http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42295
--- Comment #8 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-02 07:07:50 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Sun Sep 2 07:07:45 2012
New Revision: 190854
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190854
Log:
PR target/42295
* g++.dg/opt/pr42295
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42295
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36680
--- Comment #8 from Uros Bizjak 2012-09-02 08:01:50
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> What is the magic to avoid the -O in "-O -O1 -fschedule-insns"?
You can't. This is how currently gfortran testsuite works.
The part that should eventually
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36680
--- Comment #9 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-02 08:10:26 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Sun Sep 2 08:10:21 2012
New Revision: 190855
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190855
Log:
PR target/36680
* gfortran.dg/pr3668
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36680
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49206
--- Comment #9 from Uros Bizjak 2012-09-02 08:35:45
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> > This went away with http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181075
> > but was it really a fix for this, rather than just something that made the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49206
--- Comment #10 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-02 08:49:37 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Sun Sep 2 08:49:31 2012
New Revision: 190857
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190857
Log:
PR target/49206
* gcc.c-torture/com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49206
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.1
Target Milestone|4.6.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49206
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.8.0 |4.6.4
Summary|[4.6/4.7/4.8 Regre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42536
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2010-03-20 13:03:43 |2012-09-02
--- Comment #11 from Uros Bizjak
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42536
--- Comment #12 from Uros Bizjak 2012-09-02 09:44:12
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Reconfirmed.
BTW: Moving the complex address to the temporary (as proposed in Comment #4)
would help "atomic_compare_and_swap_doubleword" on 32bit x86 targ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54455
Bug #: 54455
Summary: [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: RTL check: expected elt 3
type 'B', have '0' (rtx barrier) in
compute_bb_for_insn, at cfgrtl.c:418
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54456
Bug #: 54456
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE: in init_seqno, at
sel-sched.c:6797 with -fschedule-insns
-fselective-scheduling
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54369
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou 2012-09-02
10:36:31 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sun Sep 2 10:36:27 2012
New Revision: 190858
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190858
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/54369
* config/mip
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54369
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou 2012-09-02
10:36:31 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sun Sep 2 10:36:27 2012
New Revision: 190858
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190858
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/54369
* config/mip
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54369
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou 2012-09-02
10:36:31 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sun Sep 2 10:36:27 2012
New Revision: 190858
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190858
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/54369
* config/mip
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54369
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou 2012-09-02
10:37:00 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sun Sep 2 10:36:54 2012
New Revision: 190859
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190859
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/54369
* config/mip
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54369
--- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou 2012-09-02
10:37:52 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sun Sep 2 10:37:49 2012
New Revision: 190860
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190860
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/54369
* config/mip
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54369
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54455
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54455
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54455
--- Comment #3 from Steven Bosscher 2012-09-02
11:47:18 UTC ---
The patch is incorrect. There can't be a BARRIER in the middle of a basic
block. This problem typically indicates that either a BARRIER was emitted in
the wrong place, or BB_END wasn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46687
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54455
--- Comment #4 from Uros Bizjak 2012-09-02 12:10:45
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> What does the insns list look like around the BARRIER? (From GDB do:
> "p debug_rtx_list(barrier_insn, -7)" and show the result here.)
(gdb) p debug_rtx_list
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54454
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54455
--- Comment #5 from Steven Bosscher 2012-09-02
12:27:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (jump_insn 30 29 31 3 (simple_return) pr54455.c:16 -1
> (nil)
> -> simple_return)
>
This should be BB_END(BASIC_BLOCK(3)). If it's not then someone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54455
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
URL|http://gcc.gnu.org/m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54457
Bug #: 54457
Summary: [x32] Fail to combine 64bit index + constant
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53942
--- Comment #8 from Uros Bizjak 2012-09-02 13:57:01
UTC ---
The proposed patch from Comment #4 is not effective on 4.6 branch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54445
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at redhat dot com
--- Comment #4 from H.J
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54290
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54445
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54455
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54455
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|steven at gcc dot gnu.org |abel at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54456
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54458
Bug #: 54458
Summary: get_loop_body, at cfgloop.c:830
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54458
--- Comment #1 from Francesco Zappa Nardelli 2012-09-02 15:42:45 UTC ---
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/home/yquem/moscova/zappa/source/gcc-svn-bin/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.8.0/lto-wrapper
--prefix=/home/yquem/moscova/zappa/source/gcc-svn-bin
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.8.0 20120902 (experimental) (GCC)
and the exact error message now is:
input.c:3:1: internal compiler error: in get_loop_body, at cfgloop.c:823
func_34 () {
^
Please submit a full bug report.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54184
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54459
Bug #: 54459
Summary: [4.8 regression] Bootstrap fails with "aliased to
undefined symbol"
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54460
Bug #: 54460
Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/nested-3.C
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54458
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54448
Hin-Tak Leung changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host||alphaev68-dec-osf5.1a
Known to fail|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||polacek at redhat dot com
--- Comment #13
(g_24[0][0] == 0 ? 1 : 1 % (g_24[0][0]))
for (; g_42; g_42--)
lbl_130: {
}
else if (p_38)
for (;;) {
}
if (g_168[0])
goto lbl_130;
goto lbl_424;
}
void main () {
g_24[0][0] = 1;
func_34(0);
}
$ gcc -O3 input.c (gcc version 4.8.0 20120902 (experimental) (GCC) )
in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
--- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu 2012-09-02
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54459
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse 2012-09-02 18:08:16
UTC ---
Likely a dup of PR 54453.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54459
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54453
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dougmencken at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54460
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab 2012-09-02 18:12:21
UTC ---
This uses yet another comment character.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54453
--- Comment #4 from Douglas Mencken 2012-09-02
18:13:40 UTC ---
Yes, looks like my bug http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54459
I can add that snapshot
ftp://ftp.fu-berlin.de/unix/languages/gcc/snapshots/4.8-20120826/gcc-4.8-20120826.ta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54461
Bug #: 54461
Summary: [avr] add configure option for better AVR-Libc
integration
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54461
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54462
Bug #: 54462
Summary: [4.8 Regression] Another "segmentation fault" after an
error in COMMON statement after r190853
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54463
Bug #: 54463
Summary: -fdefault-real-8 does not promote the BLAS call when
using -fexternal-blas
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #15 from Ulrich Drepper 2012-09-02
20:04:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> libstdc++ should check if rdrand is supported by assembler
> before using __builtin_ia32_rdrand32_step.
Every gcc feature should have a test. When you a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54456
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou 2012-09-02
20:06:46 UTC ---
Any specialist of selective scheduling interested here? Otherwise:
Index: sched-rgn.c
===
--- sched-rgn.c (revision 19
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33135
--- Comment #13 from Kazumoto Kojima 2012-09-02
22:43:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Kaz, would it be OK to remove the whole function 'sh_option_init_struct' from
> gcc/common/sh/sh-common.c ?
Definitely.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54146
--- Comment #59 from Steven Bosscher 2012-09-02
22:54:34 UTC ---
FWIW Martin: SRA blows up this test case's register pressure. Compiling with
SRA enabled takes ~900s, but with -fno-tree-sra compile time almost halves.
There are extremely long liv
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54418
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo 2012-09-02 23:15:30
UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Sun Sep 2 23:15:25 2012
New Revision: 190864
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190864
Log:
PR target/54418
* config/sh/sh.md (cmpgeusi_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33135
--- Comment #14 from Oleg Endo 2012-09-02
23:18:11 UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Sun Sep 2 23:18:08 2012
New Revision: 190865
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190865
Log:
PR target/33135
* common/config/sh/sh-commo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54460
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-09-02 23:41:30 UTC ---
On 2-Sep-12, at 2:12 PM, sch...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
> This uses yet another comment character.
Thanks. I'll see if adding it to the regexp helps.
--
John David Angli
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54463
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54453
--- Comment #5 from Douglas Mencken 2012-09-03
02:12:01 UTC ---
Successfully bootstrapped with ``Revert a few Makefile.am regexps'' patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54463
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
Sever
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54415
birender.singh at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54415
--- Comment #3 from birender.singh at hotmail dot com 2012-09-03 06:34:53 UTC
---
The gcc used as below:
bash-3.2# gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/sfw/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/3.4.3/specs
Configured with:
/sfw10/builds/build/sfw10-patch/usr/sr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51632
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2012-09-03
06:36:05 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Sep 3 06:35:59 2012
New Revision: 190869
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190869
Log:
2012-09-03 Alessandro Fanfarillo
To
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
--- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus 2012-09-03
06:36:05 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Sep 3 06:35:59 2012
New Revision: 190869
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190869
Log:
2012-09-03 Alessandro Fanfarillo
T
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54465
Bug #: 54465
Summary: Implement -Wextra for Fortran
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: enhanc
71 matches
Mail list logo
