[Bug c/49620] piece of code from modification to dvblast but cant get it to compile and run correctly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49620 julian gardner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/49667] New: Duplicate -L's with configure --with-gmp-lib on Solaris 10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49667 Summary: Duplicate -L's with configure --with-gmp-lib on Solaris 10 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug bootstrap/49667] Duplicate -L's with configure --with-gmp-lib on Solaris 10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49667 --- Comment #1 from Greg Robinson 2011-07-07 07:33:07 UTC --- Ok, I think I might know whats going on. I believe, I am assuming, that, say, an LDFLAGS option, where you specify -L and -R is the same format as --with-gmp-lib. In other words, --w

[Bug bootstrap/49667] Duplicate -L's with configure --with-gmp-lib on Solaris 10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49667 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/49668] New: [C++0x] std::thread does not forward its args as rvalues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49668 Summary: [C++0x] std::thread does not forward its args as rvalues Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/49668] [C++0x] std::thread does not forward its args as rvalues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49668 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/49648] ICE(segfault) with MATMUL and function-result actual argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49648 --- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-07-07 08:53:24 UTC --- The patch in comment #8 fixes the ICEs for the test cases without disturbing my pet bugs and without regression.

[Bug middle-end/49640] Internal compiler in C99 code (using variable-length arrays) and OpenMP

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49640 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/49666] passing nested function to inline function causes a trampoline call

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49666 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status

[Bug lto/49664] liblto_plugin.so exports too many symbols

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49664 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/49663] [4.7 Regression] [C++0x] ICE in lookup_base

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49663 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug c++/46727] [4.4 Regression] ICE with -O3 and -ffast-math (in get_callee_fndecl, at tree.c:6857)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46727 --- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-07-07 09:25:18 UTC --- This was fixed for 4.5 by Matz' r152236 ("Disentangle builtin folding from expanding").

[Bug middle-end/49662] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-XX.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49662 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/49661] et-forest.h uses extern "C"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49661 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/39150] Configure scripts have no 64-Bit Solaris defined (only i386-solaris*).

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39150 --- Comment #22 from Rainer Orth 2011-07-07 09:24:19 UTC --- Author: ro Date: Thu Jul 7 09:24:16 2011 New Revision: 175958 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175958 Log: gcc: PR target/39150 * configure.ac (gcc_cv

[Bug libstdc++/48882] [C++0x] ?: ternary operator fails in certain contexts - compile error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48882 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug other/49665] 'defined in discarded section' link failures on cpu2006 benchmarks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49665 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW AssignedTo|amodra at gmail dot c

[Bug target/49607] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: 22_locale/time_get/get_weekday/wchar_t/wrapped_locale.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49607 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Component|libstdc++ |target --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini

[Bug libstdc++/49559] [C++0x] stable_sort calls self-move-assignment operator

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49559 --- Comment #15 from Paolo Carlini 2011-07-07 09:53:23 UTC --- Chris, shall we attack this issue? Thanks.

[Bug c/49644] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49644 --- Comment #6 from Orion Poplawski 2011-07-07 09:54:59 UTC --- I am on vacation and will be out of the office until Thursay, July 21st. Your message has been saved and I will respond if needed when I return. If this is an urgent CoRA computing

[Bug c/49644] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49644 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug bootstrap/39150] Configure scripts have no 64-Bit Solaris defined (only i386-solaris*).

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39150 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libmudflap/49550] Many libmudflap tests fail on Solaris 11/x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49550 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth 2011-07-07 10:14:05 UTC --- Author: ro Date: Thu Jul 7 10:14:02 2011 New Revision: 175961 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175961 Log: gcc: PR libmudflap/49550 * gcc.c (MFWRAP_SPE

[Bug target/48108] lto should be containerized in a single mach-o section on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #24397|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug libstdc++/49668] [C++0x] std::thread does not forward its args as rvalues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49668 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wake

[Bug c++/49669] New: Compiler crashes with "internal compiler error: in perform_member_init, at cp/init.c:530"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49669 Summary: Compiler crashes with "internal compiler error: in perform_member_init, at cp/init.c:530" Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor

[Bug c++/49669] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [C++0x] Compiler crashes with "internal compiler error: in perform_member_init, at cp/init.c:530"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49669 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Status|

[Bug c++/49669] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [C++0x] Compiler crashes with "internal compiler error: in perform_member_init, at cp/init.c:530"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49669 --- Comment #2 from Kerrek SB 2011-07-07 11:49:46 UTC --- Yes, I know that the code is invalid, but that shouldn't make the compiler crash, should it? For that matter, your proposed correct syntax is also rejected by 4.6.0: Goo::Goo() : x{Foo(4

[Bug target/49621] [4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] ICE in trunc_int_for_mode, at explow.c:57

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49621 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/49621] [4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] ICE in trunc_int_for_mode, at explow.c:57

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49621 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug c++/49669] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [C++0x] Compiler crashes with "internal compiler error: in perform_member_init, at cp/init.c:530"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49669 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-07-07 12:12:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Yes, I know that the code is invalid, but that shouldn't make the compiler > crash, should it? No, that's why I confirmed the bug and marked it as a regre

[Bug target/46278] avr-gcc 4.5.1 doing suboptimal reloads using X

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46278 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2011-07-07 CC|avr at g

[Bug middle-end/49640] Internal compiler in C99 code (using variable-length arrays) and OpenMP

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49640 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-07 12:49:21 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jul 7 12:49:17 2011 New Revision: 175967 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175967 Log: PR middle-end/49640 * gimplify.c (gimplify_

[Bug middle-end/49640] Internal compiler in C99 code (using variable-length arrays) and OpenMP

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49640 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-07 12:50:08 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jul 7 12:50:03 2011 New Revision: 175968 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175968 Log: PR middle-end/49640 * gimplify.c (gimplify_

[Bug c++/49538] [4.7 regression] Revision 175341 causes segfaults

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49538 --- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2011-07-07 12:49:55 UTC --- No, c70f46b057cd12973 is fine. I've tested tested: git reset --hard c70f46b057cd12973d33c01c8fa0da5c14ba3944 and then applied Jason's patch on top of this and everything is fine.

[Bug target/49607] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: 22_locale/time_get/get_weekday/wchar_t/wrapped_locale.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49607 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/49640] Internal compiler in C99 code (using variable-length arrays) and OpenMP

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49640 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-07 12:58:22 UTC --- Fixed for 4.6/4.7+ so far.

[Bug testsuite/48727] FAIL: g++.dg/opt/devirt2.C scan-assembler-times xyzzy 2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48727 --- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-07-07 13:04:18 UTC --- > --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou 2011-07-06 > 19:15:49 UTC --- >> This also fails on 32-bit Solaris/SPARC with Sun as, which has: >> >> sethi %hi(_Z

[Bug c++/49669] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [C++0x] Compiler crashes with "internal compiler error: in perform_member_init, at cp/init.c:530"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49669 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.2

[Bug tree-optimization/49622] [4.4 Regression] Compiler segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49622 --- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-07-07 13:22:27 UTC --- This was fixed for 4.5 by r145494, Richard's merge from the alias-improvements branch.

[Bug testsuite/48727] FAIL: g++.dg/opt/devirt2.C scan-assembler-times xyzzy 2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48727 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/49475] [OOP][debugging] Add DWARF info for Fortran's OOP features (extension, member functions)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49475 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2011-07-07 13:33:18 UTC --- See thread starting at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-06/threads.html#00342

[Bug c++/49538] [4.7 regression] Revision 175341 causes segfaults

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49538 --- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2011-07-07 14:08:08 UTC --- OK I've finally found the commit in question: % git bisect start $ git bisect bad % git bisect good c70f46b057cd12973d33c01c8fa0da5c14ba3944 ... (test and repeat always with Jas

[Bug c++/49538] [4.7 regression] Revision 175341 causes segfaults

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49538 --- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2011-07-07 14:43:49 UTC --- It's the first hunk that causes the problem: diff --git a/gcc/ipa-inline-analysis.c b/gcc/ipa-inline-analysis.c index 43e0f81..b008f05 100644 --- a/gcc/ipa-inline-analysis.c +++

[Bug rtl-optimization/49646] gcc.dg/pr44194-1.c FAILs on Solaris/SPARC, Tru64 UNIX

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49646 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/44194] struct returned by value generates useless stores

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #37 fro

[Bug debug/49522] Divide by zero in validate_subreg in emit-rtl.c:695

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49522 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-07 16:06:01 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jul 7 16:05:55 2011 New Revision: 175987 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175987 Log: PR debug/49522 * df-problems.c (dead_debug_

[Bug c++/49669] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [C++0x] Compiler crashes with "internal compiler error: in perform_member_init, at cp/init.c:530"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49669 --- Comment #4 from Kerrek SB 2011-07-07 16:09:55 UTC --- You're right, it works in 4.6.1 - thanks! (Just updated.) Say, since you're here, if I change the definition of x from "Foo[2]" to "std::array", should I be allowed to initialize it with

[Bug other/49533] [4.7 regression] Firefox profiled build issues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49533 --- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2011-07-07 16:20:44 UTC --- This is caused by: 7791b0eb56c3c324004e6fffe2d5f21241c038f7 is the first bad commit commit 7791b0eb56c3c324004e6fffe2d5f21241c038f7 Author: hubicka Date: Mon Jun 13 13:12:23

[Bug regression/49498] [4.7 Regression]: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_b.c bogus warning line 20

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49498 --- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-07-07 16:22:48 UTC --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/05/11 16:52, xinliangli at gmail dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49498 > > --- Comment #7 from david

[Bug c/49653] Undefined reference to inlined function with -O0,-std=c99

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49653 --- Comment #7 from Gary Funck 2011-07-07 16:38:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > why not just add this to make the code valid by emitting an extern definition? > > extern long trouble(long, long); If you're suggesting that the front-end wo

[Bug c++/49669] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [C++0x] Compiler crashes with "internal compiler error: in perform_member_init, at cp/init.c:530"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49669 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug c/49653] Undefined reference to inlined function with -O0,-std=c99

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49653 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-07-07 16:49:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > why not just add this to make the code valid by emitting an extern > > definition? > > > > extern long trouble(long, long);

[Bug c/49653] Undefined reference to inlined function with -O0,-std=c99

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49653 --- Comment #9 from Gary Funck 2011-07-07 16:55:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > GF: If you're suggesting that the front-end would do this automatically when > GF: compiling -O0 -std={gnu}99, I'd agree that this wo

[Bug c/49653] Undefined reference to inlined function with -O0,-std=c99

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49653 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-07-07 17:08:54 UTC --- The point is your code is invalid and the compiler's behaviour at -O0 is correct. C99 6.9 "If an identifier declared with external linkage is used in an expression (other than as p

[Bug c++/49665] 'defined in discarded section' link failures on cpu2006 benchmarks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49665 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|other |c++ --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 20

[Bug middle-end/49495] -O3 causes error message "edge points to wrong declaration:"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49495 --- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor 2011-07-07 18:08:04 UTC --- Author: jamborm Date: Thu Jul 7 18:08:00 2011 New Revision: 175998 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175998 Log: 2011-07-07 Martin Jambor PR middle-end/49

[Bug middle-end/49495] -O3 causes error message "edge points to wrong declaration:"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49495 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/49670] New: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2104

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49670 Summary: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2104 Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug c/49653] Undefined reference to inlined function with -O0,-std=c99

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49653 --- Comment #11 from Gary Funck 2011-07-07 19:01:19 UTC --- Thanks for the additional info. I agree that it would be incorrect for the compiler to default to "extern" if it chooses not to inline the function (I hadn't thought that suggestion thr

[Bug debug/49522] Divide by zero in validate_subreg in emit-rtl.c:695

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49522 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-07 19:10:05 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jul 7 19:10:01 2011 New Revision: 176003 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176003 Log: PR debug/49522 * df-problems.c (dead_debug_

[Bug c/49644] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49644 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-07 19:11:29 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jul 7 19:11:27 2011 New Revision: 176004 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176004 Log: PR c/49644 * c-typeck.c (build_binary_op):

[Bug c/49644] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49644 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-07 19:14:41 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jul 7 19:14:38 2011 New Revision: 176005 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176005 Log: PR c/49644 * c-typeck.c (build_binary_op):

[Bug debug/49522] Divide by zero in validate_subreg in emit-rtl.c:695

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49522 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/49644] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49644 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-07 19:19:52 UTC --- Fixed for C in 4.6+ so far, C++ patch is waiting for review.

