http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51461
Bug #: 51461
Summary: [c++0x] [4.7 Regression] ICE with invalid
initialization of static data member
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51461
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Target Milestone|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51462
Bug #: 51462
Summary: [c++0x] ICE in cx_check_missing_mem_inits
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51463
Bug #: 51463
Summary: [c++0x] [4.7 Regression] ICE declaring a member
function virtual and static
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51463
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery,
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51464
Bug #: 51464
Summary: [c++0x] ICE with invalid use of []
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48437
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-12-08
08:50:40 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Dec 8 08:50:35 2011
New Revision: 182100
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182100
Log:
2011-12-08 Richard Guenther
PR lto/484
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48437
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39509
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.5.2, 4.6.2, 4.7.0
Summary
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48496
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49772
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de
2011-12-08 08:57:22 UTC ---
On Thu, 8 Dec 2011, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49772
>
> --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski 2011-12-08
> 04:54:41 U
r. Look into
MEM_REFs and use get_object_or_type_alignment for them.
(build_accesses_from_assign): Adjust for above change.
(access_precludes_ipa_sra_p): Likewise.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20111208-1.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/bu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51461
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
Backport from mainline
2011-09-25 Eric Botcazou
* gcc-interface/decl.c (gnat_to_gnu_entity) : Do not promote
the alignment if this doesn't prevent BLKmode access to the object.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20111208-1.c
- copied u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51416
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51315
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835
--- Comment #48 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-12-08
09:25:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #47)
> (In reply to comment #42)
> > -O2 -W -Wall -gnatpg -nostdinc a-assert.adb -o a-assert.o
> > +===GNAT BUG DETECTED==
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51460
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51465
Bug #: 51465
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51459
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51456
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51460
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.5.3
Known to fail|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51393
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-12-08
10:43:18 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 8 10:43:13 2011
New Revision: 182106
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182106
Log:
Backported from mainline
2011-12-04 Jérémi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51460
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51464
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51459
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-08
11:26:55 UTC ---
sans library:
struct func {
virtual ~func() { }
virtual void operator()() const = 0;
virtual func* clone() const = 0;
};
template
struct funcimpl : func {
explicit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49772
--- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther 2011-12-08
11:39:21 UTC ---
It's a complete mystery to me how this cgraph node cloning and edge code
works. We create the inline clone for a completely different edge
(that _is_ decided to be inlined) than t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49945
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2011-12-08
11:43:16 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Dec 8 11:43:12 2011
New Revision: 182107
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182107
Log:
2011-12-08 Richard Guenther
PR lto/499
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51459
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51459
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-12-08
11:55:48 UTC ---
Indeed, with 4.6.x preprocessed source for the reduced testcase this started
failing with http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175158 aka
PR43912.
The only important diffe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39933
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39933
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ich at az2000 dot de
--- Comment #4 from Dave
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40322
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45994
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39933
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||phantall at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41043
--- Comment #15 from Dominique d'Humieres
2011-12-08 12:15:58 UTC ---
> Probably not a very good idea for backporting this late.
IIUC 4.4 will no longer be supported soon. Is there still some plan to backport
the fix or can I close this PR as fi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50747
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2011-12-08
12:32:24 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Dec 8 12:32:19 2011
New Revision: 182108
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182108
Log:
2011-12-08 Richard Guenther
PR lto/507
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49945
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50747
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
* gcc.c-torture/execute/20111208-1.c: Fix wrong assumption
sizeof(int)==4.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20111208-1.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49772
--- Comment #13 from Richard Guenther 2011-12-08
13:23:59 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Dec 8 13:23:54 2011
New Revision: 182110
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182110
Log:
2011-12-08 Richard Guenther
PR tree-o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49772
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48721
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-12-08
13:34:02 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 8 13:33:58 2011
New Revision: 182111
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182111
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-11-30 Jakub J
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51323
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-12-08
13:36:46 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 8 13:36:40 2011
New Revision: 182112
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182112
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-12-05 Jakub J
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50074
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-12-08
13:36:46 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 8 13:36:40 2011
New Revision: 182112
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182112
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-12-05 Jakub J
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51339
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-12-08
13:37:48 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 8 13:37:44 2011
New Revision: 182113
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182113
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-12-05 Jakub Je
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51410
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-12-08
13:39:38 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 8 13:39:34 2011
New Revision: 182114
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182114
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-12-05 Jakub Je
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51323
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48721
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51339
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51315
--- Comment #14 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-12-08
13:57:51 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Thu Dec 8 13:57:43 2011
New Revision: 182115
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182115
Log:
* gcc.c-torture/execute/2011
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51466
Bug #: 51466
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE in gimple_rhs_has_side_effects,
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
--- Comment #5 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu 2011-12-08 14:30:00 UTC ---
Re:
Do the architecture manuals say anything about the sign of the qnan?
Amazingly enough, they do!
I downloaded the combined x86-64 manuals from
http://www.intel.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
--- Comment #6 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu 2011-12-08 14:31:23 UTC ---
PS: I don't know whether IEEE says anything about the sign bit, but I doubt
it.
Brad
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50199
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-12-08
14:37:14 UTC ---
Which means - taking addresses of literals should be disallowed (that
includes the prominent example of STRING_CSTs, but possibly that is not
the only existing case?). Instead when
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50395
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Krebbel 2011-12-08
14:37:24 UTC ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Thu Dec 8 14:37:19 2011
New Revision: 182116
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182116
Log:
2011-12-08 Andreas Krebbel
PR target/50
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51466
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-12-08
14:45:44 UTC ---
Created attachment 26021
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26021
gcc47-pr51466.patch
Possible fix. Though, I wonder if this isn't unnecessarily pessimistic.
The rea
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50199
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-12-08
15:02:34 UTC ---
Created attachment 26022
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26022
gimple predicate patches
GIMPLE predicate patches - that will now commit STRING_CSTs to a local
t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51467
Bug #: 51467
Summary: Stack Smashing Protector: Canary is destroyed in RAX
partially only on x86_64
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.4
Status: U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50395
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51467
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51466
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26021|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51466
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-12-08
15:41:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Created attachment 26024 [details]
> gcc47-pr51466.patch
>
> Another alternative. Note that apparently gimple_rhs_has_side_effects has
> been
> removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835
--- Comment #49 from Eric Botcazou 2011-12-08
16:00:34 UTC ---
> That is, first ada maps precisions 32, 64, and 80 to bit sizes 32, 64, and 96,
> respectively. Then ada turns around and tries to map _bit_size_ 80 to a
> precision, but bit size 8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51467
--- Comment #2 from Oliver Mueller 2011-12-08
16:04:17 UTC ---
Oh yes! It's the "promoted to 64 bit" thing.
I forgot. Sorry.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-12-08
16:06:43 UTC ---
> Does IEEE say anything about the sign of the qnan?
>From "Draft 1.2.5 DRAFT Standard for Floating-Point Arithmetic P754 October 4,
2006" at
http://www.validlab.com/754R/draft
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51468
Bug #: 51468
Summary: cannot find -ldl and collect 2 ld returned 1 exit
status
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51468
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51374
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|4.7.0 |
Known to fail|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51262
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
--- Comment #9 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu 2011-12-08 17:05:43 UTC ---
Table 4.7 of the
AMD64 Architecture Programmer’s Manual Volume 1:
Application Programming
has a footnote 3 that says
3. The floating-point indefinite value is a QNaN w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51468
--- Comment #2 from Dwight Walker 2011-12-08
17:07:52 UTC ---
QtSDK 1.1.4 built GCC (Mingw)
Windows 7 Home Premium
C:\Users\Dwight\Downloads\nokia\ZXing-1.7\zxing\cpp>c:\python27\python
scons\sco
ns.py
scons: Reading SConscript files ...
scons:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51468
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-08
17:23:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I think the dl library is not in the path. I cannot set the path for the gcc
> so
> that is why the library is not found and the compile fails.
If you ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51117
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51468
--- Comment #4 from Dwight Walker 2011-12-08
17:40:16 UTC ---
C:\Users\Dwight>gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i686-w64-mingw32
Configured with: ../gcc44-svn/configure --target=i686-w64-mingw32
--host=i686-w6
4-mingw32 --disable-multilib --di
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51468
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51468
--- Comment #6 from Dwight Walker 2011-12-08
18:18:54 UTC ---
http://code.google.com/p/dlfcn-win32/
I can't get it to work with mingw:
gcc -ldlfcn -> not found
Libraries on Mingw are in about 10 different folders.
I may use cygwin.
Linux may
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51468
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-08
18:24:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> I can't get it to work with mingw:
Bugzilla is for bugs, "I can't get it to work" is not a bug.
Please find a more suitable forum for seeking help with th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51459
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
--- Comment #10 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu 2011-12-08 18:32:56 UTC ---
Near the end of section 5.3.2 of
Book E:
Enhanced PowerPC Architecture
Version 1.0
May 7, 2002
it says
Any instruction that generates a QNaN as the result of a disab
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51468
--- Comment #8 from Dwight Walker 2011-12-08
18:35:46 UTC ---
I guess your system does not work in Windows very well. It is a bug as the
libraries are not installing properly but I can't give you exact reason.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51310
--- Comment #4 from toon at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-08 18:38:39 UTC ---
Author: toon
Date: Thu Dec 8 18:38:32 2011
New Revision: 182127
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182127
Log:
2011-12-08 Toon Moene
PR fortran/513
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51460
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Depends on|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053
--- Comment #6 from gee 2011-12-08 18:45:46 UTC ---
Created attachment 26026
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26026
generated zip file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51468
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-08
18:46:13 UTC ---
The libraries you're trying to use are nothing to do with GCC, talk to the
MinGW people, or to the person who wrote that dlfcn wrapper - it's nothing to
do with GCC. If you have the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053
--- Comment #7 from gee 2011-12-08 18:47:29 UTC ---
Created attachment 26027
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26027
generated tree from gnu.zip
/tmp/gcc/host-i686-pc-cygwin/gcc/jc1.exe -fhash-synchronization
-fuse-divide-subrou
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053
--- Comment #8 from gee 2011-12-08 18:49:10 UTC ---
Created attachment 26028
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26028
generated rtl from gnu.zip
/tmp/gcc/host-i686-pc-cygwin/gcc/jc1.exe -fno-shrink-wrap -quiet
-fhash-synchronizat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51448
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2011-12-08
18:51:33 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Dec 8 18:51:28 2011
New Revision: 182131
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182131
Log:
2011-12-08 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/51
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51407
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2011-12-08
18:54:31 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Dec 8 18:54:27 2011
New Revision: 182132
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182132
Log:
2011-12-08 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/51
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39825
Sean McGovern changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gseanmcg at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51378
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2011-12-08
18:57:01 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Dec 8 18:56:58 2011
New Revision: 182133
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182133
Log:
2011-12-08 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/51
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51469
Bug #: 51469
Summary: attr-ifunc-* tests fail on PowerPC if
--enable-gnu-indirect-function is used
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41518
Sean McGovern changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gseanmcg at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50815
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2011-12-08
19:01:00 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Dec 8 19:00:55 2011
New Revision: 182134
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182134
Log:
2011-12-08 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/50
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29189
Sean McGovern changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gseanmcg at gmail dot com
--- Comment #12
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053
gee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in |[4.7 regression] jc1
|natClass.cc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053
--- Comment #10 from gee 2011-12-08 19:15:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
whereas with -findirect-dispatch, initializer code isn't omitted.
;; Function () (_ZN3gnu3gcj7convert10Input_UTF8C1Ev, funcdef_no=47,
decl_uid=3185, cgraph_uid=94)
()
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
