[Bug middle-end/25521] change semantics of const volatile variables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25521 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/25521] change semantics of const volatile variables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25521 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||etienne_lorrain at yahoo

[Bug bootstrap/25825] Add soft float to list of libraries

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25825 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2011-12-22 01:17:18 UTC --- I don't think you can even use libstdc++ in a device driver or a kernel extension anyways as it depends on a libc to be there.

[Bug c/26367] multiple levels of __builtin_expect

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26367 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski 2011-12-22 01:21:00 UTC --- I think __builtin_unreachable resolved some of this already. Also probilities to noreturn functions are marked as notlikely already.

[Bug other/30529] Incompatible __dec_byte_swap declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30529 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/51494] Legal program rejection - capturing "this" when using static method inside lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51494 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/30728] Building a 32-bit compiler on a 64-bit system should pass --32 flag to the assembler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30728 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/32877] Cannot make GCC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32877 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/51102] missing macros in

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51102 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/50982] AIX libstdc++ GTHREADS incompatibility

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50982 --- Comment #48 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-22 02:20:43 UTC --- what's the status of the 30_threads tests now on AIX? do these results include the threads tests? http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-12/msg01863.html

[Bug middle-end/42834] memcpy folding overeager

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42834 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vegorov at chromium dot org --- Comment #

[Bug tree-optimization/45883] Incorrect store removal when compiling with -fstrict-aliasing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45883 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug target/30153] -fPIC failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30153 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/30318] VRP does not create ANTI_RANGEs on overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30318 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/30318] VRP does not create ANTI_RANGEs on overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30318 --- Comment #4 from DMueller at suse dot com 2011-12-22 03:25:02 UTC --- Hi, I'm currently out of office until December 28th and your email will be handled when I'm back. For urgent SUSE Maintenance related issues that can not wait until then,

[Bug target/29997] various targets: GCC fails to encode epilogues in unwind-info

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29997 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2011-12-22 03:26:11 UTC --- I think we encode proligue and epilogues now for all targets.

[Bug fortran/51652] New: [F03] ICE with allocatable scalars

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51652 Bug #: 51652 Summary: [F03] ICE with allocatable scalars Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug preprocessor/33919] __BASE_FILE__ does not expand correctly when included from the command line

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33919 --- Comment #5 from Gary Funck 2011-12-22 04:03:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > I'm having this problem too, and it's still happening with GCC 4.5. The ml > message suggests that this may be hard to fix, but it looks surprisingly easy: > in

<    1   2