[Bug libgomp/56357] [4.8 Regression] missing symbol references for libgomp when using -flto -fopenmp on mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56357 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Starke 2013-02-26 08:02:13 UTC --- I have currently no means to do so but I will try that as soon as possible.

[Bug sanitizer/56454] need to rename attribute no_address_safety_analysis to no_sanitize_address

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56454 --- Comment #7 from Kostya Serebryany 2013-02-26 08:07:16 UTC --- Your comment #6 explains why I did not CC gcc lists to the clang discussion. :) There are too many strong opinions on both sides and I don't want to be an instigator of a h

[Bug sanitizer/56454] need to rename attribute no_address_safety_analysis to no_sanitize_address

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56454 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug target/56455] New: [4.8 Regression on AVR] ICE in final_scan_insn

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56455 Bug #: 56455 Summary: [4.8 Regression on AVR] ICE in final_scan_insn Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug sanitizer/56454] need to rename attribute no_address_safety_analysis to no_sanitize_address

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56454 --- Comment #9 from Kostya Serebryany 2013-02-26 08:46:36 UTC --- Clang accepts the old name silently. I am not sure about "forever", clang will probably start printing a "deprecated" warning at some point.

[Bug target/56441] [ARM Thumb] generated asm code produces "branch out of range" error in gas with -O1 -mcpu=cortex-m3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56441 --- Comment #7 from gnugcc at emblocks dot org 2013-02-26 09:05:36 UTC --- I was looking completely wrong, the arm_addsi3 is acting wrong. The "add%?\\t%0, %1, %2" for "=l,%0,Py" is set at a length of 2. (first entry in the list) Howev

[Bug middle-end/45472] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] [Middle-end volatile semantics] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6124 with -fselective-scheduling2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472 --- Comment #26 from Andrey Belevantsev 2013-02-26 09:21:14 UTC --- Created attachment 29539 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29539 scheduler patch I'm testing the attached patch to fix the ICE in the scheduler. Then

[Bug c/35392] Warning "array subscript is above array bounds" in inline fct

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35392 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amylaar at gcc dot gnu.or

[Bug tree-optimization/38480] bogus warning with -O3 -Wall: "array subscript is above array bounds"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38480 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2008-12-16 20:40:17 |2013-02-25 20:40:17

[Bug tree-optimization/56456] New: [meta-bug] bogus warning when inlining: "array subscript is above array bounds"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456 Bug #: 56456 Summary: [meta-bug] bogus warning when inlining: "array subscript is above array bounds" Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug middle-end/56443] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed at -O[1-2] -ftree-vectorize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56443 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-26 09:59:17 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Feb 26 09:59:12 2013 New Revision: 196277 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196277 Log: PR tree-optimization/56443 * tr

[Bug tree-optimization/56448] [4.8 Regression] cc1 hangs on volatile array with -O or above

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56448 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-26 10:00:55 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Feb 26 10:00:31 2013 New Revision: 196278 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196278 Log: PR tree-optimization/56448 * fo

[Bug rtl-optimization/56434] document that __attribute__((__malloc__)) assumes returned pointer has BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56434 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener 2013-02-26 10:03:46 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > MALLOC_ABI_ALIGNMENT isn't properly set on most targets though. > > E.g. with glibc, the alignment of malloced memory is 2 * sizeof (void *) > (ri

[Bug tree-optimization/56446] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Generate one fewer relocation when calling a checked weakref function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56446 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener 2013-02-26 10:09:32 UTC --- I think it's a very special case and generally indirect calls should be avoided (they are slower, have a cost on the branch target buffer, have an extra dependency, increase re

[Bug tree-optimization/56446] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Generate one fewer relocation when calling a checked weakref function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56446 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.4 Severity|enhanc

[Bug rtl-optimization/56451] [4.8 regression] Wrong code for gcc.c-torture/execute/941015-1.c on SH

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56451 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug target/56455] [4.8 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56455 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0 Summary|[4.8 R

[Bug c/35392] Warning "array subscript is above array bounds" in inline fct

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35392 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/56456] [meta-bug] bogus warning when inlining: "array subscript is above array bounds"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/56448] [4.8 Regression] cc1 hangs on volatile array with -O or above

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56448 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/44433] [meta-bug] --enable-build-with-cxx issues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44433 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/56446] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Generate one fewer relocation when calling a checked weakref function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56446 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug target/52928] Alpha/VMS: c++ triggers gas errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52928 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener 2013-02-26 10:27:31 UTC --- Is this still an issue?

