http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39409
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39681
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39950
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |dje at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44827
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|gcc-bugs at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44855
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|gcc-bugs at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47906
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|jason at redh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45404
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|gcc-bugs at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22133
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|gcc-bugs at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47247
--- Comment #26 from Jan Hubicka 2011-10-02
10:41:27 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sun Oct 2 10:41:24 2011
New Revision: 179424
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179424
Log:
PR lto/47247
* lto-plugin.c (get_symbols_v
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50565
--- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-10-02
10:43:54 UTC ---
Created attachment 25393
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25393
reduced test case
> cat pr50565.c
/* pr50565.c */
struct netmessage {
unsigned char pos[2];
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50588
Bug #: 50588
Summary: gcc produce bad inlined code with -march=athlon -O2
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50588
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50588
--- Comment #2 from newsgrp at duradsl dot dyndns.org 2011-10-02 11:58:39 UTC
---
Created attachment 25395
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25395
preprocessed result of traceroute.c
This seems to be a regression from gcc 4.5.x
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36819
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-02 12:31:46 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sun Oct 2 12:31:40 2011
New Revision: 179426
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179426
Log:
2011-10-02 Paolo Carlini
PR prep
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36819
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50589
Bug #: 50589
Summary: [4.7] Ada bootstrap failure on sparc-linux
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50588
--- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-10-02
13:00:42 UTC ---
The preprocessed test case SEGVs for me with gcc-4.6-20110930, but works with
4.7-20111001, 4.5-20110929, and 4.4-20110927.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50587
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49049
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50581
--- Comment #6 from Wolfgang at Solfrank dot net 2011-10-02 16:08:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> On Sat, 1 Oct 2011, Wolfgang at Solfrank dot net wrote:
>
> > > Passing va_list as a function argument is generally hard, whether or not
> > >
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50590
Bug #: 50590
Summary: Initializing a variable to itself yields garbage/UB
and no warning.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50590
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50591
Bug #: 50591
Summary: C linker not considering number of parameters with
extern linkage
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50591
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50592
Bug #: 50592
Summary: g++ fails to see function side effect
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50592
--- Comment #1 from nospam.gccboostix.20.lenex at spamgourmet dot com
2011-10-02 17:24:43 UTC ---
Created attachment 25396
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25396
Pre-processed program to use to reproduce the issue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49696
--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-02 17:45:16 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Sun Oct 2 17:45:10 2011
New Revision: 179431
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179431
Log:
gcc/
PR target/49696
* con
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244
--- Comment #17 from Dominique d'Humieres
2011-10-02 17:46:44 UTC ---
Created attachment 25397
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25397
updated patch for revision 179415
The patch in comment #12 no longer applies cleanly (the ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49696
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50061
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50113
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50579
--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-02 18:29:30 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Sun Oct 2 18:29:27 2011
New Revision: 179433
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179433
Log:
gcc/testsuite/
PR target/50579
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49049
--- Comment #7 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-10-02
18:35:02 UTC ---
The second larger test case from Matthias started failing with r161831:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-07/msg00185.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50588
--- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-10-02
18:55:45 UTC ---
The failure started with r164552:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-09/msg00849.html
It's enough to pass -O2 -mtune=athlon to trigger the bug, you don't need
-march.
I don't see
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50581
Steven Fuerst changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||svfuerst at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50588
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2011-10-02
20:35:59 UTC ---
This could be a bug in FD_SET/FD_ZERO.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50588
--- Comment #6 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-10-02
20:45:07 UTC ---
So which libc was this originally compiled against? Some things in
traceroute.i make me think it's glibc, but I don't see any indication of which
version it was.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35722
--- Comment #16 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-02
21:45:08 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sun Oct 2 21:45:01 2011
New Revision: 179436
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179436
Log:
PR c++/35722
Implement N2555 (expanding pa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35722
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50593
Bug #: 50593
Summary: improve __attribute__((format(printf)))
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50588
--- Comment #7 from newsgrp at duradsl dot dyndns.org 2011-10-02 22:00:15 UTC
---
Created attachment 25399
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25399
glibc-2.14 patches
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50588
--- Comment #8 from newsgrp at duradsl dot dyndns.org 2011-10-02 22:01:23 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #6)
> So which libc was this originally compiled against? Some things in
> traceroute.i make me think it's glibc, but I don't see any indicatio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244
--- Comment #18 from Mikael Morin 2011-10-02
22:05:20 UTC ---
Created attachment 25400
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25400
the farthest I went about this pr
For what's worth, I have just unburied the patch above (only updat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50588
--- Comment #9 from newsgrp at duradsl dot dyndns.org 2011-10-02 22:39:42 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #4)
> The failure started with r164552:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-09/msg00849.html
>
> It's enough to pass -O2 -mtune=athlon to trig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50594
Bug #: 50594
Summary: Option -fwhole-program discards replaced new operator
for std::string
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50594
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-10-02
23:03:17 UTC ---
I think you need to mark operator new and delete as being exported.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50594
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-02
23:08:12 UTC ---
Note that basic_string, at variance with any std::map instantiation, is
exported by the *.so, in particular the functions managing memory.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50594
--- Comment #3 from Kerrek SB 2011-10-02 23:32:47
UTC ---
Thank you for the replies. Is this behaviour standard-conforming? Also, could
you tell me how I "mark the operators as exported", or just anything else
that'll make the program behave as e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50594
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39653
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50595
Bug #: 50595
Summary: template overload resolution insufficiently sensitive
to name dependency?
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCON
51 matches
Mail list logo