[Bug c++/20397] improve diagnostic for 'is inaccessible' error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20397 --- Comment #16 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2011-10-21 07:57:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > I am reopening as an enhancement request because all this discussion could be > better summarized in the error message (in particular, the part about

[Bug c++/50817] New: G++ emits errors containing lowered vtable references

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50817 Bug #: 50817 Summary: G++ emits errors containing lowered vtable references Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug c++/50817] G++ emits errors containing lowered vtable references

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50817 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot

[Bug c++/50817] G++ emits errors containing lowered vtable references

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50817 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/50817] G++ emits errors containing lowered vtable references

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50817 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-10-21 08:34:47 UTC --- I'm not sure this qualifies as an enhancement, I'd call it a plain ol' bug

[Bug target/50809] driver-arm.c:55:11: error: anonymous type with no linkage used to declare variable ' vendors []' with linkage [-Werror]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50809 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/50818] New: va_list is filled incorrectly in functions with ms_abi attribute on amd64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50818 Bug #: 50818 Summary: va_list is filled incorrectly in functions with ms_abi attribute on amd64 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.4.5 Status: UNCON

[Bug target/50818] va_list is filled incorrectly in functions with ms_abi attribute on amd64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50818 --- Comment #1 from Andrey Sploshnov 2011-10-21 09:16:32 UTC --- Sorry, there is a typo in the caller() function, it should be: const char* str = "arg"; callee("a string: %s", str); test.ii contains a correct version of the case

[Bug tree-optimization/50819] New: missed SLP vectorization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50819 Bug #: 50819 Summary: missed SLP vectorization Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Com

[Bug c++/50817] G++ emits errors containing lowered vtable references

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50817 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Severity|enhan

[Bug target/50809] driver-arm.c:55:11: error: anonymous type with no linkage used to declare variable ' vendors []' with linkage [-Werror]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50809 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Stubbs 2011-10-21 10:31:53 UTC --- Author: ams Date: Fri Oct 21 10:31:48 2011 New Revision: 180289 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180289 Log: 2011-10-21 Andrew Stubbs PR target/50809

[Bug target/50809] driver-arm.c:55:11: error: anonymous type with no linkage used to declare variable ' vendors []' with linkage [-Werror]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50809 Andrew Stubbs changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/50817] G++ emits errors containing lowered vtable references

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50817 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-21 11:32:16 UTC --- Of course agreed about the substance, but I'm still finding a bit puzzling the "simple fix" assessment, I don't see tons of lazy people around not willing to spend 5 minutes on this, d

[Bug c++/50817] G++ emits errors containing lowered vtable references

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50817 --- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2011-10-21 11:38:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Of course agreed about the substance, but I'm still finding a bit puzzling the > "simple fix" assessment, I don't see tons of lazy people around not wi

[Bug middle-end/50691] Incorrect argument evaluation in call with __thread argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50691 --- Comment #4 from John David Anglin 2011-10-21 12:17:11 UTC --- The following tree is incorrectly expanded bt expand call: (gdb) p debug_tree (exp) unit size align 32 symtab 0 alias set 2 canonical type 0x4036c3c0 precision

[Bug c++/48119] -Wtype-limits should warn when bit masking cannot possibly be true due to type size

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48119 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug target/50820] New: [avr] Use EIND consistently

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50820 Bug #: 50820 Summary: [avr] Use EIND consistently Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: documentation, wrong-code Sev

[Bug target/50820] [avr] Use EIND consistently

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50820 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/50812] libbid build fails with ICE on bid128_div.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50812 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/50821] New: [4.7 Regression] 3 new GCC HEAD@180266 regressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50821 Bug #: 50821 Summary: [4.7 Regression] 3 new GCC HEAD@180266 regressions Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/50820] [avr] Use EIND consistently

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50820 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-10-21 12:48:08 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Fri Oct 21 12:48:04 2011 New Revision: 180299 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180299 Log: PR target/50820 * config/avr/libgcc.S (__E

[Bug debug/50816] [4.6.1] Discriminators are emitted in DWARF 2 format

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50816 --- Comment #3 from Anitha Boyapati 2011-10-21 13:07:33 UTC --- Can someone confirm this and fix this? We are blocked otherwise :-(

[Bug c++/50811] [C++0x] G++ rejects class-virt-specifier if class-head-name includes nested-name-specifier

