http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54953
--- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-10-26
07:42:07 UTC ---
Without your poposed change, AFTER_WITH_REG is only used while adding
REG_UNUSED marks to REG defs. That the REG def is unused means it's going to
be discarded and, when it i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54953
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54971
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55079
Bug #: 55079
Summary: [4.8 regeression] false positive -Warray-bounds
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55076
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55079
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55078
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54824
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener 2012-10-26
10:12:41 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Oct 26 10:12:35 2012
New Revision: 192841
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192841
Log:
2012-10-26 Richard Biener
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54824
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54385
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54570
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener 2012-10-26
10:32:53 UTC ---
Note that attributes on __builtin_object_size are wrong - it is marked as pure
which means that
struct A { char a[4]; int i; } x;
__builtin_object_size (&x, 1) == __buil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54659
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55080
Bug #: 55080
Summary: -pedantic produces error: floating-point literal
cannot appear in a constant-expression
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55080
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|accepts-invalid |diagnostic
CC|fang
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11393
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11393
--- Comment #30 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-10-26
11:45:11 UTC ---
>
> Your "c" example seems like a completely separate issue that should be a
> separate PR, I don't understand why it's being discussed here.
It is now PR55080.
About this P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55049
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53695
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P3
--- Comment #22 from Richar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54659
--- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de
2012-10-26 12:05:14 UTC ---
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54659
>
> Tobias Burnus changed:
>
>What
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55080
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54659
--- Comment #3 from dnovillo at google dot com
2012-10-26 12:34:53 UTC ---
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 8:05 AM, rguenther at suse dot de
wrote:
> Fact is that all this stuff happens because gmp.h is not included
> from system.h ...
I br
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54659
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de
2012-10-26 12:36:30 UTC ---
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012, dnovillo at google dot com wrote:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54659
>
> --- Comment #3 from dnovillo at google dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55081
Bug #: 55081
Summary: [4.8 regression?] Non-optimized static array elements
initialization
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55076
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54955
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55058
Sebastian Huber changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28518|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55076
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|paolo.car
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54955
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|dodji at gcc dot gnu.org|
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55076
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-10-26 13:41:36 UTC ---
Valgrind says:
markus@x4 tmp % /var/tmp/gcc_valgrind/usr/local/bin/g++ -std=c++11 -c test.ii
==10632== Invalid read of size 2
==10632==at 0x668622: lvalue_kind(tree
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54883
Sebastian Huber changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sebastian.huber@embedded-br
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55076
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-10-26
14:00:45 UTC ---
probably bug 54403
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54984
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-26 14:03:38 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Oct 26 14:03:32 2012
New Revision: 192846
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192846
Log:
/cp
2012-10-26 Paolo Carlin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54472
--- Comment #7 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-10-26
14:04:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Have you managed to check the patch?
The patch does the right thing for sets and clobbers, but the uses case should
be amended, too, judging f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55076
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-10-26 14:07:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> probably bug 54403
Yes. Valgrind backtrace is the same.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54984
--- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-26 14:19:51 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Oct 26 14:19:44 2012
New Revision: 192847
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192847
Log:
/cp
2012-10-26 Paolo Carlin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54984
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54075
--- Comment #32 from Paolo Carlini 2012-10-26
14:34:37 UTC ---
Thanks. Francois, can you please further investigate this issue? In fact, if
the slowdown goes away with a preliminary reserve, it must be possible to
handle the problem rather
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55081
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55082
Bug #: 55082
Summary: c++11: default member constructor
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55083
Bug #: 55083
Summary: failure while configuring libatomic is not cleaned up
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55084
Bug #: 55084
Summary: please submit full bug report
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54466
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54466
--- Comment #8 from dodji at seketeli dot org
2012-10-26 15:13:10 UTC ---
"paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" a écrit:
> Dodji, are there any chances you can look into this
> issue? The alias decls seem determinant.
