[Bug tree-optimization/52307] Segmentation fault in Lapack with -O3 -floop-flatten -floop-strip-mine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52307 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |critical --- Comment #1 from Thomas Koeni

[Bug c/51437] GCC should warn on the use of reserved identifier/macro names

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51437 --- Comment #10 from Ruben Van Boxem 2012-02-19 09:33:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > You really do want to flag both definition and usage. For instance, there's > > plenty of buggy software (especially GNU soft

[Bug tree-optimization/51782] -ftree-sra: Missing address-space information leads to wrong

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51782 --- Comment #18 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-02-19 09:31:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #17) > Created attachment 26695 [details] > Untested proposed fix > > This untested patch fixes the issue for me on a cross-compiler. It > would be great if

[Bug libffi/52223] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] libffi's man page install breaks with multilibs and overridden mandir

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52223 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug c/51437] GCC should warn on the use of reserved identifier/macro names

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51437 --- Comment #11 from David Krauss 2012-02-19 11:09:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > However, note that the standards also reserve various other classes of > > names, > > such as types ending in _t, for which GC

[Bug target/51882] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2109 (unrecognizable insn) when building Mesa on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51882 --- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-02-19 11:17:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > However, the issue is no longer present in the > latest 4.7 snapshot (tested with a custom toolchain based on > gcc-4.7-20120114). Using Ramana's reduc

[Bug target/52258] __builtin_isgreaterequal is sometimes signaling on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52258 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se --- Comment #1

[Bug target/52258] __builtin_isgreaterequal is sometimes signaling on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52258 --- Comment #2 from Aurelien Jarno 2012-02-19 11:30:36 UTC --- Created attachment 26700 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26700 Testcase

[Bug tree-optimization/52307] Segmentation fault in Lapack with -O3 -floop-flatten -floop-strip-mine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52307 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-02-19 12:22:21 UTC --- PR52307 could be a duplicate.

[Bug tree-optimization/52307] Segmentation fault in Lapack with -O3 -floop-flatten -floop-strip-mine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52307 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/52275] The polyhedron test air.f90 is miscompiled with '-O2 -floop-flatten' after revision 184265

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52275 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-02-19 12:26:24 UTC --- PR52307 could be a duplicate.

[Bug tree-optimization/52307] Segmentation fault in Lapack with -O3 -floop-flatten -floop-strip-mine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52307 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-02-19 12:27:18 UTC --- > PR52307 could be a duplicate. Oops! put in the wrong pr;-(

[Bug tree-optimization/52307] Segmentation fault in Lapack with -O3 -floop-flatten -floop-strip-mine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52307 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-02-19 13:34:13 UTC --- In spbtrf.f I have put PRINT statements before and after the loops DO 90 J = 1, NB DO 80 I = J + 1, NB WORK( I, J ) = ZERO 80

[Bug tree-optimization/52307] Segmentation fault in Lapack with -O3 -floop-flatten -floop-strip-mine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52307 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-02-19 14:19:23 UTC --- Reduced code integer :: I, J, NB = 3 real :: WORK(3,3) =1.0 real :: ZERO = 0.0 DO 90 J = 1, NB DO 80 I = J + 1, NB WORK( I, J ) = Z

[Bug lto/50616] lto1.exe: internal compiler error: invalid resolution in the resolution file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50616 Stefan Reichardt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fbi.sr at gmx dot de --- Comment #8 fr

[Bug testsuite/52229] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/pr32380.f -O scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 7 loops" 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52229 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-02-19 14:42:35 UTC --- A working patch has been submitted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2012-02/msg00068.html .

[Bug ada/52219] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: cxg2001

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52219 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-02-19 15:20:14 UTC --- cxg2001 has passed my last tests without failure. What is it supposed to test? Is it in the same class as Thread_Sleep_2 in libjava or thread_leak_test.c in boehm-gc for which I

[Bug ada/52219] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: cxg2001

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52219 --- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe 2012-02-19 15:37:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > cxg2001 has passed my last tests without failure. likewise on all my recent tests on both patched & un-patched trees. I find that the acats tests are quite l

[Bug ada/52219] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: cxg2001

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52219 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/51882] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2109 (unrecognizable insn) when building Mesa on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51882 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug lto/50616] lto1.exe: internal compiler error: invalid resolution in the resolution file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50616 --- Comment #9 from niXman 2012-02-19 16:22:52 UTC --- lto-plugin/lto-plugin.c http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/trunk/lto-plugin/lto-plugin.c?view=markup line 363.

[Bug libstdc++/52309] New: [c++0x] unordered_set illegally requires value_type::operator!=

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52309 Bug #: 52309 Summary: [c++0x] unordered_set illegally requires value_type::operator!= Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/50616] lto1.exe: internal compiler error: invalid resolution in the resolution file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50616 --- Comment #10 from Kai Tietz 2012-02-19 16:31:32 UTC --- Yes, not all msvcrt versions are supporting %ll width modifier. Modern versions of it (as 64-bit versions) are supporting it, but older (and still pretty common on 32-bit OSes) don't. T

[Bug libstdc++/52309] [c++0x] unordered_set illegally requires value_type::operator!=

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52309 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/52300] Gthreads functions linking error at dynamic linking with libstdc++ when using MinGW.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52300 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/52300] Gthreads functions linking error at dynamic linking with libstdc++ when using MinGW.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52300 --- Comment #2 from niXman 2012-02-19 17:14:03 UTC --- Thanks Kai!

[Bug c/52310] New: Internal Compiler Error when building lesstif with -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52310 Bug #: 52310 Summary: Internal Compiler Error when building lesstif with -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCO

[Bug target/50946] ICE on armhf with webkitgtk+

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50946 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se --- Comment #4

[Bug middle-end/42961] [4.5/4.6 regression] IRA register preferencing bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42961 --- Comment #8 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-02-19 17:43:07 UTC --- The movss instructions were eliminated on trunk by Vladimir Makarov's "patch to solve recent SPEC2000 degradation" in r178019: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-08/msg01954.ht

[Bug target/51882] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2109 (unrecognizable insn) when building Mesa on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51882 --- Comment #5 from Steven Bosscher 2012-02-19 17:48:16 UTC --- With slightly modified test case (manually inlined apply_aa_coverage()): BEFORE RELOAD: (insn 142 133 314 9 (set (subreg:SI (reg:HI 283) 0) (unsigned_fix:SI (fix:SF (reg/v:

[Bug c++/52311] New: implicitly_declare_fn: valgrind problem

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52311 Bug #: 52311 Summary: implicitly_declare_fn: valgrind problem Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug c++/52312] New: grokfndecl: valgrind problem

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52312 Bug #: 52312 Summary: grokfndecl: valgrind problem Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libgomp/52303] libgomp leaves threads lying around that cause trouble if the program is later fork()'d

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52303 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/51437] GCC should warn on the use of reserved identifier/macro names

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51437 --- Comment #12 from Josh Triplett 2012-02-19 18:50:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > However, note that the standards also reserve various other classes of > > names, > > such as types ending in _t, for which G

[Bug c/51437] GCC should warn on the use of reserved identifier/macro names

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51437 --- Comment #13 from Josh Triplett 2012-02-19 18:56:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > (In reply to comment #9) > > > (Some of the other reserved identifier categories, such as E[A-Z0-9].*, > > > is[a-z].*, to[a-

[Bug c++/52241] Performance degradation of 447.dealII on corei7 at spec2006_base32.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52241 --- Comment #16 from Igor Zamyatin 2012-02-19 18:58:41 UTC --- Jakub, could you please clarify your statement - "But libstdc++.so.6's tree.cc has been compiled with -fPIC -DPIC before Benjamin's change and is compiled with those flags after those

[Bug fortran/38114] unneeded temp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38114 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/50688] OpenMP: Strange interaction with BLOCK

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50688 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/52241] Performance degradation of 447.dealII on corei7 at spec2006_base32.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52241 --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-19 19:24:05 UTC --- libstdc++.so.6 obviously contained -fPIC code before and does now as well, and people really should be using the shared library (almost) always. See http://www.akkadia.org/drepper/no_

[Bug c++/52312] grokfndecl: valgrind problem

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52312 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/52312] grokfndecl: valgrind problem

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52312 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug c++/52311] implicitly_declare_fn: valgrind problem

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52311 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/44022] Spurious 'unused parameter' for a used procedure argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44022 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/47844] Array stride ignored for pointer-valued function results

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47844 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug c/52310] Internal Compiler Error when building lesstif with -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52310 --- Comment #1 from Pascal Terjan 2012-02-19 20:23:15 UTC --- Created attachment 26703 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26703 Reduce source code leading to the crash Here is the minimal code I managed to trigger the crash

[Bug c/52310] Internal Compiler Error when building lesstif with -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52310 Pascal Terjan changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #26701|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c/52310] Internal Compiler Error when building lesstif with -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52310 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/51437] GCC should warn on the use of reserved identifier/macro names

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51437 --- Comment #14 from Ruben Van Boxem 2012-02-19 21:51:37 UTC --- I don't think adding future reserved identifiers serves any purpose. In general, code is written against a certain version of a language's Standard, with the current constraints, no

[Bug fortran/52313] New: useless error message for old version of .mod file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52313 Bug #: 52313 Summary: useless error message for old version of .mod file Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug target/52258] __builtin_isgreaterequal is sometimes signaling on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52258 --- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-02-19 23:32:52 UTC --- On my Tegra2 machine the testcase does report that FE_INVALID got set when compiled at -O1 with gcc-4.6 and 4.5, but not when compiled at -O0.

[Bug rtl-optimization/42522] (zero_extract:SI (mem:QI) ...) misoptimized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42522 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se --- Comment #16

[Bug target/52261] [avr] Add support for AVR Xmega cores

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52261 --- Comment #3 from Stefan Reichardt 2012-02-20 02:01:30 UTC --- Could you add support for the few new devices with USB Support aswell? example Xmega32A4U. For the moment, i am using your code with xmega128a1 and i see no problems. Thanks alot!

[Bug middle-end/52314] New: gimplifier produces volatile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52314 Bug #: 52314 Summary: gimplifier produces volatile Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/52314] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] gimplifier produces volatile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52314 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Known to work|

[Bug c++/52241] Performance degradation of 447.dealII on corei7 at spec2006_base32.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52241 --- Comment #18 from Vladimir Yakovlev 2012-02-20 05:37:32 UTC --- I tested Paolo's patch and got acceleration on 447.dial base: +7.36% peak: +5.97% Also I looked dumps: the new routine 'local_Rb_tree_increment' in inlined now in both