[Bug rtl-optimization/54592] [4.8 Regression] Cannot fuse SSE move and add together

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54592 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug fortran/54613] New: [F2003/F2008] Add FINDLOC plus support MAXLOC/MINLOC with KIND=/BACK=

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54613 Bug #: 54613 Summary: [F2003/F2008] Add FINDLOC plus support MAXLOC/MINLOC with KIND=/BACK= Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRM

Re: libiberty sha1.c: bug in adding 64-bit number to 64-bit number (binutils-2.22.90)

On 09/18/2012 02:13 AM, Geoff Pike wrote: Hello libiberty experts, I don't see anything saying that sha1_process_block() has a size limit on its input buffer, and if the length of the buffer is big (e.g., 2^32 on a 64-bit machine) then this code won't correctly add a 64-bit number to 64-bit numb

[Bug tree-optimization/54610] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-22.c (internal compiler error) on x86 AVX targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54610 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/54524] Spurious add on sum of bitshifts (forward-propagate issue)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54524 Jan Smets changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |major

[Bug tree-optimization/54610] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-22.c (internal compiler error) on x86 AVX targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54610 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-18 08:32:52 UTC --- Created attachment 28210 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28210 gcc48-pr54610.patch Untested fix.

[Bug other/54411] libiberty: objalloc_alloc integer overflows (CVE-2012-3509)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54411 --- Comment #5 from Florian Weimer 2012-09-18 08:34:12 UTC --- Author: fw Date: Tue Sep 18 08:34:05 2012 New Revision: 191413 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191413 Log: PR other/54411: integer overflow in objalloc_alloc 2

[Bug libstdc++/54612] [4.8 Regression] Many failures in ext/random testsuite

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54612 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug bootstrap/54611] [4.8 regression] Bootstrap failure: conflicting types for 'backtrace_simple'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54611 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug fortran/54613] [F2003/F2008] Add FINDLOC plus support MAXLOC/MINLOC with KIND=/BACK=

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54613 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2012-09-18 09:17:25 UTC --- Created attachment 28211 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28211 Very preliminary patch for MAXLOC/MINLOC Very preliminary patch for the MAXLOC/MINLOC support; i.e.

[Bug fortran/54613] [F2003/F2008] Add FINDLOC plus support MAXLOC/MINLOC with KIND=/BACK=

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54613 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/54599] Issues found in gfortran by the Coverity Scan

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54599 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2012-09-18 09:28:46 UTC --- Dump two patches here. First is about a pointless check ("nl->sym->..." is used all over the place) and the second: If the assert fails, we would use TREE_TYPE(NULL_TREE) ... --- a/gc

[Bug c++/54575] [4.8 Regression] ICE with std::vector::insert and -std=c++11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54575 --- Comment #11 from Paolo Carlini 2012-09-18 09:41:29 UTC --- Thanks a lot Jason!

[Bug libstdc++/54612] [4.8 Regression] Many failures in ext/random testsuite

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54612 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||drepper.fsp at gmail dot

[Bug fortran/54599] Issues found in gfortran by the Coverity Scan

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54599 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2012-09-18 10:10:28 UTC --- And another one: Unreachable code; due to "if(extremum == NULL) {...; continue}", last == NULL is always false: --- a/gcc/fortran/simplify.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/simplify.c @@ -4109,4 +

[Bug ada/54614] New: Vector * Matrix -> Vector gives wrong result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54614 Bug #: 54614 Summary: Vector * Matrix -> Vector gives wrong result Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug ada/54614] Vector * Matrix -> Vector gives wrong result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54614 --- Comment #1 from simon at pushface dot org 2012-09-18 10:44:47 UTC --- Created attachment 28213 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28213 Proposed patch for 4.7.0 code

[Bug c/7652] -Wswitch-break : Warn if a switch case falls through

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7652 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/54612] [4.8 Regression] Many failures in ext/random testsuite