Sure. Sorry for the delay,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55083
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Component|c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55084
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55081
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54973
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-10-26
15:20:54 UTC ---
This is why we need it:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2012-10/msg02459.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37448
--- Comment #47 from Jan Hubicka 2012-10-26
15:22:50 UTC ---
Hmm, good timming. I just started looking into re-tunning inliner heuristics
for 4.8 so I should look again into this inline bomb... Looks like inliner did
not get faster ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54973
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski 2012-10-26
15:25:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> This is why we need it:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2012-10/msg02459.html
I agree we need it but I don't think the above one is a good example
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54973
Frédéric Buclin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55083
--- Comment #2 from Perry Smith 2012-10-26 15:31:27
UTC ---
To be clear, the error during configuration is not what the bug report is
about. The discussion of the error can be seen here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-10/msg00380.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55081
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2012-10-26
15:33:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> but here DECL_INITIALIZED_BY_CONSTANT_EXPRESSION_P (decl) isn't set and
> cxx_dialect < cxx0x for -std=c++98. Not sure what we should do here, either
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54973
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36041
Gunther Piez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gpiez at web dot de
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55085
Bug #: 55085
Summary: [4.8 regression] false positive -Warray-bounds
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
-specific-runtime-libs
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.8.0 20121026 (experimental) [trunk revision 192841] (GCC)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55081
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54973
Frédéric Buclin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54973
Frédéric Buclin changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54971
--- Comment #10 from Martin Jambor 2012-10-26
16:13:08 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Fri Oct 26 16:13:00 2012
New Revision: 192848
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192848
Log:
2012-10-26 Martin Jambor
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55086
Bug #: 55086
Summary: ICE with FORALL in allocate_temp_for_forall_nest_1
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
--- Comment #13 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-26 16:47:08 UTC ---
Latest patch at: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2012-10/msg00126.html
This patch compiles the test case in comment 6 without errors, but the
finalizer is not called.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54973
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski 2012-10-26
16:48:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Click the URL link above to see how it looks like. The change has already been
> applied to GCC Bugzilla.
Is there any way to make the text red r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37448
--- Comment #48 from Jan Hubicka 2012-10-26
16:48:08 UTC ---
The problem here is walking of callgraph edges to sum the code size of the
caller function in both early inliner and late inliner. I am still not very
keen on making the cost cal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55076
--- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-10-26 16:48:46 UTC ---
What about the following naïve patch?
At least it fixes the problem and causes no new test suite regressions.
diff --git a/gcc/cp/tree.c b/gcc/cp/tree.c
index 8d555c2..0f1a75d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54973
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-10-26
16:52:40 UTC ---
That looks great to me (I was just being lazy reusing the existing FIELDSET
style)
Thanks for doing this!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35357
--- Comment #2 from davidxl 2012-10-26 16:55:48
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> What is the expected optimization and what is its benefit?
Should be transformed into the following the simplified loop body.
void foo(int n)
{
i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54973
Frédéric Buclin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55082
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37448
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55061
--- Comment #26 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-26
17:35:04 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Fri Oct 26 17:34:59 2012
New Revision: 192853
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192853
Log:
PR target/55061
* confi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55082
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54955
--- Comment #5 from dodji at seketeli dot org
2012-10-26 17:42:44 UTC ---
> --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini
> 2012-10-26 13:31:33 UTC ---
>
> Thanks Dodji!
You are welcome. :)
A candidate patch was proposed at
http://gcc.gnu.or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55061
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54875
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54970
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-10-26
19:19:30 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Oct 26 19:19:25 2012
New Revision: 192860
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192860
Log:
PR debug/54970
* cfgexpand.c (e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54971
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-10-26
19:19:30 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Oct 26 19:19:25 2012
New Revision: 192860
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192860
Log:
PR debug/54970
* cfgexpand.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55010
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55087
Bug #: 55087
Summary: bogus "linux-vdso.so.1: No such file or directory"
caused by libbacktrace
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Sta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55087
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55087
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-10-26 19:55:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> What system are you running on?
>
> How did you build GCC?
Linux x86_64.
~/gcc/configure --disable-werror --disable-multilib --enable-la
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55087
--- Comment #3 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-26
20:08:34 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Fri Oct 26 20:08:29 2012
New Revision: 192861
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192861
Log:
PR other/55087
* posix.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55087
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54255
--- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth 2012-10-26
20:18:05 UTC ---
Posted a general fix for all older assembler that lack -masm=intel support...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-10/msg02448.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55087
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55078
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55081
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-10-26
20:30:39 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Oct 26 20:30:35 2012
New Revision: 192862
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192862
Log:
PR c++/55081
* typeck2.c (store
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55081
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55087
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55088
Bug #: 55088
Summary: ada tarball missing COPYING file
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55089
Bug #: 55089
Summary: ICE in varasm.c during bootstrap-lean on
x86_64-pc-solaris2.10
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55089
--- Comment #1 from Tim Mooney 2012-10-26 21:12:20
UTC ---
Created attachment 28540
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28540
output from the rpmbuild that was run to configure gcc
I use rpmbuild to package local softwar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55090
Bug #: 55090
Summary: [4.8 regression] ICE in inline_call, at
ipa-inline-transform.c:269
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55078
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sch...@linux-m68k.org
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55090
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resoluti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55078
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55089
--- Comment #2 from Tim Mooney 2012-10-26 21:42:39
UTC ---
I just tried the older 4.7.0 and the same error happens, though the line number
in varasm.c is slightly different:
configure:3625: checking for suffix of object files
configure:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55091
Bug #: 55091
Summary: libgo testsuite doesn't support
--target_board='unix{-mx32}'
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIR
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
