[Bug tree-optimization/56466] [4.8 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1629 (loop with header n not in loop tree !)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56466 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek 2013-02-26 18:15:28 UTC --- Unsurprisingly started with http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=195880, but must have been latent before.

[Bug c/56467] gcc fails to link binaries with unknown reference complaint

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56467 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/56341] GCC produces unaligned data access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56341 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #29506|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug libgcc/56460] _Unwind_Find_FDE is O(n) in the number of frame infos, (and LLVM's JIT will generate many of them)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56460 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/55582] [C++11] Unable to define string user-defined literal without leading underscore.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55582 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|jaso

[Bug middle-end/56344] ICE for program with very large structs returned by value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56344 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unas

[Bug c/56463] infinite loop when having integer overflow in a simple accumulator

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56463 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2013-02-26 18:41:56 UTC --- > The compiler may assume that undefined behavior doesn't happen in the program. > It is fine to have undefined behavior in code that will be never executed, but > as soo

[Bug fortran/50190] linkpk bench of polyhedron fails during validation with gcc trunk when it is compiled with -Ofast on amd64.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50190 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2013-02-26 19:23:14 UTC --- On a Core2Duo with '-Ofast' I get 2.51200998D+01 and with '-fprotect-parens -Ofast' 2.50952975D+01. I think the tolerance value for linpk does not make sense: the targe

[Bug fortran/50537] explicit interface required (r178939)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50537 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/52748] [C++11] N3276 changes to decltype

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52748 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug fortran/51487] leak memory with eoshift(..,...,boundary)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51487 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/56461] [4.8 Regression] GCC is leaking lots of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461 --- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov 2013-02-26 20:45:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Created attachment 29544 [details] > gcc48-pr56461-2.patch > Sorry, I should have checked on leaks when I submitted LRA first time. The patch

[Bug middle-end/56461] [4.8 Regression] GCC is leaking lots of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-26 21:13:36 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Feb 26 21:13:27 2013 New Revision: 196294 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196294 Log: PR middle-end/56461 * lra-spill

[Bug libstdc++/56468] New: Clang exposes bug with unexpected forward-declaration of type_info

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56468 Bug #: 56468 Summary: Clang exposes bug with unexpected forward-declaration of type_info Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UN

[Bug libgcc/56460] _Unwind_Find_FDE is O(n) in the number of frame infos, (and LLVM's JIT will generate many of them)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56460 --- Comment #3 from Steven Bosscher 2013-02-26 22:57:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > - Why qsort the whole array, instead of e.g. memmove'ing the bits Ah, oops. qsort can't be used in libgcc, the target may not provide a qsort i

[Bug libstdc++/56468] Clang exposes bug with unexpected forward-declaration of type_info

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56468 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/56012] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] Narrowing conversion in atomic_flag

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56012 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-02-26 23:46:29 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Tue Feb 26 23:46:21 2013 New Revision: 196296 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196296 Log: PR libstdc++/56012 * include/b

[Bug libstdc++/56011] [C++11] std::atomic and std::atomic_bool miss volatile assignment operator overload

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56011 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-02-26 23:46:31 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Tue Feb 26 23:46:21 2013 New Revision: 196296 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196296 Log: PR libstdc++/56012 * include/b

[Bug libstdc++/56012] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] Narrowing conversion in atomic_flag

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56012 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-02-27 00:57:43 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Wed Feb 27 00:57:36 2013 New Revision: 196301 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196301 Log: PR libstdc++/56012 * include/b

[Bug libstdc++/56011] [C++11] std::atomic and std::atomic_bool miss volatile assignment operator overload

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56011 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-02-27 00:57:45 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Wed Feb 27 00:57:36 2013 New Revision: 196301 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196301 Log: PR libstdc++/56012 * include/b

[Bug libstdc++/56011] [C++11] std::atomic and std::atomic_bool miss volatile assignment operator overload

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56011 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/56012] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] Narrowing conversion in atomic_flag

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56012 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P3 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug driver/56469] New: The .gcno file being generated is not cleaned up after gcc exits with an error.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56469 Bug #: 56469 Summary: The .gcno file being generated is not cleaned up after gcc exits with an error. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status

[Bug target/56455] [4.8 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56455 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-27 07:27:02 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Feb 27 07:26:53 2013 New Revision: 196304 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196304 Log: PR target/56455 * stmt.c (expan

[Bug target/56455] [4.8 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56455 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/56468] Clang exposes bug with unexpected forward-declaration of type_info

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56468 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

<    1   2