[Bug c++/53350] Internal compiler error when compiling boost/smart_ptr/intrusive_ptr.hpp 1.49

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53350 --- Comment #2 from Ryan Thompson 2012-05-15 01:12:30 UTC --- The attachment was too large. I've put it here instead: http://mneme.dyndns.org/~ryan/cc0UmSiB.out

[Bug c/53354] New: %z# asm specifier could be extended to support immediate constraints

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53354 Bug #: 53354 Summary: %z# asm specifier could be extended to support immediate constraints Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRME

[Bug c/53353] Missing error/warning when using __int128_t with incorrect asm register constraints

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53353 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/53354] %z# asm specifier could be extended to support immediate constraints

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53354 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Component|c

[Bug c++/53350] Internal compiler error when compiling boost/smart_ptr/intrusive_ptr.hpp 1.49

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53350 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2012-05-15 01:47:08 UTC --- Please reduce it (http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/A_guide_to_testcase_reduction), and, as an extrema ratio, attach it compressed. Thanks.

[Bug c/53355] New: Autovectorization of a simple loop could be improved.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53355 Bug #: 53355 Summary: Autovectorization of a simple loop could be improved. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug c/53353] Missing error/warning when using __int128_t with incorrect asm register constraints

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53353 --- Comment #2 from Steven Fuerst 2012-05-15 01:54:46 UTC --- Obviously a __int128_t fits in two registers. The bug is that gcc doesn't warn/error about code mistakenly trying to fit it into one. Instead, gcc generates a weird 16-bit operation,

[Bug c/53353] Missing error/warning when using __int128_t with incorrect asm register constraints

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53353 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2012-05-15 02:02:23 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Obviously a __int128_t fits in two registers. The bug is that gcc doesn't > warn/error about code mistakenly trying to fit it into one. Instead, gcc > gene

[Bug libstdc++/53339] unordered_map::iterator requires Value to be complete type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53339 --- Comment #11 from Eugene Toder 2012-05-15 02:03:34 UTC --- Created attachment 27407 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27407 Another simple test case

[Bug c/53353] Missing error/warning when using __int128_t with incorrect asm register constraints

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53353 --- Comment #4 from Steven Fuerst 2012-05-15 02:09:05 UTC --- Actually, it is the rax:rdx pair that is most likely. ax:dx only has 32 bits. rax:rdx is specified by the 'A' constraint, the only gpr option that is 128 bits. (Yes, it would be nic

[Bug rtl-optimization/52804] IRA/RELOAD allocate wrong register on ARM for cortex-m0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52804 --- Comment #5 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-15 02:14:11 UTC --- Author: amker Date: Tue May 15 02:14:05 2012 New Revision: 187496 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187496 Log: Backport r187139 from mainline. 20

[Bug rtl-optimization/52804] IRA/RELOAD allocate wrong register on ARM for cortex-m0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52804 --- Comment #6 from amker.cheng 2012-05-15 02:15:59 UTC --- No regression reported in trunk so far, I back ported it into 4.7 branch.

[Bug libstdc++/53339] unordered_map::iterator requires Value to be complete type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53339 Eugene Toder changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #27395|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/53356] New: ICE in verify_gimple_stmt, at tree-cfg.c:4258

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53356 Bug #: 53356 Summary: ICE in verify_gimple_stmt, at tree-cfg.c:4258 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug c++/53209] [4.7 Regression] tree check ICE: expected tree_vec, have error_mark in comp_template_args_with_info, at cp/pt.c:7038

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53209 --- Comment #16 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-05-15 04:25:40 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Tue May 15 04:25:25 2012 New Revision: 187497 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187497 Log: PR c++/53209 * pt.c (tsubst_decl): Bail out if

[Bug c++/53209] [4.7 Regression] tree check ICE: expected tree_vec, have error_mark in comp_template_args_with_info, at cp/pt.c:7038

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53209 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/53353] Missing error/warning when using __int128_t with incorrect asm register constraints

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53353 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 f

<    1   2