http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52714
--- Comment #6 from Mikael Pettersson 2013-01-05
11:57:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 29086
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29086
revert gcc 4.6 to gcc 4.5 version of PR45695 fix
The ICE is caused by the gcc-4.6 versi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55881
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55873
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55873
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2013-01-05
12:15:35 UTC ---
PR18501, the most frequently reported Wuninitialized bug.
Of course, it is possible to fix it. Clang does warn:
pr18501.c:5:7: warning: variable 'res' is used uninitialized wh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763
--- Comment #20 from Harald Anlauf 2013-01-05 13:12:30
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
Sorry for the invalid code:
> select type (this)
should have been:
select type (x => this% x)
which compiles (no ICE).
;-)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55827
--- Comment #8 from Mikael Morin 2013-01-05
13:25:38 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Revision: 194928
Modified property: svn:log
Modified: svn:log at Sat Jan 5 13:25:32 2013
-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55815
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55815
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-01-05
14:34:53 UTC ---
N.B. I think the only use of _Hash_bytes which users can't already replace is
in type_info::hash_code(), which must give a consistent result across
ABI-compatible releases.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52714
--- Comment #7 from Thorsten Glaser 2013-01-05 14:35:37
UTC ---
Cool, thanks! I got another one where it fails (centerim) and will test it with
this patch, then report back (that should take a few days).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55815
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2013-01-05
14:48:22 UTC ---
Whatever we do here I suppose we should involve Matt.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44282
Harald van Dijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||harald at gigawatt dot nl
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55884
Bug #: 55884
Summary: FAIL: libgomp.fortran/omp_parse3.f90 -O0 (test for
excess errors)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55884
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|FAIL: |[4.8 Regression] FAIL:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55792
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu 2013-01-05 16:47:08
UTC ---
The page is freed since there is nothing in it:
#0 set_page_table_entry (p=0x71ab8000, entry=0x0)
at /export/gnu/import/git/gcc/gcc/ggc-page.c:640
#1 0x00544514 i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53789
--- Comment #17 from John David Anglin 2013-01-05
16:55:55 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Jan 5 16:55:43 2013
New Revision: 194933
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194933
Log:
PR target/53789
* config
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55792
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55884
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin 2013-01-05
18:59:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Revision 194745 was OK.
Correction: 194549 was OK.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55117
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jvdelisle at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55818
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55883
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54678
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-pc-linux-gnu |x86_64-pc-linux-gnu,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52015
--- Comment #19 from niXman 2013-01-05 21:24:03 UTC
---
Why not apply to gcc-4_7-branch?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472
--- Comment #25 from Zdenek Sojka 2013-01-05 21:43:55
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> This ICE has started to appear for target POWER when compiling
> testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr50907.c
>
That testcase (or pr45354.c which it inc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47043
Wolfgang Bangerth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joseph.h.garvin at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45168
Wolfgang Bangerth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47043
Wolfgang Bangerth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bangerth at gmail dot com
-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55753
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
Leo Yuriev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||leo at yuriev dot ru
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52015
--- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-01-06
01:44:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> Why not apply to gcc-4_7-branch?
A user who can build 4.7.2 successfully should not have to update their OS to
build 4.7.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52015
--- Comment #21 from Nathan Ridge 2013-01-06
02:07:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> (In reply to comment #19)
> > Why not apply to gcc-4_7-branch?
>
> A user who can build 4.7.2 successfully should not have to update their OS to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39333
--- Comment #30 from Rafał Mużyło 2013-01-06 02:20:08
UTC ---
While 4.7.2 still has the problem, I've just learnt about PR33763.
Now, while that particular patch doesn't help 4.7.2 - even it it sounds like it
should - removing ' __attribute__ (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39333
--- Comment #31 from Rafał Mużyło 2013-01-06 03:34:17
UTC ---
PS: the stripped down test case from PR33763 is quite alike attachment 25239,
yet something makes a difference.
extern void *bar (void);
extern int baz (void);
extern __inline __att
33 matches
Mail list logo
