[Bug tree-optimization/49093] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in vect_enhance_data_refs_alignment() with volatile inside peeled loop

2011-05-31 Thread irar at il dot ibm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49093 Ira Rosen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||irar at il dot ibm.com --- Comment #3 from Ir

[Bug bootstrap/49190] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 174286 on several platforms

2011-05-31 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49190 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/49235] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:424 with -O -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -fno-tree-scev-cprop -ftree-vectorize -fno-vect-cost-model

2011-05-31 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49235 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-05-31 07:46:22 UTC --- Created attachment 24401 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24401 gcc47-pr49235.patch Untested fix. base might be const0_rtx (seems other constants are moved into of

[Bug testsuite/49239] Random gcc.dg/vect/vect-strided-u8-i8-gap4-unknown.c failure

2011-05-31 Thread irar at il dot ibm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49239 Ira Rosen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||irar at il dot ibm.com Component|mid

[Bug testsuite/49239] Random gcc.dg/vect/vect-strided-u8-i8-gap4-unknown.c failure

2011-05-31 Thread irar at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49239 --- Comment #3 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-31 08:15:32 UTC --- Author: irar Date: Tue May 31 08:15:25 2011 New Revision: 174469 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174469 Log: PR testsuite/49239 * gcc.dg/vect/ve

[Bug tree-optimization/49093] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in vect_enhance_data_refs_alignment() with volatile inside peeled loop

2011-05-31 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49093 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-05-31 08:22:51 UTC --- On Tue, 31 May 2011, irar at il dot ibm.com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49093 > > Ira Rosen changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/49093] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in vect_enhance_data_refs_alignment() with volatile inside peeled loop

2011-05-31 Thread irar at il dot ibm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49093 --- Comment #5 from Ira Rosen 2011-05-31 08:30:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > I think that's reasonable for 4.6. But we don't need to make > data-ref analysis fail just because of volatile references - we for > example can easily unroll

[Bug tree-optimization/49234] [4.4/4.5/4.7/4.7 Regression] -Wstrict-overflow gives obviously unwarranted warning

2011-05-31 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milesto

[Bug tree-optimization/49093] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in vect_enhance_data_refs_alignment() with volatile inside peeled loop

2011-05-31 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49093 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-05-31 08:43:39 UTC --- On Tue, 31 May 2011, irar at il dot ibm.com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49093 > > --- Comment #5 from Ira Rosen 2011-05-31 08:30:49 > UTC --- >

[Bug ada/49240] New: Inherited equality operator of interface not visible

2011-05-31 Thread ken at codelabs dot ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49240 Summary: Inherited equality operator of interface not visible Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada AssignedTo:

[Bug tree-optimization/49234] [4.4/4.5/4.7/4.7 Regression] -Wstrict-overflow gives obviously unwarranted warning

2011-05-31 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-05-31 09:02:29 UTC --- We hit: 163724rguenth /* Similarly, if the new maximum is smaller or larger than 163724rguenththe previous one, go all the way to +INF. */ 163724rguenth

[Bug tree-optimization/49093] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in vect_enhance_data_refs_alignment() with volatile inside peeled loop

2011-05-31 Thread irar at il dot ibm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49093 --- Comment #7 from Ira Rosen 2011-05-31 09:06:04 UTC --- I am testing this patch then: Index: tree-vect-data-refs.c === --- tree-vect-data-refs.c (revision 174467) +++ tree-v

[Bug tree-optimization/49093] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in vect_enhance_data_refs_alignment() with volatile inside peeled loop

2011-05-31 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49093 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-05-31 09:09:37 UTC --- On Tue, 31 May 2011, irar at il dot ibm.com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49093 > > --- Comment #7 from Ira Rosen 2011-05-31 09:06:04 > UTC --- >

[Bug tree-optimization/49093] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in vect_enhance_data_refs_alignment() with volatile inside peeled loop

2011-05-31 Thread irar at il dot ibm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49093 --- Comment #9 from Ira Rosen 2011-05-31 09:17:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > > > > + if (TYPE_VOLATILE (TREE_TYPE (DR_REF (dr > > if (TREE_THIS_VOLATILE (DR_REF (dr))) > > instead. > OK. Thanks. Ira > Richard.

[Bug rtl-optimization/49235] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:424 with -O -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -fno-tree-scev-cprop -ftree-vectorize -fno-vect-cost-model

2011-05-31 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49235 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||48702 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guen

[Bug rtl-optimization/49235] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:424 with -O -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -fno-tree-scev-cprop -ftree-vectorize -fno-vect-cost-model

2011-05-31 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49235 --- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-31 09:26:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Created attachment 24401 [details] > gcc47-pr49235.patch > > Untested fix. base might be const0_rtx (seems other constants are moved into > offset and b

[Bug rtl-optimization/49235] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:424 with -O -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -fno-tree-scev-cprop -ftree-vectorize -fno-vect-cost-model

2011-05-31 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49235 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-05-31 09:34:04 UTC --- get_address_description only does that if TMR_INDEX2 is present: addr->symbol = NULL_TREE; if (TMR_INDEX2 (op)) { gcc_assert (integer_zerop (TMR_BASE (op)

[Bug rtl-optimization/49235] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:424 with -O -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -fno-tree-scev-cprop -ftree-vectorize -fno-vect-cost-model

2011-05-31 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49235 --- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-31 09:44:55 UTC --- Index: gcc/tree-ssa-address.c === --- gcc/tree-ssa-address.c (revision 174469) +++ gcc/tree-ssa-address.c (

[Bug libstdc++/49204] [C++0x] remaining issues in

2011-05-31 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49204 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-05-31 10:52:17 UTC --- also http://lwg.github.com/issues/lwg-active.html#2056

[Bug fortran/49241] New: memory leak with lhs realloc of zero-sized array

2011-05-31 Thread xarthisius.kk at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49241 Summary: memory leak with lhs realloc of zero-sized array Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo:

[Bug debug/49130] discrepancies between DW_AT_name and demangler

2011-05-31 Thread dodji at seketeli dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49130 --- Comment #7 from dodji at seketeli dot org 2011-05-31 11:16:16 UTC --- "jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com" a écrit: > --- Comment #6 from Jan Kratochvil > 2011-05-30 08:44:43 UTC --- > Another issue is with DMGL_VERBOSE. nm -C does not use

[Bug fortran/49103] [4.6/4.7 Regression] local variables exchange values / wrong code with -O3

2011-05-31 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49103 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-05-31 11:54:23 UTC --- Smaller, self-contained testcase: ! PR fortran/49103 ! { dg-do run } integer :: a(2), b(2), i, j open (10, status='scratch') do j = 1, 2 a = (/ 0, 0 /) b = (/ 1, 1 /) do

[Bug libgcj/49193] __sync_xxxx builtins aren't used in sysdep/*/locks.h

2011-05-31 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49193 --- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-31 11:53:37 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Tue May 31 11:53:34 2011 New Revision: 174471 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174471 Log: Use __sync_bool_compare_and_swap in x86 lock

[Bug debug/49047] DW_AT_linkage_name missing for constructors and destructors

2011-05-31 Thread dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49047 --- Comment #5 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-05-31 12:09:10 UTC --- Author: dodji Date: Tue May 31 12:09:06 2011 New Revision: 174472 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174472 Log: Fix PR debug/49047 gcc/ * dwarf2out.c (gen_s

[Bug debug/49047] DW_AT_linkage_name missing for constructors and destructors

2011-05-31 Thread dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49047 --- Comment #6 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-05-31 12:17:12 UTC --- Author: dodji Date: Tue May 31 12:17:06 2011 New Revision: 174473 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174473 Log: Revert "Fix PR debug/49047" This reverts commit c

[Bug debug/49047] DW_AT_linkage_name missing for constructors and destructors

2011-05-31 Thread dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49047 --- Comment #7 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-05-31 12:17:25 UTC --- Author: dodji Date: Tue May 31 12:17:21 2011 New Revision: 174474 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174474 Log: Fix PR debug/49047 gcc/ * dwarf2out.c (gen_s

[Bug middle-end/48953] [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: type mismatch in array reference with -flto and struct with vararray

2011-05-31 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48953 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libfortran/48906] Wrong rounding results with -m32

2011-05-31 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906 --- Comment #17 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-05-31 12:30:00 UTC --- As you can tell, finding the magic formula with this new approach is not a trivial effort. ;) My fear is that there is an unlimited number of corner cases.

[Bug rtl-optimization/49235] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:424 with -O -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -fno-tree-scev-cprop -ftree-vectorize -fno-vect-cost-model

2011-05-31 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49235 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-05-31 12:34:45 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue May 31 12:34:42 2011 New Revision: 174478 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174478 Log: PR rtl-optimization/49235 * tree-ssa-addres

[Bug tree-optimization/49093] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in vect_enhance_data_refs_alignment() with volatile inside peeled loop

2011-05-31 Thread irar at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49093 --- Comment #10 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-31 12:31:09 UTC --- Author: irar Date: Tue May 31 12:31:04 2011 New Revision: 174477 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174477 Log: PR tree-optimization/49093

[Bug fortran/49241] memory leak with lhs realloc of zero-sized array

2011-05-31 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49241 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code CC|

[Bug c/48985] bogus buffer overflow warning and abort on static flexible array member

2011-05-31 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48985 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug rtl-optimization/49235] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:424 with -O -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -fno-tree-scev-cprop -ftree-vectorize -fno-vect-cost-model

2011-05-31 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49235 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/48953] [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: type mismatch in array reference with -flto and struct with vararray

2011-05-31 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48953 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-31 12:23:58 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue May 31 12:23:55 2011 New Revision: 174475 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174475 Log: 2011-05-31 Richard Guenther Backport f

[Bug c/48985] bogus buffer overflow warning and abort on static flexible array member

2011-05-31 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48985 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-31 12:25:59 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue May 31 12:25:52 2011 New Revision: 174476 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174476 Log: 2011-05-31 Richard Guenther Backport f

[Bug fortran/49103] [4.6/4.7 Regression] local variables exchange values / wrong code with -O3

2011-05-31 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49103 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-05-31 13:28:17 UTC --- Created attachment 24402 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24402 gcc46-pr49103.patch While micha's patch is the way to go for the trunk, it most likely isn't backpo

[Bug libstdc++/49204] [C++0x] remaining issues in

2011-05-31 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49204 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-05-31 13:40:03 UTC --- We should also make std::async check the system load when deciding whether to run asynchronously or deferred. We should be able to reuse GNU Make's code for deciding whether to run

[Bug bootstrap/49242] New: Bootstrap comparison failure

2011-05-31 Thread michael.a.richmond at nasa dot gov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49242 Summary: Bootstrap comparison failure Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gn

[Bug fortran/34640] ICE when assigning item of a derived-component to a pointer

2011-05-31 Thread otte.martin at epa dot gov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640 --- Comment #20 from Martin Otte 2011-05-31 14:05:17 UTC --- Created attachment 24403 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24403 Example program that causes an ICE

[Bug fortran/34640] ICE when assigning item of a derived-component to a pointer

2011-05-31 Thread otte.martin at epa dot gov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640 Martin Otte changed: What|Removed |Added CC||otte.martin at epa dot gov --- Comment #21

[Bug target/49238] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] [SH] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2113

2011-05-31 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49238 Kazumoto Kojima changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

quote needed

2011-05-31 Thread Dave
Hello, We will like to know if you can source for this SHURE MICROPHONE andM-AUDIO SOUND CARD Kindly advice on the unit price and the availability,if you can source for the supply SHURE WIRED MICROPHONE SYSTEMS: SHURE WIRED SM58LC SM57. DMK57-52 Drum Mic Kit PGX24/SM58 M

[Bug fortran/49241] memory leak with lhs realloc of zero-sized array

2011-05-31 Thread xarthisius.kk at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49241 --- Comment #2 from Kacper Kowalik 2011-05-31 15:12:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > The memory the program needs increases continuously as "top" shows; it takes > about 5min on my computer before the OS kills it (out of memory). > > If one

[Bug driver/49178] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Space between linker option and library in gfortran

2011-05-31 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49178 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 f

[Bug debug/48354] internal compiler error: in splice_child_die, at dwarf2out.c:8064

2011-05-31 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48354 --- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka 2011-05-31 16:05:49 UTC --- The patch seems to work. I now get the ICE at output_die (already reported) but also new /abuild/jh/trunk-install/bin/g++ -flto=24 -fuse-linker-plugin -o dump_syms -fno-rtti -fno-exce

[Bug debug/49047] DW_AT_linkage_name missing for constructors and destructors

2011-05-31 Thread dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49047 Dodji Seketeli changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/49047] DW_AT_linkage_name missing for constructors and destructors

2011-05-31 Thread dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49047 Dodji Seketeli changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/49243] New: attribute((returns_twice)) doesn't work

2011-05-31 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49243 Summary: attribute((returns_twice)) doesn't work Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc

[Bug c/49243] attribute((returns_twice)) doesn't work

2011-05-31 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49243 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-05-31 16:22:43 UTC --- Created attachment 24404 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24404 test case

[Bug c++/44870] [4.7 regression] [C++0x] error when calling function with rvalue argument inside template

2011-05-31 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44870 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-31 18:06:42 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Tue May 31 18:06:39 2011 New Revision: 174499 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174499 Log: PR c++/44870 * tree.c (lvalue_kind): Recurs

[Bug c++/44870] [4.7 regression] [C++0x] error when calling function with rvalue argument inside template

2011-05-31 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44870 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/49198] GCC generates spurious "has incomplete type" errors

2011-05-31 Thread aaw at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49198 --- Comment #4 from Ollie Wild 2011-05-31 18:13:02 UTC --- Thanks for the clarification, Jason. I would not have figured that out on my own.

[Bug fortran/18918] Eventually support Fortran 2008's coarrays [co-arrays]

2011-05-31 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18918 --- Comment #54 from Tobias Burnus 2011-05-31 18:25:54 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Tue May 31 18:25:51 2011 New Revision: 174503 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174503 Log: 2011-05-31 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/1

[Bug fortran/18918] Eventually support Fortran 2008's coarrays [co-arrays]

2011-05-31 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18918 --- Comment #55 from Tobias Burnus 2011-05-31 18:41:00 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Tue May 31 18:40:55 2011 New Revision: 174504 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174504 Log: 2011-05-31 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/1

[Bug c++/48010] typedef redefinitions are allowed if the redefined type is a nested class type

2011-05-31 Thread fabien at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48010 --- Comment #4 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-31 19:02:22 UTC --- Author: fabien Date: Tue May 31 19:02:19 2011 New Revision: 174506 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174506 Log: gcc/cp/ChangeLog 2010-05-31 Fabien Che

[Bug target/48688] [x64]: shift/or instead of lea

2011-05-31 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48688 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-05-31 19:12:28 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue May 31 19:12:25 2011 New Revision: 174507 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174507 Log: PR target/48688 * config/i386/i386.md (*lea

[Bug target/48688] [x64]: shift/or instead of lea

2011-05-31 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48688 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/49245] New: Cannot compile

2011-05-31 Thread g...@marc-richter.info
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49245 Summary: Cannot compile Product: gcc Version: 4.4.5 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org Reporte

[Bug other/49244] New: no intrinsics to emit 'lock bts' and 'lock btc'

2011-05-31 Thread desrt at desrt dot ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49244 Summary: no intrinsics to emit 'lock bts' and 'lock btc' Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: other Assigne

[Bug c++/49245] Cannot compile

2011-05-31 Thread g...@marc-richter.info
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49245 --- Comment #1 from Marc Richter 2011-05-31 19:37:50 UTC --- PS: I can provide a root login for a server wherethis is reproduceable happening. You might try or destroy anything you like there, since I can easily make a snapshot of the system. Ple

[Bug bootstrap/49246] New: bootstrap comparison failure with 174455 on OpenBSD

2011-05-31 Thread jsg at openbsd dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49246 Summary: bootstrap comparison failure with 174455 on OpenBSD Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap Assign

[Bug c++/49245] Cannot compile

2011-05-31 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49245 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-05-31 19:41:32 UTC --- looks like you ran out of memory and the OOM killer kicked in

[Bug bootstrap/49247] New: libiberty configure assumes newlib does not supply psignal

2011-05-31 Thread janis at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49247 Summary: libiberty configure assumes newlib does not supply psignal Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug bootstrap/49245] Cannot compile

2011-05-31 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49245 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |bootstrap --- Comment #3 from Jonathan

[Bug fortran/18918] Eventually support Fortran 2008's coarrays [co-arrays]

2011-05-31 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18918 --- Comment #56 from Tobias Burnus 2011-05-31 20:04:13 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Tue May 31 20:04:09 2011 New Revision: 174510 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174510 Log: 2011-05-31 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/1

[Bug bootstrap/49245] Cannot compile

2011-05-31 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49245 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-05-31 20:13:10 UTC --- you could have tried searching the web for the last error: http://bugs.gentoo.org/256766

[Bug testsuite/49175] vect/pr48172.c execution failure for ARM GNU/Linux

2011-05-31 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49175 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/45786] [4.5/4.6 Regression] Relational operators .eq. and == are not recognized as equivalent

2011-05-31 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45786 --- Comment #12 from Thomas Koenig 2011-05-31 21:37:04 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Tue May 31 21:37:01 2011 New Revision: 174513 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174513 Log: 2011-05-31 Thomas Koenig Backport from t

[Bug fortran/45786] [4.5 Regression] Relational operators .eq. and == are not recognized as equivalent

2011-05-31 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45786 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.1 |4.5.4 Summary|[4.5/4.6 Regress

[Bug target/49094] ARM aligned(1) attribute is sometimes dropped

2011-05-31 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49094 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/49245] Cannot compile

2011-05-31 Thread g...@marc-richter.info
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49245 Marc Richter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/48783] ARM: kernel compiled at -O2 has a unused reference to __aeabi_uldivmod

2011-05-31 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48783 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/48203] ICE in dwarf2out.c while building eglibc.

2011-05-31 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48203 --- Comment #14 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-05-31 22:30:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) > Author: jakub > Date: Mon Mar 28 23:53:46 2011 > New Revision: 171640 > > URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171640 > Log: >

[Bug testsuite/49175] vect/pr48172.c execution failure for ARM GNU/Linux

2011-05-31 Thread janis at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49175 --- Comment #3 from Janis Johnson 2011-05-31 22:43:42 UTC --- Usually the vect tests only require effective targets like vect_int if they are checking that particular optimizations took place. There are no such checks in this test. The vector t

[Bug c/49243] attribute((returns_twice)) doesn't work

2011-05-31 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49243 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-05-31 22:49:36 UTC --- Comparing tree dumps from gcc-4.7 on a reduced compile-only test case shows that the code that calls _setjmp (a) and the code that calls my_setjmp (b) start to differ after 019t.in

[Bug ada/49248] New: Cross compile ada failed at finding command gnatmake.

2011-05-31 Thread ray_linn at hotmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49248 Summary: Cross compile ada failed at finding command gnatmake. Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: ada AssignedT

[Bug lto/49249] New: LTO streaming of builtins corrupts BLOCK lists

2011-05-31 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49249 Summary: LTO streaming of builtins corrupts BLOCK lists Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto AssignedTo: unass

[Bug debug/49250] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE in set_slot_part, at var-tracking.c:6793

2011-05-31 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
cale=gnu --enable-java-gc=boehm --without-cloog --without-ppl --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran,obj-c++,java,ada,lto Thread model: posix gcc version 4.7.0 20110531 (experimental) [trunk revision 174512] (GCC)

[Bug libfortran/48906] Wrong rounding results with -m32

2011-05-31 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #24399|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug debug/49250] [4.7 Regression] ICE in set_slot_part, at var-tracking.c:6793

2011-05-31 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49250 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/48906] Wrong rounding results with -m32

2011-05-31 Thread thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906 --- Comment #19 from Thomas Henlich 2011-06-01 06:26:27 UTC --- > Also, the test case, pr20755.f was originally intended to pass only with > -std=legacy. This is to mimic g77 which does not ignore the scale factor. At > least recently, gfortran

[Bug debug/48203] ICE in dwarf2out.c while building eglibc.

2011-05-31 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48203 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug other/49244] no intrinsics to emit 'lock bts' and 'lock btc'

2011-05-31 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49244 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,