http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52883
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52883
--- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak 2012-04-06 09:26:33
UTC ---
Uncovered by 4.8 change to allow immediate operands in *zero_extendsidi2_rex64:
(define_insn "*zero_extendsidi2_rex64"
[(set (match_operand:DI 0 "nonimmediate_operand"
"=r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52883
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52883
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52883
--- Comment #4 from Uros Bizjak 2012-04-06 11:18:35
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> > simplify_const_unary_operation tries to simplify:
> >
> > (zero_extend:DI (const_int 0 [0]))
> >
> > and trips on assert where:
> >
> > /* When zero
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52654
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #27103|0 |1
is patch|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52654
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52883
--- Comment #5 from Uros Bizjak 2012-04-06 12:00:56
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> It is allowed in *zero_extendsidi2_rex64, and "0" propagates into the pattern
> for some corner case. For the affected part, 4.7 generates:
Oops, this is the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50439
--- Comment #3 from William J. Schmidt 2012-04-06
12:09:47 UTC ---
PPL administrator "bagnara" was very helpful in investigating this.
The PPL code is not actually looping, but simply is taking a very long time to
analyze a large input set. The
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50439
William J. Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dberlin at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52878
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2012-04-06 12:23:46
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Created attachment 27102 [details]
> A patch
>
> This patch works for Linux/sparc. But it may not work
> for all sparc targets which don't include long-double-swi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52883
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
AssignedTo|ubizjak at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52857
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2012-04-06 13:05:49
UTC ---
For
(note 21 8 17 2 (expr_list:REG_DEP_TRUE (concat:SI (reg:SI 5 di)
(subreg:SI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 16 argp)
(const_int -20 [0xffec])) 0))
(nil)) NO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52596
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2012-04-06
13:25:48 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Apr 6 13:25:45 2012
New Revision: 186187
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186187
Log:
PR c++/52596
* semantics.c (finish_non_stat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52596
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2012-04-06
13:26:17 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Apr 6 13:26:14 2012
New Revision: 186188
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186188
Log:
PR c++/52596
* tree.c (lvalue_kind): Treat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52596
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50439
bagnara at cs dot unipr.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bagnara at cs dot unipr.it
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50439
--- Comment #6 from bagnara at cs dot unipr.it 2012-04-06 14:04:09 UTC ---
Created attachment 27104
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27104
Example alternative implementation for ppl_powerset_is_empty ()
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50439
--- Comment #7 from bagnara at cs dot unipr.it 2012-04-06 14:06:38 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Here is a sketch (100% untested) of what can be done without intervening [...]
So untested that I forgot to declare to the MIP problem that all v
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52886
Bug #: 52886
Summary: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr36978.c -On
(internal compiler error), n=1 and above
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52614
--- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres
2012-04-06 14:08:52 UTC ---
Thanks for the commit. I'll test the effect of -fno-common on gfortran.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52657
Jeroen Demeyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jdemeyer at cage dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52657
--- Comment #4 from Jeroen Demeyer 2012-04-06
14:25:09 UTC ---
Can this be re-opened please? I still get the error with
gcc (GCC) 4.7.1 20120406 (prerelease)
PR48496 only provided a work-around for this bug in the libffi code, it didn&#
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52857
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2012-04-06 14:51:55
UTC ---
Another testcase:
[hjl@gnu-mic-2 delta]$ cat testcase.c
void uw_init_context_1 (void *);
void _Unwind_ForcedUnwind (void)
{
uw_init_context_1 (__builtin_dwarf_cfa ());
}
[hjl@gnu-mic-2 de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50722
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50722
--- Comment #9 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-06
15:02:26 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Fri Apr 6 15:02:21 2012
New Revision: 186194
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186194
Log:
PR testsuite/50722
* gcc.dg/pr49994-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52654
Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #27054|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52654
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #27105|0 |1
is patch|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52887
Bug #: 52887
Summary: Bootstrap on AIX failure: Undefined symbol:
.std::function::function(std::function const&)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50722
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.1
--- Comment #12 from mrs at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50722
--- Comment #11 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-06
15:35:59 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Fri Apr 6 15:35:52 2012
New Revision: 186197
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186197
Log:
PR testsuite/50722
* gcc.dg/pr49994
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52883
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52657
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou 2012-04-06
15:41:20 UTC ---
> Can this be re-opened please? I still get the error with
>
> gcc (GCC) 4.7.1 20120406 (prerelease)
>
> PR48496 only provided a work-around for this bug in the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52888
Bug #: 52888
Summary: Unable to inline function pointer call with inexact
signature match
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52889
Bug #: 52889
Summary: incorrect sign of _mm_nmsub_XX intrinsics in
fma4intrin.h
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52654
--- Comment #15 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-04-06
16:40:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Created attachment 27105 [details]
> New patch incorporating recent suggestions.
>
> Using warning_at, OPT_Woverflow, etc.
> Added a new enum for ov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52890
Bug #: 52890
Summary: Revision 185336 causes 10% degradation on cpu2000
benchmark 252.eon
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52891
Bug #: 52891
Summary: ICE in adjust_bool_pattern
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52654
--- Comment #16 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> 2012-04-06
17:40:27 UTC ---
Thank you for your comments.
I was trying to follow the style of enum that I saw in the vicinity of the code
I was editing. I was not able to discern a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52857
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52886
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52668
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig 2012-04-06
18:31:19 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri Apr 6 18:31:11 2012
New Revision: 186199
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186199
Log:
2012-04-06 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/52668
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52870
--- Comment #2 from Ulrich Weigand 2012-04-06
18:31:58 UTC ---
Patch posted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-04/msg00360.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52654
--- Comment #17 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-04-06
18:38:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> Thank you for your comments.
>
> I was trying to follow the style of enum that I saw in the vicinity of the
> code
> I was editing. I was not able
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52892
Bug #: 52892
Summary: Function pointer loses constexpr qualification
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50439
--- Comment #8 from William J. Schmidt 2012-04-06
19:08:09 UTC ---
Roberto, I tried your patch, but got the following error:
PPL error code -8
PPL C interface error:
ppl_set_deterministic_timeout: the PPL Watchdog library is not enabled.
I assu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50439
--- Comment #9 from bagnara at cs dot unipr.it 2012-04-06 19:17:25 UTC ---
Pity it is not enabled: it definitely should.
Note that the addition of the deterministic timeout facility of the PPL was
solicited by the Graphite people. Previously the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52893
Bug #: 52893
Summary: [4.7/4.8 Regression] Moving functions out of implied
DO loops
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52893
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52841
David Abdurachmanov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david.abdurachmanov at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52880
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52890
--- Comment #1 from Pat Haugen 2012-04-06
21:13:04 UTC ---
My main question on this is why the MEM_REF has an alignment of 8 (i.e. byte)?
Breakpoint 1, expand_assignment (to=0xfffafed2790, from=,
nontemporal=) at
/home/pthaugen/src/gcc/temp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52894
Bug #: 52894
Summary: [4.5,4.6,4.7,4.8 Regression] Stage1 bootstrap fails
with gcc-4.6.3: Infinite loop in pointer_set_insert
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52894
--- Comment #1 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-04-06 21:27:47 UTC ---
.i.
--
John David Anglindave.ang...@bell.net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52894
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin 2012-04-06
21:41:40 UTC ---
Created attachment 27107
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27107
Preprocessed source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52894
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin 2012-04-06
22:43:09 UTC ---
cc1 is stuck in this loop in insert_aux:
while (true)
{
if (slots[n] == p || slots[n] == 0)
return n;
else
{
++n;
if (n == n_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52895
Bug #: 52895
Summary: [C++0x] ICE in unify, at cp/pt.c:15802
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52895
--- Comment #1 from taylor.goodhart at gmail dot com 2012-04-06 23:17:17 UTC ---
Created attachment 27108
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27108
CPP file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52895
--- Comment #2 from taylor.goodhart at gmail dot com 2012-04-06 23:19:50 UTC ---
Created attachment 27109
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27109
II File
I appologize for compressing this. The bug reporting system won't let me po
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52896
Bug #: 52896
Summary: internal compiler error: in do_SUBST, at combine.c:447
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52894
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin 2012-04-07
01:40:20 UTC ---
(gdb) p *pset
$54 = {log_slots = 0, n_slots = 512, n_elements = 117, slots = 0x496c990}
(gdb) bt
#0 pointer_set_insert (pset=0x488ef70, p=0x40424300)
at ../../gcc/gcc/pointer-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47052
John Marino changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gnugcc at marino dot st
--- Comment #3 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52896
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
63 matches
Mail list logo
