[Bug fortran/55603] Memory leak in intrinsic assignment of allocatable derived type function result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55603 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/55311] Cannot specialize template parameter of type 'const char *const' in 'using' alias

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55311 --- Comment #2 from Niels Penneman 2012-12-05 08:32:42 UTC --- Workaround for GCC 4.8.0-alpha20121202 (full version details see earlier post) for case #2: replace STRING_PTR template parameter with static_cast(STRING_PTR). Example code b

[Bug libgcc/55589] Failure compiling "generic-morestack-thread.c", without threads

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55589 --- Comment #2 from michael at talamasca dot ocis.net 2012-12-05 08:38:49 UTC --- My usual GCC recipe is this: configure --build=i386-pc-linux-uclibc --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --sharedstatedir=/var/com --localstatedir=/var/state

[Bug lto/55525] ICE: tree check: expected array_type, have pointer_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6768

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55525 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener 2012-12-05 08:47:45 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Dec 5 08:47:40 2012 New Revision: 194183 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194183 Log: 2012-12-05 Richard Biener P

[Bug libfortran/55601] libgfortran build fails with --disable-libquadmath

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55601 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug fortran/37336] Fortran 2003: Finish derived-type finalization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||55207, 55603 --- Comm

[Bug middle-end/51233] [ipa-iterations] running multiple passes of early IPA on zlib produces more optimal code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51233 --- Comment #6 from richard.guenther at gmail dot com 2012-12-05 09:23:56 UTC --- On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:35 PM, matt at use dot net wrote: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51233 > > --- Comment #5 from Matt Hargett 201

[Bug fortran/55534] -Wno-missing-include-dirs does not work with gfortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55534 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug lto/55525] ICE: tree check: expected array_type, have pointer_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6768

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55525 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/35272] Loop distribution fails to distribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35272 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/38277] gcc.c-torture/execute/20010910-1.c wrong code generation by loop distribution enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38277 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/43234] ICE with per-function -ftree-loop-distribution (via attribute optimize or pragma)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43234 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/35272] Loop distribution fails to distribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35272 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||changpeng.fang at amd dot

[Bug tree-optimization/43428] vectorizer should invoke loop distribution to partially vectorize this loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43428 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/50222] ICE with -O{1,2} -funswitch-loops -ftree-loop-distribution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50222 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener 2012-12-05 09:59:11 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Dec 5 09:59:08 2012 New Revision: 194188 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194188 Log: 2012-12-05 Richard Biener P

[Bug fortran/55603] Memory leak in intrinsic assignment of a scalar allocatable function result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55603 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UN

[Bug tree-optimization/50222] ICE with -O{1,2} -funswitch-loops -ftree-loop-distribution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50222 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/51810] internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51810 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/51238] ICE: SIGSEGV in find_uses_to_rename_use (tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:1267) with -Os -ftree-loop-distribution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51238 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener 2012-12-05 10:12:56 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Dec 5 10:12:53 2012 New Revision: 194192 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194192 Log: 2012-12-05 Richard Biener P

[Bug tree-optimization/51238] ICE: SIGSEGV in find_uses_to_rename_use (tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:1267) with -Os -ftree-loop-distribution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51238 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug fortran/55603] Memory leak in intrinsic assignment of a scalar allocatable function result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55603 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2012-12-05 10:14:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > The problem seems to be that we fail to do auto-deallocation of the function > result (after the assignment). One should check the standard, if and wh

[Bug tree-optimization/55600] excessive size of vectorized code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55600 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener 2012-12-05 10:33:06 UTC --- GCC fully unrolls the vectorized looo. ICC does not. The loop rolls 16 times: : # vect_p.5_30 = PHI # vect_su.12_52 = PHI # ivtmp_61 = PHI vect_var_.9_46

[Bug middle-end/55597] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in plus_constant, at explow.c:88

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55597 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot

[Bug c++/52311] implicitly_declare_fn: valgrind problem

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52311 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/55418] Valgrind: Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) in implicitly_declare_fn() method.c:1623

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55418 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- C

[Bug rtl-optimization/55598] LRA on powerpc does not like assembler in libgcc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55598 --- Comment #1 from Steven Bosscher 2012-12-05 11:44:18 UTC --- Vlad committed a set of powerpc fixes here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg00272.html Perhaps you can try the patch, see if it helps?

