http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50641
--- Comment #5 from Daniel Krügler
2011-10-07 07:13:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> N3242 says that From needs to be
> "convertible" to To, but I'm not at all convinced that "convertible" means the
> same thing as "is_convertible". Maybe i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50649
Bug #: 50649
Summary: REGRESSION: ICE in vect_is_simple_use_1, at
tree-vect-stmts.c:5689 after rev 179607
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49801
Paolo Bonzini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bonzini at gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50596
--- Comment #13 from vincenzo Innocente
2011-10-07 07:35:40 UTC ---
is not PR50649 caused by your changes?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50650
Bug #: 50650
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE in vect_is_simple_use_1, at
tree-vect-stmts.c:5689
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50650
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-10-07 07:47:35 UTC ---
Created attachment 25436
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25436
testcase
Ahoj!
Cilvēk, esi taču kaut ko dzirdējis par slepeno Mis Seksīgās līnijas konkursa
atlasi? Pat, ja neesi, nekas!
Tu vari būt absolūti drošs, ka sāncenses bija seksīgas un uzbudinošiem
apaļumiem īstajās vietās!
Ja patiešām gribi viņas satikt un paspaidīt..
dodies turp: http://www.robandphyl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50651
Bug #: 50651
Summary: GNAT rejects matching parameter in generic
instantiation as non-matching
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49279
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.2, 4.7.0
Summary|[4.5/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
Status|UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50636
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2011-10-07
08:25:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Right now alloc_page will (usually) allocate in GGC_QUIRE_SIZE * G.pagesize
> chunks, but release_pages will munmap individual pages immediately during
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50637
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2011-10-07
08:28:53 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Oct 7 08:28:48 2011
New Revision: 179648
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179648
Log:
2011-10-07 Richard Guenther
PR testsui
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50637
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50638
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50652
Bug #: 50652
Summary: [avr] Incorrect data start value for atmega164a
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50640
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i686-pc-linux-gnu
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50646
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44463
--- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka 2011-10-07 08:39:06
UTC ---
> Honza, I think that is fixed now, correct?
>
> I should probably drop my workarounds but haven't yet
Yes, this one should be fixed with alias rewrite. Please let me know if
droppin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50650
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50650
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vincenzo.innocente at cern
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50649
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50653
Bug #: 50653
Summary: At build phase there are demanded two files named
hpp but there are only files named hp
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50125
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth 2011-10-07 09:02:21 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Fri Oct 7 09:02:13 2011
New Revision: 179649
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179649
Log:
Don't XFAIL gcc.dg/uninit-B.c etc. (PR middle-end/50125)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50125
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50650
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50654
Bug #: 50654
Summary: Many Go tests fail on emutls targets
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50653
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-10-07
09:26:01 UTC ---
The archive is fine:
tar tzf gcc-g++-4.6.1.tar.gz | grep '\.hp$'
Either your download is corrupt (check its MD5 sum) or you need to use GNU tar
to extract it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50654
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50650
--- Comment #4 from vincenzo Innocente
2011-10-07 09:30:46 UTC ---
ok in my tests
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50641
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50653
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50636
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-10-07
10:01:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Perhaps on Linux, at least with recentish kernel, we could change
> release_pages
> into keeping the pages in the G.free_pages chain, but call madvise
> MAD
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50596
--- Comment #14 from vincenzo Innocente
2011-10-07 10:15:03 UTC ---
signed char k[1024];
void foo6() {
for (int i=0; i!=N; ++i)
k[i] = (a[i]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50655
Bug #: 50655
Summary: Many of the new VIS2/VIS3 tests FAIL on Solaris
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50596
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-10-07
10:31:13 UTC ---
float a[1024], b[1024], c[1024], d[1024];
int j[1024];
void
f1 (void)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 1024; ++i)
{
unsigned int x = a[i] < b[i] ? -1 : 0;
unsigned int y
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50557
--- Comment #6 from Igor Zamyatin 2011-10-07
10:33:33 UTC ---
Indeed, overall register pressure is not increased. Even before IRA dumps show
that register pressure is actually kept on the same level.
Looks like it is a tricky case we met.
