http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57596
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Jun 14 07:41:42 2013
New Revision: 200084
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=200084&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-06-14 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/57596
* trans-decl.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57596
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45170
Bug 45170 depends on bug 57596, which changed state.
Bug 57596 Summary: Wrong code for allocatable deferred-length strings
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57596
What|Removed |Added
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57608
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57608
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57608
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57608
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57599
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57593
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini ---
If a defect report has been submitted, then we should add its number to the
Subject of this bug and suspend it immediately. Do you have the number?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57599
--- Comment #7 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #6)
> Fixed for 4.9.0.
Do you plan to backport this to 4.7 and 4.8?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57604
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Krebbel ---
This is caused by a miscompilation of cp/lex.c:
#define DEF_OPERATOR(NAME, CODE, MANGLING, ARITY, ASSN_P)\
sprintf (buffer, ISALPHA (NAME[0]) ? "operator %s" : "operator%s", NAME); \
identif
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57358
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57539
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57599
--- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini ---
No, because isn't a regression. If you care a lot about that, just ask on the
mailing list.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48453
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini ---
It would be nice to have a DR # for this. In any case, if in practice the
compiler is already Ok, we can probably close it, right?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48632
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57508
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Jun 14 11:24:27 2013
New Revision: 200089
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=200089&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-06-14 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/57508
* resolve.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57508
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49074
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Version|4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57609
Bug ID: 57609
Summary: S/390 ESA mode bootstrap failure since r197266
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: boo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48453
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[C++0x] Invalid reference |[C++0x] [DR 1287] Invalid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57593
--- Comment #2 from David Krauss ---
The maintainer (Mike Miller at EDG) said simply that he will add it to the
list, but as far as I know a number isn't assigned until the new list is
drafted. The title is "access granted by friendship to class-s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57593
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini ---
Ok. Please, when you have a number, send it here. In any case, I suppose we'd
rather prefer to have a resolution in order to act, otherwise we are not sure
in which way we want to resolve any inconsistency.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48453
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini ---
Ok, thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48453
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini ---
Oh, by the way, the status is .
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57610
Bug ID: 57610
Summary: Result of conversion
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57610
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57610
--- Comment #2 from Ole Kniemeyer ---
Created attachment 30301
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30301&action=edit
cpp file (without any #includes) which shows the bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57610
Ole Kniemeyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57610
--- Comment #4 from Ole Kniemeyer ---
As I commented in the cpp example, the C++11 standard shows exactly this
example in sections 8.5.3. So this is definitely a bug according to C++11. I
think the GCC behaviour is correct according to older C++11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57610
--- Comment #5 from Ole Kniemeyer ---
Ops, sorry, of course I meant "... to older C++ standards."
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56136
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael.morin at sfr dot fr
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57611
Bug ID: 57611
Summary: [Fortran-Dev Regression] Too much memory allocated
(gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_alloc_2.f90)
Product: gcc
Version: fortran-dev
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57612
Bug ID: 57612
Summary: add builtin to assert that expression does not have
side effects
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20130614 (experimental) [trunk revision 200088] (GCC)
gcc-4.8.1 from Fedora 19 FAIL too
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/usr/bin/gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.8.1/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-redhat-linux
Configured with: ../co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57614
Bug ID: 57614
Summary: Friend declaration and qualified class member access
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57610
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57610
--- Comment #7 from Ole Kniemeyer ---
OK, thanks for your comments. I wasn't aware of the ongoing discussion about
this issue (I was referring to the the draft version N3376 of the C++11
standard).
A B-copy would be OK, but as I said copying B in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57615
Bug ID: 57615
Summary: power8 support does not deal with -mquad-memory
-mno-vsx
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57615
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57615
--- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner ---
Created attachment 30303
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30303&action=edit
Proposed patch to fix problem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52347
Simon Richter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Simon.Richter at hogyros dot de
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46459
--- Comment #5 from Mikael Morin ---
The initial test doesn't lead to a segfault any more.
It is now rejected with:
comment_0.f90:7.8:
call sub(1)
1
Error: Explicit interface required for 'sub' at (1): volatile argument
However, the fo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53477
Tomasz Gajewski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tomga at wp dot pl
--- Comment #8 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57616
Bug ID: 57616
Summary: Support -fsanitize=undefined in Fortran
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57490
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|sparc*-sun-solaris2.* |*-*-solaris2.*
Status|UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57490
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 30304
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30304&action=edit
preprocessed testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57615
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57617
Bug ID: 57617
Summary: OpenMP critical does not seem to synchronise correctly
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57618
Bug ID: 57618
Summary: OpenMP atomic read and write are not sequentially
consistent
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52347
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Simon Richter from comment #2)
> In 4.8, this causes build failures for me:
>
> $ g++ -g -Wall -W -Werror -Wno-unused -I. -o stage1/tree_bison_lex.o -c
> tree_bison_lex.cpp
> tree_bison_lex
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57619
Bug ID: 57619
Summary: std::unordered_map and std::unordered_multimap::insert
invoking std::pair move constructor
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57619
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57620
Bug ID: 57620
Summary: Phantom terminator confuses raw string literal
parsing.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57163
Marcel Meyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||meyerm at fs dot tum.de
--- Comment #2 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57163
--- Comment #3 from Marcel Meyer ---
Please have a look at bug #55800 .
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55800
Marcel Meyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||meyerm at fs dot tum.de
--- Comment #1 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51413
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57619
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52347
--- Comment #4 from Simon Richter ---
Testcase is simple:
$ cat tt.cpp
void bar(int baz) { }
$ g++-4.7 -c -W -Wall -Werror -Wno-unused tt.cpp
$ g++-4.8 -c -W -Wall -Werror -Wno-unused tt.cpp
tt.cpp:1:6: error: unused parameter ‘baz’ [-Werror
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57451
--- Comment #4 from Cary Coutant ---
The problem is a lexical block in main() that appears to be getting split by
-freorder-blocks-and-partition, but when debug info is emitted during
rest_of_handle_final(), this particular lexical block still app
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57619
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57620
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52762
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53099
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57621
Bug ID: 57621
Summary: -Og
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57621
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
67 matches
Mail list logo