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54612 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug middle-end/54615] New: unclear documentation on -fomit-frame-pointer for -O

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54615 Bug #: 54615 Summary: unclear documentation on -fomit-frame-pointer for -O Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/54612] [4.8 Regression] Many failures in ext/random testsuite

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54612 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/54612] [4.8 Regression] Many failures in ext/random testsuite

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54612 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2012-09-18 12:11:08 UTC --- Created attachment 28214 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28214 Lightly tested so far

[Bug target/52483] SH Target: Loads from volatile memory leave redundant sign/zero extensions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52483 --- Comment #3 from Kazumoto Kojima 2012-09-18 12:25:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > If that is the only reason for rejecting volatile mems, then I think it would > be OK to match volatile mems in the load/store expanders for SH, since ther

[Bug c++/54372] __attribute__((unused)) doesn't work with unused local typedef in template function.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54372 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/54524] Spurious add on sum of bitshifts (forward-propagate issue)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54524 Jan Smets changed: What|Removed |Added Target|mips|mipsisa64-octeon-elf Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/54610] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-22.c (internal compiler error) on x86 AVX targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54610 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-18 13:03:13 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Sep 18 13:03:09 2012 New Revision: 191421 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191421 Log: PR tree-optimization/54610 * tree-ssa-forwp

[Bug rtl-optimization/54524] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Spurious add on sum of bitshifts (forward-propagate issue)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54524 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.4 Summary|Spurious add

[Bug tree-optimization/54610] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-22.c (internal compiler error) on x86 AVX targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54610 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/54616] New: Segmentation fault (during parsing?)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54616 Bug #: 54616 Summary: Segmentation fault (during parsing?) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/54616] Segmentation fault (during parsing?)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54616 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/54420] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Segmentation fault in decl_mangling_context

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54420 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||patrik.h.hagglund at gmail

[Bug c++/54575] [4.8 Regression] ICE with std::vector::insert and -std=c++11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54575 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/54612] [4.8 Regression] Many failures in ext/random testsuite

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54612 --- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-18 14:02:25 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Sep 18 14:02:20 2012 New Revision: 191424 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191424 Log: 2012-09-18 Paolo Carlini PR libs

[Bug lto/54095] Unnecessary static variable renaming

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54095 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #27879|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/54617] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE when compiling gcc.c-torture/compile/pr42025-2.c on powerpc-apple-darwin9 with -m64 and -O1 or above after revision 191302

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54617 Bug #: 54617 Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE when compiling gcc.c-torture/compile/pr42025-2.c on powerpc-apple-darwin9 with -m64 and -O1 or above after revision 19130

[Bug target/54617] [4.8 Regression] ICE when compiling gcc.c-torture/compile/pr42025-2.c on powerpc-apple-darwin9 with -m64 and -O1 or above after revision 191302

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54617 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/54617] [4.8 Regression] ICE when compiling gcc.c-torture/compile/pr42025-2.c on powerpc-apple-darwin9 with -m64 and -O1 or above after revision 191302

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54617 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|ebotcazou at

[Bug rtl-optimization/54592] [4.8 Regression] Cannot fuse SSE move and add together

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54592 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-18 15:14:20 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Sep 18 15:14:15 2012 New Revision: 191430 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191430 Log: PR target/54592 * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_

[Bug fortran/54618] New: [OOP] wrong-code with CLASS(...), INTENT(OUT) -- and OPTIONAL or ALLOCATABLE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54618 Bug #: 54618 Summary: [OOP] wrong-code with CLASS(...), INTENT(OUT) -- and OPTIONAL or ALLOCATABLE Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UN

[Bug rtl-optimization/54592] [4.8 Regression] Cannot fuse SSE move and add together

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54592 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/54575] [4.8 Regression] ICE with std::vector::insert and -std=c++11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54575 --- Comment #13 from Wolfgang Bangerth 2012-09-18 15:32:17 UTC --- Thanks, all, for the quick turnaround. This works again, not just on the testcase but on the entire code base. Best W.

[Bug tree-optimization/54610] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-22.c (internal compiler error) on x86 AVX targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54610 --- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse 2012-09-18 16:06:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > The bug is obvious, vect_gen_perm_mask is not suitable for uses outside of the > vectorizer, it uses e.g. current_vector_size. Argh, I was happy to find a fun

[Bug tree-optimization/54610] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-22.c (internal compiler error) on x86 AVX targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54610 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-18 16:14:58 UTC --- It is true that it has TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS at its disposal, but it just uses the common vectorizer infrastructure to create vector types. The routines it is using also use other vecto

[Bug tree-optimization/54610] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-22.c (internal compiler error) on x86 AVX targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54610 --- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse 2012-09-18 16:22:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > It is true that it has TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS at its disposal, but it just uses > the common vectorizer infrastructure to create vector types. > The routines it

[Bug middle-end/54617] [4.8 Regression] ICE on gcc.c-torture/compile/pr42025-2.c with -m64 and -O1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54617 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |middle-end Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/54619] New: GCC aborts during compilation with '-O2 -mips16'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54619 Bug #: 54619 Summary: GCC aborts during compilation with '-O2 -mips16' Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug other/54620] New: sha1.c has incorrect math if sizeof(size_t) is 8

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54620 Bug #: 54620 Summary: sha1.c has incorrect math if sizeof(size_t) is 8 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug target/54619] GCC aborts during compilation with '-O2 -mips16'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54619 --- Comment #1 from Steve Ellcey 2012-09-18 18:34:21 UTC --- It looks like this is coming from mips16_unextended_reference_p, if mode is VOIDmode then GET_MODE_SIZE (mode) is zero and we wind up doing 'offset % 0'. I think we should be checking

[Bug c/54621] New: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault when compiling gSOAP generated Server module.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54621 Bug #: 54621 Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault when compiling gSOAP generated Server module. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.2.4

[Bug c/54621] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault when compiling gSOAP generated Server module.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54621 --- Comment #1 from Doug Dawson 2012-09-18 20:48:49 UTC --- Created attachment 28216 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28216 Console output from compilation. gzipped Interim code is too large to attach. Please access it at www.

[Bug c/54621] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault when compiling gSOAP generated Server module.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54621 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||polacek at redhat dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug ada/54614] Vector * Matrix -> Vector gives wrong result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54614 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/54584] m68k-uclinux error: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54584 --- Comment #3 from Larry Baker 2012-09-18 21:43:32 UTC --- I don't know how to attach gdb to the ld.real called by collect2. So, I added a bunch of debugging output to bfd/elflink.c to find out where the failure occurs. (I'll attach my hacked

[Bug target/53833] m68k-uclinux xgcc ICE when compiling libgcc (linux-atomic.c:203:1: in emit_library_call_value_1, at calls.c:4146)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53833 --- Comment #3 from Larry Baker 2012-09-18 21:45:23 UTC --- Created attachment 28217 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28217 Hacked binutils 1.22 bfd/elflink.c I added a bunch of debugging output to bfd/elflink.c to find out wh

[Bug rtl-optimization/54524] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Spurious add on sum of bitshifts (forward-propagate issue)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54524 --- Comment #3 from Jan Smets 2012-09-18 21:49:21 UTC --- This commit introduced the bug: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=161655 (or 182cf5a9a415f31df0f9a10e46faed1221484a35 in git)

[Bug target/53833] m68k-uclinux xgcc ICE when compiling libgcc (linux-atomic.c:203:1: in emit_library_call_value_1, at calls.c:4146)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53833 --- Comment #4 from Larry Baker 2012-09-18 21:51:36 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Created attachment 28217 [details] > Hacked binutils 1.22 bfd/elflink.c > > I added a bunch of debugging output to bfd/elflink.c to find out where the > link

[Bug target/54584] m68k-uclinux error: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54584 --- Comment #4 from Larry Baker 2012-09-18 21:53:03 UTC --- Created attachment 28218 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28218 Hacked binutils 1.22 bfd/elflink.c I added a bunch of debugging output to bfd/elflink.c to find out wh

[Bug middle-end/54617] [4.8 Regression] ICE on gcc.c-torture/compile/pr42025-2.c with -m64 and -O1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54617 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou 2012-09-18 22:42:22 UTC --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Tue Sep 18 22:42:18 2012 New Revision: 191451 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191451 Log: PR middle-end/54617 * expr.c (store_fie

[Bug middle-end/54617] [4.8 Regression] ICE on gcc.c-torture/compile/pr42025-2.c with -m64 and -O1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54617 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED URL|

[Bug target/54584] m68k-uclinux error: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54584 --- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-09-18 23:30:23 UTC --- This seems to be just a problem with flawed elf2flt linker placement of orphaned sections. But, I can't find where -elf2flt is handled in FSF binutils; you need to talk to whomev

[Bug target/54584] m68k-uclinux error: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54584 --- Comment #6 from Larry Baker 2012-09-19 00:05:38 UTC --- Hans-Peter, Thanks for looking at this. This seems a bit more complicated than "just a problem with flawed elf2flt linker placement of orphaned sections" since elf2flt/ld.real work fin

[Bug target/54584] m68k-uclinux error: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54584 --- Comment #7 from Larry Baker 2012-09-19 00:15:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > FYI: For the latest tests I ran, I used a vanilla binutils 1.22 distribution > -- > no uClinux linker patches. I also used the latest elf2flt from > www.ucl

[Bug testsuite/54622] New: gcc.dg/vect test failures for arm big-endian

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54622 Bug #: 54622 Summary: gcc.dg/vect test failures for arm big-endian Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug target/28896] -fstack-limit-symbol and m68k and non 68020

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28896 --- Comment #33 from Larry Baker 2012-09-19 01:02:31 UTC --- Created attachment 28220 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28220 Patches for GCC 4.7.1 Patches to fix stack limit checking for GCC 4.7.1 for FreeScale Coldfire uClinu

[Bug testsuite/54622] gcc.dg/vect test failures for arm big-endian

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54622 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug testsuite/54622] gcc.dg/vect test failures for arm big-endian

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54622 --- Comment #2 from Janis Johnson 2012-09-19 01:16:58 UTC --- Effective targets vect_unpack and vect_pack_trunc both require little endian for ARM, which is why I thought that perhaps some of the others do as well.

[Bug testsuite/54622] gcc.dg/vect test failures for arm big-endian

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54622 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2012-09-19 01:29:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Effective targets vect_unpack and vect_pack_trunc both require little endian > for ARM, which is why I thought that perhaps some of the others do as well. Y

[Bug rtl-optimization/54524] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Spurious add on sum of bitshifts (forward-propagate issue)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54524 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/54623] New: [4.8 regression] install fails with libbacktrace/backtrace.c:35:20: error: unwind.h: No such file or directory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54623 Bug #: 54623 Summary: [4.8 regression] install fails with libbacktrace/backtrace.c:35:20: error: unwind.h: No such file or directory Classification: Unclassified Product

[Bug bootstrap/25470] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] fixincludes/ subdirectory not cleaned by "make distclean"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25470 b.grayson at samsung dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||b.grayson at samsung dot

[Bug bootstrap/54623] [4.8 regression] install fails with libbacktrace/backtrace.c:35:20: error: unwind.h: No such file or directory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54623 --- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-19 04:37:47 UTC --- Author: ian Date: Wed Sep 19 04:37:40 2012 New Revision: 191459 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191459 Log: PR bootstrap/54623 * Makefile.am (AM

[Bug bootstrap/54623] [4.8 regression] install fails with libbacktrace/backtrace.c:35:20: error: unwind.h: No such file or directory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54623 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|