[Bug c++/57138] ICE in cp_parser_class_specifier with variadic templates, using declarations, save-temps and precompiled header

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57138 --- Comment #2 from Jacob Metcalfe 2013-05-02 07:02:47 UTC --- Modified the subject to reflect the stack produced by the given example. In our larger code base the stack was somewhat different but related. I have been unable to produce thi

[Bug target/56865] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-42.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "Vectorizing an unaligned access" 4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de 2013-05-02 07:37:55 UTC --- On Wed, 1 May 2013, wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865 > > Bill Schmidt changed: > >What

[Bug tree-optimization/57124] 254.gap@spec2000 got miscompare after r198413

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57124 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener 2013-05-02 08:01:39 UTC --- At least the reduced testcase contains undefined signed integer overflow. It multiplies 65531 by 65536 here: x3 = x2 * 65536; it's still "miscompiled" with -fno-strict-o

[Bug middle-end/57134] [4.9 Regression] ICE with -mstrict-align and inline assembly on ppc64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57134 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64 Known to work|

[Bug c++/57140] New: Segmentation fault in backtrace_dwarf_add

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57140 Bug #: 57140 Summary: Segmentation fault in backtrace_dwarf_add Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/57141] New: Cannot change attributes of USE-associated intrinsic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57141 Bug #: 57141 Summary: Cannot change attributes of USE-associated intrinsic Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug libgcj/57074] gcc-4.8.0 libgcj regression on 32bit Power architecture

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57074 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Commen

[Bug c++/57140] [4.9 Regression] Segmentation fault in backtrace_dwarf_add

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57140 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libgcj/57074] gcc-4.8.0 libgcj regression on 32bit Power architecture

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57074 --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra 2013-05-02 08:54:39 UTC --- In libgcj-tools.so 20316: 00456aec 144 OBJECT LOCAL DEFAULT 22 _ZN3gnu9classpath5tools7keytool17Main$ShutdownHook6class$E That's in .data, as expected. >From the .o

[Bug rtl-optimization/57130] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Incorrect "and --> extract" conversion in combine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57130 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unas

[Bug c++/57140] [4.9 Regression] Segmentation fault in backtrace_dwarf_add

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57140 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/57130] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Incorrect "and --> extract" conversion in combine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57130 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-05-02 09:23:22 UTC --- Created attachment 29995 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29995 simplify-truncate.patch Another thing, it is weird we don't simplify that subreg much earli

[Bug middle-end/57140] [4.9 Regression] Segmentation fault in backtrace_dwarf_add

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57140 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Component|c++

[Bug c++/57138] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in cp_parser_class_specifier with variadic templates, using declarations, save-temps and precompiled header

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57138 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/56864] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-76b.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56864 --- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab 2013-05-02 10:37:53 UTC --- r196872 it is.

[Bug rtl-optimization/57130] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Incorrect "and --> extract" conversion in combine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57130 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-05-02 10:49:08 UTC --- Created attachment 29996 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29996 gcc49-pr57130.patch Alternative to the #c3 patch, using SET instead of COMPARE only when ne

[Bug fortran/57141] Cannot change attributes of USE-associated intrinsic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57141 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libgcj/57074] gcc-4.8.0 libgcj regression on 32bit Power architecture

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57074 --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra 2013-05-02 11:35:20 UTC --- I believe this is triggered by powerpc turning on -fsection-anchors by default, and a section anchor bug loses the alignment. The classes are all nicely aligned if I compile with

[Bug fortran/57142] New: SIZE/SHAPE overflow despite kind=8

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57142 Bug #: 57142 Summary: SIZE/SHAPE overflow despite kind=8 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic, wrong-code

[Bug c++/57143] New: gcc failed to parse try/catch(...) when exception_ptr is involved

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57143 Bug #: 57143 Summary: gcc failed to parse try/catch(...) when exception_ptr is involved Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNC

[Bug c++/57143] gcc failed to parse try/catch(...) when exception_ptr is involved

