[Bug regression/53964] regression: sparc64 FreeBSD: /usr/ports/lang/gcc46/work/build/./prev-gcc/include/stddef.h:150:26: error: two or more data types n declaration specifiers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53964 Anton Shterenlikht changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/55308] /usr/ports/lang/gcc48/work/build/sparc64-portbld-freebsd10.0/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs/libstdc++.so.6: Undefined symbol "__emutls_v._ThreadRuneLocale"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55308 Anton Shterenlikht changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/57482] [4.7.3][AVR] --help=optimizers reports a wrong list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57482 --- Comment #3 from Christophe --- > 2) -f[no-]short-enums is not an optimization option; Hum, I do not really agree although it is strongly related to ABI, no doubt. Anyway, it is a very special option as I can see in opts.c : /* Set this to a

[Bug c++/56038] declarations in xmmintrin.h conflict with mingw-w64 intrin.h in c++ mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56038 --- Comment #6 from Kai Koehne --- The issue is still there with 4.8.1 . It understand that the discussion on Kai Tietz' original patch has stalled ... Any suggestion on how we can move this forward?

[Bug target/57571] linux kernel function memcpy() execute with low efficiency on Intel Ivybridge platform

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57571 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/57567] Missed optimisation: compare + or

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57567 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|U

[Bug rtl-optimization/57559] [4.9 Regression] S/390: ICE with lra

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57559 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0 Summary|S/390: ICE with

[Bug tree-optimization/57558] Issue with number of iterations calculation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57558 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||53947 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener

[Bug c++/41725] g++ accepts compounded unnamed type in template (violates 14.3.1-2)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41725 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini --- Do we have DR # for this issue?

[Bug c++/57390] Fixed point types on AVR are not available in C++ mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57390 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target||avr Priority|P3

[Bug target/57501] [avr] generated collect2 crttn24a.o missing path with -mmcu=attiny24a

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57501 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target|attiny24a |avr Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/56987] gcc/config/avr/avr.opt:80: "change" -> "changed"?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56987 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target||avr Priority|P3

[Bug c++/57576] New: Using declaration hides template for purposes of explicit instantiation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57576 Bug ID: 57576 Summary: Using declaration hides template for purposes of explicit instantiation Product: gcc Version: 4.7.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-

[Bug c++/57576] Using declaration hides template for purposes of explicit instantiation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57576 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/57575] lvalue function accepted as an rvalue

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57575 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.

[Bug other/57482] [4.7.3][AVR] --help=optimizers reports a wrong list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57482 --- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Christophe from comment #3) > Reading target.def is really instructive, but I still do not understand > (yet) how the optimizations list is built, and how options are > overwritten... All th

[Bug c++/57524] internal compiler error on dump translation unit

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57524 --- Comment #10 from James Michael DuPont --- I have reported the problem in the code to boost, they have fixed it. https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/8651#comment:1 The problem is having to do with underspecifed namespace selection. They ch

[Bug middle-end/57577] New: internal compiler error: tree check: expected class 'expression', have 'constant' (integer_cst) in tree_operand_check, at tree.h:4123

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57577 Bug ID: 57577 Summary: internal compiler error: tree check: expected class 'expression', have 'constant' (integer_cst) in tree_operand_check, at tree.h:4123 Product: gcc

[Bug middle-end/57577] internal compiler error: tree check: expected class 'expression', have 'constant' (integer_cst) in tree_operand_check, at tree.h:4123

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57577 --- Comment #1 from Anna --- Also, when I change "A[:] = foo (B[:][:]);" to "A[0] = foo (B[:][:]);" compilation hangs.

[Bug middle-end/57541] [Cilkplus]: internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7809

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57541 --- Comment #5 from Anna --- (In reply to Balaji V. Iyer from comment #4) > Hello, > This issue should be fixed in trunk revision 199837. Please let me know > otherwise. > > Thanks, > > Balaji V. Iyer. Hi Balaji, I still can reproduce segfa

[Bug middle-end/57541] [Cilkplus]: internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7809

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57541 --- Comment #6 from Anna --- Created attachment 30285 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30285&action=edit Another test case reproducing the original thing

[Bug middle-end/57541] [Cilkplus]: internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7809

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57541 --- Comment #7 from Anna --- (In reply to Anna from comment #6) > Created attachment 30285 [details] > Another test case reproducing the original thing And another issue in slightly changed test case from this attachment: int A[10]; int main ()

[Bug middle-end/57541] [Cilkplus]: internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7809

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57541 --- Comment #8 from Anna --- Thing from Comment 1 is still reproducible with this case: int A[10]; int main () { int a; a = __sec_reduce_add (1); } $ gcc -fcilkplus 1.c 1.c: In function 'main': 1.c:5:5: internal compiler error: in gimplify_v

[Bug middle-end/57541] [Cilkplus]: internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7809

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57541 --- Comment #9 from Anna --- Issue that is very alike to issue mentioned in Comment 7: int A[10]; int main () { int a; a = __sec_reduce (1); } $ gcc -fcilkplus 1.c 1.c: In function 'main': 1.c:6:1: internal compiler error: tree check: acces

[Bug rtl-optimization/57569] [4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code for struct copy at -O3 on x86_64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57569 --- Comment #2 from Michael Matz --- My guess is that it's again somewhere using the wrong predicate to test directed rw/wr/ww dependencies.

[Bug c++/54207] [4.7 Regression][C++0x] ICE in build_noexcept_spec when bool is #defined/typedef'd

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54207 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ai.azuma at gmail dot com --- Comment #9

[Bug c++/52371] [C++11] ICE in noexcept with constexpr conversion function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52371 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/52440] [C++11] Wrong template argument deduction/substitution failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52440 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini --- Fixed in 4.7.3. I'm adding the testcase and closing the bug.

[Bug target/56564] movdqa on possibly-8-byte-aligned struct with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56564 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug c++/41725] g++ accepts compounded unnamed type in template (violates 14.3.1-2)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41725 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/41725] g++ accepts compounded unnamed type in template (violates 14.3.1-2)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41725 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|SUSPENDED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug c++/52440] [C++11] Wrong template argument deduction/substitution failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52440 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug target/57578] New: SPE detection broken on Linux (bits/predefs.h: No such file or directory)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57578 Bug ID: 57578 Summary: SPE detection broken on Linux (bits/predefs.h: No such file or directory) Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/47680] [OOP] ICE with polymorphic array elements as dummy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47680 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Per comment #3, this PR should probably be closed.

[Bug fortran/48939] ICE in code involving procedure pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48939 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/49397] [F03] ICE with proc pointer assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49397 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/50539] Internal error gfc_match_entry(): Bad state (r178939)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50539 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/47680] [OOP] ICE with polymorphic array elements as dummy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47680 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/53957] Polyhedron 11 benchmark: MP_PROP_DESIGN twice as long as other compiler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53957 --- Comment #13 from Anthony Falzone --- My previous post needs a correction. Comparing gfortran O3 to Intel Fortran O3 I see a 60% speed improvement in favor of the Intel Fortran compiler. There is a 40% improvement over past releases of PROP_D

[Bug tree-optimization/57539] [4.9 Regression] ice in ipa_edge_duplication_hook

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57539 --- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor --- Created attachment 30286 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30286&action=edit Proposed fix I'm currently bootstrapping and testing this patch to fix the issue. I'll give one more thought to

[Bug debug/48163] [4.7 Regression]: ICEs for cris-elf, like gcc.c-torture/compile/calls.c gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48163 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/57579] New: Problem with vectorization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57579 Bug ID: 57579 Summary: Problem with vectorization Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee:

[Bug target/57379] [4.9 Regression]: Segfault in invalidate_any_buried_refs (x=0x0) at ../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/gcse.c:3850

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57379 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/57575] lvalue function accepted as an rvalue

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57575 Anass Lasram changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/57580] New: Repeated _Pragma message directives in macro causes problems

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57580 Bug ID: 57580 Summary: Repeated _Pragma message directives in macro causes problems Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug regression/57551] [4.9 Regression]: g++.dg/ext/visibility/anon6.C scan-assembler 1BIiE1cE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57551 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|jason at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/57579] Problem with vectorization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57579 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|federico.carminati at cern dot ch | Component|c++

[Bug debug/37132] Debug: No DW_TAG_namelist emitted for NAMELISTS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37132 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus --- New draft patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-06/msg00534.html

[Bug c++/57581] New: abi_tag vs. demangler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57581 Bug ID: 57581 Summary: abi_tag vs. demangler Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: un

[Bug c++/57581] abi_tag vs. demangler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57581 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- Try using a newer demangler. $ ./cxxfilt _ZNSt3setIiSt4lessIiESaIiEE5eraseB5cxx11ESt23_Rb_tree_const_iteratorIiES5_ std::set, std::allocator >::erase[abi:cxx11](std::_Rb_tree_const_iterator, std::_Rb_tree_co

[Bug fortran/52332] Internal compiler error in in gfc_get_symbol_decl

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52332 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/56564] movdqa on possibly-8-byte-aligned struct with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56564 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jun 11 06:03:46 2013 New Revision: 199934 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=199934&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/56564 * varasm.c (get_variable_align): Move #endif to the

[Bug libstdc++/57421] Error when linking static libstc++ due to missing future classes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57421 --- Comment #10 from Jürgen Reuter --- After I completely recompiled the trunk version (r199585) the problem is gone. So most probably it resulted from an incomplete update and recompilation of the code, or was in an intermediate step of the devel