http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53494
Bug #: 53494
Summary: initializer lists in array type
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53494
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2012-05-26
09:40:37 UTC ---
In any case a good workaround is using matchSynonyms{{ {"smile",1} }}
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53321
--- Comment #10 from Uros Bizjak 2012-05-26 10:09:35
UTC ---
Reduced testcase:
--cut here--
typedef long unsigned int size_t;
extern "C"
{
extern void *memcpy (void *__dest, __const void *__src, size_t __n);
}
extern char *src, *sources;
ext
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53490
--- Comment #7 from Jamie Allsop 2012-05-26
10:59:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > It was a vanilla bjam build of boost 1.49, so
> > no -std=c++11.
>
> Then technically that's not supported, since there are no g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50294
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou 2012-05-26
13:26:01 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sat May 26 13:25:55 2012
New Revision: 187914
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187914
Log:
PR ada/50294
* gnat.dg/array21.adb: Ne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50294
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53467
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52878
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52205
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
--- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52528
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2012-05-26
13:55:51 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sat May 26 13:55:46 2012
New Revision: 187915
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187915
Log:
Backport from mainline
2012-03-10 Chun
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52528
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52205
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
bexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.8.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../configure --with-libelf=/usr/local --enable-lto
--prefix=/home/regehr/z/compiler-install/gcc-r187906-install
--program-prefix=r187906- --enable-languages=c,c++
Thread model: posix
gcc versio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43013
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8|[4.5 regression] "warning:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39514
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53495
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37945
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53494
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery,
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53461
t-rexky changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53494
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.3
Summary|initializer li
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53494
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2012-05-26
15:16:29 UTC ---
And since it's actually invalid should be pretty easy to fix, the ICE is
happening in a gcc_assert where alignment is handled, nothing to do.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52823
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Dominiqu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53496
Bug #: 53496
Summary: gcc segfaults when compiling glic
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53496
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Component|c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53493
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-05-26
17:21:38 UTC ---
Can you provide the preprocessed source?
I think this is done on purpose since foo is not used in the source and the
rules for C++ say the const variable has vague linkage GCC can (an
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53496
--- Comment #2 from Justas 2012-05-26
17:25:40 UTC ---
Created attachment 27503
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27503
source of param.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53492
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53480
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53475
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libstdc++ |c++
Version|4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53334
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53496
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53493
--- Comment #2 from jwatte at gmail dot com 2012-05-26 19:22:01 UTC ---
Note that there is not yet any linkage involved -- this is simply a compile
pass. Specifically, the problem here is that I run into a missing symbol error
when linking a progra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53493
--- Comment #3 from jwatte at gmail dot com 2012-05-26 19:25:50 UTC ---
Created attachment 27504
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27504
The preprocessed source
Generated with:
avr-gcc -Os -mmcu=atmega328p -c foo.cpp -o foo.E -E
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53493
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53321
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53321
--- Comment #12 from Steven Bosscher 2012-05-26
19:42:26 UTC ---
Note, btw, that verify_cgraph() doesn't catch this. Honza, you loved checkers
so much a few years ago -- maybe this checker (also yours??) should be enhanced
:-)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53493
jwatte at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53493
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53494
--- Comment #5 from mako 2012-05-26 20:31:39
UTC ---
Would someone please explain to me why that compile error is considered
correct? It tells me nothing sensible.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53486
Jiří Paleček changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #27499|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53494
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2012-05-26
21:00:21 UTC ---
Who said correct?!?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53220
--- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill 2012-05-26
21:13:27 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat May 26 21:13:23 2012
New Revision: 187916
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187916
Log:
PR c++/53220
gcc/
* c-typeck.c (array_to_p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25137
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #17
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53491
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in |[4.7 Regression] ICE in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53491
--- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-05-26 21:20:44 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sat May 26 21:20:38 2012
New Revision: 187917
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187917
Log:
/cp
2012-05-26 Paolo Carlini
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53494
--- Comment #7 from mako 2012-05-26 21:41:57
UTC ---
Uh, Johnathan said "4.6 correctly rejects it:", however 4.6's rejection message
appears every bit as useless as 4.7's, perhaps more so, because it
misattributes the error. If that's the correct
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25137
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53439
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53434
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53424
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2012-05-26
23:47:56 UTC ---
(gdb) p debug_tree(t)
unit size
align 32 symtab 0 alias set -1 canonical type 0x76e6e000 precision
32 min max
pointer_to_this >
readonly
arg 0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53405
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53343
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2012-05-26
23:54:26 UTC ---
>--disable-build-poststage1-with-cxx
Is there a reason why you are using this option?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53327
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||assemble-failure
--- Comment #3 from Andr
gcc -v; gcc version 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD]
uname -srip; FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE i386 GENERI
Compiler command; gcc47 minimalErroringCode.cpp -o minimalErroringCode
Test; ./minimalErroringCode
Expected; no output
Result; Assertion failed: ((buffer[0] = 0xFF) && buffer[0] == 0xFF),
function main
On 5/26/12, Jordan Foster wrote:
> gcc -v; gcc version 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD]
> uname -srip; FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE i386 GENERI
> Compiler command; gcc47 minimalErroringCode.cpp -o minimalErroringCode
> Test; ./minimalErroringCode
> Expected; no output
> Result; Assertion failed: ((buffer[0
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Jordan Foster wrote:
> gcc -v; gcc version 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD]
> uname -srip; FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE i386 GENERI
> Compiler command; gcc47 minimalErroringCode.cpp -o minimalErroringCode
> Test; ./minimalErroringCode
> Expected; no output
> Result; Asserti
56 matches
Mail list logo
