richard Bie
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58551
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58551
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #30907|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58532
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
There is a compare-debug failure on fortran/parse.o at least, reducing that.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58507
--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton ---
Created attachment 30910
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30910&action=edit
Fix objdump output
Proposed patch to fix objdump output
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58532
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
One difference happens in 057.cunrolli already, we create a preheader for a
loop depending on -g:
;; Function bool gfc_parse_file() (_Z14gfc_parse_filev, funcdef_no=257,
decl_ui
d=17369, symbol_order=156)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58552
Bug ID: 58552
Summary: [4.9 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-opti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58552
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58532
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
First testcase reduction ended in PR58552, re-reducing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58528
--- Comment #6 from Charles ---
Created attachment 30912
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30912&action=edit
script to reproduce the ICE
This script reproduces the bug. It requires 27 .ii files and one archive file
of Google's g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53001
--- Comment #19 from Joshua Cogliati ---
Created attachment 30913
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30913&action=edit
Patch to add -Wfloat-conversion option against trunk
This version is against gcc trunk (rev 202818). It now b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58552
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58552
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Reduced:
extern void fancy_abort () __attribute__ ((__noreturn__));
extern "C" {
struct __jmp_buf_tag { };
typedef struct __jmp_buf_tag jmp_buf[1];
extern int _setjmp (struct __jmp_buf_tag __en
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58552
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Index: gcc/tree-cfg.c
===
--- gcc/tree-cfg.c (revision 202971)
+++ gcc/tree-cfg.c (working copy)
@@ -1013,6 +1013,9 @@ make_abnormal_g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58551
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Sep 27 13:44:10 2013
New Revision: 202972
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202972&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/58551
* tree-cfg.c (move_sese_region_to_fn): Also move
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57465
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Sep 27 14:06:09 2013
New Revision: 202974
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202974&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/57465
* include/std/functional
(_Function_base::_B
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57465
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Fixed on the trunk so far.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58015
--- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 9/21/2013 11:13 AM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58015
>
> --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Is this PR different from pr58113 be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58359
--- Comment #4 from Anatoly Sinyavin ---
Created attachment 30914
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30914&action=edit
Fisrt patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58359
--- Comment #5 from Anatoly Sinyavin ---
Created attachment 30915
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30915&action=edit
Second patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58359
--- Comment #6 from Anatoly Sinyavin ---
I have created two patches to fix this problem.
The first patch (bug_fix_58359_builit_unreachable.patch) just moves
functionality of optimize_unreachable from "fab" pass to "cfg" pass
The second pat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58463
--- Comment #8 from pmatos at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: pmatos
Date: Fri Sep 27 14:54:43 2013
New Revision: 202976
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202976&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/58463
* gcc.dg/pr58463.c: New test.
A
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58507
--- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton ---
Created attachment 30916
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30916&action=edit
Add parsing of known MSP430 MCU types
I am currently testing this patch to see if it introduces any regressions in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58463
--- Comment #9 from pmatos at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: pmatos
Date: Fri Sep 27 16:30:15 2013
New Revision: 202978
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202978&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline.
2013-09-27 Paulo Matos
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56716
--- Comment #11 from pmatos at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: pmatos
Date: Fri Sep 27 16:44:39 2013
New Revision: 202979
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202979&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline.
PR middle-end/58463
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58463
--- Comment #10 from pmatos at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: pmatos
Date: Fri Sep 27 16:44:39 2013
New Revision: 202979
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202979&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline.
PR middle-end/58463
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58553
Bug ID: 58553
Summary: New fail in PASS->FAIL:
gcc.c-torture/execute/memcpy-2.c execution on arm and
aarch64
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58553
--- Comment #1 from jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 30918
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30918&action=edit
Output of dom1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58463
Paulo J. Matos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58554
Bug ID: 58554
Summary: Revision 202619 causes runtime failure in CPU2006
benchmark 445.gobmk
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58553
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
James. Look in the .ldist dump. In particular look at that memset call.
We're writing off the end of the structure. Now to walk backwards and figure
out why :-)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58551
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58554
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58553
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||58554
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58555
Bug ID: 58555
Summary: Floating point exception in
want_inline_self_recursive_call_p
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58553
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Andrew. Yes it does. I've never looked at the ldist code, but the dump seems
a bit strange:
Analyzing # of iterations of loop 3
exit condition [1, + , 1](no_overflow) != 96
bounds on difference of bases
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58553
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58554
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58553
Bug 58553 depends on bug 58554, which changed state.
Bug 58554 Summary: [4.9 Regression] Revision 202619 causes runtime failure in
CPU2006 benchmark 445.gobmk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58554
What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58553
Bug 58553 depends on bug 58554, which changed state.
Bug 58554 Summary: [4.9 Regression] Revision 202619 causes runtime failure in
CPU2006 benchmark 445.gobmk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58554
What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58554
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58555
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot de
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58556
Bug ID: 58556
Summary: gen-vect-26.c / gen-vect-28.c regression merging from
r202839 to r202981
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58490
--- Comment #3 from Erik van der Werf ---
I'm sorry, that patch definitely looks relevant, and I'd like to try it, but
somehow I did not manage to rebuild the arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-4.7 package.
I'm not a gcc expert, and trying to figure out how
57 matches
Mail list logo
