http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52397
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-29
08:12:15 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 29 08:12:04 2012
New Revision: 184652
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184652
Log:
PR bootstrap/52397
* df.h (struct df_d): A
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52397
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52428
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52426
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52425
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||sparc-linux-gnu
Component|c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52424
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52423
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52429
Bug #: 52429
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE in
separate_decls_in_region_debug, at tree-parloops.c:914
with -ftree-parallelize-loops
Classification: Unclassified
Product:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46596
Jeffrey Yasskin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jyasskin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52430
Bug #: 52430
Summary: [4.4 Regression] firefox miscompilation
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.6
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52430
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-29
09:47:17 UTC ---
Created attachment 26779
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26779
dombindings.ii.bz2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49939
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-02-29
09:50:24 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Feb 29 09:50:19 2012
New Revision: 184656
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184656
Log:
PR target/49939
* config/avr/avr.h (ASM_SP
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52431
Bug #: 52431
Summary: Pass Fortran logical to C function
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52297
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52431
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-02-29
10:06:14 UTC ---
I think you forgot the value attribute like:
logical(C_BOOL), value :: inbool
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52430
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52431
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52297
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-29
10:06:00 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Feb 29 10:05:55 2012
New Revision: 184657
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184657
Log:
2012-02-29 Richard Guenther
PR testsui
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52429
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-linux-androideabi
Target Milesto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52429
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52001
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52429
--- Comment #3 from Bernhard Rosenkränzer 2012-02-29 11:35:34 UTC ---
Created attachment 26781
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26781
(Mostly) reduced version of the testcase
Attaching reduced version
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52412
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52396
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52429
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51737
--- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-29
12:09:19 UTC ---
The question is why we call delete_unreachable_blocks from
tree_function_versioning at all. We do not bother updating the
callgraph anywhere else.
Honza, you added that beast?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52432
Bug #: 52432
Summary: [C++11] -fdump-tree-gimple causes ICE: Error reporting
routines re-entered.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52252
--- Comment #2 from Stupachenko Evgeny 2012-02-29
12:32:20 UTC ---
The difference of 2 dumps from
Arm: gcc -O3 -mfpu=neon test.c -S -ftree-vectorizer-verbose=12
X86: gcc -O3 -m32 -msse3 test.c -S -ftree-vectorizer-verbose=12
Starts at:
For Arm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22200
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marc.glisse at normalesup
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52425
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52429
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52433
Bug #: 52433
Summary: [C++11] debug mode iterators need move constructors
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52411
--- Comment #7 from evrinoma at gmail dot com 2012-02-29 12:53:01 UTC ---
gdb) disassemble 0x0053e800,+32
Dump of assembler code from 0x53e800 to 0x53e820:
0x0053e800 :movdqu -0x40(%rcx),%xmm0
0x0053e805 :prefe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52433
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[C++11] debug mode |[C++11] debug mode
|i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52432
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52433
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-29
13:01:25 UTC ---
Also untested, and sub-optimal (swapping would be better than copying):
/**
* @brief Move assignment.
* @post @p __x is singular and unattached
*/
_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52387
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2012-02-29
13:02:21 UTC ---
I think it get's even messier with the following, simpler looking code, which
consists of four variants (without read/with nonadvanced read -- and with
advanced/nonadvanced write):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43878
--- Comment #2 from Frank 2012-02-29 13:02:49 UTC ---
On 03.02.2012 18:56, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43878
>
> --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-02-03
> 22:56:06 UTC ---
> The trick is t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52432
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52424
--- Comment #4 from William J. Schmidt 2012-02-29
13:06:40 UTC ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Wed Feb 29 13:06:28 2012
New Revision: 184662
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184662
Log:
2012-02-29 Bill Schmidt
PR tree-opt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52424
William J. Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52411
--- Comment #8 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-02-29
13:18:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> gdb) disassemble 0x0053e800,+32
> Dump of assembler code from 0x53e800 to 0x53e820:
>0x0053e800 :movdqu -0x40(%rcx),%xmm0
>0x
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52419
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52419
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenth
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52434
Bug #: 52434
Summary: Insufficient number of digits in floating point
formatting
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52411
--- Comment #9 from evrinoma at gmail dot com 2012-02-29 13:33:36 UTC ---
okey
i tried build astrisk on OpenSuse 12.1
with gcc
gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.6/lto-wrapper
Targe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52434
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52411
--- Comment #10 from evrinoma at gmail dot com 2012-02-29 13:37:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > gdb) disassemble 0x0053e800,+32
> > Dump of assembler code from 0x53e800 to 0x53e820:
> >0x0053e8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22200
Gabriel Dos Reis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gdr at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #41
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52432
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2012-02-29
13:41:24 UTC ---
It's a bit more tricky, because if we only do that we have a diagnostic quality
regression for decltyp32.C: many error messages are recursively produces
instead of one. The fact is, un
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52419
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-29
13:46:01 UTC ---
We are not prepared to handle bitsize != GET_MODE_BITSIZE in expand_assignment
for the movmisalign case. The following fixes it
Index: gcc/expr.c
=
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52432
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2012-02-29
13:51:03 UTC ---
Admittedly, though, the error which we currently produce for decltype32 isn't
optimal, ie:
decltype32.C: In substitution of ‘template decltype (make_array(il))
make_array(const T&) [w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52419
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-29
13:52:05 UTC ---
Failed to match this instruction:
(set (reg:DI 62)
(vec_select:DI (subreg:V2DI (unspec:V16QI [
(mem:V16QI (reg/v/f:DI 59 [ p ]) [0 *p_1(D)+0 S16 A8])
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52435
Bug #: 52435
Summary: ICE in arm_select_dominance_cc_mode, at
config/arm/arm.c:10625
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52432
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2012-02-29
14:13:44 UTC ---
Grunt, the mechanism part of unqualified_name_lookup_error isn't actually used
for decltype32.C: something else is happening which manages to avoid the
recursion in the error_messages
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52436
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52436
Bug #: 52436
Summary: BIT_FIELD_REF > should be canonicalized for
non-bitfield accesses
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52419
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-29
14:19:44 UTC ---
Created attachment 26785
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26785
alternative
This patch avoids expand_expr on the MEM_REF's base twice, by moving the mem
var computa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52433
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52427
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52419
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52419
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26785|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51737
--- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka 2012-02-29 15:01:31
UTC ---
> The question is why we call delete_unreachable_blocks from
> tree_function_versioning at all. We do not bother updating the
> callgraph anywhere else.
>
> Honza, you added that beas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46596
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka 2012-02-29 15:07:18 UTC
---
> glibc runs into the "sorry, unimplemented" part of the issue, with
> delta-reduced code like:
>
> $ cat test.i
> typedef __builtin_va_list __gnuc_va_list;
> extern __inline __attribut
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51737
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51737
--- Comment #15 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-29
15:17:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> > The question is why we call delete_unreachable_blocks from
> > tree_function_versioning at all. We do not bother updating the
> > callgraph anywhere
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51737
--- Comment #16 from Jan Hubicka 2012-02-29 15:24:18
UTC ---
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51737
>
> --- Comment #15 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-29
> 15:17:33 UTC ---
> (In reply to comment #13)
> > > The question is why we c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52430
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52433
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52425
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51663
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48820
--- Comment #6 from Walter Spector 2012-02-29
15:58:10 UTC ---
Tobias,
If you are interested, I tried the patch you posted on the email list to a
freshly checked out trunk. After building the compiler, I tried the following
small test case:
mo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46596
Mike Frysinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||toolchain at gentoo dot org
Se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52437
Bug #: 52437
Summary: internal compiler error: in spill_failure, at
reload1.c:2120
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52433
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-29
16:37:43 UTC ---
The problem exists in all active branches and isn't a regression, so I'll
implement a swap asap but it isn't urgent for 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52430
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor 2012-02-29
16:45:04 UTC ---
Created attachment 26787
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26787
Proposed untested fix
n_cloning_candidates is zero because ipcp_initialize_node_lattices
thinks that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52433
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2012-02-29
17:01:44 UTC ---
Sure, sure, likewise for vector swap ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52268
--- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth 2012-02-29
17:18:19 UTC ---
Also in clang 3.0, I see test/CodeGen/darwin-thread-specifier.c which
contains...
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-macosx10.7.0 -emit-llvm -o - %s |
FileCheck %s
// CHECK: @b =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52429
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-29
17:44:01 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 29 17:43:56 2012
New Revision: 184665
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184665
Log:
PR tree-optimization/52429
* tree-parloops.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52419
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-29
17:46:08 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 29 17:45:55 2012
New Revision: 184666
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184666
Log:
PR middle-end/52419
* expr.c (expand_assign
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52429
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52419
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52407
Paulo César Pereira de Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolut
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52438
Bug #: 52438
Summary: Some files still GPLv2
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52439
Bug #: 52439
Summary: Calculation of natural log
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49847
--- Comment #17 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-02-29
19:13:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> Created attachment 26757 [details]
> make fold_rtx handle prev_insn_cc0 == NULL
>
> The effect of Richard Guenther's r180192 patch to tree-eh.c is tha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51483
--- Comment #10 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-02-29
19:18:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> applying my tentative
> patch did allow a successful build of a gcc-4.7 cross to m68k w/ ada, so I'll
> try a native bootstrap with it soonish.
Native
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52425
--- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-02-29
19:43:38 UTC ---
Created attachment 26789
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26789
reduced test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52439
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52437
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52439
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52424
--- Comment #6 from William J. Schmidt 2012-02-29
20:26:33 UTC ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Wed Feb 29 20:26:29 2012
New Revision: 184670
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184670
Log:
2012-02-29 Bill Schmidt
PR tree-opt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52424
--- Comment #7 from William J. Schmidt 2012-02-29
20:27:45 UTC ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Wed Feb 29 20:27:41 2012
New Revision: 184671
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184671
Log:
2012-02-29 Bill Schmidt
PR tree-opt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52440
Bug #: 52440
Summary: [C++11] Wrong template argument deduction/substitution
failures
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52437
--- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak 2012-02-29 20:32:06
UTC ---
This patch adds missing alternative, and also disparages alternatives that end
with excess register->mem moves.
Index: sse.md
===
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52437
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-29
20:37:49 UTC ---
I've tried:
@@ -3899,7 +3899,7 @@
(vec_merge:VI4F_128
(vec_duplicate:VI4F_128
(match_operand: 2 "general_operand"
- " x,m,*r,m,x,x,*rm,*rm,x,fF,*r"))
+
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52437
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uros at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52424
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski 2012-02-29
20:47:34 UTC ---
I think this is related to PR 45685.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52437
--- Comment #5 from Uros Bizjak 2012-02-29 21:00:26
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> movsi uses re constraint, not rn, so I'd think we should use re.
re also includes symbols and labels and whatnot (please see
x86_64_immediate_operand predicat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52387
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2012-02-29
21:12:46 UTC ---
It gets even messier with STREAM I/O. For a compiler comparison w/o further
comments, see
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.lang.fortran/aUBQsYBto2c/d_noVS80FV4J (and
for an older v
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