[Bug regression/49498] [4.7 Regression]: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_b.c bogus warning line 20

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49498 --- Comment #9 from davidxl 2011-07-07 19:31:53 UTC --- On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 9:23 AM, law at redhat dot com < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49498 > > --- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-07-

[Bug c/49644] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49644 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-07 19:41:57 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jul 7 19:41:55 2011 New Revision: 176006 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176006 Log: PR c/49644 * typeck.c (cp_build_binary_op)

[Bug c/49644] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49644 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-07 19:43:03 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jul 7 19:42:58 2011 New Revision: 176007 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176007 Log: PR c/49644 * typeck.c (cp_build_binary_op)

[Bug other/49533] [4.7 regression] Firefox profiled build issues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49533 --- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2011-07-07 20:29:44 UTC --- With 7791b0eb56c3c324004e6fffe2d5f21241c038f7 reverted and after reverting the following hunk: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49538#c6 , Firefox builds and runs fine

[Bug target/49660] 64-bit gcc doesn't enable -mv8plus with -m32 on Solaris/SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49660 --- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou 2011-07-07 20:41:12 UTC --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Thu Jul 7 20:41:10 2011 New Revision: 176009 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176009 Log: PR target/49660 * config/sparc/sol2.h [

[Bug target/49660] 64-bit gcc doesn't enable -mv8plus with -m32 on Solaris/SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49660 --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2011-07-07 20:37:02 UTC --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Thu Jul 7 20:36:59 2011 New Revision: 176008 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176008 Log: PR target/49660 * config/sparc/sol2.h [

[Bug target/49660] 64-bit gcc doesn't enable -mv8plus with -m32 on Solaris/SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49660 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2011-07-07 20:43:45 UTC --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Thu Jul 7 20:43:43 2011 New Revision: 176010 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176010 Log: PR target/49660 * config/sparc/sol2.h [

[Bug target/49660] 64-bit gcc doesn't enable -mv8plus with -m32 on Solaris/SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49660 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Version|4.7.0

[Bug fortran/49648] ICE(segfault) with MATMUL and function-result actual argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49648 --- Comment #12 from Mikael Morin 2011-07-07 20:58:19 UTC --- Author: mikael Date: Thu Jul 7 20:58:16 2011 New Revision: 176011 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176011 Log: 2011-07-07 Mikael Morin PR fortran/49648

[Bug fortran/49648] ICE(segfault) with MATMUL and function-result actual argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49648 --- Comment #13 from Mikael Morin 2011-07-07 21:03:27 UTC --- Author: mikael Date: Thu Jul 7 21:03:25 2011 New Revision: 176012 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176012 Log: 2011-07-07 Mikael Morin PR fortran/49648

[Bug fortran/49648] ICE(segfault) with MATMUL and function-result actual argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49648 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/49353] C++ frontend should not declare function EXTERN when it forces them to stay

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49353 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/49353] C++ frontend should not declare function EXTERN when it forces them to stay

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49353 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-07-07 21:20:44 UTC --- Created attachment 24707 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24707 cgraph abort patch In case anyone is interested.

[Bug regression/49498] [4.7 Regression]: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_b.c bogus warning line 20

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49498 --- Comment #10 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-07-07 21:26:57 UTC --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/07/11 13:32, xinliangli at gmail dot com wrote: > Yes. Jump threading is inherently an iterative process. It was decided > som

[Bug c++/47752] Non-dependent name is found in dependent base class although it should be rejected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47752 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/24163] dependent Base class scope examined during unqualified name lookup in template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24163 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volker.simonis at gmail dot

[Bug c++/47356] Internal error when assigning with incomplete uniform initializer list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47356 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/49671] New: volatile goes missing after inlining

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49671 Summary: volatile goes missing after inlining Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassig.

[Bug middle-end/49671] [4.6/4.7 Regression] volatile goes missing after inlining

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49671 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Known to work|

[Bug regression/49498] [4.7 Regression]: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_b.c bogus warning line 20

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49498 --- Comment #11 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-07-07 21:51:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > > 2) On the targets that have the problem, is branch cost considered cheap? > No idea. I didn't bother to look at why cris-elf triggers the problem, >

[Bug c++/49663] [4.7 Regression] [C++0x] ICE in lookup_base

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49663 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-07-07 21:54:01 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Jul 7 21:53:58 2011 New Revision: 176013 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176013 Log: PR c++/49663 * pt.c (push_deduction_access_

[Bug c++/48157] Unable to match function call to member function template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48157 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-07-07 21:55:11 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Jul 7 21:55:09 2011 New Revision: 176014 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176014 Log: PR c++/48157 * pt.c (tsubst_qualified_id):

[Bug c++/49538] [4.7 regression] Revision 175341 causes segfaults

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49538 --- Comment #7 from Jarryd Beck 2011-07-07 21:55:06 UTC --- I just wanted to comment here that I have also found this problem. I bisected it to the same revision using my own project. I reported it as bug [[49587]].

[Bug c++/48157] Unable to match function call to member function template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48157 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/49663] [4.7 Regression] [C++0x] ICE in lookup_base

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49663 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/49538] [4.7 regression] Revision 175341 causes segfaults

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49538 --- Comment #8 from Jarryd Beck 2011-07-07 21:58:45 UTC --- Sorry I linked that wrongly, it's bug 49587.

[Bug c++/49353] C++ frontend should not declare function EXTERN when it forces them to stay

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49353 --- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka 2011-07-07 22:01:07 UTC --- Thanks for working on this! I guess we could also get rid of the rest of visibility fixup code? (i.e. copying COMDAT_GROUP into thunks&same body aliases and adding them into the cgraph c

[Bug c++/46043] attribute to mark virtual methods that can't be further overriden so they can be devirtualized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46043 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug middle-end/49662] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-XX.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49662 --- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-07 22:40:34 UTC --- The loop nest is not perfect, in interchange-15.c: for (i = 0; i < N; i++) for (j = 0; j < N; j++) x[i] += a[j][i]; used to be perfect nest, now we have x[i] read and wri

[Bug middle-end/49671] [4.6/4.7 Regression] volatile goes missing after inlining

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49671 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/49202] MMIX: Wrong debugging information generated (UNKNOWN: length 2)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49202 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug middle-end/49671] [4.6/4.7 Regression] volatile goes missing after inlining

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49671 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2011-07-07 23:07:02 UTC --- Created attachment 24708 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24708 Fix which I am going to test

[Bug target/49202] MMIX: Wrong debugging information generated (UNKNOWN: length 2)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49202 --- Comment #2 from Nils Asmussen 2011-07-07 23:10:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > I hope to check this some time in the next four weeks... > At a glance, it might be a binutils issue, with the relocs message. Thanks. I don't know if it he

[Bug target/49670] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2104

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49670 --- Comment #1 from Jeffrey Walton 2011-07-08 00:45:17 UTC --- Using the stock Crypto++ makefile did not help: g++ -DNDEBUG -g -O2 -mtune=native -pipe -c 3way.cpp g++ -DNDEBUG -g -O2 -mtune=native -pipe -c adler32.cpp g++ -DNDEBUG -g -O2 -mtune=

[Bug target/49670] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2104

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49670 --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey Walton 2011-07-08 00:47:53 UTC --- For completeness, here's the function (http://www.cryptopp.com/docs/ref/asn_8cpp_source.html): 00244 void OID::DEREncode(BufferedTransformation &bt) const 00245 { 00246 asser

  1   2   >