[Bug bootstrap/56227] Bootstrap failure on MinGW building ggc-page.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227 --- Comment #16 from Uros Bizjak 2013-02-09 08:02:22 UTC --- I didn't notice that my backport to 4.7 caused: ../../gcc-svn/branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/lto/lto.c:1060:68: warning: format ‘%wx’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argumen

[Bug bootstrap/56227] Bootstrap failure on MinGW building ggc-page.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227 --- Comment #17 from Uros Bizjak 2013-02-09 08:17:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #16) > I didn't notice that my backport to 4.7 caused: > > ../../gcc-svn/branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/lto/lto.c:1060:68: warning: format > ‘%wx’ expects argument o

[Bug target/56256] [4.8 Regression] inline asm with {|} alternatives in it no longer accepted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56256 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-09 09:30:49 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Feb 9 09:30:45 2013 New Revision: 195913 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195913 Log: PR target/56256 * config/rs6000

[Bug target/56256] [4.8 Regression] inline asm with {|} alternatives in it no longer accepted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56256 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/56227] Bootstrap failure on MinGW building ggc-page.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227 --- Comment #18 from Uros Bizjak 2013-02-09 09:47:51 UTC --- Fixed again on 4.7 branch by #including "output.h" in lto.c.

[Bug fortran/55362] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE with size() on character pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55362 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas 2013-02-09 09:49:52 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Sat Feb 9 09:49:49 2013 New Revision: 195915 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195915 Log: 2013-02-09 Paul Thomas PR fortra

[Bug fortran/56261] [OOP] seg fault call procedure pointer on polymorphic array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56261 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug fortran/55362] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with size() on character pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55362 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression]|[4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE

[Bug fortran/56261] [OOP] seg fault call procedure pointer on polymorphic array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56261 --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-09 10:03:06 UTC --- Fortunately there is a simple workaround: Declaring the procedure pointer as procedure(ff), pointer :: f => ff makes the segfault go away. The c

[Bug fortran/56261] [OOP] seg fault call procedure pointer on polymorphic array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56261 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-09 10:08:23 UTC --- Actually I wonder whether the test case is really valid. The problem is: When declaring the procedure pointer without an interface, we don't know which kind of argument

[Bug fortran/56261] [OOP] seg fault call procedure pointer on polymorphic array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56261 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-09 10:17:16 UTC --- One can play the same game with scalars, where the situation is even more severe: module t type :: nc integer :: n = 1 end type nc contains subr

[Bug target/56263] New: [avr] Provide strict address-space checking

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56263 Bug #: 56263 Summary: [avr] Provide strict address-space checking Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug target/56263] [avr] Provide strict address-space checking

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56263 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Status|UNCONFI

[Bug tree-optimization/56264] New: ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_use, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:557

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56264 Bug #: 56264 Summary: ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_use, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:557 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/56264] ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_use, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:557

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56264 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/56264] [4.8 Regression] ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_use, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:557

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56264 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/52122] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] incorrect ln -s replacement for mingw like targets in configure files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122 Evgeny Grin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||karlson2k at gmail dot com --- Co

[Bug fortran/56261] [OOP] seg fault call procedure pointer on polymorphic array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56261 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed

[Bug fortran/55907] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE with -fno-automatic -finit-local-zero

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55907 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-09 15:34:34 UTC --- The patch in comment 5 regtests cleanly!

[Bug fortran/56261] [OOP] seg fault call procedure pointer on polymorphic array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56261 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assig

[Bug fortran/56261] [OOP] seg fault call procedure pointer on polymorphic array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56261 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Benson 2013-02-09 16:50:54 UTC --- On the test case in comment 2, ifort v11.1 reports: > ifort -o bug.exe bug.F90 bug.F90(23): error #6592: This symbol must be a defined parameter, an enumerator, or an argume

[Bug tree-optimization/56265] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE in ipa_make_edge_direct_to_target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56265 Bug #: 56265 Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE in ipa_make_edge_direct_to_target Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ic

[Bug tree-optimization/56265] [4.8 Regression] ICE in ipa_make_edge_direct_to_target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56265 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug fortran/56261] [OOP] seg fault call procedure pointer on polymorphic array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56261 --- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-09 16:58:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > On the test case in comment 2, comment 1? > ifort v11.1 reports: > > > ifort -o bug.exe bug.F90 > bug.F90(23): error #6592: This

[Bug fortran/56261] [OOP] seg fault call procedure pointer on polymorphic array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56261 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Benson 2013-02-09 17:01:22 UTC --- You're right - comment 1.