[Bug rtl-optimization/55006] [4.8 Regression] aermod.f90 is miscompiled with '-m64 -O2 -funroll-loops' after revision 192526

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55006 --- Comment #9 from Andreas Krebbel 2012-12-05 11:54:11 UTC --- Created attachment 28879 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28879 Reduced testcase

[Bug rtl-optimization/55006] [4.8 Regression] aermod.f90 is miscompiled with '-m64 -O2 -funroll-loops' after revision 192526

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55006 Andreas Krebbel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug rtl-optimization/55006] [4.8 Regression] aermod.f90 is miscompiled with '-m64 -O2 -funroll-loops' after revision 192526

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55006 --- Comment #11 from Andreas Krebbel 2012-12-05 11:58:25 UTC --- Created attachment 28880 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28880 web output r192525

[Bug rtl-optimization/55006] [4.8 Regression] aermod.f90 is miscompiled with '-m64 -O2 -funroll-loops' after revision 192526

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55006 --- Comment #12 from Andreas Krebbel 2012-12-05 11:58:53 UTC --- Created attachment 28881 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28881 web output r192526

[Bug rtl-optimization/55006] [4.8 Regression] aermod.f90 is miscompiled with '-m64 -O2 -funroll-loops' after revision 192526

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55006 --- Comment #13 from Steven Bosscher 2012-12-05 12:24:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > The attached testcase gets miscompiled starting with that revision. And is not fixed after r194108?

[Bug rtl-optimization/55006] [4.8 Regression] aermod.f90 is miscompiled with '-m64 -O2 -funroll-loops' after revision 192526

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55006 --- Comment #14 from Steven Bosscher 2012-12-05 12:32:24 UTC --- Nothing new here, just yet another invalid REG_EQUAL note: The webizer tries to split r51 in this insn: ;; basic block 4, loop depth 0, count 0, freq 7100, maybe hot ;;

[Bug c++/52791] structure should always be returned by passing a hidden argument with ms_abi, x86_64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52791 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2012-12-05 12:51:18 UTC --- Kai, can you have a look? Should be "target"?

[Bug c++/52792] this pointer and return pointer are passed in wrong order when ms_abi is used (x86_64)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52792 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2012-12-05 12:52:00 UTC --- Likewise, Kai, please.

[Bug rtl-optimization/55006] [4.8 Regression] aermod.f90 is miscompiled with '-m64 -O2 -funroll-loops' after revision 192526

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55006 --- Comment #15 from Andreas Krebbel 2012-12-05 12:55:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #10) > > The attached testcase gets miscompiled starting with that revision. > > And is not fixed after r194108? Just t

[Bug c++/54466] [C++11] Recursive Type Alias, Member Function Pointer, Segmentation Fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54466 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mattipee at yahoo dot co.uk ---

[Bug c++/53026] ICE with alias-declarations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53026 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|jaso

[Bug c++/55578] Disabling warnings inside macro definition doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55578 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|ruboam at gmail dot com |dodji at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c++/54259] [4.7 Regression] Regression in move construction for std::pair

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54259 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/55582] [C++11] Unable to define string user-defined literal without leading underscore.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55582 --- Comment #2 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> 2012-12-05 13:18:36 UTC --- Created attachment 28882 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28882 Patch This patch lexes "string"XYZ user-defined literals as *

[Bug c++/55582] [C++11] Unable to define string user-defined literal without leading underscore.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55582 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2012-12-05 13:23:24 UTC --- Note that std::u16string and std::u32string aren't unconditionally available, I think you need something like: // { dg-require-effective-target stdint_types }

[Bug c++/55582] [C++11] Unable to define string user-defined literal without leading underscore.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55582 Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #28882|0 |1

[Bug tree-optimization/55590] SRA still produces unnecessarily unaligned memory accesses

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55590 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p

[Bug debug/55541] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] unable to see local variables due extra lexical block was generated

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55541 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW AssignedTo|jason at

[Bug libstdc++/55594] [4.8 Regression] -Wa,-nH incorrectly added to compile line of all targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55594 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug c++/55564] [4.8 Regression] internal error using decltype of a template type parameter for late-specified function result type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55564 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/55598] LRA on powerpc does not like assembler in libgcc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55598 --- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner 2012-12-05 16:37:46 UTC --- I'm trying the bootstrap of the lra branch right now. I discovered the bootstrap fails if I enable decimal floating point (i.e. --enable-decimal-float). More later.

[Bug c++/55513] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Incorrect snprintf folding when building with -std=c++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55513 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/54739] [4.8 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c scan-rtl-dump subreg1 "Splitting reg"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54739 --- Comment #12 from eager at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-05 17:27:10 UTC --- Author: eager Date: Wed Dec 5 17:27:05 2012 New Revision: 194226 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194226 Log: PR rtl-optimization/54739

[Bug middle-end/55597] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in plus_constant, at explow.c:88

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55597 --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu 2012-12-05 17:28:11 UTC --- It is generated by (gdb) bt #0 set_unique_reg_note (insn=0x719a07e0, kind=REG_EQUAL, datum=0x71ab4460) at /export/gnu/import/git/gcc/gcc/emit-rtl.c:4958 #1 0x00

[Bug c++/51927] [C++0x] Cannot access non-static members in initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51927 js at lastlog dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||js at lastlog dot de --- Comment #

[Bug c++/54653] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] tsubst_template_parms ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54653 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code Pr

[Bug c++/54653] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] tsubst_template_parms ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54653 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-05 17:49:20 UTC --- Perhaps errors introduced during my testcase reduction. The original bugreport is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858351

[Bug middle-end/55597] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in plus_constant, at explow.c:88

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55597 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu 2012-12-05 17:55:51 UTC --- Does this patch diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c index a24e407..b496490 100644 --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c @@ -12802,6 +

[Bug rtl-optimization/55604] New: ICE while dumping in remove_some_program_points_and_update_live_ranges

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55604 Bug #: 55604 Summary: ICE while dumping in remove_some_program_points_and_update_live_ranges Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status

[Bug rtl-optimization/55604] ICE while dumping in remove_some_program_points_and_update_live_ranges

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55604 --- Comment #1 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-12-05 18:08:24 UTC --- Created attachment 28884 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28884 proposed patch

[Bug rtl-optimization/55604] ICE while dumping in remove_some_program_points_and_update_live_ranges

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55604 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/55604] ICE while dumping in remove_some_program_points_and_update_live_ranges

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55604 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/10541] [DR 354] Is NULL a valid pointer-type template argument?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10541 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org | --- Comment #11 from Paolo Car

[Bug rtl-optimization/54739] [4.8 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c scan-rtl-dump subreg1 "Splitting reg"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54739 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug lto/55605] New: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/20010124-1.c compilation, -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55605 Bug #: 55605 Summary: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/20010124-1.c compilation, -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4

[Bug rtl-optimization/51771] trans-mem: abnormal edges get lost or corrupted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51771 torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Res

[Bug middle-end/55597] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in plus_constant, at explow.c:88

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55597 --- Comment #9 from Uros Bizjak 2012-12-05 20:45:40 UTC --- I think it is better to fixup all sites where equivalent is used: --cut here-- Index: i386.c === --- i386.c

[Bug target/54160] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc should not define __OBJC2__ when lang is not set to ObjC (gcc 4.6 and later)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54160 --- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-12-05 21:10:25 UTC --- Author: aldyh Date: Wed Dec 5 21:10:18 2012 New Revision: 194227 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194227 Log: PR target/54160 * config/t-dar

[Bug target/54160] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc should not define __OBJC2__ when lang is not set to ObjC (gcc 4.6 and later)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54160 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/55032] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Internal compiler error: in strip_typedefs, at cp/tree.c:1199

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55032 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unas

[Bug fortran/55534] -Wno-missing-include-dirs does not work with gfortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55534 --- Comment #3 from Harald Anlauf 2012-12-05 21:43:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > (See PR 54033 for the patch which originally added this feature.) > > Untested patch. With this patch, the warning is also gone. :-) However,

[Bug c++/55015] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Lambda functions not found at link time when declared in an inline function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55015 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/55604] ICE while dumping in remove_some_program_points_and_update_live_ranges

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55604 --- Comment #4 from Steven Bosscher 2012-12-05 23:55:31 UTC --- Author: steven Date: Wed Dec 5 23:55:28 2012 New Revision: 194230 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194230 Log: PR rtl-optimization/55604 *

[Bug rtl-optimization/55604] ICE while dumping in remove_some_program_points_and_update_live_ranges

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55604 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/55534] -Wno-missing-include-dirs does not work with gfortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55534 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2012-12-06 00:04:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > I addition to the patch in comment #2 tried: That piece I also had, but I forgot to include it in the diff. (I have too many patches on that tree.

[Bug c++/55606] New: sorry, unimplemented: non-trivial designated initializers not supported

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55606 Bug #: 55606 Summary: sorry, unimplemented: non-trivial designated initializers not supported Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Statu

[Bug c++/55606] sorry, unimplemented: non-trivial designated initializers not supported

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55606 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2012-12-06 00:21:19 UTC --- So? Do we have a plan of filing a PR for each sorry message?

[Bug middle-end/55597] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in plus_constant, at explow.c:88

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55597 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu 2012-12-06 00:21:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > I think it is better to fixup all sites where equivalent is used: > It works. Thanks.

[Bug c++/55606] sorry, unimplemented: non-trivial designated initializers not supported

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55606 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2012-12-06 00:29:07 UTC --- why does struct foo x = { i: 0 }; work?

[Bug c++/55606] sorry, unimplemented: non-trivial designated initializers not supported

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55606 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2012-12-06 00:30:11 UTC --- BTW, clang works fine: [hjl@gnu-6 tmp]$ /opt/llvm.old/bin/clang -c i.c i.c:6:5: warning: use of GNU old-style field designator extension [-Wgnu-designator] i: 0 ^~

[Bug c++/55606] sorry, unimplemented: non-trivial designated initializers not supported

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55606 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2012-12-06 00:32:46 UTC --- [hjl@gnu-6 tmp]$ cat i.cc struct foo { char x[128]; unsigned* i; }; struct foo x = { .i = 0 }; [hjl@gnu-6 tmp]$ /opt/llvm.old/bin/clang -c i.cc [hjl@gnu-6 tmp]$ g++ -c

[Bug c++/55606] sorry, unimplemented: non-trivial designated initializers not supported

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55606 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu 2012-12-06 00:35:38 UTC --- This works: [hjl@gnu-6 tmp]$ cat i.cc struct foo { char x[128]; unsigned* i; }; struct foo x = { "foo", .i = 0 }; [hjl@gnu-6 tmp]$ g++ -c i.cc [hjl@gnu-6 tmp]$

[Bug c++/55606] sorry, unimplemented: non-trivial designated initializers not supported

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55606 --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2012-12-06 00:35:53 UTC --- I'm not saying that some work should not be done, I'm saying that sorry message normally correspond to *known* issues, we don't need PRs for those, more or less by definition. B

[Bug middle-end/50283] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/eh/simd-1.C execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50283 --- Comment #19 from John David Anglin 2012-12-06 02:19:55 UTC --- Author: danglin Date: Thu Dec 6 02:19:48 2012 New Revision: 194238 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194238 Log: Backport for mainline: 2

[Bug target/55195] [4.8 Regression] shorten_branches generates incorrect forward branch distances

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55195 --- Comment #19 from John David Anglin 2012-12-06 02:19:57 UTC --- Author: danglin Date: Thu Dec 6 02:19:48 2012 New Revision: 194238 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194238 Log: Backport for mainline: 2

[Bug c++/54947] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] lambda cannot capture-by-copy inside braced-init-list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54947 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unas

[Bug c++/55607] New: "undefined reference" with rvalue lambda at non-namespace scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55607 Bug #: 55607 Summary: "undefined reference" with rvalue lambda at non-namespace scope Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCON