http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57359
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57458
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu May 30 07:29:49 2013
New Revision: 199437
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=199437&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-05-30 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/57458
* interface.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57458
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57461
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
There is no ICE if gcc is configured with --enable-checking=release. The ICE is
present for revision 198804 (2013-05-12), but not for revision 196555 (4.8,
2013-03-08).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57461
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milesto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57439
--- Comment #12 from Andreas Schwab ---
Successfully tested on m68k.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54189
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #1)
> Trivial patch:
Regtests cleanly. Will commit as obvious.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57465
Bug ID: 57465
Summary: Failed postcondition for std::function constructed
with null function pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57465
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57466
Bug ID: 57466
Summary: Argument deduction fails for 'const T*' when T is
function type
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57439
--- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou ---
(In reply to Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke from comment #10)
> Created attachment 30212 [details]
> experimental patch for execute/pr42721.c failure
The patch is OK but let's beef up the comment a little bit:
+ i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54189
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57467
Bug ID: 57467
Summary: [4.9 Regression] FAIL:
gfortran.dg/gomp/appendix-a/a.(22.1|22.6|33.1).f90 -O
(internal compiler error)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57464
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57468
Bug ID: 57468
Summary: [4.9 Regression] 26% performance drop on important
benchmark after r199298.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57468
--- Comment #1 from Yuri Rumyantsev ---
Created attachment 30224
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30224&action=edit
test-case to reproduce
It should be compiled on x86 with "-O2 -m32" options.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57466
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57469
Bug ID: 57469
Summary: Erroneous warning for unused dummy arguments used in
namelist
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57466
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57470
Bug ID: 57470
Summary: Wrong line number in diagnostic message
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57471
Bug ID: 57471
Summary: [C++11] Bizarre error for template parameter pack
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57469
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57469
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Bur
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57470
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57454
--- Comment #8 from Dmitry ---
Yes, you was right. Completely right.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57472
Bug ID: 57472
Summary: [4.8] internal compiler error: in
finish_member_declaration, at cp/semantics.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57473
Bug ID: 57473
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/tls/emutls-2.c (internal compiler error)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57073
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 30228
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30228&action=edit
Yet another patch that doesn't work
This one fails with
program main
^
_24 = i_1 & 1;
power_6.f90:4:0: intern
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57473
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
It looks similar to pr57467.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55517
Harald Anlauf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Comment #8 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57473
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm-none-eabi |arm-none-eabi
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57467
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
gcc.dg/gomp/pr57412.c fails the same way.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57474
Bug ID: 57474
Summary: FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/sec_implicit2?.c
-fcilkplus (internal compiler error) on
x86_64-apple-darwin10
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57475
Bug ID: 57475
Summary: "incompatible pointer type" message is not helpful
enough
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57476
Bug ID: 57476
Summary: Building gcc-4.7.3: build not passing mpc library
location
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52377
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57404
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57391
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56930
Bug 56930 depends on bug 57391, which changed state.
Bug 57391 Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE compiling AIX math.h caused by PR
c++/56930
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57391
What|Removed |Added
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57463
--- Comment #3 from MengHuan Yu ---
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/Cellar/gcc47/4.7.3/gcc/libexec/gcc/x86_64-apple-darwin11.4.2/4.7.3/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin11.4.2
Configured with: ../configure
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57477
Bug ID: 57477
Summary: gcc generates suboptimal code for a simple
and-shift-zeroextend combination on x86_64
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57415
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
Assignee|unassigned at
at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
The attached source code causes the following crash
on gcc-4.9 trunk dated 20130530 on an AMD x86_64 box
when compiled with -O3.
[dcb@localhost foundBugs]$ ../results/bin/gcc -c -O2 !$
../results/bin/gcc -c -O2 bug107.c
[dcb
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57478
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Created attachment 30231
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30231&action=edit
C source code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54812
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Various places in the compiler need to be updated to not assume that trivial
implies callable.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57473
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm-none-eabi |arm-none-eabi
|x86
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57073
--- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu May 30 21:32:53 2013
New Revision: 199461
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=199461&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-05-30 Tobias Burnus
Thomas Koenig
PR middle
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57073
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57476
Christopher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57479
Bug ID: 57479
Summary: [ARM][NEON] internal compiler error: Segmentation
fault in add_dependence_list
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57479
--- Comment #1 from bccheng at android dot com ---
Created attachment 30232
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30232&action=edit
reduced test input
51 matches
Mail list logo
