http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-26
07:58:23 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sun Jun 26 07:57:30 2011
New Revision: 175408
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175408
Log:
2011-06-26 Jakub Jelinek
PR tree-optimizat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377
--- Comment #46 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-26
07:58:18 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sun Jun 26 07:57:30 2011
New Revision: 175408
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175408
Log:
2011-06-26 Jakub Jelinek
PR tree-optimizat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49445
Mark A. Gibbs changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||indi.in.the.wired at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46261
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49530
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49407
Pawel Sikora changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49525
--- Comment #11 from Marcin Ĺšlusarz
2011-06-26 12:48:05 UTC ---
Ok, you are right. I didn't know about these patches.
Now I compiled gcc-4.4.5 with "vanilla" USE flag - which disables all these
patches - and it still fails at runtime.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49532
Summary: Dwarf Error: wrong version in compilation unit header
(is 1024, should be 2, 3, or 4) [in module
D:\mingw.tests\l.dll]
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49532
--- Comment #1 from Pawel Sikora 2011-06-26 13:19:26
UTC ---
testcase: http://pluto.agmk.net/mingw/tls-test.boost.tar.bz2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49051
--- Comment #5 from Johannes Schaub
2011-06-26 13:40:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Hmm, the example in 14.8.2p8 does seem to contradict my interpretation of the
> normative wording. I'll raise this with core.
A related question, if in t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49528
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-26
14:00:37 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sun Jun 26 14:00:33 2011
New Revision: 175409
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175409
Log:
PR c++/49528
* semantics.c (potential_const
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49445
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Severity|major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49506
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-26
15:36:45 UTC ---
This was DR 409, which wasn't resolved when GCC 3.3 was released
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2011/n3286.html#409
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47997
--- Comment #12 from Iain Sandoe 2011-06-26 16:25:32
UTC ---
Author: iains
Date: Sun Jun 26 16:25:29 2011
New Revision: 175410
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175410
Log:
PR target/47997
* config/darwin.c (darwin_m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46400
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44107
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc-apple-darwin9.8.0 |*-apple-darwin{8,9,10}
Status|U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49094
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor 2011-06-26
18:25:16 UTC ---
I have submitted a fix for this bug to the mailing list:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg01941.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46261
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|R
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49533
Summary: Firefox profiled build issues
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #106 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-06-26 19:50:20 UTC ---
I've opened a new bug http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49533
with a patch that fixes the issue seen in Comment 99.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49534
Summary: gcj segfaults on a program from stdin
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: java
AssignedTo: unassig...@gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49468
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24560|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49269
--- Comment #1 from Michael Kochetkov 2011-06-26
21:04:34 UTC ---
Created attachment 24604
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24604
UCS2 encoded sample file for the test case
samples.txt is the ucs2 encoded text file for the tes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49439
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49269
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49263
--- Comment #5 from Oleg Endo 2011-06-26 22:30:05 UTC
---
> Yes, that peephole doesn't catch all the patterns which could
> make tst #imm8,r0 use. Perhaps it would be a good idea to get
> numbers for the test like CSiBE test with the vanilla and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49386
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49535
Summary: __builtin_object_size incorrect for array arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: un
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49536
Summary: latent bug in FSF gcc with creation of vector of
arrays
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49537
Summary: cross-check DW_AT_name vs. demangling of linkage names
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: debug
As
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49528
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-27
01:07:38 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jun 27 01:07:34 2011
New Revision: 175417
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175417
Log:
PR c++/49528
* semantics.c (potential_const
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49440
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-27
01:13:36 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jun 27 01:13:33 2011
New Revision: 175418
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175418
Log:
PR c++/49440
* class.c (set_linkage_accordi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49440
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49529
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin 2011-06-27
03:13:58 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Mon Jun 27 03:13:55 2011
New Revision: 175420
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175420
Log:
PR testsuite/49529
* gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49529
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin 2011-06-27
03:23:15 UTC ---
Dominique, if the failure is resolved on darwin, please close.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45923
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49263
--- Comment #6 from Kazumoto Kojima 2011-06-27
05:14:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Anyway, why not just add all the currently known-to-work cases? What are your
> concerns regarding that? I can imagine that it is a maintenance burden to k
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46261
--- Comment #10 from Eric Weddington
2011-06-27 05:43:20 UTC ---
Hi All,
Johann is correct in his comment to bug #46261 (below).
The -mint8 compiler switch is now causing the compiler to give an ICE.
We need to finally make a decision from one
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49468
--- Comment #5 from Kazumoto Kojima 2011-06-27
06:39:40 UTC ---
Argh, I also missed clobbers. Looks fine to me now, except
that insn_and_split "*negdi2" forgot to set constraints and
some minor coding style issues below.
The first comment shoul
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46261
--- Comment #11 from chertykov at gmail dot com 2011-06-27 06:41:24 UTC ---
2011/6/27 Weddington, Eric :
> Hi All,
>
> Johann is correct in his comment to bug #46261 (below).
>
> The -mint8 compiler switch is now causing the compiler to give an ICE
40 matches
Mail list logo