http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53431
Fabio changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nomegenerico at email dot it
--- Comment #3 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393
--- Comment #8 from David Binderman ---
Still fails on 20130710.
Another test case that generates the same message is available on request.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56417
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57886
Bug ID: 57886
Summary: Invalid folding of (float)-x to -(float)x
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57887
Bug ID: 57887
Summary: nested non-type template parameters not declared in
this scope
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57855
Patrick Marlier changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||patrick.marlier at gmail dot
com
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57888
Bug ID: 57888
Summary: using non-type template parameter in constexpr
function for non static data member intializer
segfaults
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57886
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson ---
Dup of PR55771?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57886
Michael Matz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55771
Michael Matz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57889
Bug ID: 57889
Summary: Improvement: builtin to return a string from a type
(type to string builtin)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57717
Alexandru-Cezar Sărdan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexandru.sardan@freescale.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57890
Bug ID: 57890
Summary: gcc 4.8.1 regression: loops become slower
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57890
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Component|c+
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57889
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56417
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57878
--- Comment #2 from Easwaran Raman ---
After IRA, we have:
(insn 116 115 117 6 (set (reg:DI 130 [ D.3288 ])
(mem:DI (plus:SI (reg/v/f:SI 172 [orig:109 __first ] [109])
(const_int 4 [0x4])) [10 MEM[base: _1, index: _44, off
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46333
--- Comment #22 from Marc Glisse ---
Did someone try to bootstrap gcc using CC=suncc CXX='sunCC -library=stlport4'
recently? Is this PR still relevant?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29834
--- Comment #13 from M.S. Babaei ---
(In reply to James Kanze from comment #9)
> Re using the init list syntax: it won't work if you have to be compatible
> with other compilers (like Sun CC). Using something like (Doh (x)), ++x
> seems to be the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57891
Bug ID: 57891
Summary: No diagnostic of narrowing conversion in non-type
template argument
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
20 matches
Mail list logo