[Bug middle-end/53922] VRP: semantic conflict between range_includes_zero_p and value_inside_range

2012-07-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53922 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug web/53919] Version-specific install instructions not available

2012-07-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53919 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/53918] Incorrect version for cloog-ppl listed in prerequisites.html

2012-07-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53918 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/53915] gcov can call format_gcov with top > bottom, which is unexpected and gives 99.99%

2012-07-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53915 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/53922] VRP: semantic conflict between range_includes_zero_p and value_inside_range

2012-07-11 Thread amker.cheng at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53922 --- Comment #2 from amker.cheng 2012-07-11 08:03:11 UTC --- Yes, the dump before pass vrp2 is like: main () { int (*) (int) cstore.6; int g.2; int g.0; : g.0_1 = g; if (g.0_1 != 0) goto ; else goto ; : : # cstore.6_9 = PH

[Bug rtl-optimization/53908] [4.6/4.7 Regression] csa removes needed memory load

2012-07-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53908 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 from H

[Bug target/53859] ICE when calculate insn latency for armv7e-m arch in O2 level

2012-07-11 Thread gretay at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53859 --- Comment #4 from gretay at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-11 08:41:43 UTC --- Author: gretay Date: Wed Jul 11 08:41:37 2012 New Revision: 189423 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189423 Log: 2012-07-10 Greta Yorsh gcc/ PR t

[Bug target/39423] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] [SH] performance regression: lost mov @(disp,Rn)

2012-07-11 Thread chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39423 --- Comment #16 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-11 09:05:03 UTC --- humm I forgot about this case. It works in one of my dev branches, Let me extract the uncommitted change and send it to gcc-patches. Cheers Christian (In reply to comment

[Bug other/53923] New: ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'debug_expr' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1091

2012-07-11 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53923 Bug #: 53923 Summary: ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'debug_expr' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1091 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Stat

[Bug other/53923] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'debug_expr' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1091

2012-07-11 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53923 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-07-11 09:27:26 UTC --- Created attachment 27773 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27773 libgcc2-mulsc3.c: preprocessed bit of libgcc2.c compile with avr-gcc libgcc2-mulsc3.c -c -mmcu=

[Bug other/53923] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'debug_expr' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1091

2012-07-11 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53923 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/53908] [4.6/4.7 Regression] csa removes needed memory load

2012-07-11 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53908 --- Comment #8 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-07-11 09:46:06 UTC --- Backporting r186159 and its followup fix r186164 to 4.7.1 was easy and fixed the test case there too (untested beyond this test case). Backporting those revisions to 4.6.3 require

[Bug other/53923] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'debug_expr' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1091

2012-07-11 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53923 --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-07-11 10:03:49 UTC --- avr.c already contains code to work around problems from DCE, instead of DCE working out proper solutions to cover AVR, see PR50063 Something goes wrong in df-problems.c:dead_debu

[Bug middle-end/53922] VRP: semantic conflict between range_includes_zero_p and value_inside_range

2012-07-11 Thread amker.cheng at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53922 --- Comment #3 from amker.cheng 2012-07-11 10:12:24 UTC --- vrp processes PHI node " # cstore.6_9 = PHI " in calling sequence: vrp_visit_phi_node -> vrp_meet When gcc gives up in function vrp_meet, it executes following code to derive an anti-

[Bug c/53924] New: unhelpful diagnostic in invalid declaration list

2012-07-11 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53924 Bug #: 53924 Summary: unhelpful diagnostic in invalid declaration list Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug c/53924] unhelpful diagnostic in invalid declaration list

2012-07-11 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53924 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug other/53925] New: dbgcnt.c:dbg_cnt_set_limit_by_index emits diagnostic via fprintf (stderr

2012-07-11 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53925 Bug #: 53925 Summary: dbgcnt.c:dbg_cnt_set_limit_by_index emits diagnostic via fprintf (stderr Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONF

[Bug middle-end/53823] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/930921-1.c execution at -O0 and -O1

2012-07-11 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53823 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/53926] New: g++ fails to compile valid template code with casting to QVariant and back

2012-07-11 Thread a.matveyakin at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53926 Bug #: 53926 Summary: g++ fails to compile valid template code with casting to QVariant and back Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCO

[Bug c++/53926] g++ fails to compile valid template code with casting to QVariant and back

2012-07-11 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53926 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-07-11 11:36:09 UTC --- It's not valid code, you ned to say foo().template value() http://womble.decadent.org.uk/c++/template-faq.html#disambiguation

[Bug tree-optimization/53922] VRP: semantic conflict between range_includes_zero_p and value_inside_range

2012-07-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53922 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug c++/53926] g++ fails to compile valid template code with casting to QVariant and back

2012-07-11 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53926 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/53926] g++ fails to compile valid template code with casting to QVariant and back

2012-07-11 Thread a.matveyakin at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53926 Andrey Matveyakin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALI

[Bug c++/53926] g++ fails to compile valid template code with casting to QVariant and back

