[Bug fortran/51976] New: [F2003] Support deferred-length character components of derived types (allocatable string length)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51976 Bug #: 51976 Summary: [F2003] Support deferred-length character components of derived types (allocatable string length) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug fortran/51075] ICE with deferred-length character pointer component in derived types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51075 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/49050] ICE with deferred character length derived type component

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49050 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/51976] [F2003] Support deferred-length character components of derived types (allocatable string length)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51976 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||arjen.markus at deltares

[Bug fortran/51550] ICE in gfc_get_derived_type, at fortran/trans-types.c:2401

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51550 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/47545] ICE: in gfc_get_derived_type, at fortran/trans-types.c:2145

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47545 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/51976] [F2003] Support deferred-length character components of derived types (allocatable string length)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51976 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-24 08:04:21 UTC --- *** Bug 51075 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/51976] [F2003] Support deferred-length character components of derived types (allocatable string length)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51976 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- Comment #4

[Bug fortran/51976] [F2003] Support deferred-length character components of derived types (allocatable string length)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51976 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug fortran/51977] New: [OOP] MOVE_ALLOC: Bogus "must have the same rank 0/1" for same-rank arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51977 Bug #: 51977 Summary: [OOP] MOVE_ALLOC: Bogus "must have the same rank 0/1" for same-rank arrays Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCO

[Bug fortran/51948] [4.6/4.7 Regression][OOP] Rejects valid: Function result value in MOVE_ALLOC, nested in SELECT TYPE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51948 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug fortran/51948] [4.6/4.7 Regression][OOP] Rejects valid: Function result value in MOVE_ALLOC, nested in SELECT TYPE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51948 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-24 08:35:15 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Tue Jan 24 08:35:10 2012 New Revision: 183469 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183469 Log: 2012-01-24 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/51

[Bug c++/51973] [4.7 regression][C++11] Template parameter deduction fails for overloaded functions when template parameters have defaulted arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51973 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/51973] [4.7 regression][C++11] Template parameter deduction fails for overloaded functions when template parameters have defaulted arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51973 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler 2012-01-24 08:57:09 UTC --- Another observation: Whether or whether not the problem occurs depends on the order of the two template declarations. Inverting the current order makes the program valid. My gut feel

[Bug rtl-optimization/51978] New: ext-elim-1.c ICE on powerpc64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51978 Bug #: 51978 Summary: ext-elim-1.c ICE on powerpc64 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity:

[Bug rtl-optimization/51978] ext-elim-1.c ICE on powerpc64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51978 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-24 09:06:49 UTC --- Created attachment 26440 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26440 gcc47-pr51978.patch

[Bug middle-end/51389] GCC uses up to 75GB of virtual memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51389 Andrey Belevantsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/51389] GCC uses up to 75GB of virtual memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51389 --- Comment #3 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-01-24 09:08:24 UTC --- Created attachment 26441 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26441 Proposed patch The patch described above.

[Bug rtl-optimization/45678] [4.4/4.5 Regression] crash on vector code with -m32 -msse

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45678 --- Comment #32 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-24 09:17:11 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Jan 24 09:17:01 2012 New Revision: 183470 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183470 Log: 2012-01-24 Richard Guenther Forward-p

[Bug fortran/51966] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_array_constructor_expr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51966 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-24 09:26:56 UTC --- Reduced test case, which also illustrates another ICE: module EcoSystem_ml implicit none type, public:: Deriv character(len=10) :: name end type character(len=8), publi

[Bug fortran/51966] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_array_constructor_expr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51966 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-24 09:48:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > type(Deriv), save :: DepEcoSystem = Deriv(DEF_ECOSYSTEMS(1)) Here, the problem is that in #0 gfc_conv_string_init (length=0x2cf3b720, expr=0x16c117

[Bug middle-end/48600] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE when using cold attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48600 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-24 10:09:38 UTC --- Honza, ping?

[Bug tree-optimization/51879] Missed tail merging with non-const/pure calls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51879 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|una

[Bug bootstrap/49829] [4.7 Regression] --disable-static --enable-shared regression: cannot find -lstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49829 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug other/51937] [meta-bug] GCC 4.8 pending patches

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51937 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug debug/51902] lexical_blocks inside inlined_subroutines generate duplicate debug_ranges

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51902 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug bootstrap/49829] [4.7 Regression] --disable-static --enable-shared regression: cannot find -lstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49829 --- Comment #21 from Jan Kratochvil 2012-01-24 10:17:14 UTC --- With r183465 it really builds for me now, thanks.

[Bug fortran/51970] [OOP] gimplification failed for polymorphic MOVE_ALLOC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51970 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/45678] [4.4/4.5 Regression] crash on vector code with -m32 -msse

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45678 --- Comment #33 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-24 10:23:19 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Jan 24 10:23:14 2012 New Revision: 183471 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183471 Log: 2012-01-24 Richard Guenther Forward-p

[Bug middle-end/40060] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] casts loose alignment info

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40060 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c++/51223] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with invalid function parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51223 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-24 10:39:08 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Jan 24 10:39:03 2012 New Revision: 183472 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183472 Log: /cp 2012-01-24 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug c++/51223] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE with invalid function parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51223 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/41823] gcc/fortran/trans-openmp.c: possible null pointer dereference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41823 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at redhat dot com --- Commen

[Bug libstdc++/51965] Redundant move constructions in heap algorithms

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51965 --- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse 2012-01-24 10:49:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > But __pop_heap doesn't seem so straightforward to tweak, we also changed > a bit the interfaces. At first glance, I am not sure why pop_heap can end up callin

[Bug target/51959] [4.7 Regression] ICE in set_mem_alias_set, at emit-rtl.c:1884

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51959 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot |

[Bug fortran/42693] Missing gcc-internal-format on messages from gfc_arith_error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42693 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/41823] gcc/fortran/trans-openmp.c: possible null pointer dereference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41823 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug c++/51979] New: variadic templates + lambda capture list = error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51979 Bug #: 51979 Summary: variadic templates + lambda capture list = error Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug fortran/41823] gcc/fortran/trans-openmp.c: possible null pointer dereference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41823 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-01-24 11:09:05 UTC --- > It is guaranteed to be non-NULL for omp parallel/do/task and many others, see > the ew_st.ext.omp_clauses = something lines in openmp.c. Then is the 'if (clauses)' necessary?

[Bug rtl-optimization/51978] ext-elim-1.c ICE on powerpc64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51978 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/51968] gcc trunk (ARM) ICEs in final_scan_insn in final.c:2716, with "could not split insn" error msg

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51968 --- Comment #5 from Eric Batut 2012-01-24 11:12:23 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Created attachment 26436 [details] > proposed patch > > I'll run this through a cross-build first, but I expect this will fix it. This patch makes gcc trunk n

[Bug target/51959] [4.7 Regression] ICE in set_mem_alias_set, at emit-rtl.c:1884

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51959 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug target/51968] gcc trunk (ARM) ICEs in final_scan_insn in final.c:2716, with "could not split insn" error msg

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51968 --- Comment #6 from Eric Batut 2012-01-24 11:17:33 UTC --- Our Neon codebase (lots of image processing filters) produce correct results with the patch applied to the latest trunk rev.

[Bug fortran/42934] Bogus variable_check

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42934 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-01-24 11:41:21 UTC --- > The following example shows this: For LOC(f) it prints the address of the > function, for LOC(f()) the result of the function call; but it fails for This is the case for gfor

[Bug c++/51979] variadic templates + lambda capture list = error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51979 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/41933] [c++0x] lambdas and variadic templates don't work together

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41933 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||i.nixman at gmail dot com --- Comment #5

[Bug libstdc++/51965] Redundant move constructions in heap algorithms

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51965 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/49868] Implement named address space to place/access data in flash memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49868 --- Comment #14 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-01-24 12:38:59 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Tue Jan 24 12:38:52 2012 New Revision: 183473 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183473 Log: PR target/49868 * doc/extend.texi (AVR Na

[Bug rtl-optimization/44174] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] can't find a register in class 'CLOBBERED_REGS' while reloading 'asm'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44174 --- Comment #15 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-01-24 12:55:38 UTC --- > --- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski 2012-01-24 > 01:29:40 UTC --- > Since this was fixed on the trunk, can you remove the xfail? I already did so in April last

[Bug c/51971] unclear/unverified restrictions on attribute((const|pure))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51971 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-24 13:01:03 UTC --- GCC explicitely allows you to use const/pure to enable CSE even if it would not consider the function const/pure itself (thus, if you are happy to loose a second assert (), or a deb

[Bug bootstrap/51969] [4.6 regression] gcc 4.7 unable to build gcc 4.6

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51969 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.3 --- Comment #4 from Richard Guen

[Bug fortran/41823] gcc/fortran/trans-openmp.c: possible null pointer dereference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41823 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-24 13:18:18 UTC --- It is not, but it isn't that a big deal, gcc will optimize the test away.

