http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49227
--- Comment #2 from Arthur O'Dwyer
2011-07-02 08:04:20 UTC ---
Created attachment 24657
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24657
Another testcase, fairly reduced
I just ran into the same ICE via automatic test generation. I'm a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49227
Arthur O'Dwyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arthur.j.odwyer at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49562
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-02 11:08:45 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Sat Jul 2 11:08:41 2011
New Revision: 175779
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175779
Log:
2011-07-02 Janus Weil
PR fortran/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49598
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49613
Summary: Error with OpenMP / gomp and gcc detected by valgrind
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgomp
Assign
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49613
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49611
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-02
12:36:44 UTC ---
Making this work reliably is probably more work than making GCC use the flags
from more cases from regular C code.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49612
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-02
12:40:38 UTC ---
please try GCC 4.6.x. Are you sure you are using GCC 4.5.x? You shouldn't
see this kind of output with -flto there.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49614
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/vmx/gcc-bug-i.c -O0 (test for excess
errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49594
--- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe 2011-07-02 13:10:10
UTC ---
I tested the patch on darwin 8 on a G5 and with crosses from darwin 9 - >
darwin 8.
results are shown in:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg00134.html
FWIW: unless there's
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49466
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-02 13:46:23 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Sat Jul 2 13:46:21 2011
New Revision: 175780
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175780
Log:
2011-07-02 Janus Weil
PR fortran/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49466
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46261
--- Comment #20 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-07-02
17:29:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> Indeed, I simply made all bare-metal targets use newlib-stdint.h as a
> default, but since AVR has its own libc it seems more appropriate to put
> th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41885
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49615
Summary: internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed / LHS in
noreturn call with pointer-to-never-returning-member
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49615
--- Comment #1 from Harald van Dijk 2011-07-02
20:35:39 UTC ---
Actually, I'll include the other slightly different testcase here, since it'll
probably be the same problem. If you prefer me reporting it as a separate bug,
I will do so.
$ cat bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43088
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-07-02
21:07:50 UTC ---
Created attachment 24659
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24659
C source file
Compile with -mmcu=atmega168 -Os.
This file shows the flaw in function foo_3f that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39819
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49469
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49469
--- Comment #2 from Xiyue Deng 2011-07-03 04:29:09
UTC ---
Created attachment 24660
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24660
gcc_4.7_build.log.gz
Here is the build log with gcc trunk 'git pull'ed today, still the same
problem.
20 matches
Mail list logo