[Bug c/53793] New: [ARM] Debug info is wrong at optimization level -O1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53793 Bug #: 53793 Summary: [ARM] Debug info is wrong at optimization level -O1 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/52983] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in df_uses_record, at df-scan.c:3243

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52983 --- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-06-28 07:39:33 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Thu Jun 28 07:39:25 2012 New Revision: 189036 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189036 Log: PR debug/53740 PR debug/52983 PR debug/48866 * d

[Bug debug/53740] [4.8 Regression] --enable-checking=yes,rtl bootstrap failure with ada

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53740 --- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-06-28 07:39:33 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Thu Jun 28 07:39:25 2012 New Revision: 189036 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189036 Log: PR debug/53740 PR debug/52983 PR debug/48866 * d

[Bug debug/48866] gcc hangs when -g is set

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48866 --- Comment #14 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-06-28 07:39:34 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Thu Jun 28 07:39:25 2012 New Revision: 189036 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189036 Log: PR debug/53740 PR debug/52983 PR debug/48866 *

[Bug debug/47624] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43077-1.c -O1 line 42 c == 3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47624 --- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-06-28 07:39:59 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Thu Jun 28 07:39:51 2012 New Revision: 189037 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189037 Log: PR debug/53706 PR debug/47624 * var-tracking.c

[Bug debug/53671] [4.8 Regression] Many guality test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53671 --- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-06-28 07:41:14 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Thu Jun 28 07:41:02 2012 New Revision: 189038 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189038 Log: PR debug/53671 PR debug/49888 * gcc.dg/guality/p

[Bug debug/49888] VTA: -O2 -g variable value changes, it does not change in the source

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49888 --- Comment #9 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-06-28 07:41:15 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Thu Jun 28 07:41:02 2012 New Revision: 189038 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189038 Log: PR debug/53671 PR debug/49888 * gcc.dg/guality/p

[Bug debug/53740] [4.8 Regression] --enable-checking=yes,rtl bootstrap failure with ada

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53740 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/53706] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap failure due to "Invalid write of size 8 at 0xBDC35E: variable_htab_free (var-tracking.c:1418)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug lto/53787] Possible lto improvement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53787 --- Comment #4 from Igor Zamyatin 2012-06-28 08:17:13 UTC --- Created attachment 27714 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27714 gfort assembler "Init" routine should be inspected here

[Bug lto/53787] Possible lto improvement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53787 --- Comment #5 from Igor Zamyatin 2012-06-28 08:22:11 UTC --- Created attachment 27715 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27715 ifort assembler "Init" routine looks much better here

[Bug middle-end/53676] [4.7 regression] empty loop is not always removed now

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53676 --- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-06-28 08:26:12 UTC --- On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, matt at use dot net wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53676 > > --- Comment #10 from Matt Hargett 2012-06-27 18:26:55 > UTC ---

[Bug middle-end/53616] [4.8 Regression] 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53616 --- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-06-28 08:26:42 UTC --- On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53616 > > Pat Haugen changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug target/53793] [ARM] Debug info is wrong at optimization level -O1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53793 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2012-06-28 09:30:55 UTC --- That's a general issue of the old, deprecated text prologues/epilogues.

[Bug c++/53792] [C++11][constexpr] improving compiler-time constexpr evaluation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53792 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/53794] New: [c++11, accepts invalid] dangling reference accepted in nested structures with initializer lists

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53794 Bug #: 53794 Summary: [c++11, accepts invalid] dangling reference accepted in nested structures with initializer lists Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3

[Bug lto/53777] [lto] lto does not propagate optimization flags from command lines given at "compilation time"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53777 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2012-06-28 09:44:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > I fully agree that combining code sections to be optimized differently is not > well defined in particular when optimization works looking at a broader sc

[Bug c++/53788] C++11 decltype sfinae static member function check (4.7.1)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53788 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-06-28 09:44:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > Greetings all. The following code should *not* compile I'm not convinced the standard *requires* it to be rejected.

[Bug tree-optimization/53791] Branches not re-ordered using profile-information

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53791 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug preprocessor/53525] Performance regression due to enabling track-macro-expansion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53525 --- Comment #15 from Richard Guenther 2012-06-28 09:52:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) > Ping? Can someone review my last patch? I think it's clean enough to be > applied > (minus the TODO notes) and extra fixes can come separately later.

[Bug middle-end/53790] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE on dereferencing a extern union in asm statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53790 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Keywords|

[Bug target/53789] ICE in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:864/865 when compiling GNU MPFR on parisc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53789 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target||hppa*-*-* Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug ada/53795] New: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/old_errors.adb

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53795 Bug #: 53795 Summary: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/old_errors.adb Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug tree-optimization/53787] Possible IPA-SRA / IPA-CP improvement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53787 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization CC

[Bug ada/53795] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/old_errors.adb

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53795 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/53796] New: I/O INQUIRE of RECL: If not specified in OPEN, the default value should be returned (sequential access)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53796 Bug #: 53796 Summary: I/O INQUIRE of RECL: If not specified in OPEN, the default value should be returned (sequential access) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version:

[Bug c++/53788] C++11 decltype sfinae static member function check (4.7.1)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53788 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/53792] [C++11][constexpr] improving compiler-time constexpr evaluation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53792 --- Comment #2 from vincenzo Innocente 2012-06-28 11:08:38 UTC --- On 28 Jun, 2012, at 11:34 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53792 > > Richard Guenther changed: > > What|Remove

[Bug target/53793] [ARM] Debug info is wrong at optimization level -O1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53793 --- Comment #2 from Mohamed Shafi 2012-06-28 11:15:18 UTC --- So this is fixed in 4.7 then. Any plan to back port this?

[Bug c++/53797] New: Not able to print local variable while debugging at -O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53797 Bug #: 53797 Summary: Not able to print local variable while debugging at -O0 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED S

[Bug tree-optimization/53645] Missed optimization for vector integer division lowering

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53645 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-06-28 11:38:04 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jun 28 11:38:01 2012 New Revision: 189043 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189043 Log: PR tree-optimization/53645 * tree-vect-gene

[Bug middle-end/53790] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE on dereferencing a extern union in asm statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53790 --- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2012-06-28 11:45:18 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Jun 28 11:45:14 2012 New Revision: 189045 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189045 Log: 2012-06-28 Richard Guenther PR middle-

[Bug middle-end/53790] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE on dereferencing a extern union in asm statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53790 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2012-06-28 11:52:54 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Jun 28 11:52:49 2012 New Revision: 189047 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189047 Log: 2012-06-28 Richard Guenther PR middle-

[Bug c++/53797] Not able to print local variable while debugging at -O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53797 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/51119] MATMUL slow for large matrices

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119 --- Comment #6 from Joost VandeVondele 2012-06-28 11:58:20 UTC --- Janne, have you had a chance to look at this ? For larger matrices MATMMUL is really slow. Anything that includes even the most basic blocking scheme should be faster. I think thi

[Bug middle-end/53790] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE on dereferencing a extern union in asm statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53790 --- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2012-06-28 12:01:22 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Jun 28 12:01:16 2012 New Revision: 189048 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189048 Log: 2012-06-28 Richard Guenther PR middle-

[Bug middle-end/53790] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE on dereferencing a extern union in asm statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53790 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/53790] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE on dereferencing a extern union in asm statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53790 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/53791] Branches not re-ordered using profile-information

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53791 --- Comment #2 from Steven Bosscher 2012-06-28 12:05:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > The other trivially obvious possibility is to pattern-match this open-coded > switch/case and transform it back to switch/case early. The test case is a s

[Bug lto/53777] [lto] lto does not propagate optimization flags from command lines given at "compilation time"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53777 --- Comment #4 from vincenzo Innocente 2012-06-28 12:10:44 UTC --- On 28 Jun, 2012, at 11:44 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > A very convenient way of "optimize more aggressively some > computational-intensive code segments" is to use

[Bug libfortran/51119] MATMUL slow for large matrices

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119 --- Comment #7 from Janne Blomqvist 2012-06-28 12:15:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Janne, have you had a chance to look at this ? For larger matrices MATMMUL is > really slow. Anything that includes even the most basic blocking scheme sho

[Bug tree-optimization/53645] Missed optimization for vector integer division lowering

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53645 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug lto/53768] [4.7 Regression] Undefined references with boost 1.46/1.48/1.49

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53768 --- Comment #4 from vincenzo Innocente 2012-06-28 12:48:13 UTC --- similar to PR53337 ? and most probably also to PR53780

[Bug lto/53780] [l4.7.1 lto] linker fails with lto and "standard" object file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53780 --- Comment #1 from vincenzo Innocente 2012-06-28 12:52:42 UTC --- the failure on vanilla fedora may be related to PR53768

[Bug c++/53794] [c++11] dangling reference accepted in nested structures with initializer lists

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53794 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid Status|UNCO

[Bug c++/53794] [c++11] dangling reference accepted in nested structures with initializer lists

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53794 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|minor |normal

[Bug debug/53671] [4.8 Regression] Many guality test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53671 --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu 2012-06-28 13:27:02 UTC --- As revision 189040, the regression is FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43051-1.c -Os line 39 c == &a[0]

[Bug rtl-optimization/53595] Code size increase of +10% between two 4.7.1 snapshot

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53595 --- Comment #12 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-06-28 13:53:59 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Thu Jun 28 13:53:51 2012 New Revision: 189049 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189049 Log: PR 53595 * config/avr/avr.c (avr_hard_reg

[Bug rtl-optimization/53595] Code size increase of +10% between two 4.7.1 snapshot

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53595 --- Comment #13 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-06-28 13:58:37 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Thu Jun 28 13:58:32 2012 New Revision: 189050 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189050 Log: Backport from 2012-06-28 mainline r189049

[Bug other/53595] Code size increase of +10% between two 4.7.1 snapshot

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53595 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ra Status|NEW

[Bug bootstrap/53798] New: [4.7] Bootstrap fails on Linux x86_64 with pre-built libmpc/mpfr/gmp due to multilib path problem

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53798 Bug #: 53798 Summary: [4.7] Bootstrap fails on Linux x86_64 with pre-built libmpc/mpfr/gmp due to multilib path problem Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1

[Bug bootstrap/53731] [4.7] Bootstrap fails for libgfortran on Solaris 10 x86 with error "Where has __float128 gone?"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53731 --- Comment #1 from Martin 2012-06-28 14:14:49 UTC --- Just realized the diff output is in the wrong order, sorry.

[Bug bootstrap/53555] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53555 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug bootstrap/53798] [4.7] Bootstrap fails on Linux x86_64 with pre-built libmpc/mpfr/gmp due to multilib path problem

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53798 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-06-28 14:30:58 UTC --- Another, simpler, workaround is to build the support libs by putting the sources in the gcc source tree. --with-gmp behaves as designed and as documented. The installation docs for

[Bug fortran/53796] I/O INQUIRE of RECL: If not specified in OPEN, the default value should be returned (sequential access)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53796 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug ada/53795] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/old_errors.adb

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53795 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug inline-asm/49611] Inline asm should support input/output of flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49611 Jeroen van Bemmel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jbemmel at zonnet dot nl --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/46556] Code size regression in struct access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46556 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|patch |missed-optimization Stat

[Bug c++/53788] C++11 decltype sfinae static member function check (4.7.1)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53788 --- Comment #4 from exa7z at live dot com 2012-06-28 17:37:08 UTC --- You are correct in noting that even in C++03 g++ behaves like this. I also tried several other examples yesterday that led me to the same result. And I think it is because of the

[Bug c++/53788] C++11 decltype sfinae static member function check (4.7.1)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53788 --- Comment #5 from exa7z at live dot com 2012-06-28 17:42:48 UTC --- > > Therefore, SFINAE cannot even take place because of that, T is the anchor > keeping the ship from sailing *when* a compiler does *not* make a distinction > between dependent

[Bug tree-optimization/53645] Missed optimization for vector integer division lowering

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53645 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-06-28 17:52:59 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jun 28 17:52:51 2012 New Revision: 189052 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189052 Log: PR tree-optimization/53645 * tree-vect-gene

[Bug tree-optimization/51581] Integer division by constant is not vectorized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51581 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-06-28 17:54:03 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jun 28 17:53:58 2012 New Revision: 189053 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189053 Log: PR tree-optimization/51581 * tree-vect-stmt

[Bug fortran/53799] New: INQUIRE( RECL=integer_variable) returns -1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53799 Bug #: 53799 Summary: INQUIRE( RECL=integer_variable) returns -1 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug fortran/53799] INQUIRE( RECL=integer_variable) returns -1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53799 Clive Page changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/53796] I/O INQUIRE of RECL: If not specified in OPEN, the default value should be returned (sequential access)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53796 Clive Page changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clivegpage at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 f

[Bug fortran/53800] New: [OOP] Wrong copy-in/copy-out when passing CLASS array to assumed-shape TYPE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53800 Bug #: 53800 Summary: [OOP] Wrong copy-in/copy-out when passing CLASS array to assumed-shape TYPE Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNC

[Bug fortran/53800] [OOP] Wrong copy-in/copy-out when passing CLASS array to assumed-shape TYPE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53800 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-06-28 20:35:58 UTC --- Related to pr34640 and pr46339?

[Bug lto/53768] [4.7 Regression] Undefined references with boost 1.46/1.48/1.49

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53768 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu 2012-06-28 22:15:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > similar to PR53337 ? > and most probably also to PR53780 I backported revision 186252 to 4.7 on hjl/gcc-4_7-branch/pr53768 branch at http://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=g

[Bug target/32219] optimizer causes wrong code in pic/hidden/weak symbol checking.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32219 --- Comment #13 from Bernhard Reutner-Fischer 2012-06-28 22:49:52 UTC --- Created attachment 27716 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27716 testcase This was (accidentally) fixed on for at least 4.7 ff but without adding a testc

[Bug target/30354] -Os doesn't optimize a/CONST even if it saves size.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30354 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Last rec

[Bug tree-optimization/37242] missed FRE opportunity because of signedness of addition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37242 --- Comment #22 from Matt Hargett 2012-06-29 00:20:17 UTC --- Hey Andrew, any word on your patch?

[Bug middle-end/53790] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE on dereferencing a extern union in asm statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53790 --- Comment #10 from Samuel Jacob 2012-06-29 00:26:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > Fixed. Thanks Richard for the quick response.

[Bug fortran/53801] New: gfortran warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53801 Bug #: 53801 Summary: gfortran warning Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/53801] gfortran warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53801 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug lto/53768] [4.7 Regression] Undefined references with boost 1.46/1.48/1.49

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53768 --- Comment #6 from vincenzo Innocente 2012-06-29 06:09:19 UTC --- the backport seems to work for my test cases. Side effects need to be verified

[Bug lto/53780] [l4.7.1 lto] linker fails with lto and "standard" object file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53780 --- Comment #2 from vincenzo Innocente 2012-06-29 06:11:19 UTC --- seems fixed by the back-port published in comment 4 PR53768