http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50375
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34547
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2011-09-14
07:19:03 UTC ---
The patch fixes the issues of comment 0.
However, one should go through the lengthy, convoluted thread at
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/f0141
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Krebbel 2011-09-14
07:20:14 UTC ---
I've looked into the 22_locale/money_get/get/char/13.cc failure.
The problem is a miscompilation of locale-inst.cc in libstdc++.
Source:
template
_InIter
money_get<_CharT,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50383
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka 2011-09-14
07:38:03 UTC ---
Created attachment 25267
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25267
somewhat reducted testcase.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50384
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse 2011-09-14
08:23:15 UTC ---
Don't know if it is the same problem, but gcc seems to have trouble optimizing
with structs:
//typedef struct A { unsigned char t; } A;
typedef unsigned char A;
extern A f(A,A);
A g(A x
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50378
--- Comment #8 from Vittorio Zecca 2011-09-14
08:23:39 UTC ---
gfortran 4.7.0 fixes this one.
However, sometimes I get the following:
/home/vitti/gcc-4.7/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.7.0/f951:
symbol lookup error:
/home/vitti/gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392
Bug #: 50392
Summary: SIGSEGV in gfc_trans_label_assign
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50393
Bug #: 50393
Summary: free() invalid pointer in mio_expr
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48320
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Krebbel 2011-09-14
08:41:21 UTC ---
Created attachment 25270
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25270
Experimental fix
On S/390 all the failures disappear with that patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50378
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus 2011-09-14
08:50:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.7.0/f951:
> symbol lookup error:
> undefined symbol: mpfr_get_z_exp
>
> Never got this one, I have mpfr-3.0.0-4
See http://www.m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50393
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50391
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50394
Bug #: 50394
Summary: [meta-bug] Issues with building libreoffice with LTO
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50394
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50391
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50391
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50393
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50322
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Keywords|mis
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50383
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka 2011-09-14
11:32:47 UTC ---
Created attachment 25271
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25271
More reduced testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50383
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25271|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-09-14
12:42:06 UTC ---
> Created attachment 25270 [details]
> Experimental fix
I'll test the patch on ppc-darwin9, but it will take some time on my slow
machine. Meanwhile do you understand why the t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47978
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-09-14
13:31:15 UTC ---
Janus,
I am worried about your fix as it seems to break at least the original tests of
pr41656 and pr41685:
pr41656.f90:68.13:
procedure, pass(a) :: s_scal => s_coo_scal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50383
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47978
--- Comment #9 from Salvatore Filippone
2011-09-14 13:46:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
>
> The test case in my original post is wrong in this respect
>
I mean: in the original post for pr41656.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47978
--- Comment #8 from Salvatore Filippone
2011-09-14 13:45:13 UTC ---
Duh!
My bad: all versions of scal are supposed to update the A dummy argument, which
should be INTENT(INOUT).
The test case in my original post is wrong in this respect
:(
Sa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47978
--- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-14 13:49:24 UTC ---
Hi Dominique,
> I am worried about your fix as it seems to break at least the original tests
> of
> pr41656 and pr41685:
thanks for noticing. But, from a quick glance, I w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47978
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-14 13:49:04 UTC ---
Hi Dominique,
> I am worried about your fix as it seems to break at least the original tests
> of
> pr41656 and pr41685:
thanks for noticing. But, from a quick glance, I w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50395
Bug #: 50395
Summary: Infinite loop when bootstrapping java
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50176
--- Comment #7 from Igor Zamyatin 2011-09-14
14:30:35 UTC ---
In RTL everythin is vice-versa, additional instruction appears:
For the "bad" case couple instructions are responsible for cb load (asmcons
dump):
(insn 52 51 53 5 (set (reg:QI 83 [
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50251
--- Comment #19 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-14 14:32:12 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Wed Sep 14 14:32:07 2011
New Revision: 178853
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178853
Log:
2011-09-14 Tom de Vries
PR middle
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50251
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50251
--- Comment #20 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-14 14:33:40 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Wed Sep 14 14:33:35 2011
New Revision: 178854
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178854
Log:
2011-09-14 Tom de Vries
PR middle
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43241
Scott A. Colcord changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sacolcor at provide dot net
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47978
--- Comment #12 from Salvatore Filippone
2011-09-14 15:02:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> relieved if Salvatore could tell us that his
> latest code still compiles with gfortran ...
