[Bug c++/51151] Invalid -Woverflow warning in C++ frontend

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51151 Andreas Krebbel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/51151] Invalid -Woverflow warning in C++ frontend

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51151 Andreas Krebbel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #9 from Andreas Kreb

[Bug c++/51714] [4.6/4.7 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault with -std=c++11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51714 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c++/51739] New: g++ cpp compiler crash with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51739 Bug #: 51739 Summary: g++ cpp compiler crash with -O3 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/51714] [4.6/4.7 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault with -std=c++11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51714 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-checking CC|

[Bug c++/51739] g++ cpp compiler crash with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51739 --- Comment #1 from Tim 2012-01-03 08:39:34 UTC --- # command to reproduce tgraham@kepler:~/tmp$ g++ -O3 -c reduced_test_case.i.cxx -o reduced_test_case.o g++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus) Please submit a full bug report, wit

[Bug bootstrap/51734] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap fails in libada

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51734 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Krebbel 2012-01-03 08:45:59 UTC --- That looks like another fallout from having -fpic in picflag.m4. So I'll remove the s390*-*-* case in picflag.m4: s390*-*-*) $1=-fpic ;; Mike Frysinger once was afte

[Bug bootstrap/51735] [4.7 regression] stage 3 bootstrap failure compiling tree-ssa-pre.c with r182760

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51735 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel 2012-01-03 08:53:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Is the segfault in the > for (;;) > { > if ((*mem_chain)->elt == v) > { > unchain_one

[Bug bootstrap/51735] [4.7 regression] stage 3 bootstrap failure compiling tree-ssa-pre.c with r182760

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51735 Andreas Krebbel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/51725] [4.7 regression] segfault in stage 3 when compiling gcc/opts.c for sparc64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51725 Andreas Krebbel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/51730] [4.7 Regression] autoconf 2.60 through 2.67 stdbool.h check fails with GCC 4.7

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51730 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/51730] [4.7 Regression] autoconf 2.60 through 2.67 stdbool.h check fails with GCC 4.7

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51730 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-03 08:59:26 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Jan 3 08:59:21 2012 New Revision: 182830 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182830 Log: 2012-01-03 Richard Guenther PR middle-

[Bug c++/51739] g++ cpp compiler crash with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51739 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug pch/51722] [4.7 Regression] Options "-g3" or "-ggdb3" or "-g3 -gdwarf-2" and other "-g..level3" - internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51722 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/51719] [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: LHS in noreturn call with -fpartial-inlining -fprofile-use and exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51719 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-03 09:09:45 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 3 09:09:41 2012 New Revision: 182832 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182832 Log: PR tree-optimization/51719 * value-prof.c (

[Bug tree-optimization/51719] [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: LHS in noreturn call with -fpartial-inlining -fprofile-use and exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51719 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/51737] [4.6 Regression] g++ crashes (internal compiler error: Segmentation fault) when compiling quickbook

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51737 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/15867] -Wredundant-decls and explicit template specialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15867 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-03 09:33:37 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Jan 3 09:33:33 2012 New Revision: 182833 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182833 Log: /cp 2012-01-03 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug c++/15867] -Wredundant-decls and explicit template specialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15867 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/15369] "Wrong" line number for static constructor function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15369 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8 f

[Bug middle-end/39456] Functions/variables of a file in different named sections

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39456 --- Comment #4 from etienne_lorrain at yahoo dot fr 2012-01-03 09:53:59 UTC --- Thanks for looking at my reports and happy new year! I think the problem I had was the quoting and string concat, you need: void fct2 (void) __attribute__((__section__

[Bug target/50616] lto1.exe: internal compiler error: invalid resolution in the resolution file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50616 --- Comment #3 from niXman 2012-01-03 09:53:59 UTC --- Created attachment 26229 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26229 sources + temp files + logs

[Bug pch/51722] [4.7 Regression] Options "-g3" or "-ggdb3" or "-g3 -gdwarf-2" and other "-g..level3" - internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51722 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug c++/14258] typename in a using declaration not supported

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14258 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug c++/26256] ignores using declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26256 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug c++/23211] using dec in nested class doesn't import name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23211 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug c++/30195] Using declaration doesn't work in template.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30195 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug c++/6936] member "using" binds wrong

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6936 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug c++/25994] Using declarations and base function overloading

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25994 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug tree-optimization/51721] -Warray-bounds false positives and inconsistencies

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51721 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-03 10:18:12 UTC --- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-01/msg00046.html Deferring for 4.8. We should also add ASSERT_EXPRs e.g. for unsigned int x; int D.1234; D.1234_2 = (int) x_1(D); if (D.1

[Bug fortran/51638] gfortran optimization breaks a single variable used as both input and output for subroutine call

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51638 --- Comment #3 from Sebastien Bardeau 2012-01-03 10:21:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > > I can reproduce it with > -O -m32 > on x86-64-linux. Fine you can reproduce it easily. > In terms of code validity, there are two other issues:

[Bug c++/21120] Empty declaration with typeof accepted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21120 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 f

[Bug target/50616] lto1.exe: internal compiler error: invalid resolution in the resolution file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50616 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug debug/51650] [4.7 regression] LTO ICE in dwarf2out_finish, at dwarf2out.c:22501 while building libxul

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51650 --- Comment #23 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-03 11:30:32 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Jan 3 11:30:27 2012 New Revision: 182835 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182835 Log: 2012-01-03 Richard Guenther PR debug/

[Bug debug/51650] [4.7 regression] LTO ICE in dwarf2out_finish, at dwarf2out.c:22501 while building libxul

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51650 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug lto/51635] LTO should not merge (type) decls with different locations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51635 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.0 |--- Summary|[4.7 regression

[Bug c++/51092] [C++0x] [4.6 Regression] ICE array std::pair initialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51092 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.3

[Bug c++/29273] error on dynamic_cast(array)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29273 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug target/51106] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in move_insn, at haifa-sched.c:2314

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51106 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/51582] [4.6 Regression] ICE when using a class with a matrix of complex numbers in C++0x mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51582 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.5.3, 4.7.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/51692] [4.7 Regression] ICE on several valgrind tests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51692 --- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-03 11:54:58 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Jan 3 11:54:53 2012 New Revision: 182838 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182838 Log: 2012-01-03 Richard Guenther PR tree-op

[Bug tree-optimization/51692] [4.7 Regression] ICE on several valgrind tests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51692 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug lto/45089] -Os -g -fwhopr dwarf2out ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45089 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||47819 --- Comment #14 from Richard Gue

[Bug tree-optimization/51070] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE verify_gimple failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51070 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-03 12:07:22 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Jan 3 12:07:18 2012 New Revision: 182839 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182839 Log: 2012-01-03 Richard Guenther PR tree-op

[Bug tree-optimization/51070] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE verify_gimple failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51070 --- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-03 12:11:49 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Jan 3 12:11:41 2012 New Revision: 182840 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182840 Log: 2012-01-03 Richard Guenther PR tre

[Bug tree-optimization/51070] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE verify_gimple failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51070 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/48571] [4.5/4.6 Regression] Missed data-dependence for (bogus?) reconstructed array-refs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48571 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/48764] [4.5 Regression] wrong-code bug in gcc-4.5.x, related to __restrict

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48764 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/49279] [4.5 Regression] Optimization incorrectly presuming constant variable inside loop in g++ 4.5 and 4.6 with -O2 and -O3 for x86_64 targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49279 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wouter.vermaelen at scarlet

[Bug gcov-profile/51715] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-13.c execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51715 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug fortran/49693] Spurious "unused-variable" warnings for COMMON block module variables.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49693 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig 2012-01-03 12:36:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Testing this patch: which doesn't work.

[Bug bootstrap/49829] [4.7 Regression] --disable-static --enable-shared regression: cannot find -lstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49829 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/49865] [4.7 Regression] Unnecessary reload causes small bloat

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49865 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/49829] [4.7 Regression] --disable-static --enable-shared regression: cannot find -lstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49829 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Bonzini 2012-01-03 13:06:50 UTC --- You can just set enable_static=no early in libstdc++-v3/configure.ac. It will still install libstdc++-v3.a, which is a bit ugly, but that's quite hard to achieve due to libtool. One

[Bug tree-optimization/48172] [4.5 Regression] incorrect vectorization of loop in GCC 4.5.* with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48172 --- Comment #18 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-03 13:08:02 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Jan 3 13:07:57 2012 New Revision: 182841 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182841 Log: 2011-05-18 Richard Guenther Backport

[Bug tree-optimization/48172] [4.5 Regression] incorrect vectorization of loop in GCC 4.5.* with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48172 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/49907] [4.5/4.6 Regression] lto-plugin -Wall in stage1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49907 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-03 13:15:25 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Jan 3 13:15:21 2012 New Revision: 182842 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182842 Log: 2012-01-03 Richard Guenther Backpo

[Bug bootstrap/49907] [4.5/4.6 Regression] lto-plugin -Wall in stage1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49907 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/50162] [4.5 Regression] Wrong vectorization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50162 --- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-03 13:19:35 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Jan 3 13:19:28 2012 New Revision: 182843 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182843 Log: 2012-01-03 Richard Guenther Backport

[Bug tree-optimization/50162] [4.5 Regression] Wrong vectorization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50162 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/51269] Vectorization profitability threshold is not actually used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51269 --- Comment #3 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-03 13:24:12 UTC --- Author: irar Date: Tue Jan 3 13:24:04 2012 New Revision: 182844 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182844 Log: PR tree-optimization/51269

[Bug middle-end/50966] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Missing 'is used uninitialized' warning (struct pointer dereference)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50966 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/50040] [4.5/4.6 Regression] missed warning: ‘x.y’ is used uninitialized in this function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50040 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||belyshev at depni dot

[Bug middle-end/50040] [4.5/4.6 Regression] missed warning: ‘x.y’ is used uninitialized in this function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50040 --- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-03 13:29:56 UTC --- It's also questionable to cause new warnings to appear on the branch if you consider code using -Werror. Leaving open a bit for further consideration, should be closed as fixed fo

[Bug tree-optimization/51269] Vectorization profitability threshold is not actually used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51269 Ira Rosen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug pch/51722] [4.7 Regression] Options "-g3" or "-ggdb3" or "-g3 -gdwarf-2" and other "-g..level3" - internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51722 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-03 13:45:47 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 3 13:45:41 2012 New Revision: 182845 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182845 Log: PR pch/51722 * dwarf2out.c (dwarf2out_star

[Bug pch/51722] [4.7 Regression] Options "-g3" or "-ggdb3" or "-g3 -gdwarf-2" and other "-g..level3" - internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51722 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/49279] [4.5 Regression] Optimization incorrectly presuming constant variable inside loop in g++ 4.5 and 4.6 with -O2 and -O3 for x86_64 targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49279 --- Comment #20 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-03 13:54:48 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Jan 3 13:54:44 2012 New Revision: 182846 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182846 Log: 2012-01-03 Richard Guenther Backport

[Bug tree-optimization/49279] [4.5 Regression] Optimization incorrectly presuming constant variable inside loop in g++ 4.5 and 4.6 with -O2 and -O3 for x86_64 targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49279 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/51740] New: warning "is used uninitialized in this function" is missing if the variable initialized later

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51740 Bug #: 51740 Summary: warning "is used uninitialized in this function" is missing if the variable initialized later Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1

[Bug bootstrap/51725] [4.7 regression] segfault in stage 3 when compiling gcc/opts.c for sparc64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51725 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug tree-optimization/51042] [4.5/4.6 Regression] endless recursion in phi_translate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51042 --- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-03 14:46:08 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Jan 3 14:46:03 2012 New Revision: 182848 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182848 Log: 2012-01-03 Richard Guenther Backport f

[Bug c++/21120] Empty declaration with typeof accepted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21120 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/51738] C++11 initializer list does not work correctly with operator[]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51738 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2012-01-03 15:00:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Uhm, is it simply that cp_parser_postfix_open_square_expression doesn't > handle: > > postfix-expression [ braced-init-list ] > > or I'm misreading the

[Bug c/51741] New: complicatet brakets wont compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51741 Bug #: 51741 Summary: complicatet brakets wont compile Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/50040] [4.5/4.6 Regression] missed warning: ‘x.y’ is used uninitialized in this function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50040 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||szo at szo dot hu --- Comment #11 from

[Bug c/51740] warning "is used uninitialized in this function" is missing if the variable initialized later