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50811 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-21 13:31:26 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Oct 21 13:31:21 2011 New Revision: 180301 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180301 Log: PR c++/50811 * parser.c (cp_parser_class_he

[Bug bootstrap/50326] [4.7 regression] ICE in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:456

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50326 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug bootstrap/50822] [4.7 regression] Solaris/SPARC bootstrap failure with Sun as: invalid assembler for ios_init.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50822 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth 2011-10-21 13:37:47 UTC --- Created attachment 25569 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25569 preprocessed input

[Bug bootstrap/50822] [4.7 regression] Solaris/SPARC bootstrap failure with Sun as: invalid assembler for ios_init.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50822 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth 2011-10-21 13:38:33 UTC --- Created attachment 25570 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25570 assembler input

[Bug bootstrap/50778] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778 Dodji Seketeli changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned a

[Bug bootstrap/50822] New: [4.7 regression] Solaris/SPARC bootstrap failure with Sun as: invalid assembler for ios_init.cc

-sun-solaris2* Build: sparc-sun-solaris2* Between 20111014 and 20111021,Solaris/SPARC bootstrap with Sun as got broken compiling the stage1 libstdc++: > /var/gcc/regression/trunk/11-gcc/build/./gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc > -B/var/gcc/regression/trunk/11-gcc/build/./gcc -nostdinc++

[Bug bootstrap/50822] [4.7 regression] Solaris/SPARC bootstrap failure with Sun as: invalid assembler for ios_init.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50822 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug middle-end/45632] const function pointer propagation issues with inlining

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45632 --- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor 2011-10-21 14:07:53 UTC --- Is the second call to func() in main we pass the pointer p again, p2 being basically thrown away, I think that is a mistake because this way, there isn't actually any call to b_foo in

[Bug c++/50811] [C++0x] G++ rejects class-virt-specifier if class-head-name includes nested-name-specifier

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50811 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/17534] gcc fails to diagnose suspect expressions that have incompatible bit masks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17534 --- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2011-10-21 14:10:52 UTC --- Still an issue with revision 180166. This could be warned by Wlogical-op.

[Bug bootstrap/50778] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778 --- Comment #11 from Iain Sandoe 2011-10-21 14:19:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > Iain, maybe your machine is faster than Dominique's, so maybe you could give > it > a spin? looks good off a stage3-bubble, - libgfortran built, struct-la

[Bug c++/50811] [C++0x] G++ rejects class-virt-specifier if class-head-name includes nested-name-specifier

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50811 --- Comment #7 from Ville Voutilainen 2011-10-21 14:24:23 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > thanks! You're welcome! I don't like leaving bugs open in code I wrote, so instead of turning in early, I decided to fix it. ;) Just out of curiosity,

[Bug target/50820] [avr] Use EIND consistently

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50820 --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-10-21 14:24:28 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Fri Oct 21 14:24:21 2011 New Revision: 180303 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180303 Log: PR target/50820 Backport from Mainline r18

[Bug bootstrap/50778] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778 --- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-10-21 14:25:47 UTC --- If the patch in comment #10 regstrap on *-linux-*, I think it could be committed, then monitor regress on http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-10/ and http://gcc.gnu.org/

[Bug target/50820] [avr] Use EIND consistently

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50820 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.6.2 Known to fail|

[Bug fortran/50821] [4.7 Regression] 3 new GCC HEAD@180266 regressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50821 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug driver/50740] CPUID leaf 7 for BMI/BMI2/AVX2 feature detection not qualified with max_level and doesn't use subleaf

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50740 --- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 14:32:36 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Fri Oct 21 14:32:32 2011 New Revision: 180304 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180304 Log: PR target/50740 * config/i386/driver

[Bug c++/50811] [C++0x] G++ rejects class-virt-specifier if class-head-name includes nested-name-specifier

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50811 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-10-21 14:38:03 UTC --- Daniel watches any PR to do with C++11 non-conformance ;) No, this didn't come up in the context of the library (although I might use final on some of the shared_ptr and future hel

[Bug middle-end/44382] Slow integer multiply

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44382 --- Comment #10 from William J. Schmidt 2011-10-21 14:41:13 UTC --- One more data point. I repeated the experiment using -fsched-pressure. Although this reduced the degradations considerably, the overall results are equivocal. I see a few impr

[Bug driver/50740] CPUID leaf 7 for BMI/BMI2/AVX2 feature detection not qualified with max_level and doesn't use subleaf