[Bug driver/47249] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in common_handle_option, at opts.c:1695 with unknown option passed to cc1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47249 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-24 13:18:16 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 24 13:18:08 2012 New Revision: 183474 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183474 Log: PR driver/47249 * common.opt (-pie, -shared

[Bug driver/47249] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE in common_handle_option, at opts.c:1695 with unknown option passed to cc1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47249 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/51812] [4.7 regression] Virtual public inheritance and thunks leads to "undefined reference" in header files.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51812 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2012-01-24 13:37:43 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Tue Jan 24 13:37:38 2012 New Revision: 183475 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183475 Log: PR c++/51812 * cgraphunit.c (cgraph_decide_

[Bug c++/51812] [4.7 regression] Virtual public inheritance and thunks leads to "undefined reference" in header files.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51812 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug driver/47249] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE in common_handle_option, at opts.c:1695 with unknown option passed to cc1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47249 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.4.7 |4.7.0 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guen

[Bug bootstrap/49829] [4.7 Regression] --disable-static --enable-shared regression: cannot find -lstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49829 --- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-24 13:59:19 UTC --- On powerpc64-linux apparently a few symbols are gone since yesterday: _ZNSbIwSt11char_traitsIwESaIwEE4_Rep20_S_empty_rep_storageE@@GLIBCXX_3.4 OBJECT GLOBAL DEFAULT 16 _ZNSs4_Rep20_S_

[Bug target/51980] New: ARM - Neon code polluted by useless stores to the stack with vuzpq / vzipq / vtrnq

inux-androideabi-,' Thread model: posix gcc version 4.7.0 20120124 (experimental) (GCC) COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-c' '-march=armv7-a' '-mcpu=cortex-a9' '-mfloat-abi=hard' '-mfpu=vfp' '-flax-vector-conversions' '-mfpu=neon' '-O2&

[Bug c++/51973] [4.7 regression][C++11] Template parameter deduction fails for overloaded functions when template parameters have defaulted arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51973 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/51980] ARM - Neon code polluted by useless stores to the stack with vuzpq / vzipq / vtrnq

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51980 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/51970] [OOP] gimplification failed for polymorphic MOVE_ALLOC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51970 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-24 15:27:43 UTC --- Created attachment 26443 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26443 Draft patch for trans-intrinsic.c There are two issues: a) from_expr->rank *and* to_expr->rank are

[Bug fortran/51977] [OOP] MOVE_ALLOC: Bogus "must have the same rank 0/1" for same-rank arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51977 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug libstdc++/51798] [4.7 regression] libstdc++ atomicity performance regression due to __sync_fetch_and_add

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51798 --- Comment #5 from David Edelsohn 2012-01-24 15:29:44 UTC --- Are you suggesting that the existing atomicity support in libstdc++ should be changed to use ACQ_REL semantics? libstdc++ uses one function to both acquire and release a lock. It ad

[Bug libgcj/50895] Build failure in jni.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50895 --- Comment #2 from Ruben Van Boxem 2012-01-24 15:29:24 UTC --- With GCC 4.7, I get a different failure (and jni.cc hasn't been reached yet I think), which is pthread-related (I configured with --enable-threads=posix): libtool: compile: /home/r

[Bug libstdc++/51798] [4.7 regression] libstdc++ atomicity performance regression due to __sync_fetch_and_add

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51798 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Macleod 2012-01-24 16:02:03 UTC --- Others expressed concern about a change that could potentially affect all targets since its in libstdc++ code, especially considering this code is being deprecated. There are targets

[Bug libstdc++/51981] New: Missing uninitialized_move() implementation?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51981 Bug #: 51981 Summary: Missing uninitialized_move() implementation? Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug libstdc++/51981] Missing uninitialized_move() implementation?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51981 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-24 16:46:12 UTC --- Because it's non-standard

[Bug c++/51928] ICE: SIGSEGV in lookup_fnfields_idx_nolazy (search.c:1384) with -fgnu-tm on invalid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51928 --- Comment #1 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-01-24 16:47:43 UTC --- Author: aldyh Date: Tue Jan 24 16:47:24 2012 New Revision: 183478 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183478 Log: + PR c++/51928 + * class.c (set_method

[Bug c++/51928] ICE: SIGSEGV in lookup_fnfields_idx_nolazy (search.c:1384) with -fgnu-tm on invalid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51928 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/51968] gcc trunk (ARM) ICEs in final_scan_insn in final.c:2716, with "could not split insn" error msg

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51968 --- Comment #7 from Richard Henderson 2012-01-24 17:33:46 UTC --- Author: rth Date: Tue Jan 24 17:33:41 2012 New Revision: 183480 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183480 Log: PR target/51968 * config/arm/arm.c (neon_

[Bug target/51968] gcc trunk (ARM) ICEs in final_scan_insn in final.c:2716, with "could not split insn" error msg

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51968 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/51982] New: Shrink-wrapping opportunity

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51982 Bug #: 51982 Summary: Shrink-wrapping opportunity Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/51982] Shrink-wrapping opportunity

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51982 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|U

[Bug middle-end/51982] Shrink-wrapping opportunity

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51982 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||10474 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug c++/51973] [4.7 regression][C++11] Template parameter deduction fails for overloaded functions when template parameters have defaulted arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51973 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2012-01-24 19:07:29 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Tue Jan 24 19:07:24 2012 New Revision: 183487 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183487 Log: PR c++/51973 * tree.c (called_fns_equal): C

[Bug c++/51973] [4.7 regression][C++11] Template parameter deduction fails for overloaded functions when template parameters have defaulted arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51973 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/51636] Thread-safeness of new and delete operators

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51636 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-01-24 19:41:54 UTC --- >Guess: the new/new[] operators throwing std::bad_alloc have a MT-safeness problem. They should not as they are just wrappers around malloc.

[Bug c++/51917] [4.7 regression] g++.old-deja/g++.abi/vmihint.C FAILs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51917 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug c/51983] New: Wrong line number in an uninitialized variable warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51983 Bug #: 51983 Summary: Wrong line number in an uninitialized variable warning Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/41895] _Complex return type changes line numbers in diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41895 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/51983] Wrong line number in an uninitialized variable warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51983 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/39246] FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-13.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39246 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Greta.Yorsh at arm dot com --- Comment #9

[Bug middle-end/39246] FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-13.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39246 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski 2012-01-24 19:48:16 UTC --- *** Bug 41895 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug gcov-profile/51975] ICE in gcc in convert_move, at expr.c:326 with fprofile-use when source changes from fprofile-generate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51975 asharif at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #26439|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug gcov-profile/51975] ICE in gcc in convert_move, at expr.c:326 with fprofile-use when source changes from fprofile-generate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51975 asharif at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #26445|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug middle-end/51984] New: ICE: SIGSEGV with -O2 -fgraphite-identity

root/bug.c:8:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions. ~ # gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/4.7.0-svn-183

[Bug middle-end/51984] ICE: SIGSEGV with -O2 -fgraphite-identity

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51984 --- Comment #1 from Marcin Baczynski 2012-01-24 22:00:18 UTC --- Created attachment 26447 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26447 Reduced test case.

[Bug bootstrap/51985] New: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 183497 on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51985 Bug #: 51985 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 183497 on x86_64-apple-darwin10 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status:

[Bug middle-end/51986] New: [4.7 regression] uninitialized variable warning regression prevents bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51986 Bug #: 51986 Summary: [4.7 regression] uninitialized variable warning regression prevents bootstrap Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: U

[Bug middle-end/51986] [4.7 regression] uninitialized variable warning regression prevents bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51986 --- Comment #1 from Matt Hargett 2012-01-24 22:31:05 UTC --- Created attachment 26448 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26448 pre-processed source of the file that triggers the regression

[Bug tree-optimization/51987] New: [4.7 Regression] Predictive commoning wrong-code with non-volatile asm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51987 Bug #: 51987 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Predictive commoning wrong-code with non-volatile asm Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIR

[Bug tree-optimization/51987] [4.7 Regression] Predictive commoning wrong-code with non-volatile asm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51987 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/51970] [OOP] gimplification failed for polymorphic MOVE_ALLOC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51970 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-01-24 22:35:43 UTC --- The patch attached to comment #4 + the "hack" let the test compile without error (although I don't know if it is valid). I have noticed the following changes: For 51948, before

[Bug tree-optimization/51987] [4.7 Regression] Predictive commoning wrong-code with non-volatile asm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51987 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-24 22:40:11 UTC --- Created attachment 26449 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26449 gcc47-pr51987.patch Untested fix.

[Bug bootstrap/51985] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 183497 on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51985 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-apple-darwin10

[Bug target/43311] missed 'movw' optimization.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43311 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-01-24 22:52:54 UTC --- This is dup of the merge loads from two adjacent memory location into one load bug. Which I don't remember the number of the bug right now.

[Bug libstdc++/51981] Missing uninitialized_move() implementation?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51981 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marc.glisse at normalesup

[Bug bootstrap/51985] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 183497 on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51985 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-01-24 23:16:45 UTC --- Looking at the log, I see copying selected object files to avoid basename conflicts... <--- :-( copying selected object files to avoid basename conflicts... libtool: link:

[Bug tree-optimization/51988] New: value_replacement in PHIOPT should handle even the cases where there are other PHIs even with non equal value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51988 Bug #: 51988 Summary: value_replacement in PHIOPT should handle even the cases where there are other PHIs even with non equal value Classification: Unclassified Product:

  1   2   >