[Bug tree-optimization/48739] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_use() with "-ftree-parallelize-loops=2 -fno-tree-dominator-opts"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48739 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-08-20 07:48:41 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Aug 20 07:48:35 2011 New Revision: 177924 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177924 Log: PR tree-optimization/48739 * tree-ssa.c: In

[Bug tree-optimization/48739] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_use() with "-ftree-parallelize-loops=2 -fno-tree-dominator-opts"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48739 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-08-20 07:51:12 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Aug 20 07:51:09 2011 New Revision: 177925 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177925 Log: PR tree-optimization/48739 * tree-ssa.c: In

[Bug tree-optimization/48739] [4.5 Regression] ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_use() with "-ftree-parallelize-loops=2 -fno-tree-dominator-opts"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48739 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression]|[4.5 Regression] ICE in

[Bug target/50131] Optimize x = -1 with "or" for -O

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50131 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug c++/50134] -Wmissing-prototypes doesn't work for C++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50134 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab 2011-08-20 08:37:21 UTC --- -Wmissing-declaration should do what you want.

[Bug middle-end/50137] New: [4.7 Regression] ppc64/libstdc++-v3 is miscompiled on powerpc-apple-darwin9 since revision 177691

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50137 Bug #: 50137 Summary: [4.7 Regression] ppc64/libstdc++-v3 is miscompiled on powerpc-apple-darwin9 since revision 177691 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug tree-optimization/50138] New: ICE in vect_transform_stmt

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50138 Bug #: 50138 Summary: ICE in vect_transform_stmt Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 C

[Bug target/50091] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] -fstack-check gives bad assembly on powerpc-apple-darwin9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50091 --- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe 2011-08-20 13:02:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > If I edit the assembly code to have > > ... > stw r0,-12284(r1) > mr r0,r1 > stw r0,-12556(r1) > ... > > The code assembles, links an

[Bug fortran/50129] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE on where statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50129 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Morin 2011-08-20 14:22:26 UTC --- Author: mikael Date: Sat Aug 20 14:22:22 2011 New Revision: 177929 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177929 Log: 2011-08-20 Mikael Morin PR fortran/50129

[Bug fortran/50129] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE on where statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50129 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/50091] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] -fstack-check gives bad assembly on powerpc-apple-darwin9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50091 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab 2011-08-20 14:49:14 UTC --- "st 0,%0" stores the contents of register 0 at the address pointed to by operand 0. The st insn always operates on registers and cannot take immediate data. There is no modifier tha

[Bug fortran/50050] Internal compiler error free_expr0 at expr.c:3709 via gfc_done_2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50050 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Morin 2011-08-20 14:51:40 UTC --- Patch posted at: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-08/msg00106.html

[Bug fortran/50046] Hexadecimal Constants

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50046 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/49943] libgfortran fails to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49943 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/50139] New: in-tree GMP/PPL/CLooG is misconfigured

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50139 Bug #: 50139 Summary: in-tree GMP/PPL/CLooG is misconfigured Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3

[Bug libgomp/46967] lots of testsuite failures with libgomp on hppa-hp-hpux11.31

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46967 --- Comment #8 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-08-20 15:45:46 UTC --- The pthread change was applied in r170290. If it doesn't fix the bug, then further debugging is needed. I can say the tests don't fail with 11.11. You also indicated

[Bug bootstrap/50010] i386-unknown-freebsd bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50010 --- Comment #4 from Gary Funck 2011-08-20 17:03:58 UTC --- We ran a reghunt of sorts and came up with the following results. The first confirmed bootstrap comparison failure occurred after revision 177265 was applied. r177265 | uros | 2011-08-0

[Bug bootstrap/50010] [4.7 regression] i386-unknown-freebsd bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50010 Gerald Pfeifer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/50114] ICE on invalid code in pop_binding, at cp/name-lookup.c:382

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50114 --- Comment #2 from Launchpad 2011-08-20 19:04:30 UTC --- jas mann added the following comment to Launchpad bug report 827806: Sorry, I don't know, but I can venture some guesses: Q. Why did I code in such a manner as to foil parsing of the sou

[Bug fortran/49638] [OOP] length parameter is ignored when overriding type bound character functions with constant length.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49638 --- Comment #20 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-20 19:11:59 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Sat Aug 20 19:11:56 2011 New Revision: 177932 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177932 Log: 2011-08-20 Janus Weil PR fortran/

[Bug fortran/49638] [OOP] length parameter is ignored when overriding type bound character functions with constant length.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49638 --- Comment #21 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-20 19:30:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) > ToDo: For many cases one only gets a warning instead of an error right now. r177932 turns some warnings into errors.

[Bug bootstrap/50010] [4.7 regression] i386-unknown-freebsd bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50010 --- Comment #6 from Gary Funck 2011-08-20 19:35:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #0) > > x86_64-unknown-freebsd seems to work, and with nobody seeing this on > > GNU/Linux > > I am wondering whether this may be due to i

[Bug target/50131] Optimize x = -1 with "or" for -O

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50131 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2011-08-20 19:44:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Is or $-1, reg on all CPUs equally expensive to mov $-1, reg though (as or > generally needs the previous reg content while mov does not; I know some CPUs > specia

[Bug target/46770] Replace .ctors/.dtors with .init_array/.fini_array on targets supporting them

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46770 --- Comment #69 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-20 20:02:21 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Sat Aug 20 20:02:17 2011 New Revision: 177933 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177933 Log: Use .init_arrary/.fini_array sections if po

[Bug other/46770] Replace .ctors/.dtors with .init_array/.fini_array on targets supporting them

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46770 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Component|target

[Bug c++/50140] New: sorry, unimplemented: cannot expand ‘T ...’ into a fixed-length argument list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50140 Bug #: 50140 Summary: sorry, unimplemented: cannot expand ‘T ...’ into a fixed-length argument list Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: U

[Bug bootstrap/50010] [4.7 regression] i386-unknown-freebsd bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50010 --- Comment #7 from Gary Funck 2011-08-20 20:52:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > On FC14 x86_64, after installing the i686 libraries for > {gmp,libmpc,mpfr}{,-devel}, built against trunk > revision 177922 (last changed 2011-08-19 17:18:07 PD

[Bug bootstrap/50010] [4.7 regression] i386-unknown-freebsd bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50010 --- Comment #8 from Gerald Pfeifer 2011-08-20 21:04:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) >> On FC14 x86_64, after installing the i686 libraries for >> {gmp,libmpc,mpfr}{,-devel}, built against trunk >> revision 177922 (last changed 2011-08-19 17:1

[Bug c++/50140] [C++0x] sorry, unimplemented: cannot expand ‘T ...’ into a fixed-length argument list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50140 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org Summa

[Bug bootstrap/50010] [4.7 regression] i386-unknown-freebsd bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50010 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9 from

[Bug c++/50114] ICE on invalid code in pop_binding, at cp/name-lookup.c:382

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50114 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2011-08-20 23:17:42 UTC --- I was winking at Matthias... As he knows well, a reduced testcase (say, below 100 lines) would help a lot, if/when you can.