http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54801
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54808
Bug #: 54808
Summary: error: non-trivial conversion at assignment (with bit
fields)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54739
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou 2012-10-04
07:58:31 UTC ---
Thanks. The code generated for the testcase is certainly better on the SPARC
if lower-subreg doesn't split the DImode objects (which probably means that the
patch was also bene
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54809
Bug #: 54809
Summary: gengtype ignore mark_hook in struct nested in union
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54809
--- Comment #1 from Basile Starynkevitch
2012-10-04 08:05:00 UTC ---
Created attachment 28354
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28354
patch to gengtype.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54804
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54809
--- Comment #2 from Basile Starynkevitch
2012-10-04 08:09:42 UTC ---
Run
gengtype -D -v \
-r gtype.state \
-P _g-basilemarkh.h basilemarkh.h
The bug appears on GCC 4.6, GCC 4.7 and GCC 4.8 (trunk svn rev 192031)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54739
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2012-10-04
08:15:37 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Oct 4 08:15:11 2012
New Revision: 192066
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192066
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/54739
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49754
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54801
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54807
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50356
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kazu at codesourcery dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54801
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54472
--- Comment #4 from Uros Bizjak 2012-10-04 09:29:15
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> > For some reason, -fselective-scheduling is moving
> >
> > (insn 19 16 22 2 (use (reg/i:SI 0 ax)) testcase.c:6 -1
> > (nil))
> >
> > around.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54789
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2012-10-04 09:46:45 UTC ---
Created attachment 28355
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28355
Patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54810
Bug #: 54810
Summary: VRP doesn't handle comparison of narrowing cast like
comparison of BIT_AND_EXPR
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54789
Dmitry Gorbachev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||christian.bruel at st dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54810
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54810
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54789
chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50557
--- Comment #16 from Igor Zamyatin 2012-10-04
11:17:00 UTC ---
Seems with LRA code is fast again
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47788
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-10-04
11:23:23 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Oct 4 11:23:18 2012
New Revision: 192075
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192075
Log:
2012-10-04 Richard Guenther
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47799
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54801
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52859
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54801
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|hjl.tools at gmail dot com |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54735
--- Comment #13 from Richard Guenther 2012-10-04
11:48:31 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Oct 4 11:48:21 2012
New Revision: 192078
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192078
Log:
2012-10-04 Richard Guenther
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54735
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.0
Target Milestone|4.8.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54808
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54806
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.1
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54803
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54795
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.7.3 |4.8.0
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52458
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54794
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54790
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54789
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54783
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
--- Comment #3 from Ri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54782
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52536
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|olin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54718
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-10-04 12:41:42 UTC ---
> --- Comment #5 from Uros Bizjak 2012-09-28
> 08:54:51 UTC ---
> (In reply to comment #4)
>> The fix for PR bootstrap/54688 also fixed this one. I can't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54472
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45508
--- Comment #10 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-10-04 12:46:34 UTC ---
> --- Comment #9 from gellert at dkrz dot de 2012-09-25 17:00:22 UTC ---
[...]
>> I agree that gcc/g++/... not adding needed RPATHs to its runtime libraries
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54806
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-10-04
13:43:48 UTC ---
It works for me on powerpc-apple-darwin8, powerpc-apple-darwin9 and
x86_64-apple-darwin10 (builds from fink). What is your *-apple-darwin*? and
what is your command line?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51802
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-04 13:44:45 UTC ---
Note that, in a way, this 'double mangling' is not a bug but a feature.
It was introduced for PR 46313, in order to handle cases like the one below.
(There might be o
cc/gcc/ada/sem_attr.adb -o ada/sem_attr.o
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
| 4.8.0 20121004 (experimental) [trunk revision 192031] (x86_64-suse-linux) GCC
error:|
| tree code '�' is not supported in LTO streams|
| E
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54796
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52945
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka 2012-10-04 14:16:15 UTC
---
> I have the following patch in my tree for some time now
>
> PR gcc/52945
> * testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/pr52634_0.c: skip the test on Darwin.
>
> --- /opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54776
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54790
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54077
--- Comment #15 from wbrana 2012-10-04 14:25:29 UTC
---
I can reliably reproduce bug on Core 2.
Reverting 175752 reliably fixes bug.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54095
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54812
Bug #: 54812
Summary: [C++11] Delete expression doesn't respect access of
defaulted destructor
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Stat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54323
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54323
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-04 15:19:42 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Oct 4 15:19:34 2012
New Revision: 192083
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192083
Log:
2012-10-04 Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54323
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54424
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54794
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2012-10-04 15:34:04
UTC ---
This may be related to PR 54795.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53845
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53845
--- Comment #4 from Jeremiah Willcock 2012-10-04
15:43:30 UTC ---
I don't know whether it is valid or not after all of the trimming I did on it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54776
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
AssignedTo|hubicka at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54144
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53845
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2012-10-04
15:55:26 UTC ---
Minimally, can somebody check clang? Lately we fixed quite a few "error
reporting routines re-entered" issues and if the testcase isn't even invalid
there is no point in keeping
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54101
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|supe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53000
--- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini 2012-10-04
15:57:07 UTC ---
*** Bug 54101 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54776
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-10-04 15:57:19 UTC ---
> I will take a look how LTO can help us. I believe part of the problem should
> be fixed by dropping the COMDAT hack for V1 API that is on my TODO list for
> this week
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54776
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka 2012-10-04
16:07:19 UTC ---
I assume it is with linker plugin, right? In that case we need to track why
some of the functions do not become static.
There is bug in this right now, see PR52945. I will look i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54776
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-10-04 16:16:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I assume it is with linker plugin, right?
Yes.
> I assume you do see improvements with -O3 -fwhole-program? (it improves the
> scores in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54811
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54813
Bug #: 54813
Summary: NULL pointer conversion fails for template code
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54811
--- Comment #2 from dehao at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-04 16:33:00 UTC ---
I think in clear_unused_block_pointer, we already removed all block for debug
statements.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54811
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54811
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2012-10-04
16:38:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> No, look again - for some reason we skip debug stmts. That's obviously
> a bug. Eric - mind testing the "obvious" patch?
Err, misread the code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54813
--- Comment #1 from tjablin at gmail dot com 2012-10-04 16:41:06 UTC ---
I have further simplified the testcase as follows:
template static void bar(T, char[][sizeof(T)]) {}
void baz() {
bar(0, 0); // succeeds
char a[4][siz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54813
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23055
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tjablin at gmail dot com
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54811
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-10-04
16:43:37 UTC ---
Instead what happened is that I specifically restricted processing
DECL_DEBUG_EXPRs to local-vars in a previous fix. But it seems that
local vars no longer contains this dec
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54814
Bug #: 54814
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE: unable to find a register to
spill in class 'R0_REG'
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
St
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54806
--- Comment #3 from Matt Arsenault
2012-10-04 17:34:35 UTC ---
I'm using it from macports. OS X 10.8.2, x86_64-apple-darwin12.2.0
$ g++ -std=c++11 testcase.cpp
Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
"___emutls_v._ZSt11__once_call"
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54206
Matt Godbolt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matt at godbolt dot org
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54815
Bug #: 54815
Summary: [avr] missed optimization with operations with
constant operands
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCO
ls r24,r22 ; 17mulqihi3[length = 3]
movw r24,r0
clr __zero_reg__
ret ; 29return[length = 1]
.ident"GCC: (GNU) 4.8.0 20121004 (experimental)"
avr-gcc-4.7 was smarter with its code:
wmul:
lsl r22 ; 10*ashlqi3/5[leng
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33135
--- Comment #16 from Oleg Endo 2012-10-04
18:32:26 UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Thu Oct 4 18:32:20 2012
New Revision: 192097
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192097
Log:
PR target/33135
* config/sh/t-s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54206
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54206
--- Comment #5 from Andi Kleen 2012-10-04
18:50:52 UTC ---
This is the configure snippet glibc is using for this.
Someone with better autoconf-fu than me could add it
if test "`cd $srcdir; /bin/pwd`" = "`/bin/pwd`"; then
AC_MSG_ERRO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50356
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54206
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28896
--- Comment #43 from Larry Baker 2012-10-04 19:14:44
UTC ---
Those of you that use the uClinux elf2flt toolchain will find that
__stack_start is not correctly defined. This is due to a bug in the elf2flt.ld
linker script. Edit either/bot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54776
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka 2012-10-04 19:17:46 UTC
---
> > I assume you do see improvements with -O3 -fwhole-program? (it improves the
> > scores in my setup, I would be curious to see how it compares to other
> > numbers
> > you re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54776
--- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-10-04 19:40:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> > > I assume you do see improvements with -O3 -fwhole-program? (it improves
> > > the
> > > scores in my setup, I would be curious to see how
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54806
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|*-apple-darwin* |x86_64-apple-darwin12
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50356
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law 2012-10-04 20:58:33
UTC ---
Author: law
Date: Thu Oct 4 20:58:30 2012
New Revision: 192103
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192103
Log:
* PR target/50356
* config/h8300
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50356
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53403
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2012-10-04
23:06:18 UTC ---
Works in mainline. I'm adding the testcase and closing the PR.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53403
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-04 23:19:52 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Oct 4 23:19:46 2012
New Revision: 192108
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192108
Log:
2012-10-04 Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53403
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52233
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2012-10-04
23:37:19 UTC ---
This works in 4.7.2 and mainline. I'm adding the testcase to mainline and
closing the PR.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54817
Bug #: 54817
Summary: Warning about extern declarations in C and C++ files.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52233
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-04 23:48:20 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Oct 4 23:48:16 2012
New Revision: 192109
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192109
Log:
2012-10-04 Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54685
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo 2012-10-04 23:50:16
UTC ---
Just for the record...
I've tried adding this pattern
Failed to match this instruction:
(parallel [
(set (reg:SI 166 [ D.42391+-3 ])
(ge:SI (reg:SI 4 r4 [ a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52233
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo