http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53677
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53684
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53686
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53698
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-17 08:29:38 UTC ---
Created attachment 27637
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27637
Suggested fix
Please try the attached
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53694
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53219
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48542
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||martin at netbsd dot org
--- Comment #19
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: dcb...@hotmail.com
Created attachment 27638
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27638
C source code
I just tried to compile the package gstreamer-plugins-espeak-0.3.5-2
on gcc-4.8 trunk dated 20120
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53701
Cyril Brulebois changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kibi at debian dot org
--- Comment #2 f
et2-2.0.8-6
on gcc-4.8 trunk dated 20120617 on an AMD x86_64 box.
The compiler said
usagi_ifaddrs.c:428:1: error: definition in block 105 does not dominate use in
block 103
usagi_getifaddrs (struct ifaddrs **ifap)
^
for SSA_NAME: .MEM_375 in statement:
# VUSE <.MEM_375>
D
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53700
--- Comment #4 from Kacper Kowalik 2012-06-17
10:07:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> It was fixed in trunk by following changeset:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=185971
>
> Please backport
For the completness, the r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53701
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53702
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43616
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm-eabi|arm-eabi, x86
Known to fail|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53704
Bug #: 53704
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE: in based_loc_descr, at
dwarf2out.c:10027 after revision 188621
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
St
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53688
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53704
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53705
Bug #: 53705
Summary: wrong code with custom flags - stores to memory are
lost
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706
Bug #: 53706
Summary: [4.8 Regression] [ia64]: Bootstrap failure due to
"Invalid write of size 8 at 0xBDC35E:
variable_htab_free (var-tracking.c:1418)
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706
--- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak 2012-06-17 12:42:32
UTC ---
Created attachment 27641
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27641
Preprocessed source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53707
Bug #: 53707
Summary: compiler generates wrong code
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53707
--- Comment #1 from Rafał Mużyło 2012-06-17 13:03:27
UTC ---
Created attachment 27642
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27642
-Wall warnings
Attaching '-Wall' warnings for completeness.
Note, that gcc 4.7.1 generates good code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53707
--- Comment #2 from Rafał Mużyło 2012-06-17 13:05:20
UTC ---
Created attachment 27643
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27643
preprocessed sources triggering the bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53707
Rafał Mużyło changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #27643|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39333
--- Comment #29 from Rafał Mużyło 2012-06-17 13:17:36
UTC ---
gcc 4.7.1 still shows inconsistent behavior with attachment 25239.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53708
Bug #: 53708
Summary: [4.8 Regression] Many failures of the objc tests with
-O3 -fnext-runtime and -m32
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Statu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53708
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53702
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||meadori at gmail dot com
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53701
--- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-06-17
14:34:44 UTC ---
This was fixed for gcc-4.7.0 by r177658:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-08/msg00672.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-08/msg00353.html
The patch applies cleanly to 4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53709
Bug #: 53709
Summary: libada build failure when bootstrapping on Fedora 17
x86_64
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53705
Michael Matz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53705
--- Comment #2 from Michael Matz 2012-06-17 15:36:19
UTC ---
Or alternatively cselib doesn't respect one invariant in constructing the
locations of its VALUEs. As seen above it constructs two values for the same
memory area, one referring to sta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53702
--- Comment #3 from Meador Inge 2012-06-17
16:15:51 UTC ---
I will look into this one.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53328
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
--- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak 2012
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47624
--- Comment #9 from Uros Bizjak 2012-06-17 17:01:42
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Fixed on trunk. I'm going to look into backporting it.
This patch caused PR53706.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53694
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-17 17:19:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> It is not obvious from the standard that this holds, but it is analog to
> ASSIGNMENT(=) and OPERATOR(...) which also act that way. [Which is suppor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53705
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||alias
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47710
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-17 17:46:55 UTC ---
Note: Comment 3 is fixed by the patch at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2012-06/msg00111.html, but comment 0 is not.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53710
Bug #: 53710
Summary: [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap failure
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53710
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2012-06-17 18:35:28
UTC ---
There is no problem on processors where -march=native gives
-march=corei7-avx -mcx16 -msahf -mno-movbe -maes -mpclmul -mpopcnt -mno-abm
-mno-lwp -mno-fma -mno-fma4 -mno-xop -mno-bmi -mno-bm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53698
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2012-06-17 1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53694
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53691
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2012-06-17
19:30:46 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sun Jun 17 19:30:29 2012
New Revision: 188708
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188708
Log:
2012-06-17 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/53
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53685
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2012-06-17
19:30:44 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sun Jun 17 19:30:29 2012
New Revision: 188708
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188708
Log:
2012-06-17 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/53
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53703
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53647
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53710
--- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak 2012-06-17 19:35:48
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> *** glibc detected ***
> /export/build/gnu/gcc-x32-native/build-x86_64-linux/./prev-gcc/cc1plus:
> corrupted double-linked list: 0x02408e20 ***
> =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53711
Bug #: 53711
Summary: Wunused-function should warn for functions in the
unnamed namespace
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53650
--- Comment #5 from David Stone 2012-06-17
19:54:52 UTC ---
As a workaround for this bug, I was able to compile much faster (so that I can
compile my program with optimizations turned on) by declaring the constructor
for the class in the array as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53710
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2012-06-17 20:01:29
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Are you sure about the revision?
>
> Probably dup of PR53706.
They could be related since bootstrap passes when I
turn off FMA on i386:
diff --git a/gcc/config/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53710
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from H
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47710
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53703
William J. Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from William
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53710
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu 2012-06-17 22:00:43
UTC ---
Created attachment 27646
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27646
A testcase for x86-64
valgrind ./cc1plus -fpreprocessed x.ii -quiet -dumpbase x.ii -march=corei7-avx
-mcx1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53694
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53709
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53702
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53704
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53673
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-06-18
00:06:29 UTC ---
I'm ambivalent.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51867
--- Comment #5 from amker.cheng 2012-06-18
02:03:21 UTC ---
Should be fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53672
--- Comment #8 from bviyer at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-18 02:08:03 UTC ---
Author: bviyer
Date: Mon Jun 18 02:07:54 2012
New Revision: 188722
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188722
Log:
This patch should fix the 2nd case of PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53712
Bug #: 53712
Summary: SEGV in generated code for _mm_cmpistri with unaligned
operand when using -O0
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: U
66 matches
Mail list logo