[Bug fortran/56261] [OOP] seg fault call procedure pointer on polymorphic array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56261 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Benson 2013-02-09 17:06:18 UTC --- Thanks for figuring out the problem here. When I specify an interface for the procedure pointer in the original code that I derived the test case from, everything works OK.

[Bug go/56017] libgo testsuite does not support cross testing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56017 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug go/56017] libgo testsuite does not support cross testing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56017 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIX

[Bug target/50678] [4.7/4.8 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678 --- Comment #83 from Georg 2013-02-09 18:10:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #82) > Hopefully fixed once for all. Just to confirm: === acats Summary === # of expected passes2320 # of unexpected failures

[Bug fortran/56266] New: ICE on invalid in gfc_match_varspec

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56266 Bug #: 56266 Summary: ICE on invalid in gfc_match_varspec Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug go/56017] libgo testsuite does not support cross testing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56017 --- Comment #7 from Ian Lance Taylor 2013-02-09 18:17:13 UTC --- Sorry about that, I was told that it worked. Can you figure out why it doesn't work? It seems straightforward enough. The file gcc/testsuite/lib/go.exp does a load_lib of

[Bug lto/52516] FAIL: gfortran.dg/lto/pr45586* f_lto_pr45586*_0.o-f_lto_pr45586_0.o link, -O0 -flto (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52516 --- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2013-02-09 18:19:28 UTC --- I suggest this be marked as xfail, referring to PR45586.

[Bug fortran/56261] [OOP] seg fault call procedure pointer on polymorphic array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56261 --- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-09 18:25:33 UTC --- I just noticed that there is already related diagnostics in resolve.c (resolve_global_procedure): /* F2003, 12.3.1.1 (2d); F2008, 12.4.2.2 (2e) */

[Bug other/56245] -fsanitize=address miscompiles GCC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56245 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-09 18:41:05 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Feb 9 18:41:00 2013 New Revision: 195918 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195918 Log: PR other/56245 * regex.c (PTR_

[Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-09 18:42:48 UTC --- Given this is now P1, could the #c9 patch be committed soon, and perhaps just defer a testcase for it when Marc returns?

[Bug other/56245] -fsanitize=address miscompiles GCC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56245 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/56267] New: [4.7/4.8 Regression] unordered containers require Assignable hash function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56267 Bug #: 56267 Summary: [4.7/4.8 Regression] unordered containers require Assignable hash function Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.3 Status: UNC

[Bug c++/56268] New: [4.7/4.8 Regression] C++11 ICE with boost multi-precision and boost variant during assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56268 Bug #: 56268 Summary: [4.7/4.8 Regression] C++11 ICE with boost multi-precision and boost variant during assignment Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.

[Bug c++/56268] [4.7/4.8 Regression] C++11 ICE with boost multi-precision and boost variant during assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56268 --- Comment #1 from koraq at xs4all dot nl 2013-02-09 18:59:52 UTC --- Created attachment 29403 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29403 Preprocessed source

[Bug c++/55842] [4.7/4.8 Regression] C++11 ICE with boost multi-precision and boost variant

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55842 --- Comment #8 from koraq at xs4all dot nl 2013-02-09 19:01:13 UTC --- Thanks for fixing it, I can confirm this issue has been fixed. I ran into a similar problem and filed it as bug 56268.

[Bug target/52555] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE unrecognizable insn with -ffast-math and __attribute__((optimize(xx)))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52555 --- Comment #10 from Aldy Hernandez 2013-02-09 19:07:44 UTC --- Created attachment 29404 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29404 untested patch Untested proposed patch.

[Bug tree-optimization/52868] [4.7/4.8 Regression] 4.6 is faster on Atom

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52868 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/52272] [4.7/4.8 regression] Performance regression of 410.bwaves on x86.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52272 --- Comment #17 from Aldy Hernandez 2013-02-09 19:15:15 UTC --- *** Bug 52868 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/56269] New: I've installed gcc but gfortran doesn't work, see in the attached file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56269 Bug #: 56269 Summary: I've installed gcc but gfortran doesn't work, see in the attached file Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status

[Bug fortran/56269] I've installed gcc but gfortran doesn't work, see in the attached file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56269 --- Comment #1 from shimonya at gmail dot com 2013-02-09 19:39:14 UTC --- Created attachment 29405 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29405 This is the config.log file

[Bug fortran/56269] I've installed gcc but gfortran doesn't work, see in the attached file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56269 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug fortran/56269] I've installed gcc but gfortran doesn't work, see in the attached file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56269 --- Comment #3 from shimonya at gmail dot com 2013-02-09 20:00:07 UTC --- Thank you for your fast reply. What can I do in order to have only version 4.7.2? (In reply to comment #2) > You seem to have a version mix of 4.5.3 and 4.7.2

[Bug fortran/56224] [4.8 Regression] gfortran -fopenmp cannot find omp_lib.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56224 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p

[Bug fortran/56269] I've installed gcc but gfortran doesn't work, see in the attached file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56269 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Morin 2013-02-09 20:21:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Thank you for your fast reply. > What can I do in order to have only version 4.7.2? Obviously, you can remove/uninstall version 4.5.3 (the fortran c

[Bug fortran/56269] I've installed gcc but gfortran doesn't work, see in the attached file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56269 --- Comment #5 from Mikael Morin 2013-02-09 20:22:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Thank you for your fast reply. > > What can I do in order to have only version 4.7.2? > > Obviously, you can remove/un

[Bug c/53529] assembler errors while building a cross compiler if . (dot) is in your PATH

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53529 Evgeny Grin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||karlson2k at gmail dot com --- Co

[Bug fortran/51976] [F2003] Support deferred-length character components of derived types (allocatable string length)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51976 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas 2013-02-09 20:33:56 UTC --- Created attachment 29406 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29406 Draft patch for the PR This turned out to be easier than I expected. It obviously needs a bi

[Bug c++/56238] [4.7/4.8 regression] ICE in tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have template_type_parm in lookup_conversions, at cp/search.c:2515

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56238 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-09 20:38:44 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sat Feb 9 20:38:33 2013 New Revision: 195920 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195920 Log: PR c++/56238 * pt.c (build_non_

[Bug c++/56247] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:12131

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56247 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-09 20:39:21 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sat Feb 9 20:39:13 2013 New Revision: 195922 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195922 Log: PR c++/56247 * pt.c (eq_special

[Bug fortran/56269] I've installed gcc but gfortran doesn't work, see in the attached file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56269 --- Comment #6 from shimonya at gmail dot com 2013-02-09 20:43:49 UTC --- Created attachment 29407 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29407 This is the new config.log file

[Bug fortran/56269] I've installed gcc but gfortran doesn't work, see in the attached file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56269 --- Comment #7 from shimonya at gmail dot com 2013-02-09 20:45:33 UTC --- Thank you. I renamed it and now I get a new error (see in the new attached file).(In reply to comment #6) > Created attachment 29407 [details] > This is the new confi

[Bug c++/56247] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:12131

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56247 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-09 20:47:31 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sat Feb 9 20:47:24 2013 New Revision: 195923 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195923 Log: PR c++/56247 * pt.c (eq_special

[Bug go/56017] libgo testsuite does not support cross testing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56017 --- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab 2013-02-09 20:48:07 UTC --- The others were already loaded via libgo.exp. Looking for ../../../../gcc/libgo/testsuite/../../gcc/testsuite/lib/prune.exp Found ../../../../gcc/libgo/testsuite/../../gcc/te

[Bug go/56017] libgo testsuite does not support cross testing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56017 --- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab 2013-02-09 20:49:39 UTC --- # DejaGnu does not have proper library search paths for load_lib. # We have to explicitly load everything that go.exp wants to load.

[Bug c++/56247] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:12131

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56247 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-09 20:54:05 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sat Feb 9 20:53:59 2013 New Revision: 195924 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195924 Log: PR c++/56247 * pt.c (eq_special

[Bug go/56017] libgo testsuite does not support cross testing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56017 --- Comment #10 from Andreas Schwab 2013-02-09 21:03:35 UTC --- mv: cannot stat ‘.././libgo/libgo.sum’: No such file or directory mv: cannot stat ‘.././libgo/libgo.log’: No such file or directory cat: .././libgo/libgo.sum.sep: No such file

[Bug libstdc++/56257] std::vector allows access to the elements of _Vector_base

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56257 --- Comment #3 from Wolfgang Bangerth 2013-02-09 21:37:55 UTC --- :-) Sure, and of course I did tell him "don't do that". In essence it's a question of how easy it is to shoot yourself in the foot by exposing internal details of the implem

[Bug fortran/56269] I've installed gcc but gfortran doesn't work, see in the attached file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56269 --- Comment #8 from Mikael Morin 2013-02-09 22:40:10 UTC --- Something is seriously flawed on your side. What is your toplevel configure command?

[Bug fortran/56269] I've installed gcc but gfortran doesn't work, see in the attached file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56269 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/53529] assembler errors while building a cross compiler if . (dot) is in your PATH

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53529 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2013-02-09 23:00:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Similar error is always on MinGW hosts. MinGW has '.' in front of PATH by > default. > So if try to build GCC with language that require C++ or to bu

[Bug go/56017] libgo testsuite does not support cross testing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56017 --- Comment #11 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-09 23:02:27 UTC --- Author: ian Date: Sat Feb 9 23:02:09 2013 New Revision: 195926 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195926 Log: PR go/56017 libgo DejaGNU t

[Bug go/56017] libgo testsuite does not support cross testing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56017 --- Comment #12 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-09 23:19:41 UTC --- Author: ian Date: Sat Feb 9 23:19:33 2013 New Revision: 195927 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195927 Log: PR go/56017 libgo testsuite

[Bug go/56017] libgo testsuite does not support cross testing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56017 --- Comment #13 from Ian Lance Taylor 2013-02-09 23:20:42 UTC --- Those problems may be fixed, let me know what the next one is.

[Bug c/56270] New: loop over array of struct float causes compiler error: segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56270 Bug #: 56270 Summary: loop over array of struct float causes compiler error: segmentation fault Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Sta

[Bug tree-optimization/56270] loop over array of struct float causes compiler error: segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56270 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |tree-optimization --- Comment #1 from An

[Bug ada/56271] New: GCC build errors when building ada and using LDFLAGS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56271 Bug #: 56271 Summary: GCC build errors when building ada and using LDFLAGS Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug c++/56272] New: Poor diagnostics for error: specialization of ... after instantiation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56272 Bug #: 56272 Summary: Poor diagnostics for error: specialization of ... after instantiation Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONF

[Bug other/56273] New: [4.8 regression] Bogus -Warray-bounds warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56273 Bug #: 56273 Summary: [4.8 regression] Bogus -Warray-bounds warning Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug other/56273] [4.8 regression] Bogus -Warray-bounds warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56273 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Scharrer 2013-02-10 07:07:40 UTC --- The same code and command-line arguments do not produce a warning in gcc 4.7.2, 4.6.3, 4.5.4 and clang 3.2 as well as clang's static analyzer.

[Bug tree-optimization/56273] [4.8 regression] Bogus -Warray-bounds warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56273 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic, |

[Bug bootstrap/53728] [4.6 regression] Bootstrap comparison failure (gcc/varasm.o differs) with CFLAGS="-O2 -march=pentium3"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53728 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|