Firs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50575
--- Comment #3 from Rainer Orth 2011-10-07 11:33:02 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Fri Oct 7 11:32:59 2011
New Revision: 179651
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179651
Log:
Disable ABI warnings for gcc.c-torture/execute/vector-co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50492
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2011-10-07
11:43:08 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Oct 7 11:43:03 2011
New Revision: 179652
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179652
Log:
PR lto/50492
* gcc-interface/gigi.h (gn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50650
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-10-07
11:48:07 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Oct 7 11:48:03 2011
New Revision: 179653
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179653
Log:
PR tree-optimization/50650
* tree-vect-patt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50492
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50575
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50633
--- Comment #11 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-10-07
12:10:11 UTC ---
I see none of these failures in the x86_64 test run with my last patch applied.
Can you confirm that it's fixed?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49484
vijay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vijay910 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from vij
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50633
--- Comment #12 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-10-07
12:20:57 UTC ---
Sorry, commit didn't go through earlier - it's in now.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50650
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50527
--- Comment #9 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07 12:49:54 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Fri Oct 7 12:49:49 2011
New Revision: 179655
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179655
Log:
2011-10-07 Tom de Vries
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50527
--- Comment #10 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07 12:50:00 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Fri Oct 7 12:49:56 2011
New Revision: 179656
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179656
Log:
2011-10-07 Tom de Vries
PR middle
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49049
--- Comment #9 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-10-07
12:56:55 UTC ---
Author: bernds
Date: Fri Oct 7 12:56:52 2011
New Revision: 179657
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179657
Log:
PR target/49049
* config/arm/arm.md (arm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49049
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50527
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50625
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07 14:40:21 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Fri Oct 7 14:40:14 2011
New Revision: 179660
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179660
Log:
2011-10-07 Janus Weil
PR fortran/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50302
--- Comment #4 from Andi Kleen 2011-10-07
14:40:02 UTC ---
Sorry yes my mistake.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50625
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07 14:42:15 UTC ---
Fixed on trunk with r179660.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50636
--- Comment #10 from Andi Kleen 2011-10-07
14:44:10 UTC ---
To track the pattern you can simply use strace or ftrace (I did ftrace)
I checked the kernel code now and if the madvise is big enough it won't
split up the 2MB page. So doing it aggres
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50656
Bug #: 50656
Summary: Several Go tests with unrecognized test line
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50335
--- Comment #2 from Gregory Maxwell 2011-10-07
14:52:37 UTC ---
Still failing in r179659.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50335
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-07
14:57:11 UTC ---
No miracles, eh?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50655
--- Comment #1 from David S. Miller 2011-10-07
15:01:55 UTC ---
Please try to figure out why the configure test is not detecting VIS3
instruction capabilities in your assembler. That's why the VIS3 tests are
failing.
The combined-1.c test is no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50655
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-10-07 15:16:16 UTC ---
> --- Comment #1 from David S. Miller 2011-10-07
> 15:01:55 UTC ---
> Please try to figure out why the configure test is not detecting VIS3
> instruction capabili
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49868
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24916|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49868
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-10-07
15:24:32 UTC ---
Created attachment 25439
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25439
2/2: r179594: AVR part of implementation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49868
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50335
--- Comment #4 from Gregory Maxwell 2011-10-07
15:29:42 UTC ---
Ha, indeed. Well, I don't want it to be forgotten just because its become old
and potentially inapplicable.
I test GCC development periodically on all the software I work on— most o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49752
--- Comment #2 from Richard Henderson 2011-10-07
15:35:56 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Fri Oct 7 15:35:49 2011
New Revision: 179663
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179663
Log:
PR 49752
* fold-const.c (fold_checksum_tr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49752
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34888
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50644
--- Comment #2 from Michael Matz 2011-10-07 15:45:44
UTC ---
Try to find out what var is. The segfault should also happen with an
unoptimized cc1 so that you can see the value of var.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35860
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50657
Bug #: 50657
Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/select_type_12.f03
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50640
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50657
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50633
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50644
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab 2011-10-07 16:33:46
UTC ---
A @smallexample is supposed to be smaller than an @example.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50644
--- Comment #4 from Michael Matz 2011-10-07 16:34:49
UTC ---
The fortran segfault is tracked as PR50640.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50638
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from R
in/cygwin1.dbg
[New Thread 4884.0x170c]
GNU C++ (GCC) version 4.7.0 20111007 (experimental) (i686-pc-cygwin)
compiled by GNU C version 4.7.0 20111006 (experimental), GMP version
5.0.0, MPFR version 3.0.1-p4, MPC version 0.8.1
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min-heapsize=4096
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50640
--- Comment #3 from Michael Matz 2011-10-07 16:45:55
UTC ---
Hmm, this is not as trivial as PR50638. fortran frontend generates this
static variable local to MAIN:
static struct __vtype_MAIN___T1 __vtab_MAIN___T1 = {._hash=41707971, ._size=4,
.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50655
--- Comment #3 from David S. Miller 2011-10-07
16:45:52 UTC ---
Thanks, I'll add the necessary register directives and work on making the
testcases conditional on assembler support.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50640
--- Comment #4 from Michael Matz 2011-10-07 16:50:10
UTC ---
Or another solution: should the fortran frontend perhaps put all these
variables not in MAINs scope (where they aren't referenced anyway), but
rather into file scope? That last solutio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50655
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-10-07 16:51:36 UTC ---
> --- Comment #3 from David S. Miller 2011-10-07
> 16:45:52 UTC ---
> Thanks, I'll add the necessary register directives and work on making the
> testcases condit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50638
Michael Matz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from Michael Matz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50640
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50638
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-10-07 16:58:40 UTC ---
> --- Comment #5 from Michael Matz 2011-10-07
> 16:53:59 UTC ---
> Mine. See also http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg00597.html .
> What's the variable
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50638
--- Comment #7 from Michael Matz 2011-10-07 17:00:59
UTC ---
Hmm, I can't build go due to:
../../../gcc/libgo/runtime/sigqueue.goc:79:1: internal compiler error: in
maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2243
but that seems unrelated.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50638
--- Comment #8 from Michael Matz 2011-10-07 17:02:00
UTC ---
Okay, so it's really the emutlv_v variables. That should be fixed by the
patch at gcc-patches.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50638
--- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-10-07 17:03:31 UTC ---
> --- Comment #7 from Michael Matz 2011-10-07
> 17:00:59 UTC ---
> Hmm, I can't build go due to:
> ../../../gcc/libgo/runtime/sigqueue.goc:79:1: internal compiler
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50638
--- Comment #10 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-10-07 17:05:11 UTC ---
> --- Comment #8 from Michael Matz 2011-10-07
> 17:02:00 UTC ---
> Okay, so it's really the emutlv_v variables. That should be fixed by the
> patch at gcc-patc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
--- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-10-07
17:17:30 UTC ---
Legibility first. There is no need to be more catholic than the pope ;-)
/local/gcc-4.7 --enable-
languages=c,c++,fortran --disable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 20111007 (experimental) (GCC)
$ gfortran -c test.F90 -o test.o
f951: internal compiler error: in replace_symbol, at fortran/expr.c:4155
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50655
--- Comment #5 from davem at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07 17:23:53 UTC ---
Author: davem
Date: Fri Oct 7 17:23:47 2011
New Revision: 179667
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179667
Log:
Fix VIS3 assembler check and conditionaliz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50660
Bug #: 50660
Summary: gcc repeats warnings twice
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50660
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50660
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40210
--- Comment #9 from Pawel Sikora 2011-10-07 18:22:25
UTC ---
Created attachment 25442
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25442
testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50659
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40210
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski 2011-10-07
18:29:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Created attachment 25442 [details]
> testcase
I think those are hard to optimize really since those are inline-asm really.
And the unsigned short one gets
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50659
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-07 18:45:43 UTC ---
Slight reduction of the original test case:
module m
integer :: arrSize
end module
program p
implicit none
procedure(Proc) :: Proc_Get
contains
function Proc (arg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40210
--- Comment #11 from Pawel Sikora 2011-10-07 18:45:57
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > Created attachment 25442 [details]
> > testcase
>
> I think those are hard to optimize really since those are inline-asm reall
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50660
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|trivial |normal
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