2012-07-11 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53926 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/53922] VRP: semantic conflict between range_includes_zero_p and value_inside_range

2012-07-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53922 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-07-11 12:28:57 UTC --- Created attachment 27774 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27774 untested patch

[Bug target/39423] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] [SH] performance regression: lost mov @(disp,Rn)

2012-07-11 Thread chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39423 --- Comment #17 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-11 12:35:32 UTC --- Created attachment 27775 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27775 plus add combine Here is the patch that I've been running since some time, it also use the

[Bug rtl-optimization/53908] [4.6/4.7 Regression] csa removes needed memory load

2012-07-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53908 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p |

[Bug target/53689] [SH] GCC emits an invalid slot instruction for RTE (Return from Exception)

2012-07-11 Thread chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53689 chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug target/53689] [SH] GCC emits an invalid slot instruction for RTE (Return from Exception)

2012-07-11 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53689 --- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo 2012-07-11 13:05:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > (In reply to comment #0) > > > Under target (sh-elf) big-endian SuperH-2 (SH7604) (options -m2 -mb > > > I've checked this case wit

[Bug debug/53927] New: wrong value for DW_AT_static_link

2012-07-11 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53927 Bug #: 53927 Summary: wrong value for DW_AT_static_link Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/53689] [SH] GCC emits an invalid slot instruction for RTE (Return from Exception)

2012-07-11 Thread chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53689 --- Comment #4 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-11 13:21:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > (In reply to comment #1) > > > (In reply to comment #0) > > > > Under target (sh-elf) big-endian SuperH-2 (SH7604) (opt

[Bug other/53928] New: use tar.xz

2012-07-11 Thread wbrana at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53928 Bug #: 53928 Summary: use tar.xz Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: o

[Bug other/53928] use tar.xz

2012-07-11 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53928 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-07-11 14:03:04 UTC --- c.f. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-03/msg00549.html

[Bug bootstrap/53912] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap fails at stage 2 with error: cast from 'void*' to 'long int' loses precision in ggc-common.c

2012-07-11 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Emrich 2012-07-11 14:07:17 UTC --- Created attachment 27776 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27776 preprocessed source I assume for trunk there is the same issue, because ggc-common.c hasn't changed

[Bug target/39423] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] [SH] performance regression: lost mov @(disp,Rn)

2012-07-11 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39423 --- Comment #18 from Oleg Endo 2012-07-11 15:09:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #17) > Created attachment 27775 [details] > plus add combine > > Here is the patch that I've been running since some time, it also use the same > combine pattern mat

[Bug target/39423] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] [SH] performance regression: lost mov @(disp,Rn)

2012-07-11 Thread chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39423 --- Comment #19 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-11 15:24:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #18) > (In reply to comment #17) > > Created attachment 27775 [details] > > plus add combine > > > > Here is the patch that I've been running since some

[Bug c/53929] New: Bug in the use of Intel asm syntax when a global is named "and"

2012-07-11 Thread louis.granboulan.developer at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53929 Bug #: 53929 Summary: Bug in the use of Intel asm syntax when a global is named "and" Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/53930] New: bug in linker

2012-07-11 Thread bespalovdn at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53930 Bug #: 53930 Summary: bug in linker Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.5.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c++/53930] bug in linker

2012-07-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53930 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/53921] [C++0x] ICE on lambda inside method of class template

2012-07-11 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53921 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler at |

[Bug rtl-optimization/11708] [sh4-elf-gcc] Non-Optimal jump code generation.

2012-07-11 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11708 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 fr

[Bug c++/53931] New: [C++11] braced function style cast to reference should be prvalue

2012-07-11 Thread hstong at ca dot ibm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53931 Bug #: 53931 Summary: [C++11] braced function style cast to reference should be prvalue Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/51241] SH Target: Unnecessary sign/zero extensions

2012-07-11 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51241 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/53823] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/930921-1.c execution at -O0 and -O1

2012-07-11 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53823 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin 2012-07-12 01:43:11 UTC --- This hunk of RTL was generated in .expand for function f: ;; D.1356_3 = D.1355_2 * 2863311531; (insn 9 8 10 (set (reg:SI 104) (subreg:SI (reg:DI 96 [ D.1355 ]) 4)) /test/g

[Bug c++/53932] New: [4.3 regression]C++ reference variable to member of anonymous union in global is error

2012-07-11 Thread nuller0222 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53932 Bug #: 53932 Summary: [4.3 regression]C++ reference variable to member of anonymous union in global is error Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.3.4

[Bug web/53919] Version-specific install instructions not available

2012-07-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53919 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/53933] New: Register choosing error when inline assembly used at inline function

2012-07-11 Thread nicejaewon at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53933 Bug #: 53933 Summary: Register choosing error when inline assembly used at inline function Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.4 Status: UNCONFIRME

[Bug c/53933] Register choosing error when inline assembly used at inline function

2012-07-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53933 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/53930] bug in linker

2012-07-11 Thread bespalovdn at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53930 DmitryBespalov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID