http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52661
--- Comment #8 from Jim Michaels 2012-03-22
07:06:31 UTC ---
I think if I understand you correctly, you are saying that the integer and the
earlier code I tried did NOT use the L suffix. I didn't get an warning then.
which is as it should be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52656
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52662
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2012-03-22
07:24:23 UTC ---
You can compress it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52661
--- Comment #9 from Jim Michaels 2012-03-22
07:24:44 UTC ---
I will refer you to this since you don't believe me.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/2ayc1sk0.aspx
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52459
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-03-22
07:29:39 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Mar 22 07:29:30 2012
New Revision: 185676
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185676
Log:
2012-03-22 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52459
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52624
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou 2012-03-22
07:41:25 UTC ---
I think that it should be available on all architectures, like the 32-bit and
64-bit flavors. And, for x86, you don't really need to add new patterns.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52662
--- Comment #3 from Raymond Russell 2012-03-22
07:48:56 UTC ---
Created attachment 26951
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26951
Preprocessed code from successful compilation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52662
--- Comment #4 from Raymond Russell 2012-03-22
07:49:59 UTC ---
Created attachment 26952
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26952
Preprocessed code that triggered ICE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52624
--- Comment #5 from Uros Bizjak 2012-03-22 07:51:20
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I think that it should be available on all architectures, like the 32-bit and
> 64-bit flavors. And, for x86, you don't really need to add new patterns.
I ag
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52662
--- Comment #5 from Raymond Russell 2012-03-22
07:54:11 UTC ---
Thanks, for some reason I thought compressed output wouldn't be kosher
(i.e. I wasn't really thinking). I've attached both sets of
preprocessed code for completeness.
Many thanks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52624
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52624
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
Summary|Missing __builti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50229
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #11 from Richard Gue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51939
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52521
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #11 from Richard Gue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48150
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50580
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41076
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50166
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50008
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48665
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #13 from Richard Gue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50421
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49847
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #18 from Richard Gue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52391
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #11 from Richard Gue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48041
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49498
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #14 from Richard Gue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52191
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48496
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #14 from Richard Gue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51483
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #11 from Richard Gue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48596
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #61 from Richard Gue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50739
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36884
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49319
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52104
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #16 from Richard Gue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #22 from Richard Gue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51874
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #14 from Richard Gue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20128
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #11 from Richard Gue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51097
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51252
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #13 from Richard Gue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52285
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51695
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #10 from Richard Gue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51184
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52372
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21953
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #17 from Richard Gue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49874
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #39 from Richard Gue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52582
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #13 from Richard Gue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14792
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #13 from Richard Gue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50935
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51784
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #40 from Richard Gue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51258
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #19 from Richard Gue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52596
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51693
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43052
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #20 from Richard Gue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51570
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49555
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #10 from Richard Gue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50557
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #13 from Richard Gue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50045
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47440
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47406
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51498
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #10 from Richard Gue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52438
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50931
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52563
--- Comment #8 from Jiangning Liu 2012-03-22
09:17:51 UTC ---
Author: liujiangning
Date: Thu Mar 22 09:17:45 2012
New Revision: 185678
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185678
Log:
2012-03-22 Jiangning Liu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52311
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52230
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51527
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48041
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45685
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #21 from Richard Gue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52305
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623
--- Comment #6 from Michael Haubenwallner 2012-03-22 09:10:29 UTC ---
Traditionally, yes.
However, there are Import Files:
They can definitively help for the versioning issue,
and can probably help for the multilib issue too.
However, they canno
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52521
--- Comment #12 from Marc Glisse 2012-03-22
09:42:43 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> GCC 4.7.0 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
I think it is already fixed, actually.
(not closing with this message to leave someone a chance to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52624
--- Comment #7 from Uros Bizjak 2012-03-22 09:56:18
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> I think that the builtin should be expanded into a rotate (left or right) if
> they are available. On x86 this works out of the box since the rotates are
> t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52624
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2012-03-22
10:04:44 UTC ---
> Please note that the rotate is split back into bswap, so we can avoid rotate
> by
> using "xchg %rh, %rl" on P4.
Sure, 16-bit rotates are already emitted as xchg when appropriate.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52577
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-22
10:08:56 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 22 10:08:49 2012
New Revision: 185682
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185682
Log:
Backported from mainline
2012-03-13 Jakub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52577
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52521
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-22
10:10:29 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 22 10:10:24 2012
New Revision: 185683
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185683
Log:
Backported from mainline
2012-03-14 Jakub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52521
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14792
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--- Comment #12 from Paolo Carlini 2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52545
--- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-22
10:40:34 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Thu Mar 22 10:40:31 2012
New Revision: 185685
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185685
Log:
Backport from mainline r185259.
PR other/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52545
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51960
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2012-03-22
10:49:08 UTC ---
Shall we suspend this? Do we have a DR #?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51850
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-03-22
11:02:29 UTC ---
Please don't close this as a dup of the caret diagnostics PR.
I agree there's no consensus on what should be done, but printing of
reconstructed expressions is utterly awful. I th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51960
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |SUSPENDED
Summary|Missing mo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2962
--- Comment #17 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2012-03-22 11:14:10 UTC ---
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been recei
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-03-22
11:17:36 UTC ---
Also, comment 2 shows another clear bug in the current diagnostics. It doesn't
matter whether you prefer carets or types or reconstructed expressions,
printing x[1] as *(x + 4u) is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52663
Bug #: 52663
Summary: ICE: in purge_dead_edges, at cfgrtl.c:2462
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52664
Bug #: 52664
Summary: [4.8 Regression]: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr31261.c fails
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimizati
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152
--- Comment #15 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-03-22
11:37:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Please don't close this as a dup of the caret diagnostics PR.
>
> I agree there's no consensus on what should be done, but printing of
I only know
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52638
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2012-03-22
11:36:51 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Mar 22 11:36:46 2012
New Revision: 185687
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185687
Log:
2012-03-22 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52638
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52665
Bug #: 52665
Summary: scan-assembler output produces wrong FAIL due to
matching .ident
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-03-22
12:01:58 UTC ---
Right, we have the column numbers to indicate the position in the source
(not perfect, but enough to show which sub-expression the error refers to)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52665
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51258
--- Comment #20 from Andrew Macleod 2012-03-22
12:10:45 UTC ---
Is this not resolved in 4.7? I thought we had changed the timeouts back to
normal and added other mechanisms to avoid large infinite loops
1 - 100 of 218 matches
Mail list logo