>
> Cheers,
> Janus
Yes it does.
No (new) worries here
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43241
--- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-14
15:09:45 UTC ---
tr1::regex is definitely a wontfix. std::regex is a completely different
matter, of course should be implemented, maybe you can help?!?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43241
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-14
15:13:57 UTC ---
It's a known issue that std::regex is incomplete, as documented in the
libstdc++ manual. If it makes you feel better file a bug, but it isn't going
to make any difference to anythi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43241
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-14
15:26:23 UTC ---
And for std::regex, what would be more useful than just "it's not fully
implemented yet" would be listing what's missing, e.g. I disabled support for
anchors because it was buggy, s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43241
--- Comment #12 from Scott A. Colcord 2011-09-14
15:36:46 UTC ---
As long as std::regex is still on the todo list, that resolves my concern. And
I would love to be able to help; if you can give me a couple of extra hours
in my day, I'll happily
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50394
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2011-09-14
16:08:16 UTC ---
Patch:
--- a/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c
@@ -1264,9 +1265,7 @@ gfc_get_symbol_decl (gfc_symbol * sym)
TREE_USED (sym->backend_decl) = 1;
if
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50396
Bug #: 50396
Summary: SSE division by zero generates incorrect code with
optimizations enabled
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50391
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-14 16:20:12 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Sep 14 16:19:59 2011
New Revision: 178857
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178857
Log:
/cp
2011-09-14 Paolo Carlini
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50391
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-14
16:20:53 UTC ---
Done.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50391
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2011-09-14
16:40:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Patch:
I have accidentally submitted the patch before testing finished. It does not
work. The problem is that it does create the required declaration - but
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50137
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49533
Dmitry Gorbachev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50226
Dmitry Gorbachev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2011-09-14 19:35:41 UTC ---
Created attachment 25274
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25274
patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50378
--- Comment #10 from Vittorio Zecca 2011-09-14
20:01:17 UTC ---
gfortran 4.7.0 has been compiled with the old mpfr 2.4.2, I just downloaded it,
this one will probably work.
Anyway gfortran 4.7.0 does not give free() errors.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50393
--- Comment #3 from Vittorio Zecca 2011-09-14
20:03:44 UTC ---
It seems to work now, no free() error messages. Maybe you can close the issue.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50378
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50393
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49452
--- Comment #22 from Ramana Radhakrishnan
2011-09-14 20:26:43 UTC ---
On 14 Sep 2011, at 07:48, "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49452
>
> --- Comment #21 from Eric Botcazou 2011-09-14
> 06:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50388
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50303
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-14
20:59:20 UTC ---
Can you try reducing your testcase? 563 KB is definitely unmanageable.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50276
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50344
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-14
21:11:02 UTC ---
So, I guess we only need confirmation that your analysis is correct. Indeed, I
can confirm that the patch, only one line thus not requiring a Copyright
assignment, works for the testca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50344
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-14
21:34:35 UTC ---
Passes the testsuite.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50303
Andrea Arteaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25203|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50303
--- Comment #3 from Andrea Arteaga 2011-09-14
22:47:56 UTC ---
I recently blogged about this issue: http://wp.me/pzWEm-9N.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50303
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50397
Bug #: 50397
Summary: openssl crash due to incorrect codegen when using LTO
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50397
--- Comment #1 from Matt Hargett 2011-09-15 00:37:43 UTC
---
BTW, worth noting that this also happens with just -O1 as well.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50398
Bug #: 50398
Summary: ICE when compiling openssl-1.0.0d with graphite
optimizations
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50399
Bug #: 50399
Summary: [c++11] Lookup error w/ enums
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
72 matches
Mail list logo