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50740 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug translation/29897] %s substituted with parts of sentence can not be translated correctly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29897 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug bootstrap/50778] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778 --- Comment #13 from Iain Sandoe 2011-10-21 14:52:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > If the patch in comment #10 regstrap on *-linux-*, I think it could be > committed, then monitor regress on > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-10/

[Bug translation/47064] params.def: Translatable string compilatoin (vs. compilation)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47064 --- Comment #1 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 14:55:45 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Fri Oct 21 14:55:42 2011 New Revision: 180307 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180307 Log: 2011-10-21 Roland Stigge PR tran

[Bug translation/47064] params.def: Translatable string compilatoin (vs. compilation)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47064 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/50788] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in merge_overlapping_regs, at regrename.c:318 with -mavx -fpeel-loops -fstack-protector-all and __builtin_ia32_maskloadpd256

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50788 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-pc-linux-gnu |i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* Status|UN

[Bug rtl-optimization/50788] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in merge_overlapping_regs, at regrename.c:318 with -mavx -fpeel-loops -fstack-protector-all and __builtin_ia32_maskloadpd256

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50788 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|ebotcazou at

[Bug middle-end/50823] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE in inline_small_functions, at ipa-inline.c:1407

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50823 Bug #: 50823 Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE in inline_small_functions, at ipa-inline.c:1407 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRME

[Bug fortran/50821] [4.7 Regression] 3 new GCC HEAD@180266 regressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50821 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 AssignedTo|unassigne

[Bug middle-end/50823] [4.7 Regression] ICE in inline_small_functions, at ipa-inline.c:1407

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50823 --- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2011-10-21 15:22:35 UTC --- Created attachment 25571 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25571 testcase

[Bug tree-optimization/50824] New: memset or memcpy on structure prevents SRA

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50824 Bug #: 50824 Summary: memset or memcpy on structure prevents SRA Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Pr

[Bug middle-end/50823] [4.7 Regression] ICE in inline_small_functions, at ipa-inline.c:1407

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50823 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2011-10-21 16:10:45 UTC --- Caused by: commit 60ac8a3c08cc653bc92507cb1be08ca2ebe6774a Author: hubicka Date: Thu Oct 20 11:46:08 2011 + PR bootstrap/50709 * ipa-inline.c (inline_sma

[Bug c++/48940] GCC fails to issue expected error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48940 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/24314] Extra "template<>" in partial specialization is compiled successfuly.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24314 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Nimantha.Siriwardana at

[Bug c++/49453] Accepts invalid syntax for partial specialization of class template where the specialization is a class template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49453 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/50821] [4.7 Regression] 3 new GCC HEAD@180266 regressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50821 --- Comment #2 from Steve Kargl 2011-10-21 17:43:31 UTC --- On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 12:41:00PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > The errors are > > [macbook] f90/bug% gfc > /opt/gcc/work/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/g77/f90-intrinsic-bit.f

[Bug bootstrap/50825] New: [4.7 regression] bootstrap fails at stage1 libgcc from r180302

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50825 Bug #: 50825 Summary: [4.7 regression] bootstrap fails at stage1 libgcc from r180302 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/50821] [4.7 Regression] 3 new GCC HEAD@180266 regressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50821 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-10-21 18:07:39 UTC --- > Can you test the attached patch? Quick tests show that your path fixes the problem. For more serious testing my time scales are ~2h30 for bootstrap and ~1h30 to regtest gfort

[Bug c++/31423] Improve upon "invalid use of member (did you forget the '&' ?)"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31423 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug c++/31423] Improve upon "invalid use of member (did you forget the '&' ?)"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31423 --- Comment #10 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 18:19:00 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Fri Oct 21 18:18:55 2011 New Revision: 180309 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180309 Log: /cp 2011-10-21 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug bootstrap/50825] [4.7 regression] bootstrap fails at stage1 libgcc from r180302

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50825 --- Comment #1 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-10-21 18:38:48 UTC --- Author: bernds Date: Fri Oct 21 18:38:44 2011 New Revision: 180310 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180310 Log: PR bootstrap/50825 * sched-deps.c (add_dep

[Bug bootstrap/50778] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778 --- Comment #14 from dodji at seketeli dot org 2011-10-21 18:40:41 UTC --- >> If the patch in comment #10 regstrap on *-linux-*, I think it could be >> committed, then monitor regress on >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-10/ and >> ht