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51740 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/51741] complicatet brakets wont compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51741 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/51741] complicatet brakets wont compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51741 --- Comment #2 from stfu&thnk 2012-01-03 15:21:26 UTC --- I fail &secon one. forgot a * -.-

[Bug c/51741] complicatet brakets wont compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51741 --- Comment #3 from stfu&thnk 2012-01-03 15:23:12 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > as soon as you cast the .where pointer to some other type it converts to > an rvalue. Use (knot*)&(where) instead of &(knot *)(...where). I don't know how t

[Bug c/51741] complicatet brakets wont compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51741 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-03 15:25:32 UTC --- The bug reporting guidelines at http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ ask for the following which you have not provided: * the exact version of gcc * the exact command line * the complete prepro

[Bug middle-end/50189] [4.5 Regression] Wrong code error in -O2 [-fstrict-enums] compile, target independent

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50189 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/50189] [4.5 Regression] Wrong code error in -O2 [-fstrict-enums] compile, target independent

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50189 --- Comment #18 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-03 15:28:25 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Jan 3 15:28:19 2012 New Revision: 182850 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182850 Log: 2012-01-03 Richard Guenther Backport

[Bug c++/29273] error on dynamic_cast(array)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29273 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-03 15:29:47 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Jan 3 15:29:42 2012 New Revision: 182851 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182851 Log: /cp 2012-01-03 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug c++/29273] error on dynamic_cast(array)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29273 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/51738] C++11 initializer list does not work correctly with operator[]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51738 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/51541] ICE on ill-formed alias template declarations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51541 Dodji Seketeli changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned a

[Bug c/51741] complicatet brakets wont compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51741 --- Comment #5 from stfu&thnk 2012-01-03 15:47:08 UTC --- yeah i just realised how the second one was a fail of my side. but I didn't realze the rvalue lvalue stuff. thanx for the help, and please don't go all pissed off I didn't want to insult

[Bug c/51741] complicatet brakets wont compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51741 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-03 15:53:13 UTC --- noone's insulted and noone's flaming, but in future please follow the bug reporting guidelines (and maybe check with someone who knows C well before assuming the compiler is wrong, e

[Bug debug/45682] missing namespace parent die when using -gdwarf-4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45682 Dodji Seketeli changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/51737] [4.6 Regression] g++ crashes (internal compiler error: Segmentation fault) when compiling quickbook

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51737 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org Known

[Bug c++/30539] Accepts invalid explicit specialization declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30539 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug bootstrap/51725] [4.7 regression] segfault in stage 3 when compiling gcc/opts.c for sparc64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51725 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-03 16:24:00 UTC --- Managed to reproduce this even using x86_64-linux -> ia64-linux cross. Indeed, what happens is that when add_mem_for_addr is called, mem_elt is still its own canonical_cselib_val, the

[Bug bootstrap/51742] New: 4.6.2 v. HP-UX 11.11, PA-RISC: "make bootstrap-lean" fails: "internal compiler error: Segmentation fault" (In function '__fixunssfdi')

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51742 Bug #: 51742 Summary: 4.6.2 v. HP-UX 11.11, PA-RISC: "make bootstrap-lean" fails: "internal compiler error: Segmentation fault" (In function '__fixunssfdi') Classification: Unclas

[Bug c++/41596] handling of library-related options by g++spec.c causes a failure when generating pch.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41596 --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2012-01-03 16:37:07 UTC --- Iain, what's going on with this issue? Are there patches on the mailing list waiting to be reviewed?

[Bug bootstrap/51725] [4.7 regression] segfault in stage 3 when compiling gcc/opts.c for sparc64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51725 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug c++/51666] NSDMI parse fails for template'd intializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51666 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|jason at gcc

[Bug libstdc++/39796] cin/cout/cerr constructors should run at high priority when possible

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39796 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/51675] [C++11][4.7 Regression] Cannot create constexpr unions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51675 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|jason at gcc

[Bug target/51743] New: [ia64] Many gcc.dg/torture/vshuf*.c tests FAIL with -O2 -mbig-endian

=== gcc Summary === # of expected passes50 # of unexpected failures14 # of unresolved testcases 2 # of unsupported tests 224 /home/uros/gcc-build/gcc/xgcc version 4.7.0 20120103 (experimental) [trunk revision 182829] (GCC)

  1   2   >