[Bug target/44640] spu port fails to build with --enable-build-with-cxx

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44640 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/53635] --enable-build-with-cxx: stage1-gcc shrinks from 1.1 GiB to 0.4 GiB

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53635 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/53635] --enable-build-with-cxx: stage1-gcc shrinks from 1.1 GiB to 0.4 GiB

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53635 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Ri

[Bug middle-end/56443] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed at -O[1-2] -ftree-vectorize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56443 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-26 10:29:58 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Feb 26 10:29:47 2013 New Revision: 196279 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196279 Log: PR tree-optimization/56443 * tr

[Bug middle-end/56443] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed at -O[1-2] -ftree-vectorize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56443 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/55632] trunk/gcc/cp/decl.c:10614: strange line of code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55632 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/56457] New: Bogus warning: loop-invariant.c:786:20: error: unused variable ‘regno’ when building vax-*-*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56457 Bug #: 56457 Summary: Bogus warning: loop-invariant.c:786:20: error: unused variable ‘regno’ when building vax-*-* Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug target/52928] Alpha/VMS: c++ triggers gas errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52928 --- Comment #3 from Tristan Gingold 2013-02-26 10:38:40 UTC --- On Feb 26, 2013, at 11:27 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52928 > > --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener 2013-02-26

[Bug target/26546] missed optimization with respect of vector intrinsics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26546 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|meta-bug| Target|

[Bug target/56444] mn10300.c:3228:16: error: unused variable ‘loops’

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56444 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener 2013-02-26 10:49:30 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Feb 26 10:49:25 2013 New Revision: 196280 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196280 Log: 2013-02-26 Richard Biener P

[Bug target/56444] mn10300.c:3228:16: error: unused variable ‘loops’

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56444 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/47091] non-elf arm targets fail to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47091 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolu

[Bug tree-optimization/56426] [4.8 Regression] Segmentation fault in find_var_scev_info, at tree-scalar-evolution.c:358

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56426 --- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek 2013-02-26 11:06:28 UTC --- Author: mpolacek Date: Tue Feb 26 11:06:14 2013 New Revision: 196281 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196281 Log: 2013-02-26 Marek Polacek

[Bug tree-optimization/56426] [4.8 Regression] Segmentation fault in find_var_scev_info, at tree-scalar-evolution.c:358

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56426 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/47107] ix86-netware is recognized by config.guess, but has no valid basic_machine set

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47107 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolu

[Bug sanitizer/56454] need to rename attribute no_address_safety_analysis to no_sanitize_address

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56454 --- Comment #10 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2013-02-26 11:19:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > Clang accepts the old name silently. > I am not sure about "forever", > clang will probably start printing a "deprecated" warning at some point. W

[Bug target/54657] darwin-c.c:278:27: error: invalid conversion from ‘const char*’ to ‘char*’

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54657 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolu

[Bug tree-optimization/18374] [meta-bug] Argument and return value marshalling at tree level

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18374 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener 2013-02-26 11:33:15 UTC --- On the other hand we do have a mismatch between caller and callee, for C at least: short barshort (short a) { return a; } short foo1short (short a) { return barshor

[Bug c/56458] New: support for crash on invalid array access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56458 Bug #: 56458 Summary: support for crash on invalid array access Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug c/56458] support for crash on invalid array access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56458 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug target/47100] No prototype for ‘vxworks_override_options'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47100 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolu

[Bug target/52495] rs6000.c fails to (cross-) build: "implicit declaration of function ‘ASM_WEAKEN_DECL’"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52495 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolu

[Bug target/56455] [4.8 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56455 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/54660] iq2000_function_arg_advance: format ‘%p expects argument of type ‘void*’, but argument 3 has type ‘const_tree

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54660 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolu

[Bug target/54661] mcore_output_movedouble: operation on ‘memexp’ may be undefined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54661 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolu

[Bug c++/56419] [4.8 regression] transactions in for-loops disappear

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56419 --- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez 2013-02-26 12:40:36 UTC --- Author: aldyh Date: Tue Feb 26 12:40:27 2013 New Revision: 196282 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196282 Log: PR c++/56419 * semantics.c (be

[Bug c++/56419] [4.8 regression] transactions in for-loops disappear

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56419 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/55632] trunk/gcc/cp/decl.c:10614: strange line of code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55632 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-26 14:04:59 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Feb 26 14:04:47 2013 New Revision: 196284 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196284 Log: 2013-02-26 David Binderman

[Bug c++/55632] trunk/gcc/cp/decl.c:10614: strange line of code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55632 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libitm/53113] Build fails in x86_avx.cc if AVX disabled but supported by as (Solaris & Linux)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53113 --- Comment #10 from Martin 2013-02-26 14:18:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) In fact I [suppose I] do as you suggest: I use "-march=core2" to prevent it from using AVX. The problem is that this is inconsistently overruled by the cap

[Bug target/48901] lm32.md: ashlsi3: error: unused variable ‘one’

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48901 --- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke 2013-02-26 14:19:32 UTC --- Author: amylaar Date: Tue Feb 26 14:19:24 2013 New Revision: 196285 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196285 Log: PR target/48901

[Bug fortran/56459] New: Wrongly rejects "TYPE(CHARACTER*1,)" (with comma)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56459 Bug #: 56459 Summary: Wrongly rejects "TYPE(CHARACTER*1,)" (with comma) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: reject

[Bug bootstrap/53798] [4.7] Bootstrap fails on Linux x86_64 with pre-built libmpc/mpfr/gmp due to multilib path problem

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53798 Martin changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.7.1 |4.7.2 Known to fail|

[Bug target/52500] dwarf2cfi.c fails to build with -Werror for c6x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52500 --- Comment #2 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke 2013-02-26 14:24:22 UTC --- Author: amylaar Date: Tue Feb 26 14:24:17 2013 New Revision: 196286 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196286 Log: PR target/52500

[Bug target/52501] cr16-protos.h uses enum rtx_code outside #ifdef RTX_CODE guard

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52501 --- Comment #2 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke 2013-02-26 14:30:27 UTC --- Author: amylaar Date: Tue Feb 26 14:30:17 2013 New Revision: 196287 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196287 Log: PR target/52501

[Bug target/52550] tile*.c: unused variable ‘cfa_offset’

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52550 --- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke 2013-02-26 14:34:34 UTC --- Author: amylaar Date: Tue Feb 26 14:34:26 2013 New Revision: 196288 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196288 Log: PR target/52550

[Bug target/54639] mn10300_expand_epilogue: signed / unsigned comparison

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54639 --- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke 2013-02-26 14:39:24 UTC --- Author: amylaar Date: Tue Feb 26 14:39:15 2013 New Revision: 196289 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196289 Log: PR target/54639

[Bug fortran/55758] LOGICAL and BIND(C): Reject kind=2/4/8/16 with -std=f2008, improve warning, switch to nonBOOLEAN_TYPE for those

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55758 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug libgcc/56460] New: _Unwind_Find_FDE is O(n) in the number of frame infos, (and LLVM's JIT will generate many of them)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56460 Bug #: 56460 Summary: _Unwind_Find_FDE is O(n) in the number of frame infos, (and LLVM's JIT will generate many of them) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Versio

[Bug libgcc/56460] _Unwind_Find_FDE is O(n) in the number of frame infos, (and LLVM's JIT will generate many of them)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56460 --- Comment #1 from Chris Reed 2013-02-26 14:43:15 UTC --- Created attachment 29540 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29540 Proposed fix - maintain array, binary search it

[Bug target/54640] arm_adjust_block_mem: signed/unsigned comparison

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54640 --- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke 2013-02-26 14:51:46 UTC --- Author: amylaar Date: Tue Feb 26 14:51:36 2013 New Revision: 196290 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196290 Log: PR target/54640

[Bug target/54662] Wrong warning flags for building mep-pragma.o, fails to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54662 --- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke 2013-02-26 14:55:37 UTC --- Author: amylaar Date: Tue Feb 26 14:55:31 2013 New Revision: 196291 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196291 Log: PR target/54662

[Bug target/56453] Gcc segmentation fault building argz_add.c for xcompiler newlib for fr30-elf

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56453 --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton 2013-02-26 14:58:34 UTC --- Author: nickc Date: Tue Feb 26 14:58:17 2013 New Revision: 196292 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196292 Log: PR target/56453 Import this patc

[Bug target/56453] Gcc segmentation fault building argz_add.c for xcompiler newlib for fr30-elf

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56453 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/47333] [4.6/4.8 regression] g++.dg/lto/20091219 FAILs on Solaris 2 with SUN as

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug debug/55056] [4.8 Regression] -O0 -g missing location for register double var

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55056 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #8 from Ri

[Bug rtl-optimization/55092] [4.8 Regression] LRA aggravates var-tracking scalability problems

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55092 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #7 from Ri

[Bug lto/56061] [4.8 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56061 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug middle-end/56461] New: [4.8 Regression] GCC is leaking lots of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461 Bug #: 56461 Summary: [4.8 Regression] GCC is leaking lots of memory Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/56461] [4.8 Regression] GCC is leaking lots of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-26 15:53:22 UTC --- Created attachment 29541 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29541 gcc48-pr56461.patch The biggest leak there is: ==31825== 1,491,200 bytes in 11,650 blocks

[Bug middle-end/56461] [4.8 Regression] GCC is leaking lots of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org Ta

[Bug middle-end/56461] [4.8 Regression] GCC is leaking lots of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-26 15:58:34 UTC --- Created attachment 29542 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29542 opts* memory leak fixes Another thing, something that bothered me for a while and clutters

[Bug middle-end/56461] [4.8 Regression] GCC is leaking lots of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-26 16:00:32 UTC --- Created attachment 29543 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29543 incpath.c leak fixes Another place which leaks memory all the time is incpath.c. Untested

[Bug fortran/48890] length of a character derived-type component

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48890 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/56462] New: Simple use of auto in template function causes internal error in type_unification_real

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56462 Bug #: 56462 Summary: Simple use of auto in template function causes internal error in type_unification_real Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1

[Bug c/56463] New: infinite loop when having integer overflow in a simple accumulator

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56463 Bug #: 56463 Summary: infinite loop when having integer overflow in a simple accumulator Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UN

[Bug c/56463] infinite loop when having integer overflow in a simple accumulator

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56463 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/56464] New: Crashes when using implicit this in a lambda capture in member initilizer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56464 Bug #: 56464 Summary: Crashes when using implicit this in a lambda capture in member initilizer Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Sta

[Bug c++/56464] Crashes when using implicit this in a lambda capture in member initilizer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56464 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/56462] Simple use of auto in template function causes internal error in type_unification_real

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56462 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Known t

[Bug middle-end/56461] [4.8 Regression] GCC is leaking lots of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-26 16:32:18 UTC --- Created attachment 29544 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29544 gcc48-pr56461-2.patch Another leak fix, this time in lra. ==31825== 161,960 bytes in 32

[Bug c++/56464] Crashes when using implicit this in a lambda capture in member initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56464 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug target/56441] [ARM Thumb] generated asm code produces "branch out of range" error in gas with -O1 -mcpu=cortex-m3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56441 --- Comment #8 from Richard Earnshaw 2013-02-26 17:01:36 UTC --- Please use an open (non-proprietory) file format for attaching files. I don't have access to RAR format.

[Bug target/56441] [ARM Thumb] generated asm code produces "branch out of range" error in gas with -O1 -mcpu=cortex-m3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56441 --- Comment #9 from Richard Earnshaw 2013-02-26 17:03:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > I was looking completely wrong, the arm_addsi3 is acting wrong. > > The "add%?\\t%0, %1, %2" for "=l,%0,Py" is set at a length of 2. > (first e

[Bug c/56465] New: Strange warning about variable modified range

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56465 Bug #: 56465 Summary: Strange warning about variable modified range Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug c/56465] Strange warning about variable modified range

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56465 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2013-02-26 17:23:21 UTC --- >it is actual a constant. I don't think it is a integer constant expression though as it contains a cast from a pointer type to an integer type.

[Bug target/56441] [ARM Thumb] generated asm code produces "branch out of range" error in gas with -O1 -mcpu=cortex-m3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56441 --- Comment #10 from gnugcc at emblocks dot org 2013-02-26 17:24:52 UTC --- The ARM branch, sorry I see now that the trunk is different. Arm branch: ;; The r/r/k alternative is required when reloading the address ;; (plus (reg rN) (r

[Bug c/56463] infinite loop when having integer overflow in a simple accumulator

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56463 --- Comment #2 from Cristóbal Camarero 2013-02-26 17:39:31 UTC --- I think that at least -Wall -Wextra -Wstrict-overflow=5 should give a giving notice of the extremely odd behaviour. However, I am not following your reasoning to invalidate the

[Bug tree-optimization/56466] New: ICE in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1629 (loop with header n not in loop tree !)

Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: antoine.balest...@gmail.com Using GCC 4.8.0 as of 20130226 : $ cat peel.c int a, b, c; void f(void) { for(; b; b

[Bug tree-optimization/56448] [4.8 Regression] cc1 hangs on volatile array with -O or above

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56448 --- Comment #5 from Dara Hazeghi 2013-02-26 17:47:04 UTC --- Thanks! That was a very quick fix.

[Bug target/56441] [ARM Thumb] generated asm code produces "branch out of range" error in gas with -O1 -mcpu=cortex-m3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56441 --- Comment #11 from gnugcc at emblocks dot org 2013-02-26 17:51:16 UTC --- Richard, you can close this one. I'm leaving the ARM-branch and are moving to the head of branch 4.7. Sorry for the inconveniences, I thought that the ARM branch

[Bug c/56463] infinite loop when having integer overflow in a simple accumulator

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56463 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-26 17:53:43 UTC --- The compiler may assume that undefined behavior doesn't happen in the program. It is fine to have undefined behavior in code that will be never executed, but as soon as you hit

[Bug tree-optimization/56466] [4.8 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1629 (loop with header n not in loop tree !)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56466 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/56466] [4.8 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1629 (loop with header n not in loop tree !)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56466 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Ma

[Bug c++/56452] [C++11] Using declaration for inheriting constructors taints template parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56452 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/56358] [C++11] Erroneous interaction of typedef and inherited constructor declarations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56358 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lucdanton at free dot fr --- Co

[Bug c/56467] New: gcc fails to link binaries with unknown reference complaint

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56467 Bug #: 56467 Summary: gcc fails to link binaries with unknown reference complaint Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRM

  1   2   >