[Bug bootstrap/50778] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778 --- Comment #15 from Iain Sandoe 2011-10-21 18:48:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) > > hm.. got an ICE in stage1 libgcc .. @180302 - but possibly unrelated > > > > /GCC/gcc-live-trunk/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c: In function ‘__popcountti2’: > >

[Bug bootstrap/50825] [4.7 regression] bootstrap fails at stage1 libgcc from r180302

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50825 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/50778] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778 --- Comment #16 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-10-21 19:00:59 UTC --- Patch proposed to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg02017.html

[Bug target/49992] lto-bootstrap reveals duplicate symbols on x86_64-apple-darwin11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992 Nenad Vukicevic changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nenad at intrepid dot com --- Comment #

[Bug target/49992] lto-bootstrap reveals duplicate symbols on x86_64-apple-darwin11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992 --- Comment #59 from Iain Sandoe 2011-10-21 19:23:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #58) > Is there a final patch for this? Or more testing is required. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg01245.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011

[Bug target/50813] gcc.dg/torture/vshuf-{v4di,v8si}.c fail on AVX target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50813 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-10-21 19:32:23 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Oct 21 19:32:20 2011 New Revision: 180311 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180311 Log: PR target/50813 * config/i386/i386.c (expan

[Bug c++/45385] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] missing -Wconversion for method calls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45385 --- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 20:01:34 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Fri Oct 21 20:01:31 2011 New Revision: 180312 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180312 Log: /cp 2011-10-21 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug c++/45385] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] missing -Wconversion for method calls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45385 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7|[4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression]

[Bug middle-end/20319] -fkeep-static-consts with -O asserted doesn't keep consts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20319 Oleg Goldshmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pub at goldshmidt dot org --- Comment #

[Bug bootstrap/50826] New: bootstrap on 64 bit pa broken by r180194, ICE in mem_loc_descriptor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50826 Bug #: 50826 Summary: bootstrap on 64 bit pa broken by r180194, ICE in mem_loc_descriptor Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/50826] bootstrap on 64 bit pa broken by r180194, ICE in mem_loc_descriptor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50826 --- Comment #1 from Steve Ellcey 2011-10-21 20:46:46 UTC --- Created attachment 25573 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25573 small test case Test case.

[Bug bootstrap/50826] bootstrap on 64 bit pa broken by r180194, ICE in mem_loc_descriptor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50826 --- Comment #2 from Steve Ellcey 2011-10-21 20:55:47 UTC --- forgot to mention that the test case needs to be compiled with -O2 -g to reproduce the problem.

[Bug fortran/50821] [4.7 Regression] 3 new GCC HEAD@180266 regressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50821 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 22:48:43 UTC --- Author: kargl Date: Fri Oct 21 22:48:39 2011 New Revision: 180316 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180316 Log: 2011-10-20 Steven G. Kargl PR fort

[Bug c++/50810] c++0x-compat does not warn about narrowing conversions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50810 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug fortran/50821] [4.7 Regression] 3 new GCC HEAD@180266 regressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50821 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/50810] c++0x-compat does not warn about narrowing conversions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50810 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-21 22:57:31 UTC --- (detail: not sure about the 'if (!warn_narrowing) return;' at the beginning of check_narrowing: probably we don't want -Wno-narrowing to suppress the warnings enabled of -Wc++0x-compat

[Bug target/50182] Performance degradation from gcc 4.1 (x86_64)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50182 --- Comment #15 from davidxl 2011-10-21 23:02:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #13) > > David, it looks like we are seeing different things with v4.7... See my > > comment 11 - I am still observing the slowdown. Do you

[Bug target/50691] Incorrect argument evaluation in call with __thread argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50691 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |target --- Comment #5 from John David

[Bug c++/50810] c++0x-compat does not warn about narrowing conversions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50810 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/50810] c++0x-compat does not warn about narrowing conversions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50810 --- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2011-10-22 01:24:25 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > (detail: not sure about the 'if (!warn_narrowing) return;' at the beginning > > of > > check_narrowing: probably we don't

[Bug c++/50810] c++0x-compat does not warn about narrowing conversions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50810 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-22 04:38:15 UTC --- Makes sense to me.

[Bug bootstrap/50778] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778 --- Comment #17 from Iain Sandoe 2011-10-22 06:49:09 UTC --- bootstrap & regtest completed (r180257 + patch proposed); fails in struct-layout1 and vmx are gone (all plugins are now failing, but likely a different reason). thanks for the patch.