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57143 --- Comment #1 from Fabien Pichot 2013-05-02 11:52:39 UTC --- Created attachment 29998 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29998 g++-4.8.0 -v output

[Bug c++/57143] gcc failed to parse try/catch(...) when exception_ptr is involved

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57143 --- Comment #2 from Fabien Pichot 2013-05-02 11:53:39 UTC --- Created attachment 2 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2 preprocessed file

[Bug fortran/57142] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] SIZE/SHAPE overflow despite kind=8

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57142 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/57143] gcc failed to parse try/catch(...) when exception_ptr is involved

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57143 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/56388] [4.7/4.8/4.9 regression] catch(...) in lambda rejected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56388 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pichot.fabien at gmail dot

[Bug fortran/57142] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] SIZE/SHAPE overflow despite kind=8

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57142 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||franke.daniel at gmail dot

[Bug libgcj/57074] gcc-4.8.0 libgcj regression on 32bit Power architecture

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57074 --- Comment #5 from Alan Modra 2013-05-02 14:01:59 UTC --- So the section anchor code places vars (and constants) in blocks according to their alignment and sizes (varasm.c:place_block_symbol). The calculations are all good, offsets are p

[Bug middle-end/56988] ipa-cp incorrectly propagates a field of an aggregate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56988 --- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor 2013-05-02 14:05:35 UTC --- Patch committed to trunk. I will commit the 4.8 version early next week. Author: jamborm Date: Thu May 2 14:03:02 2013 New Revision: 198540 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewc

[Bug libgcj/57074] gcc-4.8.0 libgcj regression on 32bit Power architecture

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57074 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab 2013-05-02 14:25:09 UTC --- There is a long standing bug with VLA types (see bug 28865) that has a similar effect.

[Bug bootstrap/48231] bootstrapping gcc-4.6.0-RC-20110321 fails for h8300-rtems*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48231 Joel Sherrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joel at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug c++/52892] Function pointer loses constexpr qualification

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52892 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/57144] New: [4.9 regression] mpfr miscompiled after r198413

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57144 Bug #: 57144 Summary: [4.9 regression] mpfr miscompiled after r198413 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: build

[Bug c++/57109] ice tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:12171

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57109 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED Ever Confirmed|1

[Bug fortran/57145] New: [OOP] Faulty "Actual argument must be polymorphic" error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57145 Bug #: 57145 Summary: [OOP] Faulty "Actual argument must be polymorphic" error Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/57144] [4.9 regression] mpfr miscompiled after r198413

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57144 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug spam/57146] New: Makefile error in wiselib library

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57146 Bug #: 57146 Summary: Makefile error in wiselib library Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Prio

[Bug libgcj/57074] gcc-4.8.0 libgcj regression on 32bit Power architecture

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57074 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug spam/57146] Makefile error in wiselib library

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57146 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/56865] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-42.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "Vectorizing an unaligned access" 4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865 --- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt 2013-05-02 15:27:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > > Correct. Dumping order is affected by the patch though, thus if > we previously disabled vectorization at some point the dumping > before that ca

[Bug target/56865] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-42.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "Vectorizing an unaligned access" 4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865 --- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt 2013-05-02 15:29:10 UTC --- Created attachment 30001 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30001 Vectorization details dump for r196871

[Bug target/56865] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-42.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "Vectorizing an unaligned access" 4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865 --- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt 2013-05-02 15:29:51 UTC --- Created attachment 30002 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30002 Vectorization details dump for r196872

[Bug tree-optimization/57027] [4.9 Regression] ICE in gimple_assign_rhs_code, at gimple.h:2022

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57027 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin 2013-05-02 15:42:23 UTC --- Related fails: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/991202-1.c -O2 (internal compiler error) FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/991202-1.c -O2 (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.c-to

[Bug lto/57084] 483. xalancbmk run fails with -O2 -flto for i686

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57084 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug middle-end/57140] [4.9 Regression] Segmentation fault in backtrace_dwarf_add

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57140 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/57145] [OOP] Faulty "Actual argument must be polymorphic" error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57145 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/56864] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-76b.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56864 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug target/56864] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-76b.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56864 --- Comment #11 from Andreas Schwab 2013-05-02 16:19:57 UTC --- Created attachment 30003 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30003 r196871 dump

[Bug tree-optimization/57027] [4.9 Regression] ICE in gimple_assign_rhs_code, at gimple.h:2022

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57027 --- Comment #3 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke 2013-05-02 16:28:15 UTC --- Created attachment 30004 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30004 tentative patch Would that help?

[Bug tree-optimization/57144] [4.9 regression] mpfr miscompiled after r198413

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57144 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comm

[Bug fortran/57142] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] SIZE/SHAPE overflow despite kind=8

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57142 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug target/56864] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-76b.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56864 --- Comment #12 from Andreas Schwab 2013-05-02 16:36:18 UTC --- Created attachment 30005 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30005 r196872 dump

[Bug tree-optimization/57144] [4.9 regression] mpfr miscompiled after r198413

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57144 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/57147] New: [4.9 Regression]: setjmp call and if body wrongly elided (function runs off early end)

t.s GNU C (GCC) version 4.9.0 20130502 (experimental) (arm-linux-gnueabi) compiled by GNU C version 4.6.3, GMP version 5.0.2, MPFR version 3.1.0-p3, MPC version 0.9 GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min-heapsize=4096 ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/loca

[Bug tree-optimization/57147] [4.9 Regression]: setjmp call and if body wrongly elided (function runs off early end)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57147 roland at gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenther at suse dot de

[Bug bootstrap/48231] bootstrapping gcc-4.6.0-RC-20110321 fails for h8300-rtems*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48231 --- Comment #5 from DJ Delorie 2013-05-02 17:39:29 UTC --- I'm OK with it being committed, but it's not up to me, ping Jeff or Kazu. h8 portJeff Lawl...@redhat.com h8 portKazu Hiratak...@codesource

[Bug libgcj/57074] gcc-4.8.0 libgcj regression on 32bit Power architecture

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57074 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aph at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug bootstrap/48231] bootstrapping gcc-4.6.0-RC-20110321 fails for h8300-rtems*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48231 --- Comment #6 from Joel Sherrill 2013-05-02 18:55:02 UTC --- >From Jeff Law: The problem is that's not the right fix. See this thread: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg00707.html Basically something needs to avoid buil

[Bug c++/14283] Diagnostic for invalid template-id could be improved

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14283 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|gcc-

[Bug fortran/57148] New: integer*4 fails to read largest negative number

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57148 Bug #: 57148 Summary: integer*4 fails to read largest negative number Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/33285] integer too big compile error in gfortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33285 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jayas at hvdc dot ca --- Commen

[Bug fortran/57148] integer*4 fails to read largest negative number

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57148 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/57131] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Wrong register assignment?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57131 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-05-02 19:26:38 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu May 2 06:00:46 2013 New Revision: 198511 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=198511&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/57131 * gcc

[Bug target/57091] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE: in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1268 with -mcmodel=large and indirect call

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57091 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/57097] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in find_hard_regno_for, at lra-assigns.c:561 with -O2 -fPIC -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57097 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/57046] [4.8 Regression] wrong code generated by gcc 4.8.0 on i686

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57046 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/57018] [4.8 Regression] Miscompilation of bison 2.7.1 under "-Os -fomit-frame-pointer"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57018 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/56999] [4.8 Regression] LRA caused miscompilation of xulrunner

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56999 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/56847] [4.8 Regression] '-fpie' triggers - internal compiler error: in gen_add2_insn, at optabs.c:4705

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56847 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/57149] New: [4.8 Regression] wrong -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning with -Os

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57149 Bug #: 57149 Summary: [4.8 Regression] wrong -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning with -Os Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFI

[Bug target/57150] New: GCC when targeting power7 spills long double using VSX instructions.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57150 Bug #: 57150 Summary: GCC when targeting power7 spills long double using VSX instructions. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status:

[Bug target/57150] GCC when targeting power7 spills long double using VSX instructions.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57150 --- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner 2013-05-02 19:37:21 UTC --- Created attachment 30009 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30009 Assembler file

[Bug libgcj/57074] gcc-4.8.0 libgcj regression on 32bit Power architecture

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57074 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-05-02 19:37:46 UTC --- Created attachment 30010 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30010 gcc49-pr57074.patch Fix I've tried, but it didn't survive bootstrap, will need to debug it

[Bug target/57150] GCC when targeting power7 spills long double using VSX instructions.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57150 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64-gnu-linux

[Bug middle-end/57073] __builtin_powif (-1.0, k) should be optimized to "1.0 - 2.0 * (K%2)"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57073 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #29968|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/57148] integer*4 fails to read largest negative number

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57148 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug other/57151] New: Wasted work in method verify_cgraph_node

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57151 Bug #: 57151 Summary: Wasted work in method verify_cgraph_node Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/54318] [C++11] Bogus "template instantiation depth exceeds maximum" error + segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54318 Nathan Ridge changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.8.0 |4.7.3 --- Comment #1 from Nathan

[Bug target/57150] GCC when targeting power7 spills long double using VSX instructions.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57150 --- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner 2013-05-02 21:03:08 UTC --- It shows up due to -fcaller-saves, which creates a V2DF save area.

[Bug middle-end/57073] __builtin_powif (-1.0, k) should be optimized to "1.0 - 2.0 * (K%2)"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57073 --- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2013-05-02 21:08:36 UTC --- The problem is the following in gimplify.c: In gimplify_cond_expr, one has: /* If this COND_EXPR has a value, copy the values into a temporary within the arms. */

[Bug c++/53846] [c++11] memory exhaustion on simple recursive function template that uses decltype

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53846 --- Comment #3 from Nathan Ridge 2013-05-02 21:12:27 UTC --- This seems to be fixed in the 4.8.0 release. Close?

[Bug middle-end/57073] __builtin_powif (-1.0, k) should be optimized to "1.0 - 2.0 * (K%2)"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57073 --- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2013-05-02 22:00:53 UTC --- For completeness, gimplify_ctxp->into_ssa is 0 for the -O0 optimization and it gets set to 1 in gimple_regimplify_operands. Thus, it is not surprising that it works with the -O0

[Bug libgcj/57074] gcc-4.8.0 libgcj regression on 32bit Power architecture

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57074 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.8.1 |--- --- Comment #10 from Alan Modr

[Bug c++/57152] New: [C++11] Compiler segfault when using const in template alias

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57152 Bug #: 57152 Summary: [C++11] Compiler segfault when using const in template alias Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIR

[Bug gcov-profile/57121] undefined reference to gcov_merge_init and gcov_merge_add

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57121 --- Comment #9 from Netra 2013-05-03 00:58:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Simple work around is to use -fprofile-generate instead of -lgcov and GCC > knows > what it should be linking against then. Andrew , It would be great

[Bug c++/57153] New: [C++11] tries to use copy constructor for in-class initialized member in default constructor of template struct

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57153 Bug #: 57153 Summary: [C++11] tries to use copy constructor for in-class initialized member in default constructor of template struct Classification: Unclassified

[Bug bootstrap/57154] New: [4.9 Regression] Bootstrap broken for powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57154 Bug #: 57154 Summary: [4.9 Regression] Bootstrap broken for powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/57154] [4.9 Regression] Bootstrap broken for powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57154 --- Comment #1 from Teresa Johnson 2013-05-03 05:13:07 UTC --- Investigating. I am not sure I have access to a powerpc64, but I am trying to trigger it on x86_64. Teresa On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 9:16 PM, wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > h